|
Scratch that part about not showing the western half, the guy who made the first map also made this one showing who's in control & troop locations: Click here for the full 1440x871 image. Click here for the full 1440x871 image. (Already posted the second one, but I should probably keep them on the same page.) The guys who made these maps is Iyad El-Baghdadi, and made a few in the past as well, which can be viewed here. His Twitter account has updates on Libya as well. e: he's gone to bed, but his last tweet is pretty interesting: quote:Also, before I go to sleep, I should tell you I expect tomorrow to be decisive on the Sirt/Sidra front too. Narmi fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Mar 5, 2011 |
# ? Mar 5, 2011 22:37 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 10:51 |
|
I'm really surprised at how fast this Libyan revolution is moving. I remember it taking years of brutal civil war for something like this to depose a dictatorship. I guess this is what happens when you have a populist uprising with no one to support the sitting government.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 22:52 |
|
Once the madman and his family are dead, it seems like the Gadaffi tribe are going to be taking the blame for everything from the massacres to the mercenaries, plus all the little atrocities that we can't keep track of right now... I wonder if any of them realize that they've managed to piss off literally every other tribe in Libya, including the tribes that are supposed to be their vassals or whatever, and they're not a large tribe to begin with. This isn't even taking the cities and attacks into account, just look at Zawiya, those poor people have been surrounded and under constant attack for eighteen days now, but they're just not giving up, and I don't think they're going to be very merciful when this all over.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:02 |
|
The map of the east is a bit out of date I think, Bin Jawad was reported as being in the hands of the rebels earlier today, and Ras Lanuf was in the hands of the rebels since yesterday night. Looks like the Egyptians have started scanning docs: quote:Finfisher intrusion software (spy on email software) proposal by Gamma ~300,000 Euros And Wikileaks posted the following: quote:wikileaks: Egyptians: Don’t throw away #AmnDawla shredded paper! We have the world’s best shredder reconstruction team on hand. They've also got their own Facebook page, where they are posting documents, and sharing data recovery tips.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:07 |
|
Brown Moses posted:The map of the east is a bit out of date I think, Bin Jawad was reported as being in the hands of the rebels earlier today, and Ras Lanuf was in the hands of the rebels since yesterday night. You're right, I posted yesterday's by accident. Fixed now - thanks!
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:15 |
|
Young Freud posted:I'm really surprised at how fast this Libyan revolution is moving. I remember it taking years of brutal civil war for something like this to depose a dictatorship. Or maybe this is what happens when the media and the world at large pay close attention to daily events. Basically, a civil war is an effort at reaching a consensus. A 'social contract' (the recognition of a single legitimate government) depends upon a consensus. Often they can be reached by non-violent means - debates, discussion, voting, etc. Sometimes they cannot. When communication fails to produce a consensus, guns are drawn. But the end goal of any war is to create a consensus. You can do this either by killing every last member of the opposition, or by demoralizing the opposition to the point where they stop fighting.* The latest communication technology affords us much greater ability to reach a consensus non-violently, and accelerates the process of reaching a consensus even when violence is involved. Even if the people on the ground in Libya are not all 'digital natives', they still get media from television. When the people of the world are watching daily events, producing detailed maps of troop movements, compiling a large sampling of tweets from across the region into a coherent narrative, and when networks like Al Jazeera are reporting that narrative (in a way that is accessible to people on the ground in Libya), the consensus can be reached MUCH faster - and with much less bloodshed. *I cribbed this bit from Sun Tzu. Sun Tzu basically says 'killing off every last enemy is impractical; so you should work to demoralize the enemy so they stop fighting.' Media and communication is absolutely essential to such an effort. 'War Crimes' such as genocide and mass murder are best understood (imho) from this perspective.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:17 |
|
quadratic posted:The second one looks like it's regarding the purchase of a metric fuckton of hollow-point ammunition.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:29 |
|
Narmi posted:Not sure why it's working for me and not you, but here's the full article for anyone in a similar situation:
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:42 |
|
Jack Napier posted:Shredded mountains There are many things that Arabs and Persians do not see eye-to-eye on, but I hope that Egypt takes note of the great success that Iran achieved in reconstructing this style of shredded documents following the revolution of 1979. Even by hand, it is possible if it is not completely destroyed. Today, with scanning and image-matching software, it should be greatly facilitated. I have great hope that it will all be reconstituted, entered as evidence where and when needed, and then kept as an archive similar to the records of the former East German STASI.
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:54 |
|
That is more shredded paper than I can properly understand. Even if they can't reconstruct it all I hope it at least serves its purpose as the nice soft bedding for a revolutionary hamster
|
# ? Mar 5, 2011 23:58 |
|
Uglycat posted:The latest communication technology affords us much greater ability to reach a consensus non-violently, and accelerates the process of reaching a consensus even when violence is involved. This is an interesting point, but I really should've clarified that by "support", I really meant "external support". There's no one funneling guns or sending military advisors to Qaddafi or the protesters, as of yet. That's what I meant. It really puts an emphasis on how much pain this "rotten apple", "he's our son of a bitch" proxy war mentality has caused over the last half-century.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 00:00 |
|
Young Freud posted:This is an interesting point, but I really should've clarified that by "support", I really meant "external support". There's no one funneling guns or sending military advisors to Qaddafi or the protesters, as of yet. That's what I meant. It really puts an emphasis on how much pain this "rotten apple", "he's our son of a bitch" proxy war mentality has caused over the last half-century. That's kind've the other thing... It used to be that little wars were fought as proxies for larger conflicts. Russia might back the enemy of the US, etc. We've reached a point where larger powers generally stay out of smaller conflicts - and outside support has been key in perpetuating these little wars. This may be partially facilitated by a mutual understanding by all major powers that prolonged wars are bad, and that the goal must be to reach a consensus rather than to win a larger ideological war. Unfortunately, there are forces in the US Gov't (and in Russia, and presumably in China) that still believe there's a larger ideological war to be fought. Certainly Israel feels that way. This mindset is the biggest threat to humanity, with respect to these revolutions. Israel needs to get their poo poo in order, accept the new world that's forming around them, make the right concessions, and find a way to exist peacefully with their neighbors. I worry it's too late for them to do so - as they've been so bold and bull-headed in past negotiations. edit- the end of the cold war is very key here. And wikileaks makes transparency a reality, whether the superpowers want it to be or not. This dramatically weakens support for cloak-and-daggar efforts to fight a covert ideological war on the shores of dark-skinned people. Furthermore, the reach of the internet allows folks like us to better empathize with the people who suffer in war-torn regions, eroding support for such prolonged conflicts.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 00:11 |
|
#AmnDawla is going to be busy tonight. Lot's being posted on the Facebook page too. From the basement of the security HQ: The shredding room, seems to have been interupted midshred: State Security files. Each file is an individual person: Flickr account with 75 scans of leaked documents, sadly all in Arabic. (zipped) Youtube video of people wandering around the former home of the ex Interior Minister. Brown Moses fucked around with this message at 00:28 on Mar 6, 2011 |
# ? Mar 6, 2011 00:25 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Youtube video of people wandering around the former edit: I got goosebumps watching that. The fact that they were just told to leave by the soldiers rather than taken away, never to be heard from again is a testament to how much things have changed. quadratic fucked around with this message at 00:41 on Mar 6, 2011 |
# ? Mar 6, 2011 00:38 |
|
"Yeah, I'm just chilling out on this pile of shreded documents reading some secret files in the security HQ, you?" Cells in the security HQ: File on Khaled Said: Computers with hard disks removed: Video of a mobile phone that's also a stun gun, found in the HQ. Jack Napier posted:
Apparently it's a Kuwati Princess and Egyptian businessman.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 00:56 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Apparently it's a Kuwati Princess and Egyptian businessman. It would be pretty funny to watch British rags self-combust if it turned out to be a certain English Princess and a certain Egyptian born businessman on those tapes...
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:07 |
|
There's loads of documents in Arabic being posted, I'm just not posting them here because most people here don't speak Arabic, but if you do there's alot of reading for you to do.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:09 |
|
Brown Moses posted:
That would be this nasty little bugger: http://www.jskelin.com/en/productview.asp?id=230
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:15 |
|
herp derp i can't read
Sneakums fucked around with this message at 01:30 on Mar 6, 2011 |
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:20 |
|
Apparently Amr Moussa was part of the regime's plan to "stop" the revolution, he was gonna be on a faux "presidential council" with other popular media and sports figures..wow.. I'll read through this stuff and look for anything interesting. Also apparently they have files on everyone in college. Ham fucked around with this message at 01:25 on Mar 6, 2011 |
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:22 |
|
http://twitter.com/SultanAlQassemiquote:Al Jazeera: Libyan Consul General in Mali resigns from post #Libya quote:AFP: Berlusconi hopes for "change like that in Tunisia & Egypt towards a democracy" in Libya http://bit.ly/dZjz6Q #Libya I've been too busy lately to update the OP regularly, but I've made a few changes today and added a link to Brown Moses' posts.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:33 |
|
quote:Apparently Amr Moussa was part of the regime's plan to "stop" the revolution, he was gonna be on a faux "presidential council" with other popular media and sports figures..wow.. What's this about media/sports figures getting tapped, and was Moussa in on this? Unless you're talking about whatever formal civilian executive authority there is right now...
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:35 |
|
There's an absolute full-fledged civil war in Libya now... http://www.frequency.com/video/gadhafis-forces-bombard-besieged-zawiya/3115539 Short of deposing Qadhafi, it looks like the situation will continue to spiral out of control.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 01:37 |
|
Chortles posted:Waitwaitwaitwhaaaaa...? Just as I posted, Amr Moussa was gonna be part of it. In fact after Mubarak's second speech he went down to Tahrir Square to tell protesters "It's over he'll do it, go home" which was apparently the part of the government's plan. Most of these are letters/reports to higher authorities. Here's a summary of what I've read so far: #1 - After the 2005 parliamentary elections which the MB gained a lot in (over 70 seats), the security apparatus was open to the formation of new left-leaning liberal parties to combat the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in certain towns. #2- Another one asks that the demands of factory workers be met. #3- In another they talk about providing the utmost protection for their stealth e-mail hacking operations and tools by preventing inexperienced officers from using them to hack personal accounts. #4- In this one they request check-ups on the political leanings of 23 people a local oil-refinery wants to hire and wether the ministery approves or not. #5- About Niqab: "Encouraging college deans, student union leaders etc to disallow women wearing niqab from living in student residences in an effort to combat the spread of this extremist outfit" About college students in general: "Investing the efforts of moderate elements (silent majority) (of students) and encouraging them to participate in a political fabric representing moderate, enlightened values far from confrontational political ideas that are held by a small portion of students; we do this by inviting these students into our "College Families" that we've already created in universities." "Preventing any and all politically active students from residing in government provided student dorms" #6- Here's one for Americans: During the last population census, the security apparatus requested a "limited" amount of fake census IDs worn by the census workers who went to every home in Egypt in order to use them to spy on suspects etc. #7- In another, they talk about a phone line they tapped belonging to an official in "Ghad Party".
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 02:02 |
|
Ham posted:Just as I posted, Amr Moussa was gonna be part of it. In fact after Mubarak's second speech he went down to Tahrir Square to tell protesters "It's over he'll do it, go home" which was apparently the part of the government's plan. So was he on the government's side all along, or was he just predictable enough that they used/tricked him?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 02:26 |
|
I found a really dry, really technical article about Sudan if you'd care to read it. I'll quote a little of it here:quote:1. The Current Situation http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/key-issues/preventing-implosion-in-sudan.aspx I'm probably the one who really needs to read it so I can understand what's really going on in Sudan, but I got through Section 1 and my eyesight got all blurry and the letters started to swim around, so I'll read it later when I'm less tired SO. MANY. ACRONYMS!!! I stink at acronyms. and a little more on the revolution-that-isn't-happening: quote:China state media warn against protest calls in capital http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=236885&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter I take this to mean that "We will make Gaddahfi look like Ghandi if you even think about it" I am hearing persistent "chatter" that the dissidents that have been rounded up have nothing to do with the mysterious calls to protest, and that the calls are coming from outside of China. Of course I can't confirm anything that I've heard that I term as "chatter". It's as useful as barroom gossip or tabloid news; some of it is undoubtedly true, a lot of it is false, there's no way to tell the difference between the two, and in this case, some of it could very well be purposeful disinformation. The one thing that all of the chatter seems to agree upon is that the dissidents that are being rounded up in China right now have nothing to do with the situation and are entirely innocent. At the top of a "retrospective" type article that I didn't bother to read was this fantastic picture: I found it here: http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2011/03/palestine-and-revolution.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter It may be a good article, it may be bad, I don't know, I'm not bothering to read opinion pieces that attempt to tie all the events in the Arab world together and apply the examples to countries that are not in open revolt right now. The piece is supposed to be about Palestine, but since it didn't get around to even mentioning Palestine in the first 5 paragraphs, I decided that it was beating around the bush too much for my liking. I want news right now, not opinion. I fear that this poor guy's family is dead: quote:By Rebecca Lefort 9:00PM GMT 05 Mar 2011 There's more to this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor..._medium=twitter Like he said, I don't like to think that they're dead, but I don't want to think about what they're going through if they're alive. If you're a praying sort of person, you might want to pray for them. Algerian security manages to squelch protest pretty quickly, but the Algerian people aren't giving up so easily: (translated from Arabic by Google Chrome) quote:
http://www.france24.com/ar/20110305...lgiers&ns_fee=0 <---This is in Arabic btw ~*BIG BUT INTERESTING DERAIL ABOUT TRANSLATIONS AHEAD, READ IF YOU WANT*~ A friend of mine from Syria explained to me that there are a number of reason why Google Chrome screws up the translations of Arabic and (even worse) Persian. First, there are so many dialects of Arabic that without the aid of television, he would never have been able to understand the Arabic that is spoken in Egypt when compared to the Arabic that is spoken in Syria---they're that different. However, Egypt makes a lot of movies and produces a lot of Arabic music (the best Arabic singers are Egyptian, he said) so the Egyptian dialect of Arabic has spread with the accessibility of televisions and radios. Second, he said that translation programs usually operate under a single set of rules, so that they're unable to translate as well for languages that don't follow those rules. Translation programs like Google Translate seem to work best with romance languages like French, Italian, and Spanish, and work best of all with English because English is one of the most popular languages. Google isn't in that big a hurry to fine-tune their translation services to deal with Arabic and Persian better, because Arabic is less popular, so it's probably low on their list of priorities. He told me an anecdote about Syrian immigrants trying to pass their written driving tests at the DMV in Michigan. Everyone who asked for their test in Arabic failed, and everyone who took the plunge and asked for it in English passed. The reason was that the translated tests were translated by machine, not human, and the text was so garbled by the translation program that some of the questions were flat out non-sequiturs in Arabic. They had a better chance of passing if they just guessed what some of the English words meant. Third, he said that Persian uses the same characters as Arabic, but doesn't use the same words or the same grammar rules. He doesn't speak fluent Persian but knows enough of it and has spoken to enough Persians that he says the translation programs often attempt to use Arabic grammar on Persian sentences or sometimes substitutes Arabic words in the middle of the text. He said that the same word with the same spelling may mean different things in Arabic and Persian; as an analogy, "pants" may mean "clothing for your lower body" in the US and it might mean "Birds that fly south for the winter" in Canada, but it's spelled "pants" in both places. He then pointed out that when we met about ten years ago, free translations weren't available to me at all and I should stop my over-privileged American whining and just be grateful that I can understand anything, especially for free. I reminded him that as a natural born citizen of the United States that whining was a genetic defect that I really couldn't help and he should give me a break. He then kindly offered to translate anything important that may come up from Arabic to English, and I thanked him but politely declined, because I know he's too busy running his liquor empire to dick around with translating protest videos. This is someone who started out barely speaking English and working as a counter clerk at someone else's liquor store to someone who reads and writes English pretty well and owns one store and has a partial interest in another. I'm greatly impressed with this man, since he started with far less and now has far more than I do. Always treat people with respect, kindness, and interest no matter what their station in society is, because you'll never know how good a friend they can be if you don't try talking to them first. ~*END GIANT DERAIL ABOUT TRANSLATIONS*~
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 02:27 |
|
Brown Moses posted:#AmnDawla is going to be busy tonight. Lot's being posted on the Facebook page too. It always amazes me how people can KEEP that many records. I mean is there seriously that much intelligence of value?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 02:29 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:It always amazes me how people can KEEP that many records. I mean is there seriously that much intelligence of value? When you're spying on your entire country, the documents add up.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 02:32 |
|
I'm more amazed that local people feel confident enough to just stroll in there and take a look around, I understand it's abandoned but if the police or whatever come back they're hosed
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 03:37 |
|
Maybe you missed the revolution but the secret police are either lying low/distancing themselves from Mubarak's govt, or disbanded. They've lost their HQs around Egypt and all their intel, and they've lost their leadership so I doubt there is much direction for them, unless it's in the military.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 03:40 |
|
So Mubarak stuck around and held things together just long enough for the incriminating evidence to be destroyed? That makes a lot of sense.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 03:44 |
|
MJ_Turbo posted:I'm more amazed that local people feel confident enough to just stroll in there and take a look around, I understand it's abandoned but if the police or whatever come back they're hosed State Security members arrested https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT4aLc_iPyg
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 03:52 |
Apology posted:~*BIG BUT INTERESTING DERAIL ABOUT TRANSLATIONS AHEAD, READ IF YOU WANT*~ Dialect differences wouldn't really factor into text translation, since people only ever write in the formal dialect (you sometimes see local dialects being written down in works of fiction or on like, social networking sites, but never in news outlets). It's also significant that vowels aren't typically written in Arabic, so you can have several words that look identical on the page but have different meanings – the word for "scholar" and for "world" are both written عالم, for example, though they're pronounced differently – so this requires an ability to analyze context, which is complicated.
|
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 04:10 |
|
Apology posted:I found a really dry, really technical article about Sudan if you'd care to read it. I'll quote a little of it here: Heads up, but that article is a year old. Southern seceded after 99% of the population voted for it. It's its own country now. There is a rogue general still killing a few people though.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 04:17 |
|
Shageletic posted:Heads up, but that article is a year old. Southern seceded after 99% of the population voted for it. It's its own country now. There is a rogue general still killing a few people though. It has voted to secede but it won't declare independence until July.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 04:20 |
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:It always amazes me how people can KEEP that many records. I mean is there seriously that much intelligence of value? Probably not much. I doubt every college kid really has that much to really go on outside of some wild conjecture. That's the problem with totalitarian states: they're paranoid to an extent that borders on insanity. The only thing that gives it an official air is how bureaucracy masks and confuses the issue. All those files represent one man's lust for power and the lengths he would go through to make it look like he's in power. It's pretty sad.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 05:21 |
|
Shageletic posted:Heads up, but that article is a year old. Southern seceded after 99% of the population voted for it. It's its own country now. There is a rogue general still killing a few people though. I was looking for something a little older because all the recent articles make it sound like another pro-democracy vs. dictatorial government fight, and it's a bit more complicated than that. The South hasn't quite finished seceding yet, from what I understand. The current fighting might delay the split into two different countries as well, since it doesn't look like Al-Bashir has complete control over the country presently. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Sudan Oh my, isn't this interesting: quote:Libyan rebels reportedly capture British special forces troops http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/uk/news/article_1623932.php/Libyan-rebels-reportedly-capture-British-special-forces-troops Not so special any more, are ya This turned out to be much more successful than Hands Across America. Regardez Hands Around Manama: quote:Shiite protesters form human chain around Bahrain's capital http://www.tampabay.com/incoming/sh..._medium=twitter Israel is at it again: quote:Middle East http://english.aljazeera.net//news/middleeast/2011/03/20113613338552670.html It seems like Gaza is perpetually bringing a dull pocket knife to a WMD fight. At this point, I don't even believe that there was any rocket fired from Gaza, I think that the Israelis wanted to bomb Gaza, so they bombed first and claimed there was a rocket afterwards. It was probably started by a car backfiring outside Israeli Army headquarters. Terse but surprising: quote:BEIJING - China's spending on police and domestic surveillance will hit new heights this year, with "public security" outlays unveiled on Saturday outstripping the defence budget for the first time as Beijing cracks down on protest calls. http://www.forexyard.com/en/news/Re..._medium=twitter Imagine that the United States had a second military that cost a little more than the $663.8bn that was budgeted for the regular military in 2010. Now imagine that all that military did was suppress the right to free speech, freedom of the press, freedom to assemble, and freedom of religion. Okay I said I wasn't going to read opinion pieces that compared the Middle East protests to other nations that aren't protesting now, but this one caught my attention more than the rest for some reason. Maybe it's due to its biting wit in some places and its tragic facts in others. I've bolded some of the saddest and funniest parts: quote:Arab spring in South Asia? Guy's on a roll And today's Ivory Coast news: quote:UN experts are investigating suspected sanctions-busting arms deliveries from Zimbabwe to Ivory Coast strongman Laurent Gbagbo, according to a UN report. They're still trying to figure out where the hell Ivory Coast is getting arms. I'm kind of confused about the suspicion that it's from Zimbabwe, though, since Zimbabwe is under an EU arms embargo. I suppose Zimbabwe could still be buying arms from the US, and then reselling them to Ivory Coast? It's all so convoluted it's making my head spin. Al Jazeera has received footage of the attack on the women's protest in Abobo on Tuesday that killed six women: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7opSZsLpY Please note that the government has claimed that they had no military activities in Abobo on Tuesday, yet in the video you can clearly see a large armored vehicle cruising by after the shots were fired. This video makes me sad because the women seemed so peaceful and happy just before the shots rang out. The UN is sending in reinforcements: quote:Baku-APA. U.N. peacekeepers in Ivory Coast will be reinforced by 2,000 soldiers and have received two combat helicopters to face worsening violence between rival political factions, a U.N. official said, APA reports quoting news.yahoo.com website. http://www.en.apa.az/news.php?id=142249 Power has been restored to the rebel-held north of Ivory Coast: quote:Power, water back in Ivory Coast's rebel north http://www.theusdaily.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=1387572 No electricity, no refrigeration, no clean clothes, no television, no sanitation, no water, and NO INTERNET for a solid week...just picture that in your mind for a minute or two. Apology fucked around with this message at 07:37 on Mar 6, 2011 |
# ? Mar 6, 2011 05:45 |
|
Why would the Brits send a "junior diplomat"?
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 06:58 |
|
Koine posted:Why would the Brits send a "junior diplomat"? Because what they really need is someone on the ground to put them in contact with the decision making process, not someone to negotiate for the British government. It's an amusing story but it sounds more like the special forces wouldn't want to open fire, but the rebels can hardly confirm the bona fides of some westerner with a heavily armed bodyguard. I'm sure the brits wouldn't want it specifically known, but it was clearly a risk sending a diplomatic envoy into an incredibly unstable situation.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 07:18 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 10:51 |
|
Koine posted:Why would the Brits send a "junior diplomat"? Maybe they didn't want to send anyone who wasn't somewhat expendable? I'm just guessing though.
|
# ? Mar 6, 2011 07:41 |