|
I don't understand why the deer has a zombie head stuck on it's antlers.
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 19:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
Hahahaha that bear totally holding a hand. This is awesome.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 19:54
|
|
|
This is what that Branden Fraser family comedy from a year ago should have been.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 19:59
|
|
|
I like to imagine that shotgun barrel keeps going to comedic lengths.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 20:00
|
|
|
Cartoon Man posted:This is what that Branden Fraser family comedy from a year ago should have been. I thought that was already a horror film? 
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 20:00
|
|
|
HoldYourFire posted:I thought that was already a horror film? Geez, he looks like a Rob Botten creation.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 20:36
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Geez, he looks like a Rob Botten creation. Now that you mention that, it looks like that kid melting in the '80s remake of The Blob.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 20:45
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Every once in a while you come upon an image that makes you want to just end it all. This falls in that category, not because of a bad photoshop, just because I don't want to live in this world anymore because this exists. You didn't even grab the worst poster for that movie:  NOTHING makes me want to see a movie more than some girl looking at her loving phone!! my buddy Superfly fucked around with this message at 22:52 on May 14, 2012 |
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 21:03
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Every once in a while you come upon an image that makes you want to just end it all. This falls in that category, not because of a bad photoshop, just because I don't want to live in this world anymore because this exists. If it makes you feel better/worse knowing, it's a pretty terrible movie.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 21:13
|
|
|
Vince Videogames posted:You didn't even grab the worst poster for that movie: As I was scrolling down I thought there was an explosion behind her as she's casually texting.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 22:39
|
|
|
Vince Videogames posted:You didn't even grab the worst poster for that movie: Considering the (supposed) target demographic, she's probably having a crazy time and you just can't wait to see what wacky text messages she's getting from her bff!
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 22:50
|
|
|
Why do they need posters for that movie when they've had viral marketers for it ruining every movie I've been to for the past three years.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2012 23:06
|
|
|
Y'know, after Casa de mi Padre, which had no English, and The Artist, which had no words at all, I think audiences are ready for this avant-garde movie which will replace dialogue with texting. Is this also that film where audiences are supposed to send a text at the start to receive supplementary, inner monologue texts from the characterss?kiimo posted:I really want to know if the trailer for this has a voice over and the guy reading it has to say "LOL" at the end.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 01:03
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I really want to know if the trailer for this has a voice over and the guy reading it has to say "LOL" at the end. IN THREE DAYS DISCOVER WHY CRITICS EVERYWHERE ARE SAYING... "OMG" "GTFO HLYSHT" "ROFLMAO" THE MOST LOLOL FILM SINCE LOLLERSKATES EL... "Oh my god no loving way" OH... "You just can't trust a text these days" EL... "Everyone needs a frienemy" LOL. thisfilmisnotyetrated
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 01:21
|
|
|
The two posters are interesting in how different they are. One poster makes me think it's a movie about two friends who do everything together and go to far away places and are BFF's. The second poster makes me think the LOL is short for Lolita.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 01:52
|
|
|
kiimo posted:
TFINYR. Kill me.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 02:11
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:I don't understand why the deer has a zombie head stuck on it's antlers. "Rise of the Mammals Who Are All Relatively Easy to Shoot and Are Probably Mostly Endangered Anyway." I have a script for a similar movie but where the insects rise up, too. The movie lasts about thirty seconds.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 02:26
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:I don't understand why the deer has a zombie head stuck on it's antlers. This reminds me I've always wanted to see a Zombie movie from the prespective of animals. Not featuring the animals as zombies as this seems to, but rather the animals just watching humanity fall to poo poo and going "Guess it's ours now!"
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 02:31
|
|
|
Vince Videogames posted:You didn't even grab the worst poster for that movie: This one was a bomb of epic proportions. Despite a budget reported to be about $11 million, Lionsgate unceremoniously dumped it in about 100 theaters over the May 4-6 weekend (probably because their Hunger Games success would let them eat the loss of production costs, or at least made eating the loss more viable financially than throwing another $10-15 toward trailers, TV spots, prints, etc.) The result? It made about $44k over the weekend nationwide. That's the amount Avengers averaged... per theater. http://news.yahoo.com/lol-miley-cyrus-flop-earned-just-440-per-155600224.html
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 03:50
|
|
|
CRINDY posted:This one was a bomb of epic proportions. Despite a budget reported to be about $11 million, Lionsgate unceremoniously dumped it in about 100 theaters over the May 4-6 weekend (probably because their Hunger Games success would let them eat the loss of production costs, or at least made eating the loss more viable financially than throwing another $10-15 toward trailers, TV spots, prints, etc.) You know how Disney War had that whole chapter about how Hillary Duff got kicked out of Disney because of her crazy mom's demands and then her career fizzled away without them backing her? It looks like Miley Cyrus is entering that same downward spiral.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 04:08
|
|
|
Thank you to two posters above me, you've made everything right again.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 04:34
|
|
|
Lobok posted:"Rise of the Mammals Who Are All Relatively Easy to Shoot and Are Probably Mostly Endangered Anyway." Ridiculous. If cartoons have taught me anything it's that if you get all the bugs to swarm in the shape of a larger bug or something they are unstoppable. Sure a few bees are easy enough, but thousands of bees in the shape of a giant bee or a punching fist?! Or millions of fire ants that rise up to form a human shape or monster! Think big Lobok... the insects did...
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 05:05
|
|
|
CRINDY posted:This one was a bomb of epic proportions. Despite a budget reported to be about $11 million, Lionsgate unceremoniously dumped it in about 100 theaters over the May 4-6 weekend (probably because their Hunger Games success would let them eat the loss of production costs, or at least made eating the loss more viable financially than throwing another $10-15 toward trailers, TV spots, prints, etc.) Well, that makes me feel less like  .Seriously, I hope whoever green lit this learns from it. Mind you, I haven't seen it but if the posters are any indication of the film I am sure it is atrocious.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 05:14
|
|
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:Why do they need posters for that movie when they've had viral marketers for it ruining every movie I've been to for the past three years. Not getting enough love. Neither of those posters make me care about that character. Who passes that by and says "Man I wanna watch that girl apathetically text."
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 08:02
|
|
|
squarerandom posted:Not getting enough love. Neither of those posters make me care about that character. Who passes that by and says "Man I wanna watch that girl apathetically text." Okay, I'll defend the second poster with her on the fuzzy blanket. The movie is Cyrus shaking up her image, with the storyline being about her attempts to lose her virginity. The visual arithmetic in that poster is to show her differently than her Hannah Montana character, and to show her as a girl too involved with her cell phone to even realize that she's supposed to pay attention to the audience; she's too drat self absorbed. I hate self promoting, but I watched it and was part of that 44k, so here's my review of the movie.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 08:38
|
|
|
So Robert Rodriguez just uploaded these on to Facebook. 
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 11:04
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:So Robert Rodriguez just uploaded these on to Facebook. Yeeessssss.... 
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 11:48
|
|
|
Let's see. Coriolanus. Shakespeare adaptation.    Boy, you'd better not give me that artsy-fartsy crap for the Bluray!
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:06
|
|
|
Thanks, now I can post about the DVD release in my Coriolanus thread and cause it to edge slightly closer to two pages. Edit: or maybe I won't bother.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:13
|
|
|
HoldYourFire posted:Thanks, now I can post about the DVD release in my Coriolanus thread and cause it to edge slightly closer to two pages. I'll see it soon and post there, I swear!
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:14
|
|
|
Vince Videogames posted:You didn't even grab the worst poster for that movie:
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:28
|
|
|
spookygonk posted:So is this film title supposed to be as in "laugh out loud" (which everyone, except your gran who has never seen a phone or a computer in her life, knows LOL means) or "lots of love" (which supposedly only David Cameron here in the UK thinks it is)? I think it's the character's nickname.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:30
|
|
|
HoldYourFire posted:I think it's the character's nickname. 
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 12:37
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Let's see. Coriolanus. Shakespeare adaptation. That was a really good movie that already had great posters. Having said that, putting the guns on it may generate more sales. Have there been studies done on this kind of thing?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 15:01
|
|
|
HoldYourFire posted:I think it's the character's nickname. Yup. Her name is Lola. So...everyone calls her LOL (Lawl) gently caress everything about that movie.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 15:04
|
|
|
spamman posted:That was a really good movie that already had great posters. Having said that, putting the guns on it may generate more sales. Have there been studies done on this kind of thing?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 15:06
|
|
|
Stare-Out posted:The second poster is genuinely great, and while the Blu-Ray cover is pretty abysmal, I'm willing to let it slide if it gets more people to see this movie. Of course. I'm not trying to say it's not effective. Having said that, I seriously doubt that the movie inferred by that cover is going to please those particular people.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 15:21
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Of course. I'm not trying to say it's not effective. It's difficult to say. The opening third of the movie might be enough for them. Hopefully then they're intrigued enough to stick with it.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 15:30
|
|
|
spookygonk posted:So is this film title supposed to be as in "laugh out loud" (which everyone, except your gran who has never seen a phone or a computer in her life, knows LOL means) or "lots of love" (which supposedly only David Cameron here in the UK thinks it is)? It ends with LOL spelling out 'Lots of Love' on screen, so that may explain where Cameron got it from.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 16:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 11:33 |
|
|
Macaluso posted:Ridiculous. If cartoons have taught me anything it's that if you get all the bugs to swarm in the shape of a larger bug or something they are unstoppable. Sure a few bees are easy enough, but thousands of bees in the shape of a giant bee or a punching fist?! Or millions of fire ants that rise up to form a human shape or monster! Think big Lobok... the insects did... We could make the movie last longer by having the insects form all kinds of fun shapes, but I meant the movie was over so quickly because the bugs won instantly. Dissapointed Owl posted:Let's see. Coriolanus. Shakespeare adaptation. I wonder how many people would recognize the movie as Shakespeare if they picked this up thinking it was a raucous action film. It's not one of his well-known plays and maybe with the cast, the viewer would just think it's some kind of British talk, like Cockney rhyming slang.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2012 17:10
|
|