|
you know how when u take a dump it's like "yeah that smells like poo poo, but it's my poo poo" but when anyone else takes a dump it's "eww wtf is that lovely smell" that's how programmers argue about languages, methodologies, and environments
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 21:55 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:21 |
|
Deuterieux posted:i skipped the lat few pages. are all programming languages, methodologies, and development environments still unmitigated pieces of poo poo? much like your POSTING i barely GNU her! posted:"yeah that smells like poo poo, but it's my poo poo"
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 21:57 |
|
everyone who doesn't write their programs by physically soldering together big old NAND gates and D type flip flops that they keep in a bucket in the corner needs to get out and learn to code in a real physical giant loving physical programming language
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:03 |
|
i barely GNU her! posted:you know how when u take a dump it's like "yeah that smells like poo poo, but it's my poo poo"
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:14 |
|
its weird when you take a poo poo forget about it walk back in a minute later are grossed out by the smell then realise it's yours conflicted is a word that springs to mind
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:42 |
|
echinopsis posted:its weird when you take a poo poo what what
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:53 |
|
if its yellow let it mellow if its brown let it sit around
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:55 |
|
not flushing the toilet when you take a piss because you want to pretend you're a conservationist and are protecting the environment is the most moronic liberal guilt bullshit i've ever heard of
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 22:57 |
|
ahhh spiders posted:not flushing the toilet when you take a piss because you want to pretend you're a conservationist and are protecting the environment is the most moronic liberal guilt bullshit i've ever heard of but lol@ rurals live in a city morans
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 23:42 |
|
BonzoESC posted:in rural places with self-contained septic systems it's not a liberal guilt thing but a legit practical thing to do so you don't have to call the honey wagon as often if that were the case why wouldn't you have a dual-flush toilet
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 23:49 |
|
ahhh spiders posted:if that were the case why wouldn't you have a dual-flush toilet
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 23:51 |
|
erlang and haskell are cool cause you can spray poo poo across all your rooms simultaneously and are notified when you miss a spot, without the global poo poo smearing taking a poo poo
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:38 |
|
tinselt0wn posted:erlang and haskell are cool cause you can spray poo poo across all your rooms simultaneously and are notified when you miss a spot, without the global poo poo smearing taking a poo poo Haha, yeah, but how about explaining it without using an analogy that involves your posting?
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:45 |
|
i only do verilog and sometimes perl or ruby, and systemverilog which is to verilog as objective c is to c, well that's my post
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:50 |
|
ahhh spiders posted:Haha, yeah, but how about explaining it without using an analogy that involves your posting?
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:53 |
|
poo poo I read that wrong
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:54 |
|
my posting is single threaded for yospos
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 00:58 |
|
Janin posted:haskell is awesome if you want to write high-performance (lol, erlang) servers that don't crash, or if you want to have a nicer interface to some gnarly old C/C++/Python/Lua/etc library, or you are working on an extremely constrained environment and want to write a program with guaranteed-fixed memory allocation and cpu time, or or or or ... seryospost, for a lot of task Haskell appears to become thunk heaven, and it gets very hard to get good performance and/or good profiling out of it because it's pretyt hard to get profiling working at all without messing up with the lazy semantics of the language. When you get some performance problems (usually related to memory), the act of trying to profile the code or ad debugging info is often enough to solve the problem, but then you don't want to ship code that's running in debug mode and welp Haskell gets really lovely hard to make work well for certain classes of serious things.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 02:23 |
|
lmao if your program isn't simply a collection of smaller single-purpose programs that talk to each other using character streams that can have their parallelism managed by the os
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 04:55 |
|
rotor posted:lmao if your program isn't simply a collection of smaller single-purpose programs that talk to each other using character streams that can have their parallelism managed by the os my system doesn't have an os
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:16 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:my system doesn't have an os then use windows instead of linuxes
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:18 |
|
rotor posted:lmao if your program isn't simply a collection of smaller single-purpose programs that talk to each other using character streams that can have their parallelism managed by the os
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:21 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:my system doesn't have an os
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:23 |
|
if you got no os idunno just write some bytes or some poo poo I ain't give a gently caress
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:24 |
|
nigga so poor he ain't even got an os, drat, it hard for a po white man to get ahead in obamas america
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:26 |
|
haskell is old news the only reason anyone says anything good about it is that we don't have a new hotness yet. for free i will share what the Next Big Thing will look like: language support for bloom filters, tries, and sharding. maybe some other things that you can do perfectly well with one or at most two arrays. it will not support arrays.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 05:32 |
|
MononcQc posted:seryospost, for a lot of task Haskell appears to become thunk heaven, and it gets very hard to get good performance and/or good profiling out of it because it's pretyt hard to get profiling working at all without messing up with the lazy semantics of the language.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:05 |
|
Janin posted:this is easily solved by spending more than like twenty minutes learning the language pffff. pass.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:10 |
|
i think janin is trying to troll but its p difficult to separate his real wrongposts from the fake ones
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:19 |
|
Janin posted:this is easily solved by spending more than like twenty minutes learning the language
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:24 |
|
Gazpacho posted:worse is better, you will never sell a language that depends on a graduate CS education to get started vs. one in which you can write "og say print stuff to screen" code:
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:28 |
|
main = do
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:37 |
|
lmao
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:37 |
|
I mean honestly
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 06:37 |
|
Janin posted:
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:02 |
|
main = doo-doo imo
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:06 |
|
rotor posted:maine = doo-doo imo
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:11 |
|
main = pee main = pee main = do main = do putStrLn "it is a bad language"
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:13 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:main = pee
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:15 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:21 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:haskell is old news the only reason anyone says anything good about it is that we don't have a new hotness yet. for free i will share what the Next Big Thing will look like: language support for bloom filters, tries, and sharding. maybe some other things that you can do perfectly well with one or at most two arrays. it will not support arrays. another event-based single-threaded network server. this time it uses blitzbasic
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 07:56 |