|
Shageletic posted:poo poo getting real-er? That's what Gaddafi gets for touching the oil. Why does he care that much about Zawiyah anyway? Is it merely the closest large settlement?
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 21:44 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:56 |
|
Al-Jazeera has launched a Twitter dashboard to measure what's being tweeted about in different middle eastern countries. http://blogs.aljazeera.net/twitter-dashboard
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 21:53 |
|
Regarding the US and EU:quote:22:39 European Parliament urges the recognising of the Libyan Transitional Council as legitimate. There is currently no consensus amongst all the EU countries to recongise the council’s legitimacy. quote:22:35 The White House issues a statement saying that the UN resolution is sufficiently flexible to allow the arming of the revolutionaries in Libya if the necessity arose. Last I heard, pro-Gaddafi troops were 1.5km from the city center, so if this can be corroborated it'll be a great boost of morale (provided they can hold out): quote:21:55 @ChangeInLibya tweets: Confirmation from Zawia. Centre under control, troops pushed 2-5km out. They captured dozens of mercenaries and killed more And regarding Libya's oil production: quote:22:15 Al Jazeera reports that Libya’s oil production has dropped by 70% e: Namarrgon posted:Why does he care that much about Zawiyah anyway? Is it merely the closest large settlement? It seems like it might be more of a morale/psychological victory. He probably needs it to show people in other cities like Tripoli that they might be able to resist for awhile, but in the end he'll win. Narmi fucked around with this message at 22:03 on Mar 9, 2011 |
# ? Mar 9, 2011 21:55 |
|
Namarrgon posted:Why does he care that much about Zawiyah anyway? Is it merely the closest large settlement? It's isolated, and he desperately needs a propaganda victory.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 21:56 |
|
Namarrgon posted:Why does he care that much about Zawiyah anyway? Is it merely the closest large settlement? Interestingly the rebels said they had been told by captured soliders in Zawiyah that Gaddafi wanted Zawiyah under his control by any means necessary by Wednesday, and since then Zawiyah has been under heavy attack. State TV claimed Zawiyah was under Gaddafi control today, and showed pictures of Gaddafi supporters celebrating in Zawiyah (apparently in the suburbs). Gaddafi even arranged for international news crews to visit Zawiyah, but less than a km from Tripoli the reporters were returned to the hotel with no reason given. Around the same time the rebels announced they had retaken the central square, and driven Gaddafi's forces out yet again. This goes to show that even with their full focus Gaddafi's forces are still failing to achieve their aims, and yet again Gaddafi has been humiliated in front of the worlds press.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 21:57 |
|
Namarrgon posted:Why does he care that much about Zawiyah anyway? Is it merely the closest large settlement? It's less than an hour's drive from Tripoli, so it had to be contained to keep the uprising from spreading. The important road to the Tunisian border goes right through the city, so it has strategic importance. A major oil refinery is also located there, I think. Not to mention it's the largest city west of Tripoli, 4th largest in Libya. Taking it back, or destroying it if he can't, sends a strong message to the remaining revolting cities that are much less important (except Misurata and, of course, Benghazi). Like: "Give up or I'm going to crush you, I don't give a gently caress."
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:12 |
|
Freigeist posted:It's less than an hour's drive from Tripoli, so it had to be contained to keep the uprising from spreading. Thanks. I already figured out it was needed as a symbolic victory, but I wondered if it also had strategic importance.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:35 |
|
I think I also read Zawiyah has fuel production facilities as well, which are pretty important at the moment.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:37 |
|
Jack Napier posted:I removed the guy behind him for those that want to turn it into an Av or something: You made me do this! Lareous fucked around with this message at 22:44 on Mar 9, 2011 |
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:41 |
|
In regards to food vs freedom, it doesn't have to be either/or. A food crisis has serious potential to be a catalyst for long-standing issues, since it makes people start feeling like they have nothing to lose if they can't feed their families anyway, but once the revolt is in full swing it takes a life of its own.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:43 |
|
This has been ,what, 20 days now? If he destroyed the entire city it would be a victory for Gadaffi in the same way that the Alamo was a victory for Santa Anna.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 22:45 |
|
A BBC news team has been detained by pro-Gaddafi forces and subjected to beatings and a mock execution reports the BBC website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12695077
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 23:16 |
|
In Morocco,quote:RABAT — Morocco's King Mohammed VI on Wednesday announced a "comprehensive constitutional reform" to be put to the people in a referendum, in his first speech following uprisings across the Arab world.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 23:23 |
|
Lareous posted:You made me do this! He needs to come back from the left by firing the opposite way.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 23:34 |
|
Elliptical Dick posted:A BBC news team has been detained by pro-Gaddafi forces and subjected to beatings and a mock execution reports the BBC website: That's horrifying; I wonder what kind of orders/structure those soldiers are working under that makes them believe that they're justified in their actions.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 23:35 |
|
Tadhg posted:That's horrifying; I wonder what kind of orders/structure those soldiers are working under that makes them believe that they're justified in their actions. I'd guess very little actual structure.
|
# ? Mar 9, 2011 23:37 |
Tadhg posted:That's horrifying; I wonder what kind of orders/structure those soldiers are working under that makes them believe that they're justified in their actions. As we've seen from Abu Ghraib or the Stanford prison experiment, all you have to do is tell some of these grunts to terrify people and they will. Hell, a few people are hard wired to get a boner from this kind of thing, as sad a fact as that is.
|
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 00:06 |
|
So Mohamed El Baradei was on TV for 3 continuous hours in a landmark interview. Never thought I'd see a politician declare themselves socialist that easily. Will post a summary of the interview later but sandmonkey is probably already doing that right now. Also it was really fun I don't even know why. Ham fucked around with this message at 01:11 on Mar 10, 2011 |
# ? Mar 10, 2011 01:00 |
|
Ham posted:So Mohamed El Baradei was on TV for 3 continuous hours in a landmark interview. Never thought I'd see a politician declare themselves socialist that easily. I'm going to go ahead and assume you are also from North America. Everywhere else in the Western world (and many places elsewhere), about half the socialists will openly call themselves socialist. E: I'm an idiot; didn't even notice the username. Lustful Man Hugs fucked around with this message at 04:34 on Mar 10, 2011 |
# ? Mar 10, 2011 01:51 |
|
Lareous posted:You made me do this! I have to admit that if I was that guy, I would be doing that until I ran out of ammo.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 01:51 |
|
ChaosSamusX posted:I'm going to go ahead and assume you are also from North America. Everywhere else in the Western world (and many places elsewhere), about half the socialists will openly call themselves socialist. Ham is Egyptian. e: Also in Canada we have the NDP who follow openly follow socialism. Narmi fucked around with this message at 02:04 on Mar 10, 2011 |
# ? Mar 10, 2011 01:58 |
|
ChaosSamusX posted:I'm going to go ahead and assume you are also from North America. Everywhere else in the Western world (and many places elsewhere), about half the socialists will openly call themselves socialist. I'm Egyptian and I live in Egypt. Politics here were a joke and people just blindly followed capitalism and a lot of Egypt's youth pay a lot of attention to American politics. It's just interesting to me seeing the difference between how easy politicans can do something like that here but definitely not in the US.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 02:01 |
|
Ham posted:So Mohamed El Baradei was on TV for 3 continuous hours in a landmark interview. Never thought I'd see a politician declare themselves socialist that easily. Did he really call himself a socialist? In the event that he's elected, what are the odds that some foreign intelligence agency *cough* CIA *cough* topples him and installs another dictator?* *Half kidding
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 02:05 |
|
Obviously it's just proving Glen Beck's prediction of an Islamofascistsocialcommunistic caliphate correct.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 02:17 |
|
King Dopplepopolos posted:Did he really call himself a socialist? In the event that he's elected, what are the odds that some foreign intelligence agency *cough* CIA *cough* topples him and installs another dictator?* He called himself a democratic socialist and talked about common ownership for a bit. He also wasn't afraid to call out Israel and the Egyptian government on the Gaza blockade issue and nuclear weapons, in fact they were joking around that Israeli leadership were probably watching the show live. He talked for quite a bit about the arrogance and ignorance of Bush's administration and how he stood up against them in the security council and denied the presence or development of WMDs in Iraq prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, dispelling many rumors the NDP had spread that he had caused the invasion in Iraq. He also dispelled rumors from the same source saying his daughter's husband is atheist, that he has dual citizenship, that his wife is jewish etc. He also said he would definitely try to restore normal relaitons between Egypt and Iran if he is elected, these relations were cut decades ago when Iran named a street in Tehran after Khaled El Islamboli, Sadat's assassin. The interview was a huge breath of fresh air, most people here have never experienced anything like it. People are actually saying "if only we knew democracy felt so good", referring to free media and freedom of opinion. EDIT: He also criticized some of the new constitutional amendments, which demands that a presidential candidate be of "pure Egyptian birth" and not to hold dual-citizenship or be married to a foreigner or a woman with dual-citizenship, even if he drops said citizenship. He said the focus on "pure Egyptian birth" reminded him of Hitler. He also said he'd vote No on the vote for the amendments taking place March 19th. Ham fucked around with this message at 02:31 on Mar 10, 2011 |
# ? Mar 10, 2011 02:18 |
|
Slantedfloors posted:He needs to come back from the left by firing the opposite way.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 03:23 |
|
Ghetto Prince posted:This has been ,what, 20 days now? If he destroyed the entire city it would be a victory for Gadaffi in the same way that the Alamo was a victory for Santa Anna. So they just keep on fighting till they can't fight anymore.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 03:40 |
|
The BBC is reporting that one of their reporting teams trying to get to one of the big cities in Libya was detained for 21 hours and everyone on the team was beaten and possibly sexually assaulted. Eh poo poo I was beaten badly.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 04:04 |
|
Spiky Ooze posted:As we've seen from Abu Ghraib or the Stanford prison experiment, all you have to do is tell some of these grunts to terrify people and they will. Hell, a few people are hard wired to get a boner from this kind of thing, as sad a fact as that is. I actually get hard when I troll really hard. Is that what you're talking about?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 06:09 |
|
Lareous posted:
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 07:06 |
|
SPECIAL SAUDI ARABIA REPORT BY Al-Saqr All right, as you may have heard recently, there’s a bit of a revolution happening in different parts of the middle east, I happen to live there, particularly, in Saudi Arabia, While generally people feel that there’s probably nothing going to happen here (due to the strength of the secret police, the religious establishment and the military/tribal/economic alliances that are firmly with the ruling family) that and the overall situation while bad is nowhere near the level that Egypt and the African countries were, there’s still rumblings of trouble coming up soon. There are rumors and rumblings of poo poo that’s going to come down tomorrow, and when you start hearing of how extensively the security and military forces are mobilizing and if the government decides to go all the way with their crackdown, then were talking about a poo poo gently caress of epic proportions. WHAT SOME SAUDI’S ARE SAYING: http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2011/s3160196.htm http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/08/saudi-arabia-revolution-protests WHY I THINK THE SITUATION IS hosed: “let the insects come out so we can crush them” – Overheard Conversation from Saudi elites. “We will cut off the hands of those who endanger the unity and stability of the country” – The government “ Protestors are apostates” – The religious establishment. -- The people who will be called upon to shoot should it come to that From the movement of the police around me to the kinds of talk being heard, all signs point to the protests not happening at all or the end of the country as we know it, it really could go either way, little by little my attitude is starting to turn from “meh” to “Freak the gently caress out”, but I’ll be keeping my eyes and ears open and reporting forth anything I could find. I'll be glad to answer any questions in the meantime. By the way, would now be a prudent time to open up an ask/tell thread on how to survive a societal breakdown?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 07:32 |
|
Crazy Ted posted:The BBC is reporting that one of their reporting teams trying to get to one of the big cities in Libya was detained for 21 hours and everyone on the team was beaten and possibly sexually assaulted. Not as bad as them.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 07:38 |
|
Lareous posted:The only thing that could make this better would be to somehow throw in there. (Against a completely different background, of course. Perhaps the cockpit of a fighter plane?)
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 07:46 |
|
Ham posted:EDIT: He also criticized some of the new constitutional amendments, which demands that a presidential candidate be of "pure Egyptian birth" and not to hold dual-citizenship or be married to a foreigner or a woman with dual-citizenship, even if he drops said citizenship. He said the focus on "pure Egyptian birth" reminded him of Hitler. He also said he'd vote No on the vote for the amendments taking place March 19th. While I agree with his objections, (quadratic 2015 ) wouldn't it be better to get these amendments in and then decide later whether to amend it further or start anew? The current constitution is unworkable as it stands. Lareous posted:This is fantastic. Al-Saqr posted:“ Protestors are apostates” – The religious establishment. The same religious establishment that justifies the monarchy?
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 07:52 |
|
quadratic posted:While I agree with his objections, (quadratic 2015 ) wouldn't it be better to get these amendments in and then decide later whether to amend it further or start anew? The current constitution is unworkable as it stands. He said the current constitution even with amendments rushes change too much and still gives ultimate power to the president. He called for the complete independence of the judicial systeam, the limiting of the president's powers in regards to the constitution and rushes parliamentary elections which at this stage will be confined to former NDP and muslim brotherhood. He said he would open the door for the formation of political parties, letting them work for a few months before opening to parliamentary elections.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 08:52 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:SPECIAL SAUDI ARABIA REPORT BY Al-Saqr If the government reacts this way to a mediocre size protests, would that not be viewed by the international community no different than Libya? Would it matter? All of the oil consuming world wants the Saudi Family to stay in charge. How are the average Arabians getting their information? State TV, or is there a lot of Al Jazeera? What is the common view of the protests happening in every loving nation around you? Can it be expected to see a significant segregation between men and women during these protests, or is the youth more progressive? Sivias fucked around with this message at 09:03 on Mar 10, 2011 |
# ? Mar 10, 2011 08:56 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:By the way, would now be a prudent time to open up an ask/tell thread on how to survive a societal breakdown? I'd be super-interested in such a thread... but only if you somehow found people who were experts on the subject. The reality is, you'll get a hundred goons from wealthy, safe Western countries spewing their opinions as-informed by movies, fantasy novels, computer games, and occasionally a boy scout merit badge or something. If there's someone around who's actually been in the thick of things during a societal collapse, though... yeah, that'd be an interesting ask/tell.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 09:49 |
|
One thing to note about Libya, Zawiyah has a population of about 300,000. Misurata has twice that population, has had more time to prepare for attacks, and has to be taken next by Gaddafi's forces before they can secure a route to Sirte. It's taken a huge amount of effort by his forces to take Zawiyah, so expect Misurata to taken even longer. In the east Sirte has about 130k, and Ras Lanuf and Brega have much smaller populations, but the situation is different their as those are the frontlines, supplied by Benghazi with troops and weaponary. There's a chance Sirte could be captured by the rebels before Misurata is captured by the pro-Gaddafi forces, which will make life very hard for the Gaddafi forces, especially if they have to keep Zawiyah and Misurata under control at the same time.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 09:51 |
|
Al-Saqr posted:SPECIAL SAUDI ARABIA REPORT BY Al-Saqr Sivias already asked all the things I was curious about, so I'll just say good luck and I hope you stay safe.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 10:02 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:56 |
|
Live Blogs March 10th BBC Guardian Al Jazeera Guardian Morning Round Up quote:Good morning. Welcome to live coverage of events in Libya and the response of the international community to the crisis.
|
# ? Mar 10, 2011 10:24 |