Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
NIMBY?
NIMBY
YIMBY
I can't afford my medicine.
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
RoastBeef
Jul 11, 2008


Euros are asleep, post l a n e s



Just one more span bro ..., just one more

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

RoastBeef posted:

Euros are asleep, post l a n e s



Just one more span bro ..., just one more

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.
:jackbud:

Nissin Cup Nudist
Sep 3, 2011

Sleep with one eye open

We're off to Gritty Gritty land




xpost from main US hread

Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:

A tale of two housing policies:

Arizona Governor vetoes a bipartisan housing bill over concerns that it isn't "balanced" in considering current homeownership home values and building new housing because it errs too far on the side of new construction. Also, because the Department of Defense objected to increased density and new construction near military bases.

The DoD complaint seems like a fig leaf that could easily be changed and it is mostly about appeasing people who are terrified about new housing attracting traffic/crime or reducing property values.

https://twitter.com/brahmresnik/status/1769799663010349119
https://twitter.com/brahmresnik/status/1769802308370465074

On the other hand, the WSJ reports on Austin's rapid homebuilding project, but frames it as a negative because rents and home values have fallen 7% since they started allowing significantly more housing construction and engaged in "overbuilding" according to the WSJ.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1769710393125974503

WSJ: Good things are actually bad

Mooseontheloose
May 13, 2003

Nissin Cup Nudist posted:

xpost from main US hread

WSJ: Good things are actually bad

Turns out we can build our way of it.

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...

Nissin Cup Nudist posted:

xpost from main US hread

WSJ: Good things are actually bad

WSJ’s target market are people who collect rent or otherwise profit from high property values.

I’d be more worried if it were a real newspaper giving that kind of editorial rather than a financial rag.

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Badger of Basra posted:

Apropos of the impact of NEPA on project timelines - maybe it's not NEPA but there is definitely a lot of unnecessary (and not even legally required) process BS going on

https://twitter.com/numble/status/1557525354788577282

https://twitter.com/numble/status/1557525425110278145
I was just looking for another post of mine and at some point I must've quoted this one.

It's 2024 now so let's see what's happening!

quote:

L.A. Metro awards Vermont Transit Corridor Planning and Environmental Study to Vermont Corridor Partners
The study calls for a comprehensive BRT and rail improvement strategy along Vermont Avenue, the second busiest transit corridor in L.A. Metro’s bus portfolio

The Los Angeles County Transportation Authority (L.A. Metro) has awarded the Vermont Transit Corridor Planning and Environmental Study to the Vermont Corridor Partners (VCP), an AECOM-led joint venture with minority-owned small businesses Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. and RAW International, Inc.

The study calls for a comprehensive bus rapid transit (BRT) and rail improvement strategy along Vermont Avenue, the second busiest transit corridor in L.A. Metro’s bus portfolio, stretching from Hollywood Boulevard to 120th St. The joint venture will play a central role in its planning, design and implementation, with an emphasis on mobility access, equity and community priorities.
https://www.masstransitmag.com/mana...rridor-partners
The announcement doesn't make it super clear but it's either the "environmental study for medium term BRT project" in which case it's only a year late, or the "lon-germ rail study", in which case it's right on schedule.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

mobby_6kl posted:

I was just looking for another post of mine and at some point I must've quoted this one.

It's 2024 now so let's see what's happening!

https://www.masstransitmag.com/mana...rridor-partners
The announcement doesn't make it super clear but it's either the "environmental study for medium term BRT project" in which case it's only a year late, or the "lon-germ rail study", in which case it's right on schedule.


https://twitter.com/TribTowerViews/status/1775678660479254874

they're also using a CEQA exemption

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply