|
I'll play: I have no idea what Legolas is aiming at.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 13:54 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 19:12 |
|
Stellar Curiosity posted:I have no idea what Legolas is aiming at.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 14:10 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:And this
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 14:15 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:Oh man I had totally forgotten about Keira Knightley's digital boob-job on those. For people wondering:
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 14:26 |
More:
|
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 15:11 |
|
Alhazred posted:There's also this: I never realized the arrowheads were painted... The gently caress? It looks so jarring to me now.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 18:21 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:For people wondering: This is great. Now I want to go through every poster Natalie Portman has ever been on to see if anything similar has happened.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 18:36 |
|
Bows are iconic images in general, and look really cool on posters. It's kind of a cliche now, but it works.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 19:40 |
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:I could see that happening. I'm thinking it plays out more like Bip...
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 19:53 |
|
A lot of posters where the hero is firing arrows, but what about when the hero is the arrow's target? (Though the weapon is actually a crossbow.)
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 21:01 |
|
Stellar Curiosity posted:I'll play: I really like the pose in the Brave poster. With the others it looks like a a generic "I am going to shoot something" but with The Brave poster the character is posing in such a way that conveys fear and, well, bravery. You can look at the poster and wonder what has got the character behaving like that while knowing that she has her bow and arrow and is ready to take whateve the challenege is full on.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 21:17 |
|
edit: i am an idiot.
CRINDY fucked around with this message at 22:33 on Apr 7, 2012 |
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:03 |
|
Literally not even 10 posts ago.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:30 |
|
It amuses me to no end that the Keira Knightly photoshop boobjob is the only thing that people tend to remember about that movie. Wasn't it supposed to be one of the big summer movies in whichever year it was released in?
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:34 |
|
The vast majority of these posters have nothing in common besides someone holding a bow and arrow.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:41 |
|
Noxville posted:The vast majority of these posters have nothing in common besides someone holding a bow and arrow. Up until the Narnia post, it was pretty much entirely "person aiming arrow roughly toward viewer and looking intense."
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:44 |
|
Post your favorite longbows or the archery pics you got.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:49 |
|
SuperMechagodzilla posted:Post your favorite longbows or the archery pics you got. Hey, here's a poster I kinda dig!
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 22:57 |
|
Vagabundo posted:It amuses me to no end that the Keira Knightly photoshop boobjob is the only thing that people tend to remember about that movie. Wasn't it supposed to be one of the big summer movies in whichever year it was released in? Well, I liked it a lot at the time. It was really cool-looking, though, and at the time I saw it (at a drive-in theater, which really enhanced it) Clive Owen was my FAVORITE ACTOR EVER. It has a stellar cast, led by Owen, Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Joel Edgerton, Ray Winstone, Stephen Dillane, Stellan Skarsgard, and Til Schweiger. I'd like to revisit it some time to see if it holds up.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:19 |
|
Spatula City posted:Well, I liked it a lot at the time. It was really cool-looking, though, and at the time I saw it (at a drive-in theater, which really enhanced it) Clive Owen was my FAVORITE ACTOR EVER. It has a stellar cast, led by Owen, Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Joel Edgerton, Ray Winstone, Stephen Dillane, Stellan Skarsgard, and Til Schweiger. I'd like to revisit it some time to see if it holds up. It made a fair amount of money world-wide ($50million in the US, but made back its budget internationally, taking in $150) so quite a lot of people obviously went to see it. But do people actually really remember it outside of the whole spot of bother with Knightly's breasts? It doesn't even get brought up in any other context either.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:25 |
|
With all the archery posters, I'm surprised (well, not really) this one wasn't included... Edit: here, have a painted foreign version as well... Young Freud fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Apr 7, 2012 |
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:27 |
|
More adventures of Graphic Designer and Boss! So what have you got for me today? Well, the movie's about Jason Statham who has to protect this young girl who knows the code to a very important safe. This is what I came up with: What is this? This tells me nothing. Some guy is walking with some girl somewhere but don't worry, potential audience: They're safe! See the man even has a gun! No, I want people to know it's an action movie. Well, I guess this would make it more... obvious: Hrmph... Better. Audiences love having a gun pointed at them and/or their crotch, but look at that title. What about it? It's sideways! Nobody's gonna be able to read that! Change it! Well... How about this? The girl. What about the girl? There's a little girl in my goddamn action movie, that's what. No teen aged boy is gonna want to see an action movie starring a little Asian girl! Why not just put Statham in a tutu and have him fight the Snuggle bear army! Get rid of her! But sir, she has the code! It's an important part of the plo... No, gently caress that. They have the code now. They have the code? But they have the safe! That doesn't make any sen... gently caress it, Statham can crack the code. He's the key, isn't he? Safes use keys right? Sir, the taglines are just complicating everyth... JASON STATHAM. WITH A GUN. Fuuuuuuuuuuuuu Dissapointed Owl fucked around with this message at 21:04 on Nov 3, 2012 |
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:38 |
|
I'm pretty sure "tod sicher" is the tagline for the German poster. It means "Sure Death".
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:52 |
|
Young Freud posted:I'm pretty sure "tod sicher" is the tagline for the German poster. It means "Sure Death". Nah, it's the alternate German title. I'm pretty sure it means, 'Dead Certain'.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2012 23:57 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:This is a great post.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 00:07 |
|
I really love this poster: Just look at it. It's so simple, but there's so much to be derived from the overall tone, the colour scheme, Dafoe's body language, the understated lettering, the subtle off-white colouring and the tasteful thickness of it. It reminds me off this poster, which I also really liked: There's just something about these 'screencap' like posters that really get me into it. This one's good too but it doesn't tell me much. And this one on the other hand... terrible. A picture taken with instagram of Dafoe casually walking away from his mountain cottage, hands in his pockets, as two children in a weird depth perspective melt into the soil. Oh also there's a mystery or somesuch.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 00:41 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:The expression on Jason's face is just "Wait how did it end up like this?"
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 02:06 |
|
I thought it looked like he'd just realised he'd left that girl behind on one of the other posters.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 02:12 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:More adventures of Graphic Designer and Boss! Good job hypothetical movie poster executive.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 02:18 |
|
Well, remember that the poster's don't replace each other, they supplement each other. While some of those posters will make you see Safe, the ones that you hate might make a more reluctant person see it.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 04:17 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:For people wondering: But sir, she'd be a much less effective archer with.... I SAID GIVE HER SOME loving TITS JOHNSON! A... Alright sir...
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 04:46 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:More adventures of Graphic Designer and Boss! Wait, is this for reals?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 05:04 |
|
Cabin in the Woods seems to be a weird case where the campaign improved due to the movie being on the shelf. The first ones- eh, kinda funny, might be a goofy spoof: Then it delayed forever, usually a bad thing for a movie, now there's this: Now THAT'S attention-getting.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 05:18 |
|
Maxwell Lord posted:Cabin in the Woods seems to be a weird case where the campaign improved due to the movie being on the shelf. That's some Scream-worthy self awareness.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 06:59 |
|
Madkal posted:That's some Scream-worthy self awareness. Yeah, that's the thing- I like Whedon's work and all, but I was thinking "Do we need another riff on horror movie conventions?" But apparently it's a bit more complex than that, and the new poster conveys it's a bit weirder.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 07:01 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:More adventures of Graphic Designer and Boss! If this is about you, when did the Chinese characters get put on the gun?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 07:03 |
|
I think the marketing for Cabin in the Woods gives away too much.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 07:39 |
|
Die Laughing posted:I think the marketing for Cabin in the Woods gives away too much. Apparently the trailer only reveals early 1st act stuff, which just makes it seem like it must be an even crazier horror movie than I can imagine a Whedon flick to be.
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 11:50 |
Madkal posted:That's some Scream-worthy self awareness. The campaign for Cabin in the Woods was so self aware that it probably at some point went down to the local pub and got pissed:
|
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 12:03 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 19:12 |
|
Alhazred posted:The campaign for Cabin in the Woods was so self aware that it probably at some point went down to the local pub and got pissed: Is there any evidence that those two posters were actually released, and they're not just Photoshop jobs?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2012 12:14 |