Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

Bruce Leroy posted:

To his credit (which physically sickens me to say on his behalf), Tucker Carlson actually made this point on TV once to Ann Coulter who was coming out against gay marriage. He basically said, "If marriage is such a wonderful, civilizing institution, why wouldn't you want more people like gays to take part in it to make them better people and better couples?"

Really? I thought Ann Coulter's (tepid) support of gays was one of her only redeeming qualities. Pretty sure she wasn't allowed to come to CPAC this year (or last?) because of her support of GOProud and gay marriage.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.
Man...subsidized vacations for the poor? I want to know more.

Something like subsidizing trips to domestic destinations in the off-season (not necessarily Alaska-in-January off-season) could benefit a lot of people.

The Bunk
Sep 15, 2007

Oh, I just don't know
where to begin.
Fun Shoe

Soviet Commubot posted:

Well, I've lived in France for two years now and I just ran into my first instance of :bahgawd: CANARD VEINARD (lucky ducky):bahgawd:



Quick and dirty translation:

[quote]Man I'd love to switch! How is it that full timeworkers get up every morning, struggle to get through each month, almost never go on vacation and can't take good care of themselves while people who do nothing get free housing through APL, can sleep in, goes on vacation every year with the nice CAF vacations and can take care of themselves thanks to CMU better than a worker who can't get any of that!!!!! So let's help the producers (he said workers but producers is a good GOP equivalent talking point) for a France that moves forward and puts these losers to work!!!! I'd like to know who dares to copy this message and share it![quote]

A couple things:

Unless you live in a cardboard box the APL is not paying for all of your housing. I get about 130 EUR a month from it, if you are under 25 you can get a bit more but not a whole lot.

The CAF (Caisse d'allocation familiales) has some sort of subsidized vacation program for poor people but again, it definitely isn't free.

I have a really hard time seeing how someone working full time in France isn't getting their healthcare needs taken care of.

So don't feel too bad about crazy assholes like this in the States, they're pretty much everywhere.

e: The best part is that the guy who posted this is unemployed but gets taken care of by his well off parents.

The funny thing is the writer (assuming the original writer has a job) gets at least 5 weeks paid time off per year. Most Americans would kill for that - except, I suppose, for the half who would oppose it simply because it was mandated by the Government

King Dopplepopolos
Aug 3, 2007

Give us a raise, loser!

Sarion posted:

Really? I thought Ann Coulter's (tepid) support of gays was one of her only redeeming qualities. Pretty sure she wasn't allowed to come to CPAC this year (or last?) because of her support of GOProud and gay marriage.

It might have been earlier in her career. Maybe her position on gays "evolved" like Obama's. :v:

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Strudel Man posted:

If that's the actual math behind the number, that'd genuinely be dishonest statistics, since the savings would have continued to accumulate beyond those four months if not halted. Anything with an upfront cost and extended savings will be revenue-negative if terminated early.

This, however, could be an explanation. If an application period is 6 months, then you'd have ~$730 per family per half-year, which is at least in the ballpark of the $670 per applicant.

edit: Ah. Well, it's slightly more complicated than we might like, for the purposes of calculating costs.


So, either six months or a year, depending on what they do.

Based on this, the most favorable calculation of the program cost would seem to be:

148 people (108 failing, 40 canceling) denied an average of $1460 in benefits, for a gross savings of $216,080
4046 people reimbursed ~$30 for a negative test, for a gross cost of $118,140
Net savings of $97,940. ($23.74 per potential applicant)

The least favorable would be:

108 people denied $670 (assuming this is a 6-month sum based on information I'm not privy to) in benefits, for a gross savings of $72,360
4046 people reimbursed ~$30 for a negative test, for a gross cost of $118,140
Net cost of $45,780 ($11.09 per potential applicant)

So, yeah. Statistics. Unfortunately, often not as cut-and-dried as we'd wish. Worth noting, though, that even in the most favorable interpretation, the amount that the state saves per applicant is less than the amount of money that goes to to the testing company.

How many times are people tested though? If they're tested every 6 months or whatever, then the costs will go up. It's not very likely that those that passed before are going to fail now.

Soviet Commubot
Oct 22, 2008


VideoTapir posted:

Man...subsidized vacations for the poor? I want to know more.

Something like subsidizing trips to domestic destinations in the off-season (not necessarily Alaska-in-January off-season) could benefit a lot of people.

If you can read French here you go. The quotient familial is the result of some formula and not the family's gross income. It sounds pretty low but even without the APL my rent, utilities and food bills were only about 450 EUR/month. Right now my bills are only about 320 EUR per month.

http://www.caf.fr/web/Web681.nsf/VueLien/BONSVACANCES?opendocument

Sulphuric Sundae
Feb 10, 2006

You can't go in there.
Your father is dead.


Posted by a Facebook friend, with the comment "I don't know about you? But I find it disturbing!"
Responding to let her know that last I checked, bibles weren't banned in school, and you'll get in trouble if you're reading anything personal when you should be doing schoolwork. Buuuuut she won't listen.

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

King Dopplepopolos posted:

It might have been earlier in her career. Maybe her position on gays "evolved" like Obama's. :v:

I think you mean her position was intelligently redesigned. :colbert:


Sulphuric Sundae posted:



Posted by a Facebook friend, with the comment "I don't know about you? But I find it disturbing!"
Responding to let her know that last I checked, bibles weren't banned in school, and you'll get in trouble if you're reading anything personal when you should be doing schoolwork. Buuuuut she won't listen.

It's actually even more stupid than that; I read the Bible in public school as part of my school work! It was even the Creation story in Genesis! It was in my World History class in 10th grade; we read a bunch of Creation myths from around the Ancient world. Not that they will care. The fact that kids can read the Bible in school, read parts of the Bible as school work, learn about Christianity, and can even pray any time they feel like it does not matter. The narrative is that schools are godless hell-holes that hate Christianity and want it to be destroyed; anything less than that must be false.


Also, prisons aren't actually Government Institutions. They're privately run institutions that get contracts from the Government which pays them per prisoner. There's an entire "prison industry" in the United States. Since they get paid per prisoner, its no surprise that these companies lobby for stricter laws with longer prison sentences, and have even been known to bribe judges to get more prisoners sent their way.

This may vary from State to State though.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

King Dopplepopolos posted:

It might have been earlier in her career. Maybe her position on gays "evolved" like Obama's. :v:

No, she only switched tones when GoProud (literally the worst gays) invited her to their big gay con where she mocked them for being gay and said gay marriage isn't a civil right and they paid and defended her proudly.

The_Rob
Feb 1, 2007

Blah blah blah blah!!
Didn't she also call John Edwards a human being?

Zero_Grade
Mar 18, 2004

Darktider 🖤🌊

~Neck Angels~

"Canard Veinard" is pretty cool sounding, like some sort of super-fancy insult.

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

Finally saw a liberal image posted on facebook, and it's relevant to the earlier discussion...


Strudel Man
May 19, 2003
ROME DID NOT HAVE ROBOTS, FUCKWIT

Taerkar posted:

How many times are people tested though? If they're tested every 6 months or whatever, then the costs will go up. It's not very likely that those that passed before are going to fail now.
Based on the statute, it's only when you first apply.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


Sarion posted:

Finally saw a liberal image posted on facebook, and it's relevant to the earlier discussion...




I saw that on a bumper sticker but with "Foreign Born" instead of "Brown Skinned" which I think is better.

The Macaroni
Dec 20, 2002
...it does nothing.

Bruce Leroy posted:

23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
Oh, there's hilarity with that too. A lot of American Christians claim that "the Eye of the Needle" is actually a reference to an extremely narrow and low gate to the city of Jerusalem. As legend had it, the only way a camel laden with goods and riches could pass through the eye of the needle was to get on its knees. So you see, it's fine to be rich and enter the Kingdom of God as long as you're penitent!

2 problems:

1. Camels can get on their knees, but then they can't actually move forward. Especially if they're carrying something.
2. There was never a tiny, poorly-built gate called "the Eye of the Needle" in the city wall at Jerusalem.

King Dopplepopolos
Aug 3, 2007

Give us a raise, loser!

The Macaroni posted:

Oh, there's hilarity with that too. A lot of American Christians claim that "the Eye of the Needle" is actually a reference to an extremely narrow and low gate to the city of Jerusalem. As legend had it, the only way a camel laden with goods and riches could pass through the eye of the needle was to get on its knees. So you see, it's fine to be rich and enter the Kingdom of God as long as you're penitent!

2 problems:

1. Camels can get on their knees, but then they can't actually move forward. Especially if they're carrying something.
2. There was never a tiny, poorly-built gate called "the Eye of the Needle" in the city wall at Jerusalem.

I've heard that according to Israeli tour guides, the only people who ask them where the Eye of the Needle is (as if it were an actual place and not just a metaphor) are American evangelical Christians. Colour me surprised. :v:

Prosperity Gospel proponents remind me of alcoholics that swear up and down that they actually drive better when they're drunk.

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


The Macaroni posted:

Oh, there's hilarity with that too. A lot of American Christians claim that "the Eye of the Needle" is actually a reference to an extremely narrow and low gate to the city of Jerusalem. As legend had it, the only way a camel laden with goods and riches could pass through the eye of the needle was to get on its knees. So you see, it's fine to be rich and enter the Kingdom of God as long as you're penitent!

2 problems:

1. Camels can get on their knees, but then they can't actually move forward. Especially if they're carrying something.
2. There was never a tiny, poorly-built gate called "the Eye of the Needle" in the city wall at Jerusalem.

It's also absurd since the guy was totally willing to be penitent and follow Jesus he just didn't want to give up all his stuff so even their bad explanation fails the parable.

Shimrra Jamaane
Aug 10, 2007

Obscure to all except those well-versed in Yuuzhan Vong lore.
Was prosperity theology an invention of American Evangelicalism?

Unzip and Attack
Mar 3, 2008

USPOL May

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Was prosperity theology an invention of American Evangelicalism?

Not really. The notion started with Weber.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Was prosperity theology an invention of American Evangelicalism?

No, it's been a thing forever, the puritans were huge on it.

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

Shimrra Jamaane posted:

Was prosperity theology an invention of American Evangelicalism?

No. It seems to have sprung from the "Healing Revival" movement in the 1950s. They were separate from the Evangelical Revivals that are better known from that time period. But I suspect the two theologies, if you can even call Prosperity Gospel a theology (its a loving scam), have some level of cross-pollination. They've become hugely popular and have become a big part of televangelism. And most of the ones I see on TV certainly seem to support the same things that Evangelicals do, but with more focus on "send me money, god will send you cash in the mail"; rather than "pray the gay away". But many of the arguments that are used to support the Prosperity Gospel (like the BS about the Camel and the eye of the needle) are useful to Conservatives who need a way to justify the fact that their political beliefs are the complete opposite of what Jesus told them to do.

One of the responses to that image I posted from Facebook was something to effect of "But Jesus' socialism was all about choice. Choosing to give to the poor and help the sick." You know, because God is all about his commandments and teachings being optional.



On another note; have I mentioned lately how much I love the NRA? :allears:

Sarion fucked around with this message at 21:40 on Jun 15, 2012

Dr Snofeld
Apr 30, 2009

The Macaroni posted:

Oh, there's hilarity with that too. A lot of American Christians claim that "the Eye of the Needle" is actually a reference to an extremely narrow and low gate to the city of Jerusalem. As legend had it, the only way a camel laden with goods and riches could pass through the eye of the needle was to get on its knees. So you see, it's fine to be rich and enter the Kingdom of God as long as you're penitent!

2 problems:

1. Camels can get on their knees, but then they can't actually move forward. Especially if they're carrying something.
2. There was never a tiny, poorly-built gate called "the Eye of the Needle" in the city wall at Jerusalem.

The way I always heard it was that "camel" was a mistranslation of "rope." This explanation makes more sense - the correctly translated phrase means the same thing but is less of a non-sequiteur.

babies havin rabies
Feb 24, 2006

All of it goes back to the Protestant work ethic.

ducttape
Mar 1, 2008

Dr Snofeld posted:

The way I always heard it was that "camel" was a mistranslation of "rope." This explanation makes more sense - the correctly translated phrase means the same thing but is less of a non-sequiteur.

In greek kamilos (καμιλοσ) means rope (or the better cognate 'cable'), and kamelos (καμηλοσ) means camel.

tek79
Jun 16, 2008

Sarion posted:

On another note; have I mentioned lately how much I love the NRA? :allears:

I know the NRA is full steam ahead in their marketing efforts to get members to mash the donate button as many times as possible before Obama leaves office, but has the Obama administration enacted any legitimate anti-gun anything? The only thing I can remember is some non-issue about M1 Garand's not being allowed back into the U.S. from Korea, and some rider attached to a bill that allowed concealed carry in national forests (presumably a good thing for 2nd amendment rights).

Also, isn't a lot of that stuff on the wallet card poo poo he supported as a senator, and is pretty much completely toxic politically speaking as POTUS?

Edit: Hey look, I answered my own question: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/jun/15/nra-right-obama-coming-our-guns/

tek79 fucked around with this message at 23:14 on Jun 15, 2012

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Sarion posted:

On another note; have I mentioned lately how much I love the NRA? :allears:

99% of gun stores are near schools and parks and poo poo? How would someone think that's a good thing?

CellBlock
Oct 6, 2005

It just don't stop.



Glitterbomber posted:

99% of gun stores are near schools and parks and poo poo? How would someone think that's a good thing?

Around here (and I can almost see NRA HQ as I type this if I look out the window), a "gun store" is anything from a shady pawn shop, to Wal-mart, to an actual gun dealer who doesn't sell anything but gun stuff.

If you designate enough parkland and build enough schools, it's easy for most of those places to fall near one, especially if the threshold is something like 250 yards.

TapTheForwardAssist
Apr 9, 2007

Pretty Little Lyres
I was thinking about some of the "white people are second-class citizens!" whining from a few pages back, plus some of the "the gay minority dictating to the conservative majority is Just Like Aparthedi" moaning from Freep.

It got me to pondering some sarcastic shows of support, and I was thinking maybe some of these might work in deliberately cheesy macros for Facebook, with some sort of title like When Will the White Americans Have Their Day??? and some patriotic imagery.

If anyone likes making goofy macros and thinks some of this has potential, hit me up on PMs:

quote:

Did you know?

- Hetero acts, even in the privacy of the home, were prohibited in more than 15 states through 2004 when those laws were struck down by the Supreme Court. Regardless, those laws remain on the books, unenforced, in six states!!!

- Holidays vital to white culture receive no federal recognition, requiring White Americans to work through such deeply held holidays as St. Patrick's Day, Walpurgis Night, and Leif Erickson Day. Similarly, Christian holidays such as Ash Wednesday are ignored while federal employees are given four-day weekends for the Muslim Eid ul-Fitr and for Cesar Chavez Day!!!

- Out of 44 presidents, only president Eisenhower was of white descent (Martin Van Buren was half-white on his mother's side), and only Kennedy was a Christian. There are no presidents in US history recognized as straight, though some historians posit that Taft, Coolidge, and Kennedy may have had covert relationships with female members of their staff.

- While calls for White Entertainment Television have been labeled "divisive" and "unnecessary", the fact remains that in surveys of prime-time programming, only 12% of programming time depicts white characters. Worse, more than three-quarters of those depictions are neutral or negative, with whites being type-cast as "hicks", prisoners and/or prison guards, investment bankers, or folksingers.

- Drugs popular with non-whites, such as marihuana, opium, and cough syrup routinely incur prison sentences of one-quarter the length of those arrested for drugs popular in the white community, such as Tylenol+Codeine, merlot, and clove cigarettes.

Strudel Man
May 19, 2003
ROME DID NOT HAVE ROBOTS, FUCKWIT

Glitterbomber posted:

99% of gun stores are near schools and parks and poo poo? How would someone think that's a good thing?
Within five miles? I could easily believe that. There's a lot of parks and schools out there, after all. It's the same thing that forces convicted sex offenders to live under bridges.

Bruce Leroy
Jun 10, 2010

Sarion posted:

Really? I thought Ann Coulter's (tepid) support of gays was one of her only redeeming qualities. Pretty sure she wasn't allowed to come to CPAC this year (or last?) because of her support of GOProud and gay marriage.

Nope, she's still against gay marriage and GOProud works with her anyways.

Ann Coulter 04/06/2012 posted:

"Most of us learn how a bill becomes law and what the supreme court does in grade school. Liberals are often trying to push this idea that judicial review means overturning any act of Congress. Or rather judicial activism. Judicial activism is anything when the Supreme Court doesn’t obey what the constitution says — like when they invent rights to gay marriage or rights to abortion or rights to go free if a specific Miranda warning wasn’t read to them. Normally you get the opposite from liberals, because whatever they can’t get through the process of democracy by having people vote on it, they get five justices on the Supreme Court to announce it’s a constitutional right. You only have judicial activism on the left, never from the conservative justices or they would be fantasizing a constitutional right to a flat tax, to bear nuclear arms."

Read more: http://www.towleroad.com/2012/04/coulterhannity.html#ixzz1xulZflYD

When they first got criticized by other gay advocacy groups for working with a bigot like Coulter, GOProud went into this whole big rant about how it's liberal gay activists who are the real bigots because liberals are insisting on "ideological purity" by only associating with gay marriage and gay rights advocates and demonize anyone who doesn't. This is pretty much the same as their criticism of the Log Cabin Republicans, which GOProud split from because the LCRs also insisted on prioritizing gay issues and calling out other conservatives on their anti-gay views and behaviors. GOProud also said some bullshit about how liberals are bigots because they demonize gay Republicans just like they do Black Republicans.

I originally saw it on Right Wing Watch but I'm having trouble finding the original entry.

A Fancy 400 lbs
Jul 24, 2008
What? How is not associating with people who oppose your main cause bad? Ideological purity can be taken too far, but when you go in the opposite direction to working with people who outright want to stop your main ideal what's the point?

Dr Christmas
Apr 24, 2010

Berninating the one percent,
Berninating the Wall St.
Berninating all the people
In their high rise penthouses!
🔥😱🔥🔫👴🏻
Despite whatever anti-gay stiff may or may not be festering In his cesspool, Andrew Breitbart worked for GOProud for a while, before leaving when they revenge-outed a Rick Perry advisor.
They did something so hateful and personally destructive that it offended Andrew loving Breitbart.

Also, Ann Coulter wasn't showing a change of heart by joining GOProud. She was basically hired by GOProud to insult them to their faces at their own functions.

GOProud is weird.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
^^^Andrew left to avoid flack because he was the first one people looked to when the news 'creepy rear end in a top hat invades privacy for political gain' hit, there are some dangling threads that he could have been fully aware of it when it happened too. He wasn't 'disgusted' with it, he bailed to avoid losing his one 'I'm not a bigot...' shield in 'I like the gays! Mostly! As long as they don't disagree with me!'

A Fancy 400 lbs posted:

What? How is not associating with people who oppose your main cause bad? Ideological purity can be taken too far, but when you go in the opposite direction to working with people who outright want to stop your main ideal what's the point?

Because tolerate my intolerance, also tax breaks.

Just to be clear, GOProud is currently headed by a straight woman, it's basically 99.9% wealthy white gays, and is basically everything that's disgusting in the gay advocacy fields in one neat package.

Guilty Spork
Feb 26, 2011

Thunder rolled. It rolled a six.

Dr Christmas posted:

Despite whatever anti-gay stiff may or may not be festering In his cesspool, Andrew Breitbart worked for GOProud for a while, before leaving when they revenge-outed a Rick Perry advisor.
They did something so hateful and personally destructive that it offended Andrew loving Breitbart.
The only way that I can make any sense of that is to go with the idea that Breitbart operated on a different set of rules for fellow conservatives (something more like a decent human being would have for everyone) than liberals.

e: Or it was just totally cynical and shallow. There's always that.

VideoTapir
Oct 18, 2005

He'll tire eventually.

Sarion posted:



Also, prisons aren't actually Government Institutions. They're privately run institutions that get contracts from the Government which pays them per prisoner. There's an entire "prison industry" in the United States. Since they get paid per prisoner, its no surprise that these companies lobby for stricter laws with longer prison sentences, and have even been known to bribe judges to get more prisoners sent their way.

This may vary from State to State though.

It does vary from state to state, but private prisons only hold about 10 percent of inmates. That is enough to create a lobby for harsher sentences, which benefits them even if they don't get all of it. (Also, increasing pubic prison populations increases their ability to manufacture demand for private ones.)

Publicly-owned prisons can be partially privatized in various ways, though (prison industries and such).

Choadmaster
Oct 7, 2004

I don't care how snug they fit, you're nuts!

Sulphuric Sundae posted:



Posted by a Facebook friend, with the comment "I don't know about you? But I find it disturbing!"
Responding to let her know that last I checked, bibles weren't banned in school, and you'll get in trouble if you're reading anything personal when you should be doing schoolwork. Buuuuut she won't listen.

There's so much hosed up sex and violence in the bible that would get any other book banned from elementary schools in a second. But as you say, bibles aren't banned in school at all.

Perhaps the little boy in the picture was crying because he actually did get to read the bible...

Judges 19 posted:

22 While they were enjoying themselves, some of the wicked men of the city surrounded the house. Pounding on the door, they shouted to the old man who owned the house, “Bring out the man who came to your house so we can have sex with him. ”

23 The owner of the house went outside and said to them, “No, my friends, don’t be so vile. Since this man is my guest, don’t do this outrageous thing. 24 Look, here is my virgin daughter, and his concubine. I will bring them out to you now, and you can use them and do to them whatever you wish. But as for this man, don’t do such an outrageous thing.”

25 But the men would not listen to him. So the man took his concubine and sent her outside to them, and they raped her and abused her throughout the night, and at dawn they let her go. 26 At daybreak the woman went back to the house where her master was staying, fell down at the door and lay there until daylight.

27 When her master got up in the morning and opened the door of the house and stepped out to continue on his way, there lay his concubine, fallen in the doorway of the house, with her hands on the threshold. 28 He said to her, “Get up; let’s go.” But there was no answer. Then the man put her on his donkey and set out for home.

29 When he reached home, he took a knife and cut up his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel.

Bruce Leroy
Jun 10, 2010

A Fancy 400 lbs posted:

What? How is not associating with people who oppose your main cause bad? Ideological purity can be taken too far, but when you go in the opposite direction to working with people who outright want to stop your main ideal what's the point?

It's basically the reason GOProud exists at all. They were originally members of the Log Cabin Republicans, but they didn't like how the LCRs were so adamant about gay rights to the point of shunning mainstream right wing figures because they were homophobic bigots. GOProud is for gay rights just like the LCRs but they want so badly to become part of the GOP mainstream (e.g. sponsoring CPAC a couple of years ago, resulting in an even larger anti-gay backlash the year afterwords which prevented them from having any participation in future CPAC events) that they are willing to sideline gay rights issues to gain acceptance from the larger GOP community. So, where the LCRs refuse to associate with anti-gay Republicans even if they agree on all other issues, GOProud will gladly work with them even if it means betraying core issues of gay rights, which are the reasons gay advocacy groups like GOProud are supposed to exist in the first place. GOProud justifies this as some kind of strategy for gay Republicans to gain power and influence in the GOP so that they can later use this political currency to further gay rights, but it rings pretty hollow when the GOP is currently so virulently anti-gay to the point of supporting presidential candidates like Rick Santorum and Ron Paul who are in favor of overturning Lawrence v. Texas and reinstating anti-sodomy laws, and Mitt Romney who has come out strongly against gay and marriage and even civil unions.

My favorite part about GOProud and the Log Cabin Republicans is how they attack Obama and Democrats for not being pro-gay enough, but are completely silent and complicit about being in the party actually championing homophobia and enacting anti-gay legislation.

E.g. http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/gay-conservatives-attack-obama-marriage

Right Wing Watch posted:

After coming out in favor of marriage equality for gays and lesbians, gay conservative groups Log Cabin Republicans and GOProud have attacked the President for his announcement.

Log Cabin Republican’s Executive Director called the move “offensive and callous”:

Log Cabin Republican posted:

“That the president has chosen today, when LGBT Americans are mourning the passage of Amendment One, to finally speak up for marriage equality is offensive and callous,” said R. Clarke Cooper, Log Cabin Republicans Executive Director. “Log Cabin Republicans appreciate that President Obama has finally come in line with leaders like Vice President Dick Cheney on this issue, but LGBT Americans are right to be angry that this calculated announcement comes too late to be of any use to the people of North Carolina, or any of the other states that have addressed this issue on his watch. This administration has manipulated LGBT families for political gain as much as anybody, and after his campaign’s ridiculous contortions to deny support for marriage equality this week he does not deserve praise for an announcement that comes a day late and a dollar short.”

In a similar vein, GOProud called the announcement “cold comfort” for North Carolina’s LGBT community:

GOProud posted:

“It is good to see that after intense political pressure that President Obama has finally come around to the Dick Cheney position on marriage equality. I am sure, however, the President’s newly discovered support for marriage is cold comfort to the gay couples in North Carolina. The President waited until after North Carolina passed a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.”

“This is hardly a profile in courage by President Obama. For years now, President Obama has tried his hardest to have it both ways on this issue.
Meanwhile, Mitt Romney continues to oppose not only marriage equality but also civil unions for same-sex couples.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

Radish posted:

I saw that on a bumper sticker but with "Foreign Born" instead of "Brown Skinned" which I think is better.

Eh, the point that Jesus, assuming he was a real person, is ridicilously unlikely to have been white can't be made enough.

Bruce Leroy
Jun 10, 2010

Orange Devil posted:

Eh, the point that Jesus, assuming he was a real person, is ridicilously unlikely to have been white can't be made enough.

I'm a big fan of The Boondocks and the episode "A Huey Freeman Christmas" has such a great exchange about this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhfZ4BqklU8

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Leospeare
Jun 27, 2003
I lack the ability to think of a creative title.

Bruce Leroy posted:

LCR and GOProud stuff

The phrase "Dick Cheney position" is creepy as all hell.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply