|
Narmi posted:Just out of curiosity, has the Patriot Act been repealed yet? If not, is there any plan as to how long it'll stay around? I...I don't understand. It's always been around, I hope you aren't having some unpleasant thoughts brother. It's not good, perhaps we can talk to a party committee about these thoughts and get you help.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 05:31 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 19:34 |
|
Narmi posted:How is the Patriot Act in the Bill of Rights? I thought it could be repealed, or declared unconstitutional. It should expire sometime this year (it was set to expire in 2 days, though it almost got enough votes for a longer extension).
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 05:43 |
|
Pine Cone Jones posted:I...I don't understand. It's always been around, I hope you aren't having some unpleasant thoughts brother. It's not good, perhaps we can talk to a party committee about these thoughts and get you help. 2 + 2 = 5
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 05:47 |
|
Xandu posted:He's being sarcastic because the patriot act is never going to be repealed. The USA PATRIOT Act is biblically mandated and if you don't believe that then you can go to hell.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 05:57 |
|
Wait, did the Tunisian military send an "apology" note as well as the Egyptians, or did imagine that?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 05:58 |
|
Cjones posted:The USA PATRIOT Act is biblically mandated and if you don't believe that then you can go to hell. In the years before the USAPATRIOT Act, back in prehistory, America was under attack from violent Arab Muslims daily. We lost a billion people before the USAPATRIOT Act was passed, and saved the world from certain destruction at the hands of the browns.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 06:00 |
|
North Korea is now threatening to shoot at South Korea unless the South ceases its provocations (ie. dropping leaflets about the Middle East revolutions).
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 06:32 |
|
Cjones posted:The USA PATRIOT Act is biblically mandated and if you don't believe that then you can go to hell. That's going at little far, imo. I think the earliest recorded use was when it was invoked to rally minutemen and patriots against the British. In fact it's name comes from the idea that patriots acted in ways that defended their country against the British invaders. Sam Adams, an orphan who taught himself to read, write, and do business, even put down his brewer's pale for some time and took up the musket, eventually becoming a Brigadier general and likely capable of being a serious opponent to Washington. Instead he return to his brewery, satisfied that he had done his nation proud and not wanting to use his duty as a chance to seize power.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 06:46 |
|
In Kashmir they are holding a hunger strike:quote:Indian-controlled Kashmir separatist leader stages hunger strike against arrests http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90777/90851/7301750.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter I'm not wild about hunger strikes. They're only effective if the opposition gives a poo poo if you starve to death. However, they have a right to protest in whatever way they see fit, so more power to 'em. Not about the revolutions, but did anyone else hear about this? quote:Perhaps taking a cue from Wisconsin, the mayor of Providence, R.I., took an interesting approach to solving the city’s budget problems: He laid off every teacher in the city. More accurately, the school board ordered the pink slips. http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/business/910546-192/owner-of-downtown-nashua-jewelry-store-giving.html That's low. Any delusions that any of y'all had about working hard and being a good employee leading to success, you can forget about them now. It's a wonder that anyone's willing to be a schoolteacher any more. Mauritania is protesting too: quote:2. The climate. Around 2,000 people turned out in the main square in Nouakchott. In the early hours it is said there were only 200 with numbers swelling steadily as they day went on especially following prayers. The organizers range from small groups of leftist and Islamist youth to larger groups linked to student groups and opposition parties like the RFD, UFP and Tawassoul. Social media has not been the key organizing tool: word of mouth and mass texts have driven turn out more than anything else. Slacktivists sometimes more vocal on Facebook actually made their way outside, shouting in the streets rather than cyberspace. (A large number of Facebook groups supporting the protests have proliferated in the last two weeks.) Many youth activists have been inspired to make their demands this week as a result of what they watched happen in Tunisia and Egypt and Libya: others brought down dictatorships far stronger than their own government brought down in weeks or days thus begging the inevitable question “why not here?” Asked what they want, many simply answer “cheaper food and water.” Some have drawn inspiration from the Fassala events, which have been a popular subject of discussion on webforums and among youth who identify with the local population and see the government’s heavy-handed response as representative of its overall disposition, if not the overall Arab condition. But their slogans include such things as “the people want the downfall of the regime! No to slavery! No to high food prices!” (الشعب يريد إسقاط النظام، لا للعبودية، لا لارتفاع الاسعار) and condemnations of “one man rule” (حكم الفرد ). Opposition party leaders have issued statements of support while urging the demonstrators to be ware and the regime not to beat them, others asking the army to protect the demonstrators. Reports of government provocateurs attempting to move the protestors from the square in the direction of the presidential palace indicate government efforts to exploit the protest, although for most of the day the demonstrators were unmolested by the police and security forces. As the day went on and demonstrators attempted to pitch tents to stage a sit-in the square, they were dispersed by police who told them to get permits for their attempted sit-in, according to some reports by force. The protesters have nevertheless vowed to maintain a sit in in the square. Protests took place in Nouakchott, Zouerate, Boutilimit, Nouadhibou and several big towns over the course of the day. If protests spread to towns like Kiffa (in Assaba), al-‘Ayoune (in Hodh al-Gharbi), which have concentrations of large and important tribes, the situation could grow more politically threatening to the regime. The inclusion of black Mauritanians is an important factor: the black communities (who are most populous in the southern region near the Senegal River) have been well represented in the current government more than at most times in the past and if black youth turn out in anti-regime protests it would add significant momentum. http://themoornextdoor.wordpress.com/2011/02/26/thoughts-re-mauritanias-protests/ What do we want? CHEAPER FOOD AND WATER!!! When do we want it? BEFORE WE DIE OF THIRST AND STARVATION!!! How would you feel if you were Libyan and fled the regime there, only to wind up in Gaza? You'd probably feel like this: quote:Nothing describes this situation better than this vulgar variant of an Arabic proverb: And here is a part of their story: quote:In Palestine, they hope for Qaddafi's fall, so that they can return to Libya, after having been forced by Qaddafi to cut ties with their homeland. Mohammed Al Madhoun reports from Gaza. Whole thing here: http://www.nizosblog.com/2011/02/gazas-libyans-hang-lanterns-from.html Please note: in the comments there are some people questioning the veracity of this story. And something else that just smells wrong: quote:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=23399&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter "My family's not dead, it's Al Jazeera lies to hide the subservience of Qatar to American interests!" Is the guy using an error on the press' part in order to take a cheap potshot at Al Jazeera? Is he a Gaddahfi loyalist? I just don't know what the hell to think about this one Let's all play Kick the Reporter in the Head, it's more fun that soccer: quote:Yemen: Security Forces, Gangs Attack Reporters http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/02/26/yemen-security-forces-gangs-attack-reporters It was a big day in Yemen today, too: quote:Hundreds of thousands of demonstrators massed in Yemeni cities, holding their largest demonstrations against President Ali Abdullah Saleh since the wave of anti-authoritarian uprising began sweeping across North Africa and the Middle East. http://www.presstv.ir/detail/167254.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter Can't stop the signal, Saleh. And news about my favorite revolution in Ivory Coast: quote:Ivorian rebels seize town http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=135637 Every day that man Gbagbo stays it gets worse: quote:ABIDJAN (AFP) - Fresh clashes erupted on Saturday in Ivory Coast's main city Abidjan a day after UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned the crisis-hit nation was on the brink of civil war. http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/8913703/more-heavy-weapon-fire-in-i-coasts-abidjan/ I like the idea of the women storming the buses in order to get their children out of harm's way. Now that's a good mother And hidden among the Ivory Coast news, there's this: quote:In a recent interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! Professor Emeritus, Noam Chomsky debunked such propaganda is his comments on one of the White House declarations calling for an orderly transition in Egypt: http://www.modernghana.com/news/318162/1/cote-divoire-a-chocolate-revolution-or-war-for-oil.html So Noam Chomsky knows about the playbook, and it's not just an Arab Dictator Playbook, but the US uses it too
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 07:29 |
|
For those that aren't aware, when Mauritania says "no to slavery," they mean it in a literal sense. Mauritania has the widest prevalence of modern slavery anywhere, IIRC.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 07:49 |
|
Apology posted:So Noam Chomsky knows about the playbook, and it's not just an Arab Dictator Playbook, but the US uses it too Welcome to the machine.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 07:55 |
|
The Moor Next Door is a loving awesome name for a blog.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 08:05 |
|
Here's a handy list of South American countries and their government's views on the current revolution in India. http://blogs.aljazeera.net/americas/2011/02/25/latin-americas-sudden-silence-gaddafi I would say that once it's all settled Libya and Nicaragua might not be very friendly. quote:Nicaragua’s President Daniel Ortega this week has publicly supported Gaddafi more than almost any other head of state on the planet, saying the north African leader is ‘waging a great battle’ for his country. Ortega called Tripoli to offer support. And he has vowed to stand by Gaddafi until the end, saying, ‘difficult moments put loyalty to the test.’ And former Cuban President Fidel Castro, in a newspaper column, also urged caution before rushing to judgment against Gaddafi and suggested the United States was about to invade Libya. Yaos fucked around with this message at 08:34 on Feb 27, 2011 |
# ? Feb 27, 2011 08:19 |
|
Soviet Commubot posted:The Moor Next Door is a loving awesome name for a blog. He's also very knowledgable about North Africa.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 08:22 |
|
Apology posted:
I wouldn't have that someone setting themself on fire would've made much of a difference, but.. welp.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 08:25 |
|
Oh snapquote:
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 08:56 |
|
Xandu posted:Oh snap Not sure it's a smart idea to announce something like that until after it occurs.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 09:46 |
|
Nenonen posted:North Korea is now threatening to shoot at South Korea unless the South ceases its provocations (ie. dropping leaflets about the Middle East revolutions). Yeah I just read that too. Poor Kim, he's lost the media spotlight.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 10:14 |
|
rolleyes posted:Yeah I just read that too. Poor Kim, he's lost the media spotlight. North Korea will likely see a revolution soon themselves. There are big areas of the country controlled by anti-government street gangs of youths, where the police basically dare not go near, for example. Law and order (or the criminality of authority that passes for it) is breaking apart at the seams in that country - no one feels safe, everyone is paranoid. It's really only a matter of time before these street gangs get angry enough with others to do what we've seen in Libya and the like. What will also help spur it on is the fact that resource shortages are now over the past year or two keeping the north korean army from being cared for and fed. Dividing the lower classes is a means for elites to maintain power and oppress underclasses - in this case, the elites of north korea giving a carrot on a string to people in the army, but giving everyone else starvation and abuse. When that divided underclass starts to feel in danger or has more in common with the commoner than the elites, that's pretty much the seeds of revolutionary movement.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 10:23 |
|
From what I've read of NK revolution could do an enormous amount of damage. There are no shortage of people in that country who have absolutely no idea what the modern world is like, and the reports I've seen from undercover journalists who make it back from the place tell of a country supported entirely by manual labourers who are proud to be tilling fields with a wooden plough strapped to an ox while simultaneously genuinely believing that their leadership gives them the best technology available. While it's undeniable that the current regime needs to go, I believe violent revolution (and there's no way in hell it could be peaceful) would do more harm than good by dumping the modern world and all of its problems on a population not just unprepared for it but completely ignorant of it. edit: This photo and its description gives a particularly good illustration of NK's priorities when it comes to government spending. The whole gallery is well worth a look too. rolleyes fucked around with this message at 10:50 on Feb 27, 2011 |
# ? Feb 27, 2011 10:40 |
|
A NK revolution will not happen. If anything, a coup may take place if the situations presents itself. But their leader is basically a God to the people, and there are 1.2m of the 24 million serving active duty in the army. Saudi Arabia and China would fall before NK would.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:02 |
|
Thousands of Nigerians are stranded in Libyaquote:Libya: Gaddafi Stalls Evacuation of Nigerians Not surprising since Nigeria is the African country that Gaddafi hates most
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:17 |
|
Lascivious Sloth posted:A NK revolution will not happen. If anything, a coup may take place if the situations presents itself. But their leader is basically a God to the people, and there are 1.2m of the 24 million serving active duty in the army. I see petty dictators aren't the only ones who haven't learned anything in the last two months.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:22 |
|
Namarrgon posted:I see petty dictators aren't the only ones who haven't learned anything in the last two months. The current domino effect of revolutions and unrest has been driven by coverage of the first one, both by traditional media and, more importantly, on the internet which as Egypt proved is very hard to suppress. The only news of these events available to ordinary North Koreans is whatever South Korea floats over the border tied to balloons. Most North Koreans don't have a phone, never mind the internet. Many don't even have electricity. If they're lucky enough to have access to a TV or a radio there is nothing but state-controlled programming. Satellite TV is unheard of. How you can think the situation is remotely comparable is beyond me.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:29 |
|
Namarrgon posted:I see petty dictators aren't the only ones who haven't learned anything in the last two months. The chances of the Middle East revolutions having an effect on North Korea is about equal to the Tea Party movement making its way to the country.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:33 |
|
For monitoring Twittercioxx posted:This is the best site for monitoring twitter, for those who don't know. For monitoring aircraft unable to land at Tripoli Monkeytime posted:Here's an interesting site that lets you monitor global air traffic: Live Blogs BBC AJE
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:33 |
|
lil sartre posted:Thousands of Nigerians are stranded in Libya Ghadaffi, Gaddafi, Qaddafi...What the gently caress is his name? I've seen so many different spellings of it and no one article ever mentions why they chose a specific one.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:35 |
|
It's because his name is originally written in Arabic, and letters in Arabic don't directly translate to the western alphabet, so it's written how it sounds.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:38 |
|
Guardian live blogquote:Good morning and welcome to the Guardian's live blog of the thirteenth day of turmoil in Libya where, Muammar Gaddafi's regime is clinging on despite international condemnation at the UN and moves to form an interim government in the east.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:49 |
|
Brown Moses posted:It's because his name is originally written in Arabic, and letters in Arabic don't directly translate to the western alphabet, so it's written how it sounds. But Qaddafi and Ghaddafi sound completely different. Which one is correct?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:54 |
|
Either, I think it's because the way the Arabic letter is pronounced varies a bit, and that can't be correctly represented in a western alphabet. There's a very details explanation somewhere else in this thread that has charts and everything.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 11:56 |
|
harskarenjag posted:But Qaddafi and Ghaddafi sound completely different. Which one is correct? What Brown Moses is getting at is that they're technically ALL right. wiki posted:Because of the lack of standardization of transliterating written- and regionally-pronounced Arabic, Gaddafi's name has been transliterated in many different ways into English and other Latin alphabet languages. Even though the Arabic spelling of a word does not change, the pronunciation may vary in different varieties of Arabic, which may cause a different romanization. In literary Arabic the name معمر القذافي can be pronounced /muˈʕamːaru lqaðˈðaːfiː/. [ʕ] represents a voiced pharyngeal fricative (ع). Geminated consonants can be simplified. In Libyan Arabic, /q/ (ق) may be replaced with [ɡ] or [k] (or even [χ]); and /ð/ (ذ) (as "th" in "this") may be replaced with [d] or [t]. Vowel [u] often alternates with [o] in pronunciation. Thus, /muˈʕamːar alqaðˈðaːfiː/ is normally pronounced in Libyan Arabic [muˈʕæmːɑrˤ əlɡædˈdæːfi]. The definite article al- (ال) is often omitted. Not all combinations are possible, but most are. e: If you want, you can play around with Google Trends to see what's more popular where. For example, worldwide, Gaddafi is the most popular way to spell his name by far, followed by Gadhafi. In the UK, they just use Gaddafi, and Gahafi is hardly mentioned; in France it's Khadafi, with some Gaddafi tossed in. Narmi fucked around with this message at 12:21 on Feb 27, 2011 |
# ? Feb 27, 2011 12:04 |
|
harskarenjag posted:Ghadaffi, Gaddafi, Qaddafi...What the gently caress is his name? I've seen so many different spellings of it and no one article ever mentions why they chose a specific one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_al-Gaddafi#Name ^^ This has some good information on it (including which press outlets use which spellings) as well as a cool diagram showing the different alternatives (which I posted earlier in the thread). EDIT: In fact, the diagram above is the one I am referring to.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 12:04 |
|
Some arabic dialects pronounce "Q" as "Gh", namely Egyptian. If you say either, it's pretty clear who you mean, much like when the british/americans say aluminium. efb
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 12:12 |
|
There's several reports that despite Gaddafi's attempts to capture Misurata the local protesters are still in control their. It also sounds like Zawiya, somewhere that's come under attack a lot in past days, is now fairly firmly in the hands of the protesters. [edit]Just posted on the Guardian: quote:Peter Beaumont has just phoned in with news that has come straight from Catch-22. In the Audioboo, he told me me Libyan minders were taking him to the town of Zawiyah, presumably to show that it's still under government control. That has not turned out to be the case as Peter has been busy interviewing rebel forces who have taken over the town. He can confirm that Zawiyah, some 30 kilometres from Tripoli is under rebel control. The people he talked to in the town centre said they are now under "Benghazi government" control. In the background there are people chanting "Down with Gaddafi" and "We want change". So the regime's PR campaign has got off to a shaky start to say the least as the minders have taken foreign journalists to a town in rebel hands. Pity those minders, not exactly what the regime had in mind. Also from AJE: quote:We're getting reports of Libyan customs officers deserting their posts in Ras Ajdir along the border with Tunisia. More soon... Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 12:22 on Feb 27, 2011 |
# ? Feb 27, 2011 12:17 |
|
Narmi posted:What Brown Moses is getting at is that they're technically ALL right. Muammer el Gaadhdhaffy?
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 12:45 |
|
Petr posted:Muammer el Gaadhdhaffy? No idiot it's Moamer El Khazzafi.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 13:02 |
|
More evidence that Zawiyah is in rebel hands quote:Further confirmation - if needed - that Zawiyah is in rebel hands. This from Reuters. quote:CNN reporter Nic Robertson in Zawiya tweets: "Anti-Gadhafi rally in center of town. Civilians w/guns on rooftops, securing area, fear will be attacked by regime." Gaddafi's regime was confident enough that Zawiya was under regime control that they sent foreign journalist their with minders to show them Gaddafi was winning, yet it appears the regime didn't know the situation there. Zawiya has been under a lot of attacks from Gaddafi's forces over the past few days, yet it appears not only have those attacks failed, but Gaddafi's regime isn't even aware those attacks are failing.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 13:15 |
|
Ewan posted:There isn't a standard spelling. The sounds are transliterated from Arabic into the Roman alphabet, which usually gives some variation as it is not standardized. (e.g. Taliban/Taleban al-Qaeda/al-Qaida/al-Qa'ida). This is made worse in this instance by Gaddafi's name being pronounced several ways depending on the Arabic dialect, so you get many different transliterations. There was a short and interesting piece on the Economist's website about this whole issue with Gaddafi's name. It gets the shifts from Classical Arabic to modern Libyan Arabic without going to deep into linguistics terminology. Fun fact: he's "Kezafi" to a lot of Farsi-speakers and Iranian Arabs.
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 13:31 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 19:34 |
|
Fun fact: if you transliterate Mu'ammar al-Gaddafi enough times from Arabic to Latin and back, eventually you end up with "Hairloon the Porksnout".
|
# ? Feb 27, 2011 13:38 |