|
Knuc U Kinte posted:If you abuse the game mechanics in Morrowind to minimise the lovely combat, you are a retarded baby. Same as the Witcher 2. It's science dude. basically. i think this mentality is of the new school gamers who dont want a challenge and expect everything to be handed to them.
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
seriously though what is this magic RPG you all have played that has no broken builds at all? It's New Vegas, isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuBMI5PYXgs
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
The Sharmat posted:seriously though what is this magic RPG you all have played that has no broken builds at all? i don't think these people play video games or enjoy them.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:49
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:basically. I want a challenge, that's why I don't play lovely games like Morrowind and Witcher 2 and instead play actual good balanced games.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:49
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:basically. How does that follow. A skilled gamer figures out the most efficient way to win. If the game is good oyu will have multiple ways to approach an encounter and this will be a difficult decision with many pros and cons to consider. In a lovely game you just activate quen and roll around like a retard because everything else is clearly sub optimal.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
I mean, you don't want a challenge, you just play easy games badly on purpose and then pretend you beat a hard game. Its laughable.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
Ragg posted:I want a challenge, that's why I don't play lovely games like Morrowind and Witcher 2 and instead play actual good balanced games. what are good balanced games? it's also a single player game, though, so why try and be overpowered anyway? except those times when you just wanna cruise, i understand. Knuc U Kinte posted:How does that follow. A skilled gamer figures out the most efficient way to win. If the game is good oyu will have multiple ways to approach an encounter and this will be a difficult decision with many pros and cons to consider. In a lovely game you just activate quen and roll around like a retard because everything else is clearly sub optimal. yeah if it were multiplayer i would understand this mentality and say 'get gud scrub' if someone complained i was using a good build
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
The quality of the witcher is up for debate but all this arguing loving sucks
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
Knuc U Kinte posted:How does that follow. A skilled gamer figures out the most efficient way to win. If the game is good oyu will have multiple ways to approach an encounter and this will be a difficult decision with many pros and cons to consider. In a lovely game you just activate quen and roll around like a retard because everything else is clearly sub optimal. yrden is more useful than quen
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
CharlestonJew posted:The quality of the witcher is up for debate but all this arguing loving sucks no one is arguing we are discussing you dickbag
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:what are good balanced games? it's also a single player game, though, so why try and be overpowered anyway? except those times when you just wanna cruise, i understand. I'm trying to meet the games challenge. I'm playing to the best of my ability because that's what gaming is about. you play badly on purpose and pretend you're a real gamer.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
Ragg posted:you play badly on purpose and pretend you're a real gamer. yeah, I suppose. I guess thats where we differ. i like playing 'hand-to-hand only monk' builds in morrowind and things like that in rpgs so thats what appeals to me in single player games
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:53
|
|
|
I play to have fun but I've been told that's wrong
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
Zoq-Fot-Pik posted:Why do you think so? I had fun playing them. I enjoyed the story a lot. The combat isn't perfect but every game has stuff that is bad about it. I like the games but it's ok if you don't!
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:54
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:yeah, I suppose. I guess thats where we differ. i like play 'hand-to-hand monk' only builds in morrowind and things like that in rpgs so thats what appeals to me in single player games Well, I don't actually play RPGs for challenge, I play them for the story and whatnot, and that's why Witcher 1 & 2 sucks balls. I mean, the combat is no great shakes but I wasn't expecting it to be. It's just made by Poles who haven't managed to build an interesting world, the writing is bad, the characters are boring, so I say, it's a turd. It has no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:55
|
|
|
Ragg posted:Well, I don't actually play RPGs for challenge, I play them for the story and whatnot, and that's why Witcher 1 & 2 sucks balls. I mean, the combat is no great shakes but I wasn't expecting it to be. It's just made by Poles who haven't managed to build an interesting world, the writing is bad, the characters are boring, so I say, it's a turd. It has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. You can avoid large parts of the game through dialogue options. 'Tis epic.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:56
|
|
|
oh nvm.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:56
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:did you like the first one, ragg? No. I've tried to play through it at least like 5 times probably. And I always get worn out by the horrible opening chapter.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
Ragg posted:No. I've tried to play through it at least like 5 times probably. And I always get worn out by the horrible opening chapter. lol
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:57
|
|
|
Ragg posted:No. I've tried to play through it at least like 5 times probably. And I always get worn out by the horrible opening chapter. its really bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:58
|
|
|
drat, I actually understand that. took me two or three times to get into the first one, but its a rewarding experience once you get past it. not exactly a glaring example of a 'great game' when you have to say that, but you should power through for what its worth. the first one is way, way better than the second, but i didnt think thr second was that bad
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:58
|
|
|
LaTex Fetish posted:drat, I actually understand that. I'm never going to try to play that game again. I probably won't even try W3.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:59
|
|
|
If they somehow manage to gently caress up Cyberpunk 2077 I'm gonna burn down all of Poland.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 00:59
|
|
|
Is the amount of tiny tedious poo poo that adds up to an insane amount of crap (like spinning around the witch man to make a potion for 5 seconds every time you open the potion menu) in Witcher 2 similar to in Witcher 1.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:00
|
|
|
Ragg posted:I'm never going to try to play that game again. I probably won't even try W3. yeah, I understand. I think if they would remake the first one with a better opening act people would enjoy it more.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:00
|
|
|
Cuz that's what warn me down the most, was all the really stupid rear end crap they should of just made a really quick menu for, including turning most of the towns into a menu probably.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:00
|
|
|
TW2 actually has a really good story by AAA RPG standards though it doesn't have quirky as gently caress Bioware characters though so if you're into that
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:00
|
|
|
Wormskull posted:Is the amount of tiny tedious poo poo that adds up to an insane amount of crap (like spinning around the witch man to make a potion for 5 seconds every time you open the potion menu) in Witcher 2 similar to in Witcher 1. There's an infinite amount of flowers to pick everywhere and that really triggers me. Also you have to run around in a fairly sizeable zone and there's no like fast travel or anything. So it's constant loving running back and forth in these completely empty areas. They build a fairly big zone and don't put poo poo in it except for like, some quests here and there spaced out. Its pure rear end.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:01
|
|
|
The Sharmat posted:TW2 actually has a really good story by AAA RPG standards though It has folks that talk like poor parodies of Game of Throne characters or w/e, making the writing an insane turd.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:02
|
|
|
The Sharmat posted:TW2 actually has a really good story by AAA RPG standards though Bioware has actual characters in their games at least.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:03
|
|
|
you're wrong
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:03
|
|
|
I fuckfarted into a dwarfcunt's ballcock. -- Thing probably said by several characters in the Witcher series.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:03
|
|
|
Wormskull posted:I fuckfarted into a dwarfcunt's ballcock. Lmfao.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:03
|
|
|
Wormskull posted:Is the amount of tiny tedious poo poo that adds up to an insane amount of crap (like spinning around the witch man to make a potion for 5 seconds every time you open the potion menu) in Witcher 2 similar to in Witcher 1. nah, you dont have to sit down to drink potions (no idea why they changed this). just pop open the menu mid combat and chug em the combat is more floaty, but most of the game is actually dialogue. the swamp level later in the game can be tedious because the amount of the same enemy is kinda gay the story is actually pretty good, I think, and some of the twists and turns are worthwhile and actually unexpected. there's a bit of running around and the 'quest areas' arent as optimized as they could be, but that's just how it is.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:05
|
|
|
I'm sick and tired of running around.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:06
|
|
|
I think TW1's story meanders too much and is kinda lame actually The twist at the end is really well done though
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:06
|
|
|
Make Cities A drat Menu In RPGs You Ridiculous European Smacktards.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 12:05 |
|
|
You know back in wow vanilla when you had to run all the way down from crossroads to camp taurajo? That's what the witcher is like all the time.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2014 01:06
|
|