|
Cacahuate posted:Did the giants piss skyscrapers made of pee or peas? I wasn't clear on that. I'm sorry, the floor has not been opened for questions. I'm gonna have to dock you points.
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 04:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
Need another Jon Hamm episode. I really like that guy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 10:36
|
|
|
The Senator Giroux posted:I'm sorry, the floor has not been opened for questions. I'm gonna have to dock you points. The floor is creaking under my weight, it really wants to open!
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 11:25
|
|
|
The Senator Giroux posted:I'm sorry, the floor has not been opened for questions. I'm gonna have to dock you points. Could you open it, please? I dropped my hat under there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 15:24
|
|
|
I don't notice when I intrude unless I physically stumble over barbed wire.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 15:50
|
|
|
Dear lord, Andy Daly repeatedly throwing all his characters out the window had me unable to breathe. I love this podcast.
|
|
#
?
Apr 7, 2012 16:02
|
|
|
Intro for latest episode is giving me a panic attack
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2012 18:31
|
|
|
Past Tense Ragu posted:Intro for latest episode is giving me a panic attack Came here to post the exact same thing. Jesus Christ it's a 7 minute long disclaimer 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2012 18:37
|
|
|
The episode is not really bad at all compared to some of the worst ones, I think he just didn't want people to go "Ugh, Ed Helms is just a bad guest I guess" when he would probably be great on the show with a better situation.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2012 21:39
|
|
|
Liked the last ep, but that disclaimer really made me anticipate the absolute worst episode in history, really bummed me out >:(
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2012 23:21
|
|
|
Man, I liked the episode, but that disclaimer. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 01:32
|
|
|
I thought they were mustard packets.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 01:56
|
|
|
I see what scott was saying. It wasn't that Ed wasn't funny, it was just that his ideas were a little all over the place. There were a few really great moments though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 06:07
|
|
|
It was still a pretty weak episode and I would have blamed Ed, so I think the into was necessary. Seth's Gelman impression was incredible though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 10:02
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:Seth's Gelman impression was incredible though. YES, it was so totally spot-on, I'd love to hear more of that, or get both of them together, maybe get Gelman to take a crack at Bob Ducca. Really I'm glad that Scott gave that intro. If I had heard that episode without it I would have been a little disappointed that Ed Helms is maybe not as funny as I thought he was.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 12:14
|
|
|
Yeah it needed that disclaimer, but it kept going and going. "Ok cool, Ed will play a character live and it might be a it rough..." 8 minutes later "Oh god this is going to be the worst episode ever produced" WOULD YOU RATHER: Have a 15 minute disclaimer before every episode, warning about the quality of the show or No characters on the podcast at all? I'm opening the floor for questions
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 13:12
|
|
|
Zsinjeh posted:Yeah it needed that disclaimer, but it kept going and going. In the scenario with no characters on the podcast, do I have AIDS?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 14:26
|
|
|
Poopy Palpy posted:In the scenario with no characters on the podcast, do I have AIDS? Excellent question, this is how we play. Yes, you do have AIDS. You contracted it from a podcast, and every time you appear on another podcast you pass it on to one of the listeners at random.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 14:51
|
|
|
Fil5000 posted:Excellent question, this is how we play. I have a question. In the scenario where there are 15 minute disclaimers before every podcast, is my life more fulfilling?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:36
|
|
|
I have a question. In the AIDS scenario, do I like having AIDS?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:38
|
|
|
That's easy I'll go with the disclaimers
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:39
|
|
|
Fil5000 posted:Excellent question, this is how we play.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:39
|
|
|
I think I'll vote for the 15-minute disclaimer scenario.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:40
|
|
|
caveman thug poo poo posted:That's easy I'll go with the disclaimers SpacePig posted:I think I'll vote for the 15-minute disclaimer scenario. I'm sorry, I'm going to have you dock you both points for voting early.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:54
|
|
|
Classic WYR blunder.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:55
|
|
|
Who is giving these disclaimers in the first scenario?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 15:59
|
|
|
Leonard Nimoy as Spock
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:03
|
|
|
In the no characters at all scenario, are there no characters ever again or do we enter an alternate reality where there were never any characters on CBB?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:11
|
|
|
Does the lack of characters mean that the real-world versions of the current characters being to appear on the show?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:14
|
|
|
Alastor_the_Stylish posted:I have a question. Yes, your life is infinitely more fulfilling as you receive royalties as the inventor of the disclaimer. WoodrowSkillson posted:I have a question. Yes, you absolutely love it as you consider it a gift from Jesus. The_Rob posted:I have two questions. First question is Which podcast do you contract it from, and second question is if the aids will actually make you a funnier person. You contract AIDS from the BBC Friday night comedy podcast, specifically from an episode of The Now Show that has Jon Culshaw on it (note: I am not suggesting Culshaw has aids, he's just terrible). And yes, the AIDS makes you funnier; in this scenario, one of the symptoms of AIDS is an increase to the humourosity gland's production.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:26
|
|
|
I have my answer.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:36
|
|
|
The_Rob posted:I have my answer. Oh, please. Don't vote yet. The floor for questions is still open.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 16:42
|
|
|
I'm going to recuse myself. Using both questions as a two-parter for Planet Centaur.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 17:10
|
|
|
This one's easy, it's president Barack Obama.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 17:56
|
|
|
Does the scenario where no characters are present have any kind of beginning disclaimer, and if so how long is it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 18:29
|
|
|
It is 4 days long, and repeats every year
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 19:48
|
|
|
Lugaloco posted:I'm going to recuse myself. Using both questions as a two-parter for Planet Centaur. Followup question - does the "no characters" scenario have any sort of investment opportunity involving Ice-T attached to it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 20:03
|
|
|
I'd like to go ahead and dock myself 15 points as I had to abstain my role as host due to pressing matters elsewhere.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 20:21
|
|
|
Fil5000 posted:Followup question - does the "no characters" scenario have any sort of investment opportunity involving Ice-T attached to it? Indeed it does! In this scenario Ice-T is looking for investors for his all new animal rescue service! Mainly situated in the middle of the Sahara Desert (known for it's lack of animal rescue coverage and hence a seller's market), Ice-T plans on getting the best vehicles for the job in order to get those animals to safety as quick as possible. Ice-T's Camel Tow is a sure-fire success!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 20:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 14:56 |
|
|
In the "No characters" scenario, does that also apply to Bob Ducca, who now has his own podcast, or to the characters portrayed by Paul F. Tompkins, who also exist in his own podcast?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2012 20:24
|
|