Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

Greyhawk posted:

Ahahahahahaha, Ahmadinedschad blames US for uprisings in Tunesia, Egypt and Libya.

The guy's baghdad bob in a dinner jacket, what'd you expect?


Also this is expressly WHY we can't get involved.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

Sivias posted:

Then again, Mubarak said the same thing.
Yeah see, I wasn't expecting that either, that's what gives me a sliver of hope that Gadaffi would make the right decision at the last minute.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->

roundmidnight posted:

If you want to be deliberately dense, go ahead. History supports my assertion.

You significantly limit yourself, your nation and the world by believing the future cannot differ from the past.

Jalumibnkrayal
Apr 16, 2008

Ramrod XTreme

roundmidnight posted:

Yes it is, if it means real and legitimate democracy. Otherwise, you get the same poo poo in 20, 30, 40 years, except in the meantime the other dictators have slaughtered many times the number of people who have died in the past few days.

It's not just about the end result. How it happens is just as important. This is their revolution and they are willing to die for it. Don't let their courage go to waste.

Your policy is literally that we have to let genocides occur. You do realize that the most extreme Khaddafi loyalist would have the same isolationist policy, right?

XCPuff
Nov 26, 2005

FEAR THIS MAN

Greyhawk posted:

Ahahahahahaha, Ahmadinedschad blames US for uprisings in Tunesia, Egypt and Libya.

Source? I want to read this.

The Cheshire Cat
Jun 10, 2008

Fun Shoe

Samurai Sanders posted:

Just to confirm, there's no chance that he will volunteer to step down, right?

If he was planning to step down gracefully I don't think he would have ordered the army to go out and indiscriminately murder people.

What is his plan here exactly? Does he think he can just kill everyone in the whole country and run it himself?

Namarrgon
Dec 23, 2008

Congratulations on not getting fit in 2011!

Jalumibnkrayal posted:

Your policy is literally that we have to let genocides occur. You do realize that the most extreme Khaddafi loyalist would have the same isolationist policy, right?

Dude, stopping genocide would be interfering with a sovereign nation, that's just uncivilized.

MortuusLupus
May 7, 2007

WILL THIS NEVER END?

Uglycat posted:

You significantly limit yourself, your nation and the world by believing the future cannot differ from the past.

"Maybe this time when I reach into the fire it won't burn my hand!"

Sivias
Dec 12, 2006

I think we can just sit around and just talk about our feelings.

Samurai Sanders posted:

Yeah see, I wasn't expecting that either, that's what gives me a sliver of hope that Gadaffi would make the right decision at the last minute.

I wouldn't count on it. The human atrocities that have happened so far in Libya are outweighing what happened in Egypt by leaps and bounds. Not to say what happened in Egypt was a walk in the park - gently caress that, I wouldn't have wanted to be there.

But from the reports coming out of Libya... I don't really want to speculate.

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

Jalumibnkrayal posted:

Your policy is literally that we have to let genocides occur. You do realize that the most extreme Khaddafi loyalist would have the same isolationist policy, right?

I think maybe France or Italy might be able to intervene, but the US is so reviled and hated there, it'd be like having Nazi Germany come in to support the wisconsin teachers. A group so reviled and hated it would instantly *END* any popular support just by being a part of it.

That's why we can't get involved. Right or Wrong, our name is cursed.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->

roundmidnight posted:

Yes it is, if it means real and legitimate democracy. Otherwise, you get the same poo poo in 20, 30, 40 years, except in the meantime the other dictators have slaughtered many times the number of people who have died in the past few days.

It's not just about the end result. How it happens is just as important. This is their revolution and they are willing to die for it. Don't let their courage go to waste.

Governments don't fall because they come from 'illegitimate' roots; they fall because they cease to serve the needs of the people.

If a government emerges that makes the people feel free, safe, and involved - there will NOT be another revolution '20, 30, 40 years' down the road.

If it does not, regardless of how the next government is formed - there will be.

In truth, NO government has true 'legitimate' roots. The 'social contract' is bullshit. Read some loving Hume, his ideas (on social contracts, on the is/ought gap, on the problem of induction, and the problem of causation) are directly relevant to the situation today.

BIG HORNY COW
Apr 11, 2003

Boner Slam posted:

Here is one of these anti-air weapons in action.
Imagine this beeing fired at people holy poo poo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUUeqSseERo&feature=related




gently caress literally everything

Don't think Libya has any ACTUAL 2S6's (they were ordered) but yeah that's about what something like a ZSU or a ZU can dish out.

Brown Moses
Feb 22, 2002

It really sounds like he's trying to wipe out anyone who is against him, and doesn't care if innocent civilians get in the way.

Owlkill
Jul 1, 2009

Intel5 posted:

So even just a no fly zone, no troops ever set foot in Libya, only stopping Gaddafi from using the air force against the protesters, will destroy the legitimacy of the revolution?

This is what I was suggesting. I see and understand all the points people are making about why the US/Europe intervening would look bad and carry bad connotations/destroy the legitimacy of the revolution but when I'm hearing about people being turned into literal mincemeat with anti-aircraft guns and hearing reports of indiscriminate shootings and bombings of crowds of civilians, it just viscerally feels like something HAS to be done to stop it, or at least limit the massacre. Someone else pointed out that at the stage things seem to be at now, it's hard to see what effect sanctions would really have on Qadaffi. We've seen what he's willing to do to his own people himself, why should he care if they go hungry?

I'm fully aware that I'm probably being massively naive here and that any intervention could well at best damage the legitimacy of the protest. It's just horrible to watch this happening and feel like world leaders aren't willing to do anything but tut and call on other people to take action.

The Casualty
Sep 29, 2006
Security Clearance: Pop Secret


Whiny baby

Boner Slam posted:

Here is one of these anti-air weapons in action.
Imagine this beeing fired at people holy poo poo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUUeqSseERo&feature=related




gently caress literally everything

I keep seeing that scene from Saving Private Ryan when the 20mm opens up on those dudes on the tank :gonk:

edit: Libya is bombing their own arms depots according to AJE. Does this mean they are worried about people taking these over and arming?

Greyhawk
May 30, 2001


XCPuff posted:

Source? I want to read this.

It was mentioned in the newsticker on Al Jazeera TV. Have not found an additional source yet.

The Cheshire Cat
Jun 10, 2008

Fun Shoe

Brown Moses posted:

It really sounds like he's trying to wipe out anyone who is against him, and doesn't care if innocent civilians get in the way.

I'm pretty sure that to him "innocent civilians" and "people who are against me" is the same group.

Boner Slam
May 9, 2005

BIG HORNY COW posted:

Don't think Libya has any ACTUAL 2S6's (they were ordered) but yeah that's about what something like a ZSU or a ZU can dish out.

If you are firing explosive rounds into civilians, I dont think the fine points of armor-busting capabilities matter

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

The Casualty posted:

I keep seeing that scene from Saving Private Ryan when the 20mm opens up on those dudes on the tank :gonk:

Exactly this, but the rounds are larger and fire twice as fast as in the movie.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
"10:52pm: Two military planes reportedly land at Benghazi airfield - after their pilots refused to attack the city, our colleagues at Al Jazeera Arabic tell us."

Cross your fingers for a Free Libyan Air Force.

In a wider view, Libya may be doing more to discredit Arab dictatorships then the collapsed regimes in Tunisia and Egypt did.

Ireland Sucks
May 16, 2004

The Cheshire Cat posted:

What is his plan here exactly? Does he think he can just kill everyone in the whole country and run it himself?

Maybe a few thousand. People get too scared to go into the street, security forces get the upper hand and go gently caress up any ringleaders, order restored, international community does nothing to remove him from power, continue more or less as before.

Even in egypt there were a lot of doubters and people who thought enough was enough. It's going to be drat hard to keep momentum going in Libya when people are getting blown to smithereens the minute they congregate or step out of the door.

Uglycat
Dec 4, 2000
MORE INDISPUTABLE PROOF I AM BAD AT POSTING
---------------->

MortuusLupus posted:

"Maybe this time when I reach into the fire it won't burn my hand!"

Really?

I've got a racist neo-con evangelical co-worker who insists that Egypt will be incapable of establishing a true democratic government because 'Egypt has NEVER been a democracy!'

His reasoning is identical to yours.

Xandu
Feb 19, 2006


It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am.

Doccers posted:

I think maybe France or Italy might be able to intervene, but the US is so reviled and hated there, it'd be like having Nazi Germany come in to support the wisconsin teachers. A group so reviled and hated it would instantly *END* any popular support just by being a part of it.

That's why we can't get involved. Right or Wrong, our name is cursed.

I don't know why you think France or Italy have any credibility. France has sold weapons to Libya that have been shown to have been used against protesters and has been close with Gaddafi for the past decade for economic reasons. Italy imports a huge amount of Libyan oil and Berlusconi is quite friendly with Gaddafi.

SirViver
Oct 22, 2008
Is AJE's live stream working for anyone? I'm always getting "Server not found: rtmp://media7.lsops.net/live/" from livestation.com and a "please try again later" from AJE.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin
They used anti-aircraft weapons on people during the Lebanese Civil War. Much easier and efficient then tanks.

Boner Slam
May 9, 2005
Found a very high quality video of the actual tank they use in Lybia.

This might not make the gore videos easier to stomach, but whatever here it is


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYCjfvHIsQ



Edit: notice how they (polish in this case) specifically train to target things on the ground, not aircraft

The Cheshire Cat
Jun 10, 2008

Fun Shoe
I suppose if it's any consolation, being hit by ammunition like that would kill someone too quickly for them to even feel it.

That doesn't justify it in the slightest but at least you can feel relatively secure that those horrifying mutilated bodies that used to be people didn't suffer.

(Unfortunately there's probably a lot of people who survived as collateral damage and have lost limbs who are suffering greatly :()

The Cheshire Cat fucked around with this message at 23:02 on Feb 21, 2011

Jalumibnkrayal
Apr 16, 2008

Ramrod XTreme

Doccers posted:

I think maybe France or Italy might be able to intervene, but the US is so reviled and hated there, it'd be like having Nazi Germany come in to support the wisconsin teachers. A group so reviled and hated it would instantly *END* any popular support just by being a part of it.

That's why we can't get involved. Right or Wrong, our name is cursed.

If I was in Wisconsin and the government was shooting me with tanks and AA vehicles, I would cheer Satan himself if he came to defend me. There is no enemy greater than the one that is shooting your unarmed neighbors with a tank.

The Brown Menace
Dec 24, 2010

Now comes in all colors.


Uglycat posted:

Really?

I've got a racist neo-con evangelical co-worker who insists that Egypt will be incapable of establishing a true democratic government because 'Egypt has NEVER been a democracy!'

His reasoning is identical to yours.

I love how by these standards no nation ever should have become a democracy. I mean do people like this even think about what the hell they are saying.

Xandu posted:

I don't know why you think France or Italy have any credibility. France has sold weapons to Libya that have been shown to have been used against protesters and has been close with Gaddafi for the past decade for economic reasons. Italy imports a huge amount of Libyan oil and Berlusconi is quite friendly with Gaddafi.

Let's not forget Italy's imperial history in Libya.

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

Xandu posted:

I don't know why you think France or Italy have any credibility. France has sold weapons to Libya that have been shown to have been used against protesters and has been close with Gaddafi for the past decade for economic reasons. Italy imports a huge amount of Libyan oil and Berlusconi is quite friendly with Gaddafi.

Really, I have no clue about their credibility, I just know Italy was saying they were scrambling their air force, and France has a tendancy to get involved in things as well. They were just pulled out of my rear end as an example of "Somebody but the united states" that can and would use military powder.

I really don't know as much as I should about north africa, but I'm trying to learn.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Jalumibnkrayal posted:

Your policy is literally that we have to let genocides occur.

I don't think you really understand the word 'genocide' correctly.

Doccers posted:

Really, I have no clue about their credibility, I just know Italy was saying they were scrambling their air force

I believe this is just a reaction to the two Libyan fighter pilots defecting to the neighbouring Malta, nothing else. It's more a precaution aimed at assuring Italians that those crazy brown people won't be landing in the St. Peter's Piazza or anything, but will be properly escorted to army air bases.

Or maybe Italians just realized that they could finally capture Malta???

Nenonen fucked around with this message at 23:05 on Feb 21, 2011

Paradoxus
Nov 22, 2007
BOCK?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

Namarrgon posted:

Dude, stopping genocide would be interfering with a sovereign nation, that's just uncivilized.

The problem for the US is that if we called out Qadafi for bombing/ using Air cannons against civilians in Bahrain, the rest world might be able to say the same things about what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

No i think its much better if we just sit on our thumbs wait this poo poo out and not risk showing ourselves for the war mongering imperialists that we are.

Xandu
Feb 19, 2006


It's hard to be humble when you're as great as I am.
Crimes against humanity is the proper term here, not any less bad than genocide, but more accurate.

Doccers posted:

Really, I have no clue about their credibility, I just know Italy was saying they were scrambling their air force, and France has a tendancy to get involved in things as well. They were just pulled out of my rear end as an example of "Somebody but the united states" that can and would use military powder.

I really don't know as much as I should about north africa, but I'm trying to learn.

No worries, wanting to learn is good. But basically, European countries aren't really more credible than the US in that part of the world.

Ireland Sucks
May 16, 2004

Everyone who sells arms sells them to Middle Eastern dictatorships, especially Libya

married but discreet
May 7, 2005


Taco Defender

Paradoxus posted:

The problem for the US is that if we called out Qadafi for bombing/ using Air cannons against civilians in Bahrain, the rest world might be able to say the same things about what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

:psyduck:

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

SauceNinja
Nov 8, 2002
Knock Knock.
Who's There?
You're Fired.

Samurai Sanders posted:

Just to confirm, there's no chance that he will volunteer to step down, right?

I think he's eliminated that option for himself. I think he went all in with the violence. He saw Egypt and Ivory Coast not attack the protesters completely and those leaders fell. He sees Iran fixing problems with violence and probably decided that was his best bet to end the rebellion and maintain power. Turns out, he was wrong and the people just got more angry about it, much like I think the people of Egypt would have done had Mubarak had enough control to make the military shoot civilians. Now that the violence in large scale has begun, I don't think they people will quit until he is dead. Even if he goes to another country, I think someone in that country is probably going to find him.

The Brown Menace
Dec 24, 2010

Now comes in all colors.


If anybody wanted to help, the best solution would probably be routing humanitarian aid to the revolutionaries via Turkey, Egypt and Tunisia.

loud dildo
Jan 26, 2011

by Cowcaster
Libyans caught themselves a mercenary and killed him, heres the aftermath:

http://www.youtube.com/user/QuatchiCanada#p/u/2/V9OZJ4WvTJU

That account has other videos you guys might be talking about so don't click that link if you don't want to see dead bodies.

Doccers
Aug 15, 2000


Patron Saint of Chickencheese

The Cheshire Cat posted:

I suppose if it's any consolation, being hit by ammunition like that would kill someone too quickly for them to even feel it.

That doesn't justify it in the slightest but at least you can feel relatively secure that those horrifying mutilated bodies that used to be people didn't suffer.

(Unfortunately there's probably a lot of people who survived as collateral damage and have lost limbs who are suffering greatly :()

sadly, it's often the opposite. These things leave burning hot steel fragments everywhere. If you're not hit somewhere immediately fatal, you have a burning hot chunk of metal imbedded in you and it's ripped open your flesh like Pyramidhead or the chainsaw loving massacre guy.

:(

Jalumibnkrayal: personally I agree but we're not Libyans and don't see the world through their eyes. (Personally I'd note that the ZSU series doesn't have particularly strong armor and it's worth taking a shot at it with a .50 or AP .30 cal, but thats because I know too much useless poo poo)

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Namarrgon
Dec 23, 2008

Congratulations on not getting fit in 2011!

Paradoxus posted:

The problem for the US is that if we called out Qadafi for bombing/ using Air cannons against civilians in Bahrain, the rest world might be able to say the same things about what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan.

No i think its much better if we just sit on our thumbs wait this poo poo out and not risk showing ourselves for the war mongering imperialists that we are.

I'm not talking about the US. I just used them as an example. I'm not American, I don't care.

Basically, I was trying to say this;

Jalumibnkrayal posted:

If I was in Wisconsin and the government was shooting me with tanks and AA vehicles, I would cheer Satan himself if he came to defend me. There is no enemy greater than the one that is shooting your unarmed neighbors with a tank.

  • Locked thread