|
Sockser posted:Is it normal to be bothered that heads are cut off in nearly all of those? This seems to be a new thing. Pretty sure most of the Jason Statham's Safe posters do the same thing
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:26 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 02:15 |
|
Sockser posted:Is it normal to be bothered that heads are cut off in nearly all of those? Yeah it's bugging me too. They'd probably look better in a frame on a wall but laid out on a screen like that it looks bad.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:26 |
|
Sockser posted:Is it normal to be bothered that heads are cut off in nearly all of those? Obviously they didn't want anyone to find out that Bruce Willis is bald.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:27 |
|
Maybe me dumb, but I didn't know that was a word. I had to look it up to be sure. I can't tell if I like that or hate it.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:36 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Here's all 8 character posters The last one looks like they accidentally included a Mortal Kombat character. Edit: kiimo posted:
It's French, look at the release date.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:36 |
|
Thanks for the link! I like those posters. That last poster is Jinx, who I'm surprised they put in one but am glad they did.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 18:39 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Here's all 8 character posters
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 19:16 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:Wait gently caress, the RZA's in this movie too!? Blind karate master RZA who trained Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow!
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 19:58 |
|
HoldYourFire posted:The last one looks like they accidentally included a Mortal Kombat character. To be honest they all kind of look like they could be Mortal Kombat posters. The Rock is Jax of course.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 20:17 |
|
Codependent Poster posted:Blind karate master RZA who trained Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow! gently caress that's awesome.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 20:23 |
|
Codependent Poster posted:Blind karate master RZA who trained Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow! I'd see the movie for that alone.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 20:27 |
|
Yeah, I'm also not a fan of heads being cropped off in posters. It's not that it disturbs me, I just don't find it interesting at all. Maybe it's not meant to be anything stylistic but it's kind of lame if it is. At least it's not like the cropped half-face thing.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 20:59 |
|
bobkatt013 posted:Or the Smallville episode Hero. STRIDE GUM
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 21:40 |
|
Nothing beats the three episode arc that the Nissan Rogue got on Heroes. Saved this which tickled my fancy at the time and still does. http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k203/kiimosabe/heroes.jpg (Please please please don't probate me for posting a macro, it is from a different time.)
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:22 |
|
Man and here I was going a good couple of years of successfully purging that scene/season from m head. gently caress.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:40 |
|
Codependent Poster posted:Blind karate master RZA who trained Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow! Well poo poo. Didn't watch the first one but I'll have to make sure I see this one just to help pay for movies featuring Kung Fu and RZA.
|
# ? Apr 20, 2012 22:42 |
|
kiimo posted:Nothing beats the three episode arc that the Nissan Rogue got on Heroes. USA Network's The Dead Zone Tylenol placement was HORRIBLE. *Plot based conversation. Suddenly, someone has a headache. "Do you have some TYLENOL?" "Yes, here." *CLOSE UP OF BOTTLE HAND OFF, LABEL CLEAR TO READ. They did this multiple times in the final season. I also seem to recall a clip of a daytime soap opera where a character showed up to a cafe or something with a box of healthy cereal, which they went on to preach about for a few seconds before returning to the plot.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 00:09 |
|
What about the Thomas Crown Affair remake which was a serviceable heist movie, except for the bit where Rene Russo's character has to stop everything in the middle of exposition to guzzle down a soda (a Pepsi, I think) while everyone waits patiently for her to finish?
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 00:16 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Here's all 8 character posters When I saw the promo for this in a theatre, I was convinced that John McClain had made his way into the new GI Joe movie. Not only did it turn out not to be true, but no one else knew who I was talking about. It was a failure all around.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 01:26 |
|
Das Boo posted:When I saw the promo for this in a theatre, I was convinced that John McClain had made his way into the new GI Joe movie. Not only did it turn out not to be true, but no one else knew who I was talking about. loving hell. Find new friends. -------------------------------------- Here are the character posters for On The Road
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 01:35 |
|
Those quotations are terrible. I love love.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 05:41 |
|
I guess we're supposed to immediately recognise the characters or something, but I've never read any Kerouac, so it means nothing to me. I'm sure the people Kerouac based his book on weren't half as pretty as that cast though.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 05:54 |
|
Is Viggo Mortensen playing William Burroughs? He and Amy Adams are almost unrecognizable.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 06:28 |
|
Vagabundo posted:I guess we're supposed to immediately recognise the characters or something, but I've never read any Kerouac, so it means nothing to me. I'm sure the people Kerouac based his book on weren't half as pretty as that cast though. All I know about Kerouac is that On the Road is up there with Atlas Shrugged when it comes to books that people cringe to remember liking.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 06:30 |
|
I barely had the patience to put up with On The Road when I read it. The style kind of repulsed me to the point where I don't think I could offer a fair analysis, but I recall it being quite the self-centred ramble. It's definitely not the kind of story that's built around having a big recognizable ensemble cast (the vast majority of characters only drift through the narrative for brief segments), so the character posters feel like a complete misfire.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 07:03 |
|
Vagabundo posted:What about the Thomas Crown Affair remake which was a serviceable heist movie, except for the bit where Rene Russo's character has to stop everything in the middle of exposition to guzzle down a soda (a Pepsi, I think) while everyone waits patiently for her to finish? Yes, this is my go-to example of overbearing product placement. It was a diet coke(EDIT: found a pic, it was Pepsi One), I think, and she just stops her conversation to drink the whole thing, label towards camera, and then pause to look refreshed. The times product placement bothers me are when it breaks the fourth wall and shows the seams of the movie, so to speak. It takes you out of the story and reminds you of the machinery behind the scenes, and it's a bummer. That said, there are ways to do it that are either funny, subtle, or interesting, and I am all for that. (Wayne's World, at 4m 52sec, is a favorite) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wACBAu9coUU Ishamael fucked around with this message at 07:23 on Apr 21, 2012 |
# ? Apr 21, 2012 07:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 07:59 |
That's pretty neat, where did you find them? Are there more?
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 08:04 |
|
Yeah, those are pretty cool, though the text on the Gump poster is the wrong way round. Edit: I'm dumb. It's the text in front of his feet, instead of behind him, that threw me off. VVV A Buttery Pastry fucked around with this message at 12:59 on Apr 21, 2012 |
# ? Apr 21, 2012 11:42 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:Yeah, those are pretty cool, though the text on the Gump poster is the wrong way round.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 12:04 |
|
Young Freud posted:Is Viggo Mortensen playing William Burroughs? He and Amy Adams are almost unrecognizable. Yep, or "Old Bull Lee" anyway. But will he be better than Peter Weller? Adams is Joan/"Jane" to boot. Vagabundo posted:I guess we're supposed to immediately recognise the characters or something, but I've never read any Kerouac, so it means nothing to me. Is there any reason to care about this film if you don't like the book? I've heard a lot about it, but it's all boils down to "it's the first film adaptation of this well loved book".
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 14:26 |
|
Those are pretty neat, shame they don't reveal anything new or interesting with the POV flipped. That could've made them really cool.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 14:47 |
|
Can't wait for the film adaptation of On The Bro'd: It's exactly what you think.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 15:04 |
|
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 17:03 |
|
I really wish that if after watching that movie, I could say "yes. That poster was an exact representation of what that movie was all about." Speaking of obnoxious product placement, it was really weird being lent a copy of Dracula 2000 by a friend, and after a while realizing there is never not a Virgin logo somewhere on screen.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 17:37 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:That's pretty neat, where did you find them? Are there more? Dunno. Was in the top images in imgur's gallery yesterday, which means if I go digging around Reddit for a few hours I might find something but gently caress that.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 17:40 |
|
It never occurred to me that I would love a product placement. But Resse's Pieces in ET and Nike in Back to the Future 2. Love them both.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 19:44 |
|
kiimo posted:It never occurred to me that I would love a product placement. The least offensive (for lack of a better word) product placement is when the real company advertises using a fake or future product. The shoes in BttF 2 are a perfect example, or the cars in Minority Report, even if the latter were concept cars and not complete fantasy.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 19:49 |
|
Sockser posted:Dunno. Was in the top images in imgur's gallery yesterday, which means if I go digging around Reddit for a few hours I might find something but gently caress that. Not being a dick, just for future information: Most of the pictures on imgur have a source link to the right that will take you to the Reddit post they came from. Then usually someone in the comments will have linked the original source. In this case, they came from a marketing campaign for LG. Those seem to be the only three.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 20:02 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 02:15 |
|
Mr. Squishy posted:Is there any reason to care about this film if you don't like the book? I've heard a lot about it, but it's all boils down to "it's the first film adaptation of this well loved book". It's doing a fantastic job in ensuring I'll probably never see the movie with quotes from the book that I'm sure are meant to be profound statements about whatever. "I love love?" "The road is life?" gently caress off.
|
# ? Apr 21, 2012 20:09 |