|
rotor posted:where do you even come up with this poo poo?!? oh my god post some lovely band's youtubes about it
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 12:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i didn't know this but i'm not surprised. the useless academics really did a number on 5.4 only because you engineers couldn't get 6.0 to work
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 13:55
|
|
|
there are neither engineers nor academics involved in php 
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 17:24
|
|
|
php is spawned by shitlords
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 18:24
|
|
|
i had to work on a drupal 6 thing and i guess drupal 6 isn't compatible with php 5.3, at least i couldn't figure out how to make it stop spewing infinite errors b/c drupal 6 doesn't know what E_DEPRECATED is. ended up patching the source but it's ok because it was all checked in anyway so the whole site was kind of a drupal fork, except that the guy i was working with also would unpack a drupal tarball into the build dir. one time i wondered what would happen if we didn't have both drupal-in-tarball and drupal-in-svn as part of the build but i figured that whole thing was made of NOT WORTH THE EFFORT and debugged some errors caused by ignoring undefined arary indexes instead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 18:43
|
|
|
dont use drupaul
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 19:44
|
|
|
sometimes you just gotta ram it in there and figure out--yep, there's razor blades in your fleshlight
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 22:35
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:drupaul
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 22:53
|
|
|
Stringent posted:post some lovely band's youtubes about it no need to get all defensive dude, they're just posts
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2012 23:45
|
|
|
homercles posted:use Modern::Perl hope on the cool train choo choo Nah this is better http://p3rl.org/Acme::Very::Modern::Perl or maybe just use5.10.0; use strict; use warnings; like you should
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 09:25
|
|
|
a rly fuckin nice web framework thing im currently using is perl w/ mojolicious. if youre tired of an epically bad language like php, try it out
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 09:32
|
|
|
TiMBuS posted:a rly fuckin nice web framework thing im currently using is perl w/ mojolicious. if youre tired of an epically bad language like php, try it out whats the deal with every web "framework" and its dog coming with its own built in http server these days jesus christ 
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 11:25
|
|
|
are there any good web frameworks/platforms
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 11:29
|
|
|
Rufo posted:whats the deal with every web "framework" and its dog coming with its own built in http server these days jesus christ cuz they're a pita to deploy and every p language has its own special snowflake way of doing it mods namechange posted:are there any good web frameworks/platforms no just different depths of poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 11:44
|
|
|
TiMBuS posted:a rly fuckin nice web framework thing im currently using is perl w/ mojolicious. if youre tired of an epically bad language like php, try it out how does it compare to dancer? i've been tinkering with dancer and it's p much exactly what i want
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 12:18
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:cuz they're a pita to deploy and every p language has its own special snowflake way of doing it just use fastcgi for everything itd be preferable at this point im sure being able to run some command from your shell and get a pos server running on port 6969 is great for playing about with things quickly but its prob raising a generation of devops retards who dont realise they are but one part of the ~stack~
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 12:31
|
|
|
my deployment platform is a screen session, what more do you want?!
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 13:22
|
|
|
Rufo posted:whats the deal with every web "framework" and its dog coming with its own built in http server these days jesus christ for just doing preliminary work, nothing beats an auto-configured built in http server
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 14:11
|
|
|
Casao posted:how does it compare to dancer? i've been tinkering with dancer and it's p much exactly what i want its also infinitely better for debugging. even has a LWP replacement for testing. it owns. Rufo posted:whats the deal with every web "framework" and its dog coming with its own built in http server these days jesus christ
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2012 14:44
|
|
|
C# Design Patterns on Tekpub has been one of the most illuminating and fun learning experiences I have ever experienced. But goddammit, it has been almost two months since their last video. I'm going to rage.
Shameproof fucked around with this message at 02:10 on Jul 8, 2012 |
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 01:58
|
|
|
mods namechange posted:(open sores) That's a Foxtrot! That irreverence, that wit... I'd recognize it anywhere. Some charlatan has stolen a Foxtrot and passed it off as his own. I can prove it. Quick, to my archives.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 02:18
|
|
|
i havent erally used java for a couple of years for anything and professionally for eevn longer. i started making a program in java (1.7) just this past week and you know what? java is g*d d*mn decent. felt good man
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 10:26
|
|
|
TiMBuS posted:a rly fuckin nice web framework thing im currently using is perl w/ mojolicious. if youre tired of an epically bad language like php, try it out looks cool. reminds me of flask
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 13:19
|
|
|
just use express.js and node if you want true simplicity and ease of development
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 14:47
|
|
|
Wheany posted:i havent erally used java for a couple of years for anything and professionally for eevn longer. i started making a program in java (1.7) just this past week and you know what? java owns
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 16:54
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:just use express.js and node if you want true simplicity and ease of development bookmarking this to look at any time i start thinking i have dumb coworkers. it could be worse
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 18:48
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:just use express.js and node if you want true simplicity and ease of development haha
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 18:56
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:just use express.js and node if you want true simplicity and ease of development yeah maybe that would work if i was writing some bullshit tiny api
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 19:01
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:java owns how to make an empty array of org.javatuples.Triplet: new Triplet<>[]{}; 
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 19:41
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:just use express.js and node if you want true simplicity and ease of development lmao guys is there a good thing to use for setting up documentation & architecture & flowcharts and whateverfor a new project
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 22:32
|
|
|
with the power of Microsoft™ Office 2010® Visio™ for Windows™-based PCs, you can—
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2012 23:32
|
|
|
CaptainMeatpants posted:lmao OmniPlan + OmniFocus + OmniOutliner
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 01:14
|
|
|
what is the big deal about python 3 migration anyway I keep reading people complaining about it also trexeaterofcadrs does groovy 2.0 fix those problems you experienced, we have some jvm integration work coming up and I'd like to use it
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 01:30
|
|
|
Internaut! posted:what is the big deal about python 3 migration anyway
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 01:33
|
|
|
Internaut! posted:what is the big deal about python 3 migration anyway programmers don't like change, except the changes they wanted. (c.f the 'gil') basically all of the people whining don't realise that python 3 is not going to adopted over night. it's only relatively recently become production ready and as a result the major libraries have porting efforts are happening. in reality it isn't so much the shift from python 2.7 to 3, but the shift from 2.4 to 2.7 that is the sticking point. many of the libraries already support multiple versions of python, so they're going to have to drop a few before they support python 3.
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 01:59
|
|
|
tef posted:programmers don't like change, except the changes they wanted. (c.f the 'gil')  i bet ruby 2 won't be nearly as bad because we already have like four different implementations that get used (1.8.7/ree, 1.9.3, jruby, rbx)
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 02:29
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:OmniPlan + OmniFocus + OmniOutliner what the hell are these
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 02:31
|
|
|
http://www.omnigroup.com/products/omniplan/ lmao $200 for this
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 02:33
|
|
|
if being able to manage your projects efficiently to save you time isnt worth $200 your job is a pos
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 02:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 22:30 |
|
|
gantt janitor
|
|
#
?
Jul 9, 2012 02:38
|
|