|
uPen posted:Is a poster that's so awful that it's getting publicly mocked still accomplishing it's goal of drawing an audience? I know when I see an awful photoshop hackjob it doesn't make me want to see the film.
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
MorgaineDax posted:
Holy gently caress they made a movie just for me. How kind! Ominous Jazz posted:I didn't know they were making a Killer Seven movie! Not enough luchadore. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:09
|
|
|
Alouicious posted:Not enough luchadore. No movie has enough luchadore.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:24
|
|
|
Ominous Jazz posted:No movie has enough luchadore. Even this one? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:40
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:Even this one? I actually own that poster, so no.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:44
|
|
|
Ominous Jazz posted:I didn't know they were making a Killer Seven movie! A Killer 7 film with that cast would rule because Tom Waits would be perfect as Harman Smith. Dunno who would fill in for Mask though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 09:48
|
|
|
uPen posted:I imagine that these contracts which have such specific stipulations about elements on a piece of advertisement is mostly why this thread exists. Well, partly. It's also because the studios and distributors will micromanage the advertising because they can, and so you get the "Rasta-fy him by 20%" factor. Plus things like billing and ad prominence are common in contracts because they're small and easily tradable. Instead of paying the star 20 million, the studio can pay him 15 million plus points off the back end plus your name is above the title plus you get the bigger Gulfstream and all the Gummi Bears you can eat, and all these things cost the studio less. (Unless the star really loves him some Gummi Bears.)
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 18:26
|
|
|
Coming soon, Taylor Lautner in Disney's Adventures of the Gummi Bears!
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2012 18:34
|
|
|
MorgaineDax posted:Oh look, finally a poster is made so people can't complain that the names don't match the order of the faces! Are you happy now, Sockser? These People Are In Big Trouble: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 06:24
|
|
|
Ah, 2001. Back when Tome Sizemore had a career and Zooey Deschanel was merely snarky instead of annoyingly quirky.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 06:36
|
|
|
If I remember correctly, that movie was pushed back and re-edited to take out several scenes involving a bomb on a plane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 06:41
|
|
|
Gonz posted:If I remember correctly, that movie was pushed back and re-edited to take out several scenes involving a bomb on a plane. Yeah, it never made its September 21, 2001 release date.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 06:52
|
|
|
I think I'm the only person on Earth who likes that film although I haven't seen it in a long time. The version I saw definitely featured a scene were there is a nuclear device on board a plane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 06:59
|
|
|
Ominous Jazz posted:I actually own that poster, so no. Can you tell me where I can buy it? I've literally been looking for that exact poster for quite a while.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 08:31
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:Can you tell me where I can buy it? I've literally been looking for that exact poster for quite a while. I was on my phone and can't thumbnails. This is the one I have(somewhere)  this actually has sufficient Lucha for me, but thankfully amazon has a wide variety of posters for Santos fans
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 09:10
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:I think I'm the only person on Earth who likes that film although I haven't seen it in a long time. The version I saw definitely featured a scene were there is a nuclear device on board a plane. It's a fantastic movie that gets better with every viewing. The bomb scenes are still in, I'm pretty sure they just never bothered to give it a theatrical release at all. The whole climax of the movie is about getting a nuke on a plane so it would've been impossible to edit around.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 11:02
|
|
|
404GoonNotFound posted:Zooey Deschanel was merely snarky instead of annoyingly quirky. She and Ben Foster are so different from what they became over the last decade.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 14:01
|
|
|
I like New Girl well enough that I catch it on Hulu if I miss it, and I had no idea that was Zoey Deschanel there. I guess she had a different thing going on ten years ago.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 18:20
|
|
|
I guess women flashing their tits for sea monsters is becoming a trend now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 21:07
|
|
|
Role Play McMurphy posted:It's a fantastic movie that gets better with every viewing. The bomb scenes are still in, I'm pretty sure they just never bothered to give it a theatrical release at all. The whole climax of the movie is about getting a nuke on a plane so it would've been impossible to edit around. It definitely got a theatrical release (at least in the US), but it was dumped with very little marketing around seven months after its original release date.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 21:11
|
|
|
Slasherfan posted:I guess women flashing their tits for sea monsters is becoming a trend now. Pretty sure that's been a trend as long as there have been movies about sea monsters, though. The reason you go to see a movie about a sea monster is for sea monster carnage and inevitable tit shot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 21:57
|
|
|
Pirahnaconda? Whoever the gently caress produces these movies must have played the gently caress out of Impossible Creatures.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 22:01
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Pirahnaconda? Whoever the gently caress produces these movies must have played the gently caress out of Impossible Creatures. I can't wait until bad horror movie irony reaches such critical mass that SyFy and The Asylum start making ridiculously improbable and unthreatening creature hybrids. Pandaconda 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 22:06
|
|
|
Slasherfan posted:I guess women flashing their tits for sea monsters is becoming a trend now. It's for the same reason the sea is always seen as a feminine space in fiction (expansive, formless, transgressive). This is why Piranhaconda is the poster's subject - the protagonist. By watching this movie, we are Piranhaconda.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 22:18
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:I think I'm the only person on Earth who likes that film although I haven't seen it in a long time. The version I saw definitely featured a scene were there is a nuclear device on board a plane. I've actually been meaning to watch this someday. The previews were interesting enough, but it's a shame that everything changed on 9/11 to keep it out of theaters. Slasherfan posted:I guess women flashing their tits for sea monsters is becoming a trend now. I swear I've seen that same woman on the Piranha 3D poster. Or am I confusing this with yet another movie that ripped off that poster.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 22:22
|
|
|
So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. I will listen to and accept any and all criticisms and flimsily defend ourselves while blaming the other company for anything you don't like. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2012 23:50
|
|
|
kiimo posted:So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. I thought the trailer was neat, it got played in the front of Cabin In The Woods in this area. Am I correct in thinking it'll be The Hills Have Eyes in Pripyat?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:04
|
|
|
kiimo posted:So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. I really like that poster. That poster says: It's Chernobyl. It's a horror movie. It's stupid but fun. Am I right so far? I really have no idea what the movie actually is about, but that's what I get from the poster.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:15
|
|
|
The tagline is pretty awful but I like the poster itself.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:15
|
|
|
Nemesis Of Moles posted:The tagline is pretty awful but I like the poster itself. Haha! Yes my first opportunity to do what I said I would!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:18
|
|
|
On Friday the 13th, counselors let teenagers stay at Camp Crystal Lake. They said it was safe... It wasn't. Three decades ago, parents let their children fall asleep in their houses on Elmstreet. They said it was safe... It wasn't. At the start of the 80s, a hotel manager let the Torrance family care for the Overlook Hotel. They said it was safe... It wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:35
|
|
|
A hundred years ago, the townsfolk of Little Boston allowed Daniel Plainview to drill for oil. They said it was safe... It wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:43
|
|
|
In the future, the crew of the Nostromo were hired to tow stuff They said it was safe... It wasn't. e; In 2001, Someone gave Tom Green 14 Million Dollars. They said it was save... It wasn't. Nemesis Of Moles fucked around with this message at 00:54 on Apr 24, 2012 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:52
|
|
|
kiimo posted:So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. The radiation tri-foil looks like a scared ghost. Could it be possible to make it both a radiation tri-foil and a skull? Also, I agree, that tagline is way to loving long.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 00:54
|
|
|
Young Freud posted:The radiation tri-foil looks like a scared ghost. Could it be possible to make it both a radiation tri-foil and a skull? I was thinking the same thing about the tri-foil. I think it looks good now but I wonder if it can look scarier. Anyway, good job on the poster! You may have already sold me on the film.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:09
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:I thought the trailer was neat, it got played in the front of Cabin In The Woods in this area. Am I correct in thinking it'll be The Hills Have Eyes in Pripyat? Thanks, we did that too. I saw Cabin in the Woods but purposefully stayed outside until right before it started to avoid our trailer. I've seen it enough. I haven't seen The Hills Have Eyes though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:20
|
|
|
kiimo posted:So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. Awesome poster. Is the movie a found footage flick?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:31
|
|
|
Slasherfan posted:Awesome poster. Is the movie a found footage flick? I feel like this term has become nearly too blurry to even be used any more. It is kind of like calling Modern Family or The Office a faux documentary because they use OTFs. So I guess they answer is yes but it isn't tied to the rules on that. By the way if you see this and hate it I apologize in advance.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:42
|
|
|
kiimo posted:So here's our new one. This film got snatched up and fast-tracked and we had to turn this around super fast with Alcon. I honestly think the poster is rather striking, but everything about this film makes me want to run for the ferris wheel and take up a good sniper position.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
kiimo posted:I feel like this term has become nearly too blurry to even be used any more. It is kind of like calling Modern Family or The Office a faux documentary because they use OTFs. Well, The Office used to be a faux documentary but that angle was dropped long ago and now the cameras are so omnipresent it's more a taped comedy that allows 4th wall breaking.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2012 01:58
|
|
