|
Gursky is awesome. Speaking of that, someone post some awesome tableu photographers. I'm well into it atm.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 17:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 11:32 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I don't think those are banal at all. Gursky is banal. A photo of a random wall is banal. Those are well executed landscapes of an exotic location. That is not banal. Don't assume, and don't tell people not to post based on those assumptions. They're not landscapes, nor are they trying to be exotic. Given that you think Gurksy is 'banal', all signs point towards you being unable to comprehend a photograph beyond the obvious.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 17:55 |
|
I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. Gursky's work explores a lot of banality, we even had a discussion on it in the early pages of this thread. Bottom Liner fucked around with this message at 18:01 on Apr 27, 2012 |
# ? Apr 27, 2012 17:57 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. Jesus Christ you're an idiot. Stop posting. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 17:59 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. Why not just not post when you don't understand something instead of being dismissive of an entire genre?
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:01 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. Oh yeah, because we are the ones randomly talking poo poo about stuff we don't understand. Why don't you go make a whiny QCS thread about it? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:01 |
|
Ok please shut up as of now.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:02 |
|
Well seeing as I am a regular poster of actual content for this thread and I posted my opinions on the matter in a much more mature way than you guys are acting here, how about you all go away? <--- sweet title, glad you guys care so much. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:03 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. How does one discuss "its been done."? It's not a critique of the pictures, it's just you dismissing the pictures because it's not new and exciting. Have a worth while opinion that is worth discussing and then there will be discussion. Here is an example: Personally I liked the colour palette used. Even though I wasn't a huge fan of some of the pictures. 1,2, and 4 were my favorites. See, that is something that can be discussed. Why did I like those ones, and not some of the others? What about the palette appealed to me. I didn't just vomit a lovely opinion then furiously back pedal when called on it. Edit: Bottom Liner posted:Well seeing as I am a regular poster of actual content for this thread and I posted my opinions on the matter in a much more mature way than you guys are acting here, how about you all go away? So posting in this thread give you the privilege of poo poo posting and telling other (larger) contributers to get out? Noted. Anything else that being King of this thread entitles you to? Editedit: Bottom Liner posted:(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:04 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:Well seeing as I am a regular poster of actual content for this thread and I posted my opinions on the matter in a much more mature way than you guys are acting here, how about you all go away? Okay, actual effort: those photos are very interesting examinations of density vs. open space. That's a much more interesting angle on Hong Kong than viewing it as an exotic other. Less effort: Who are you to tell people you've contributed more to this thread than others? http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3229836&userid=40451 http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3229836&userid=92483 In summary: (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:12 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:Ok please shut up as of now. This wasn't a suggestion.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:18 |
|
One of the best series I've found recently, in both content and execution; Eric Valli: Off the Grid quote:There are growing number of people http://www.ericvalli.com/index.php?/stories/off-the-grid/
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 18:24 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:One of the best series I've found recently, in both content and execution; I love these - it gives your imagination room to design explanations or stories to support the image.
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 19:10 |
|
They look like stills from movies in the 70's.. especially the one with the mountains. Urge to fiddle with white balance is almost impossible to resist!
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 19:18 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:
|
# ? Apr 27, 2012 20:50 |
|
http://www.americanelegy.com/an-interview-with-tom-wik/ This guys work owns.
|
# ? Apr 28, 2012 08:21 |
|
More sweet lanscape stuff. I like the clean minimalist lines in "white noise" and "tunnels". http://www.sandermeisner.nl/
|
# ? Apr 29, 2012 23:40 |
|
Continuing my streak of not being a regular contributor: Steven Brooks has a pretty awesome series called American Pickup:
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 20:12 |
|
Reichstag posted:Lars Tunbjörk m4mbo posted:I think you're thinking about exactitudes...http://www.exactitudes.com/ These are both great, thank you.
|
# ? Apr 30, 2012 23:17 |
|
Christian Stoll: Doer of Amazing Photo Stuff. edit: changed to timg, didn't realize these were so huge...
|
# ? May 1, 2012 01:31 |
|
That's a wacky update to how timg functions. In some ways it's cool, in others, I liked having big images open in a new tab better.
|
# ? May 1, 2012 03:09 |
|
dukeku posted:Continuing my streak of not being a regular contributor: I wasn't paying attention to what thread I was in and thought this was your stuff.
|
# ? May 1, 2012 03:55 |
|
xzzy posted:That's a wacky update to how timg functions. In some ways it's cool, in others, I liked having big images open in a new tab better. Whoa...I didn't even notice that until you mentioned it. Odd, but neat. ThisQuietReverie posted:I wasn't paying attention to what thread I was in and thought this was your stuff. (glad I wasn't the only one)
|
# ? May 1, 2012 04:29 |
|
Eh, that stuff is 6x6 Dukeku is a 6x7ist.
|
# ? May 1, 2012 06:53 |
|
Really creative double exposure work http://andredefreitas.com/Double-Exposures
|
# ? May 1, 2012 08:28 |
|
Tokihiro Sato - 3 hour exposures on 8x10: and also some interesting pinhole work: taken with this camera: MrBlandAverage fucked around with this message at 16:27 on May 1, 2012 |
# ? May 1, 2012 16:23 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:Really creative double exposure work These are so drat cool. I really wish my 60d could do this natively.
|
# ? May 1, 2012 17:07 |
|
Falco posted:These are so drat cool. I really wish my 60d could do this natively. Time to upgrade to a 5d3!
|
# ? May 1, 2012 17:11 |
|
Paragon8 posted:Time to upgrade to a 5d3! Or any edition of Photoshop with layers. Seriously, in camera multiexposures are hard. Those ones are done in post.
|
# ? May 1, 2012 20:27 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:Really creative double exposure work These are not double exposures. They're reflections on a window. I remember reading about the photographer and I'm pretty sure he said they were reflections.
|
# ? May 2, 2012 00:06 |
|
Santa is strapped posted:These are not double exposures. They're reflections on a window. I remember reading about the photographer and I'm pretty sure he said they were reflections. Makes sense.
|
# ? May 2, 2012 01:00 |
|
Hyungwon Kang: Store owners defend their property as gunfire breaks out in Koreatown at Western Avenue and 5th Street on April 30 From a multi-photographer gallery of images from the 1992 LA riots at framework.latimes.com
|
# ? May 2, 2012 01:08 |
|
Santa is strapped posted:These are not double exposures. They're reflections on a window. I remember reading about the photographer and I'm pretty sure he said they were reflections. Wow, that's crazy. I assumed it was done in post as well, but that's genius.
|
# ? May 2, 2012 01:57 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:Wow, that's crazy. I assumed it was done in post as well, but that's genius. Hmm, now that I'm looking at the whole set, some do look like they are double exposures - these ones in particular: and some others as well. May be I was confused as to which photographer said that. Hmm... unless he was carrying a piece of glass with him and held it between the subjects.
|
# ? May 2, 2012 05:18 |
|
dukeku posted:Continuing my streak of not being a regular contributor: This is interesting, I like it a lot. It has given me some inspiration for a project...
|
# ? May 2, 2012 05:26 |
|
Here's some portraits from the newly scanned Gemini photos. Rest of the stuff is here in hi-res. http://tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/ Lots of shots of the spacecraft/earth.
|
# ? May 3, 2012 07:01 |
|
East Lake posted:Here's some portraits from the newly scanned Gemini photos. All of these. I want them in my room.
|
# ? May 3, 2012 08:48 |
|
I, Butthole posted:All of these. I want them in my room. Totally agreed. Although don't you know that it was all filmed in a studio anyway? (just trying to prod the conspiracy theorists)
|
# ? May 3, 2012 14:28 |
|
East Lake posted:Here's some portraits from the newly scanned Gemini photos. They have this nice film-look. I really, really dig them.
|
# ? May 3, 2012 18:25 |
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2024 11:32 |
|
East Lake posted:
|
# ? May 4, 2012 02:08 |