|
what the gently caress
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:32 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2024 18:06 |
|
Heresiarch posted:what the gently caress
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:33 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one i can't even tell if this is a joke
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:35 |
|
tbh I'd rather have a gaping anus
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:35 |
|
Cantorsdust posted:i can't even tell if this is a joke It has to be right? If he was actually serious he would surely pick the stupid fake money that at least pretends to be not a joke
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:36 |
|
Cease to Hope posted:tbh I'd rather have a gaping anus new thread title
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:39 |
|
it's clearly a joke it's just not funny
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:43 |
|
JadeRaven posted:It has to be right? If he was actually serious he would surely pick the stupid fake money that at least pretends to be not a joke one crupto currency was legitimately used to get a national team into the winter olympics. the one is dropping like a rock due to magic the gathering online exchange
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:45 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one i'd rather gaze into a gaping distended rear end in a top hat
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:54 |
|
Heresiarch posted:both storify and tweetdeck want you to manually add every tweet to the story/timeline, there's no way (that i can find) to pull in a whole conversation and edit it using either tool Well, here is my half-assed attempt. And that guy is a loving douchebag. http://storify.com/booktweeting/twitter-bitcoin-debate
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:56 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one what is that man doing to his cryptocurrency
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:57 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one You knew about this because goatse is your homepage, isn't it?
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:59 |
|
well this is weird, i signed up for storify earlier today to see if i could use it to archive that twitter convo with bitcoin jesus, and then when it turned out to be too much effort i gave up i just got an email from storify telling me that somebody just did it for me http://storify.com/booktweeting/twitter-bitcoin-debate is this one of you guys or is this just some weird coincidence
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:59 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one i think i need a hug now
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:59 |
|
Heresiarch posted:well this is weird, i signed up for storify earlier today to see if i could use it to archive that twitter convo with bitcoin jesus, and then when it turned out to be too much effort i gave up AlbieQuirky posted:Well, here is my half-assed attempt. And that guy is a loving douchebag.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 02:59 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:twitter is really bad in general
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:00 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:Well, here is my half-assed attempt. And that guy is a loving douchebag. whoops, there's my answer thanks for going to the trouble like that
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:00 |
|
Heresiarch posted:whoops, there's my answer It wasn't a big deal, but don't know how accurate it turned out. If you do a better version, let me know and I'll delete that one.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:02 |
|
quote:YOSPOS › "tbh I'd rather have a gaping anus" - the bitcoin thread Heresiarch posted:what the gently caress
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:04 |
|
lol someone replied saying it's expensive so the butthead thought they had the ultimate XWzGjtin0 posted:In this case then this country should not complain and expect any effort from our side. Let it die slowly but surely. fhqwhgads posted:Indeed. If Bitcoin can’t play by the rules, it’ll be dead soon enough.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:04 |
|
AlbieQuirky posted:It wasn't a big deal, but don't know how accurate it turned out. If you do a better version, let me know and I'll delete that one. i am honestly not too concerned. i was mostly just whining about how halfass everything seems to be on twitter and i doubt if i'll ever need to actually refer to that conversation, but thank you nonetheless
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:06 |
|
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:07 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:[–]chalash 55 points 4 hours ago (66|11)
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:07 |
|
best thread title 2014 - this thread
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:08 |
|
the mods do love us
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:09 |
|
well that's magicalDisabled Hitler posted:You knew about this because goatse is your homepage, isn't it? now all we need is ohsh and the gang's all here
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:21 |
|
jony ive aces posted:lol someone replied saying it's expensive so the butthead thought they had the ultimate ok i'm gonna own up to that one wouldn't normally write such a lovely little comment but i figured it'd get the most rage out of him
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:23 |
|
still not sure what "it" he was referring to. the united states? lol yep anti-money laundering laws are the death knell of this country
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:25 |
|
If Goatse isn't a part of your computer's start up routine then you can get the gently caress outCease to Hope posted:well that's magical He was the first person I told about this and he wouldn't click it. It was extremely unohsh like behavior It had references to buttcoins and a shock site. That's two of his favorite things on this earth
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 03:32 |
jony ive aces posted:buying pseudonymous internet points with the explicit stated purpose of buying illegal goods is not money laundering because because when the bitcoin does it, that means it is not illegal.
|
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:16 |
|
Look, if Wired says it's a disruptive new paradigm, it's above the law.
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:37 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:because when the bitcoin does it, that means it is not illegal. quote:[–]coqui33 2 points 2 hours ago
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:39 |
|
i can rules lawyer my way out of a tight spot in dungeons and dragons, and real life is simply an extension of that, ergo,
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:47 |
the interesting thing is that it doesn't seem like the funds being expected to be used for criminal acts matters in the law. the police went the extra mile to make sure that they nabbed willing money launderers instead of just some people who didn't know about the law.
|
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:51 |
|
the rozzers nabbed the dodgy geezers innit
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 04:55 |
|
[–]twiked 8 points 5 hours ago If your local shop owner said "I'm gonna use it for drugs" when you give him your money, you have to take the cash back and shop elsewhere ? Wasn't aware of this law. [–]PoliticalDissidents 3 points 2 hours ago But your shop owner isn't a lying big that wants to lock you up in a cage [–]psynusoidal 4 points 2 hours ago Overdid what? What any sane, non-authoritarian individual would consider perfectly harmless, legitimate business? [–]gotamd 4 points 2 hours ago Who do you think you are, making a living for yourself? [–]psynusoidal 2 points 2 hours ago I disagree. This difference in thought is what separates a free man from a slave. [–]psynusoidal 4 points 1 hour ago "So if I were to sell grocery bags full of Euros out of the trunk of my car, you'd consider this a legitimate business as well?" Of course. "You're also aware that every remotely developed country on earth regulates the sale of currency?" Because they're not free. [–]psynusoidal 3 points 51 minutes ago Of course. It's not commerce that is being regulated. Things are not and cannot be regulated. It is people and their behavior that are regulated, through the use of coercive force. [–]psynusoidal 2 points 22 minutes ago I did not dodge any question, I answered with a very clear affirmative, "of course". You are reading too deeply into what I wrote. I'm saying that, in a general sense, the only things that can be regulated are people. Regulation of any sort, commerce or otherwise, is a direct affront to an individual's freedom. Freedom and regulation are mutually exclusive. [–]Patrick5555 3 points 1 hour ago does he face prison time? Does the constitutional amendment on slavery allow slavery when it is punishment for a crime? Does it have to be as bad as 1860 slavery to still be slavery? [–]psynusoidal 2 points 1 hour ago Nice misrepresentation of my argument. How delightfully dishonest of you. I disagree that a business needs to be "licensed" to be legitimate. Legitimacy does not stem from government approval. If you do believe that government approval is what creates legitimacy then you are not free as you have relinquished your own volition. [–]danster82 22 points 4 hours ago So instead of law enforcement doing the proper thing and telling the fellow you do know you cant exchange more than $20,000 without a money transmission license? Instead of doing that they deliberately entrap him by setting up a fake $30,000 trade, its just so lame its beyond words. That was not the intent or the spirit of the law. The whole idea of money transmission license needs reviewing. It is once again a banking lobbied and written law because I swear to God I can bearly find a single person who thinks they ought to need a license to exchange THEIR money which leads me to conclude the people never wrote this law. [–]ApplicableSongLyric 7 points 2 hours ago No, it's just proof positive that we have too many goddamn laws. We need a dozen criminal laws only and the rest meted out in the free market and civil systems. [–]paulej 6 points 1 hour ago You've got that right. What's more, the government is more focused on money transmitters than the people who are breaking real laws. They can't find the drug dealers, so they arrest these guys. They should be so proud. [–]ApplicableSongLyric 5 points 6 hours ago All the more reason to offer more goods and services directly in BTC and flip a finger to fiat. [–]captaincoffee88 4 points 4 hours ago This is why we need a decentralized LocalBitcoin/BitMessage p2p application with reputation system. No escrow. Just a way to arrange an in-person transaction time/location and weed out bad actors with low reputation. [–]psynusoidal 1 point 2 hours ago Sorry, but I'm not in the business of tongue-cleaning boots. [–]A1nerd 0 points 8 hours ago I thought Bitcoins are not a commodity or currency how the hell can they go to jail for money laundering! Looks like in America when you try to get rich and your successful you get thrown in prison for a felony
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 05:16 |
|
...! posted:[–]paulej 6 points 1 hour ago but when they arrested all the silk road people it was bad because:
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 05:24 |
|
Disabled Hitler posted:You knew about this because goatse is your homepage, isn't it? Some people can't function without looking at it once a day. Literally shaking right now
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 06:07 |
|
JadeRaven posted:So you guys are just going to have to loving trust me on this one ehheheheh
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 06:27 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2024 18:06 |
|
...! posted:[–]Patrick5555 3 points 1 hour ago
|
# ? Feb 8, 2014 06:28 |