|
Sue Denim posted:I can't find Granny on facebook "Granny do you want to give your name so people who aren't Facebook friends with you can find you?" "No."
|
#
?
May 28, 2011 21:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 09:21 |
|
|
granny isnt accepting any new gang members
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2011 22:15
|
|
|
Protip: searching for "granny's gang" on google will not, in fact, lead you to her facebook page.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2011 22:18
|
|
|
I don't know if these will be funny to someone who's unfamiliar with Dave meltzer, but the first one drat near killed me.   
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2011 23:07
|
|
|
Dave sounds so much different live than on the phone.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 00:16
|
|
|
Borh posted:Protip: searching for "granny's gang" on google will not, in fact, lead you to her facebook page. You can try searching for it on Facebook but you might get similarly disturbing results.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 01:09
|
|
|
Dave was in fine form last podcast. I laughed at the reason why banning cell phones from the impact zone won't affect spoilers. And in addition they think THAT'S why TNA sucks.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 05:58
|
|
|
Wait, TNA banned cell phones from the impact zone? To stop spoilers? I seriously have a hard time accepting that TNA is THAT stupid.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 08:12
|
|
|
Won't that just stop any Universal Studios tourists from attending? I mean even if they have lockers or something to hold your phone while you watch the show, people who didn't go to the park specifically to watch TNA likely won't want to leave their phone somewhere. Especially only to find out that TNA has swerved them and replaced their phone with a Jeff Hardy t-shirt.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 08:27
|
|
|
so at a stroke they've managed to discourage people from going to see Impact, piss off the people who actually do go by making them hand in their cellphones, and also removed any buzz possible from people tweeting about the event? And all this to stop the spread of spoilers, in a way that can be circumvented with a pad of paper and a loving payphone? This is graduate level stupidity right here.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 09:26
|
|
|
Sionistic posted:Wait, TNA banned cell phones from the impact zone? To stop spoilers? I seriously have a hard time accepting that TNA is THAT stupid. They want to keep people from using them to text spoilers. Not ban them from the building.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 09:33
|
|
|
Their idiot show is taped, what does it matter if the spoilers are 2 minutes or 2 hours old when the goddamn thing won't air for 3 days?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 09:45
|
|
|
Guess we can add "If we can just stop the spoilers" to the list of ways TNA is gonna turn itself around.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 09:57
|
|
|
"We just need to stop internet spoilers"
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 12:09
|
|
|
"How did you miss that fight?" "I went and got ice cream."
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 12:51
|
|
|
Akileese posted:"Granny do you want to give your name so people who aren't Facebook friends with you can find you?" I would have sent a killer cover letter to be one of Granny's picks for a friend. Naw, I have a feeling we would have been BFF's.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2011 18:01
|
|
|
Sue Denim posted:I missed that and thought they came to the compromise of five new friends a week. I admittedly don't listen to Granny segments but it was a shorter one so I actually listened to it. Perhaps they did so on the next one.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 00:04
|
|
|
The guys that call into the LAW are the worst callers of any radio show in history.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 05:53
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:The guys that call into the LAW are the worst callers of any radio show in history. This post has me very excited to listen to this weeks episode. LAW callers generally fall into one of three categories: -unrepentant morons -nowhere near as funny as they think they are -regular old folks who wanna talk wrestling/MMA That list is in order of frequency of occurrence btw. Though it's really fun to hear Jason Agnew (who is also not as funny as he thinks he is) rip into them from time to time.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 09:43
|
|
|
After hearing Agnew's rant on Kharma on this weeks LAW I'm sold on him just being a prick, what an rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 14:40
|
|
|
Sue Denim posted:After hearing Agnew's rant on Kharma on this weeks LAW I'm sold on him just being a prick, what an rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 15:07
|
|
|
Sue Denim posted:After hearing Agnew's rant on Kharma on this weeks LAW I'm sold on him just being a prick, what an rear end in a top hat. Yeah Agnew apparently thinks that condoms are 100% effective and never ever break or fail. I'd like to see him call Kia Stephens stupid to her face and get loving slaughtered. What was even sadder was hearing John Pollock (who I actually really like) pitifully trying to say  "condoms are only 99% effective you guys."
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 15:33
|
|
|
Yeah, he could have expressed the same opinion and I would have thought it was stupid if he had said it with more tact, but the way he said it just made him sound like an ignorant douchebag.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 15:45
|
|
|
The LAW fans on facebook (myself included) spoke out against what Agnew said so he posted this response:Jason Agnew posted:KHARMA RESPONSE: Not really doing himself any favors in my eyes.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 17:00
|
|
|
Making this choice? Yeah I'm sure that's exactly what happened.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 17:04
|
|
|
clearly every woman who gets pregnant definitely wanted to get pregnant at that time and by that person. It's why there's no such thing as abortions.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 17:11
|
|
|
I mean, for all we know she could've been sexually assaulted in which case "blaming" her is all the more revolting.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 17:20
|
|
|
Oh man I bet Vince turns this into a pro-choice/pro-life angle
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 17:58
|
|
|
I don't listen to LAW, but I read that response or whatever and it seems sensible to me. Perhaps I'm missing something.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 18:07
|
|
SAVE_US.CHR
|
ChampRamp posted:I don't listen to LAW, but I read that response or whatever and it seems sensible to me. Perhaps I'm missing something. Most of it seems reasoned. But it's lines like 'decide to partake' and 'making this choice' that really strike me as ignorant. If it was an accidental pregnancy, and why would there be reason to think otherwise given her career, it seems rather foolish to blame a person by saying their choice was stupid.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 18:10
|
|
|
ChampRamp posted:I don't listen to LAW, but I read that response or whatever and it seems sensible to me. Perhaps I'm missing something. The necessary context is that he ranted about how loving stupid she was for about 10 minutes on the radio last night.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2011 19:08
|
|
|
Hearing Dave try to use a sports analogy with Bryan made up for the inevitable week of hearing about Bryan and Ed's tame Vegas adventures. The worst week of the year is hearing about wrestling geeks exclaiming how wild and crazy they were at the STRIP CLUB getting DRUNK. I need to invite Coughlin along for some real adventures.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 07:01
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:Hearing Dave try to use a sports analogy with Bryan made up for the inevitable week of hearing about Bryan and Ed's tame Vegas adventures. The worst week of the year is hearing about wrestling geeks exclaiming how wild and crazy they were at the STRIP CLUB getting DRUNK. I could just picture Bryan the entire time Dave was talking about football. Just waiting for the chance to just somehow change the subject. And Dave just kept going and going. It was hilarious. That and the Kazarian saga were my favorite parts of last night's show.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 07:10
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:Hearing Dave try to use a sports analogy with Bryan made up for the inevitable week of hearing about Bryan and Ed's tame Vegas adventures. The worst week of the year is hearing about wrestling geeks exclaiming how wild and crazy they were at the STRIP CLUB getting DRUNK. I could sort of relate to Bryan, because I know and care jack poo poo about American Football. I realize Dave had a point he was trying to make and I understood perfectly what the point was, but he could clearly have made it in 30 seconds instead of 10 minutes. Still, Dave's long-windedness and semi-incoherent tangents have a sort of charm to them, and are part of the appeal of the shows, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 09:31
|
|
|
The thing that shocked me most about Bryan's wrestling bubble is that when Judas and Brutus are mentioned in the context of treachery, he immediately thinks of Brutus Beefcake rather than the guy who killed Caesar
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 10:37
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:Hearing Dave try to use a sports analogy with Bryan made up for the inevitable week of hearing about Bryan and Ed's tame Vegas adventures. The worst week of the year is hearing about wrestling geeks exclaiming how wild and crazy they were at the STRIP CLUB getting DRUNK. Holy poo poo there was a raffle and Bryan didn't go to bed until 1 am? DUDES NIGHT OUT
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 19:54
|
|
|
Big Bob Pataki posted:Holy poo poo there was a raffle and Bryan didn't go to bed until 1 am? Haven't listened yet, but I'm sure he tells tales of his amazing alcohol intake (no more than 4 shots) and how late they stayed up - "YOU WOULD NOT BUHHHHHLIEVE HOW LATE WE STAYED UP."
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 20:44
|
|
|
He spent about 10 minutes talking about Granny staying up until like 1:30 playing the slots Seriously
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 20:51
|
|
|
Big Bob Pataki posted:He spent about 10 minutes talking about Granny staying up until like 1:30 playing the slots God loving dammit. Is the show all Vegas talk, or is it at least tucked into the beginning or end?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 21:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 09:21 |
|
|
It's the first half hour
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2011 21:43
|
|