|
Deuce posted:Did anyone manage to get a copy of this document they can mirror? WND seems to have been either goonrushed or had it taken down, all I get is an error message and other sites don't have the complete documents. It's still up for me, maybe try again? Alternately look for a cached version. If you're using chrome, put cache: in front of the url and you should get a plain text version.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 16:59 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:52 |
|
Sarion posted:I post here often, but don't usually have content, just responses. But I came across something today that's kind of relevant and amusing. It's too long to post the whole thing here (several pages), but here's a link: I love that they seriously say nuclear war will come to the Middle East in 2010, but 2011 and 2012, Congress is still messing around with gays and health care. Because nuclear war/world war 3 is just gonna be a fad, over in a month or two.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 18:42 |
|
I'm in yellow. The guy is read is always going on about them horrible socialist liberal crybabies. Really, like 50% of his facebook page is some stupid bumper sticker phrase or "LOL STUPID LIBERALS" image macro. He's a very outspoken evangelical (which I have no problem with, and actually admire that he tries to understand his faith in depth), but I think he is truly purblind to how his FYGM/boostraps regurgitation is oftentimes contrary to the religion he follows. I used to try to engage him and his friends in serious, rational discussions and back up my claims and debunkings with facts, but more often than not I'd still end up with him or his buddies just ignoring the point and attacking strawmen. I found that making a direct emotional appeal seems a lot more effective in terms on getting them to consider other viewpoints, or recognize the dissonance between their beliefs and reality. Well, up to a certain point.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 20:39 |
|
UppityNegress posted:I'm in yellow. The guy is read is always going on about them horrible socialist liberal crybabies. Really, like 50% of his facebook page is some stupid bumper sticker phrase or "LOL STUPID LIBERALS" image macro. He's a very outspoken evangelical (which I have no problem with, and actually admire that he tries to understand his faith in depth), but I think he is truly purblind to how his FYGM/boostraps regurgitation is oftentimes contrary to the religion he follows. "Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away." —Matthew 5:38–5:42 KJV Republican Jesus, on the other hand: "Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also AND THEN SHOOT HIM IN THE FACE. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy BULLETS TO THE FACE also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, RUN HIM OVER WITH YOUR SUV. Give to him that asketh thee HIS JUST DESSERTS, and from him that would borrow of thee turn
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 20:50 |
|
XyloJW posted:I love that they seriously say nuclear war will come to the Middle East in 2010, but 2011 and 2012, Congress is still messing around with gays and health care. That's a good catch, I didn't even consider that. Nuclear War breaks out in 2010, but apparently everything else just keeps moving along as normal!
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 21:17 |
|
vyelkin posted:"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also. And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain. Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away." I seriously want to make a conservative Bible. Not of the Andy Schlafly variety (although considering how crazy he is, it wouldn't surprise me that they'd come out nearly the same), but taking out all instances of Jesus preaching about forgiveness and tolerance and replacing it with guns, bootstraps, and vengeance. I'd bet hard money that quite a few in the American right would see it as an improvement. 40 And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him, If thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. 41 And REPUBLICAN JESUS, moved with compassion, put forth his hand, and held out a pair of bootstraps. And Jesus said unto him, "Who thinkest thou art, to ask for healing. Knowest thou that healthcare is a right, not a privilege?" Mark 1:40-41 3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst, 4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. 5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?......7 So when they continued asking him, REPUBLICAN JESUS lifted up himself, and said unto them, "Killeth the bitch. Dost though not know that mercy, forgiveness, and self-reflection are the scourge of the liberals?" John 8:3-7 20 Looking at his disciples, REPUBLICAN JESUS said:
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 21:25 |
|
Mark 12:41-44 posted:
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 21:31 |
|
I'll take any excuse I can get to post this Tim Kreider classic.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 21:44 |
|
Cowslips Warren posted:'Merican Jesus doesn't have time to save your liberal socialist rear end when He is out there Protecting Merican Soldiers from Muslims. Instead of "prove it," I just ask if they have a link to Obama actually saying /doing whatever it is. IF I get a link, it will be from one of the usual suspects. But usually they end the conversation. I also get prayed for a lot.
|
# ? Nov 1, 2012 21:57 |
|
Here's a Facebook share I got from my elderly French-Canadian aunt. Check out the lovely artefacts! The last bit galls me a bit. "Doesn't matter what evidence to the contrary you have, I have already made up my mind!"
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:37 |
|
Someone repost that with 'gay' instead of Christian and see how many defriends you get.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:40 |
|
well, it's interesting in part because it doesn't mention anything about persuasion, the list is literally all about someone trying to humiliate, attack, and kill her because she is a christian. It's pure lizard brain. You can never talk with this woman about anything outside her comfort zone or she will feel immediately threatened.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:46 |
|
She's actually a really nice person and supports gay marriage etc. so I don't want to get into an argument with her. That, and she's almost 90; I'd rather focus on the young
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:48 |
|
Imperialist Dog posted:She's actually a really nice person and supports gay marriage etc. so I don't want to get into an argument with her. That, and she's almost 90; I'd rather focus on the young There are a lot of liberal Christians like that, nothing wrong there.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:49 |
|
This popped up on my Facebook today. Does anyone have the original? I had it saved on my computer maybe 2 days ago but I've since deleted it. edit: Guess I was thinking of Mittamorpho. As I should have been. http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2011/11/village-voice-cartoonist-gives-washington-d-c-a-dc-style-makeover/ Verisimilidude fucked around with this message at 05:20 on Nov 2, 2012 |
# ? Nov 2, 2012 04:54 |
|
Dirty Job posted:
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 05:09 |
|
Saw this one tonight... from a guy I frequently argue with. http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/obamas_taqqiya_unravels.html#ixzz2B0krL3Xw I think I argue with him so much that he asked people not to reply because this formerly Muslim convert to Christianity's story moved him that he had this to say: "If I added any commentary, it would simply screw it up. And it's for that reason, I don't want some 50-post discussion to erupt in the comments below. If Nonie's words resonate with you, feel free to like/share the page. If you simply wish to stir the pot and instigate, do us all a favor and keep scrolling. If you're truly peeved, shoot me a message and I'd be happy to discuss." I shot him a message with 8 links to news articles debunking everything she said. I also pointed out that socialism doesn't mean what he thinks it does and that his frequent dismissal of my education had finally come to an end because I actually have an advanced degree in political science and I, if anyone, am fit to actually define what socialism is. I'm really, REALLY tired of the religious right and their persecution complex and reality denial. I don't even blame it on people like my friend - I blame it on the media that feeds their fear.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 05:45 |
|
sicarius posted:Saw this one tonight... from a guy I frequently argue with. I got in a debate with a classmate the other day, and his definition of socialism was, "socialism is telling people what to think." Don't bother with the long history of socialism, its origins in the industrial revolution, its change from a radicalist approach to an approach that favors small reforms through the system over time. Don't mind the fact that moderate socialist-type societies and regulated capitalism can and do exist together (social democracy) in several countries. Nope, socialism is telling people what to think. The problem with the definition of socialism, at least in the US, is that everyone agrees it's bad but no one can really define what it actually is.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 05:55 |
|
Mitchicon posted:I got in a debate with a classmate the other day, and his definition of socialism was, "socialism is telling people what to think." Don't bother with the long history of socialism, its origins in the industrial revolution, its change from a radicalist approach to an approach that favors small reforms through the system over time. Don't mind the fact that moderate socialist-type societies and regulated capitalism can and do exist together (social democracy) in several countries. Nope, socialism is telling people what to think. That's because what it actually is takes time to explain and an understanding of real economics. I'm not a huge fan of socialism - I think that, with regulation, private industries do just fine. However, being able to explain, in detail what socialism is, what its goals are, and all that requires time these people don't have. So they just agree that it's anti-American, and therefore anti-Democracy and religion and everything else they believe is "American." It has, like "liberal", just become another phrase for them. I laugh even harder when someone calls Obama a Marxist. At that point I ask them to explain the difference between Marxism, communism and socialism. I get nothing but blank stares at that point. Arguing political theory with me (not to sound conceited) is far out of most peoples' depths. Then again, I've spent nearly 8 years studying it.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 05:59 |
|
sicarius posted:That's because what it actually is takes time to explain and an understanding of real economics. Even more laughable when you take into consideration that liberal does not equal socialist, and while the European Social-Democracies have several socialist-type policies, they are not socialist. But many people operate on a slippery-slope judgement. Once there is one socialist-type policy considered or enacted, you might as well redistribute everything, make everyone work on agricultural communes, and distribute Chairman Obama's little red book. I really hope Obama announces himself as being a HomoIslamoFascoSocialist the day after the election and mandates gay marriages for everyone.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 06:04 |
|
vyelkin posted:Are you sure about this? That was my first instinct too but I googled the quote and all I got were sources saying it was from a month or so after he took office. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUPZJDBJI84 The initial part saying, "We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America" is from an October 2008 rally. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other out-of-context bits from other random speeches as well.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 12:24 |
|
Imperialist Dog posted:Here's a Facebook share I got from my elderly French-Canadian aunt. Check out the lovely artefacts! So, she has faith, I don't know why that's in the crazy section of the forum. Like yea it's a good few notches extreme with the 'kill me' and 'threaten me' lines but that's just a normal expression of faith.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 12:33 |
|
Glitterbomber posted:So, she has faith, I don't know why that's in the crazy section of the forum. Like yea it's a good few notches extreme with the 'kill me' and 'threaten me' lines but that's just a normal expression of faith. There's nothing normal about paranoid delusions. edit: I am, of course, not referring to her Christianity as a paranoid delusion, but her apparent belief that she faces potentially fatal persecution for it in Canada (where I am assuming she lives based on Imperialist Dog's comment), of all places. Leospeare fucked around with this message at 12:46 on Nov 2, 2012 |
# ? Nov 2, 2012 12:43 |
|
UppityNegress posted:I seriously want to make a conservative Bible. Not of the Andy Schlafly variety (although considering how crazy he is, it wouldn't surprise me that they'd come out nearly the same), but taking out all instances of Jesus preaching about forgiveness and tolerance and replacing it with guns, bootstraps, and vengeance. I'd bet hard money that quite a few in the American right would see it as an improvement. I was at CVS waiting for a prescription and found a book titled "Common Myths from the Bible." The entire purpose of the book was to take stuff like "turn the other cheek," "it's easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for the rich to go into heaven," and show how the bible actually wants you to do the opposite. The entire purpose of the book was to justify acting like a complete rear end in a top hat and further the gently caress you got mine mentality that permeates christianity today.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 12:46 |
|
Glitterbomber posted:So, she has faith, I don't know why that's in the crazy section of the forum. Like yea it's a good few notches extreme with the 'kill me' and 'threaten me' lines but that's just a normal expression of faith. Christianity, the small and ever persecuted minority of the western world. It's not crazy at all to think that this small minority is constantly under ridicule, threat, and the danger of murder just for their religious beliefs. Don't be willfully dense. This might make sense if a Coptic Christian in Egypt were posting it, but coming out of the heart of Appalachia, you may as well replace "Christian" with "straight, white, male".
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 13:29 |
This hasn't been forwarded to me, but it's still hilarious. Americans For Tax Reform have created a "projected" mockup of what the PPACA mandate tax liability form will look like. http://s3.amazonaws.com/atrfiles/files/files/wolf_final.pdf
|
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 15:11 |
|
I saw this posted on a libertarian acquaintance's fb this morning http://www.waff.com/story/19981857/some-nonunion-ala-crews-turned-away-from-sandy-recovery To her credit she did say "If it's true..." but I hope this is easily refuted anyway
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 15:23 |
|
Defenestration posted:I saw this posted on a libertarian acquaintance's fb this morning People really need to confirm if things are true before posting. "If it's true" is an annoying shield along the lines of foxnews classic "some say..." line.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 15:39 |
|
Loving Life Partner posted:This hasn't been forwarded to me, but it's still hilarious. Except for the fact that no IRS tax form is going to have "Obamacare" in the title, it didn't seem as crazy as it could have been. I didn't give it a really careful look though, so I may have missed stuff.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:23 |
|
Sarion posted:Except for the fact that no IRS tax form is going to have "Obamacare" in the title
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:42 |
|
You can't spell Obamacare without ACA
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:43 |
|
They couldn't just copy the Massachusetts 1099-HC form? It's basically, do you have health insurance? If yes, attach the form your health insurer mailed you. If no, you don't get the tax break, sry.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:45 |
|
TheQat posted:You can't spell Obamacare without ACA Neptr posted:They couldn't just copy the Massachusetts 1099-HC form? It's basically, do you have health insurance? If yes, attach the form your health insurer mailed you. If no, you don't get the tax break, sry. Well, from what I saw of the form, even with the wrong name, they got a lot of the exceptions and details right (or at least close enough). For example, the penalty is prorated by the number of months you didn't have insurance. How does Massachusetts handle all of that, or are there just not any exceptions?
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:51 |
|
Sarion posted:
Pretty much the same in MA. It's based on the number of months.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 16:57 |
|
I believe that MA also allows you to be without insurance for a period (three months?) without penalty, which I think is pretty much because many companies don't start providing benefits until after some probationary period.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 19:48 |
|
I love my libertarian "friends" on Facebook. They do a great job of raising my blood pressure.Facebook posted:There you go liberal Yankees: waiting on government to provide you things does not work. I have no sympathy for those unprepared and crying for help from someone else. Work together, solve problems yourselves. Stop letting collectivism and trust in government rule your life. When the SHTF, it's individuals with drive who matter, not fat old men telling you how much Coke you can drink while taxing you to death.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 20:27 |
|
RhoanAegis posted:I love my libertarian "friends" on Facebook. They do a great job of raising my blood pressure. Work together, solve problems yourselves. He contradicted himself in the same runon sentence.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 20:30 |
|
Yeah collectivism doesn't solve problems. We should just work together to solve problems instead.
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 20:54 |
|
Yeah, why don't you drat Yankees just get together, decide how to solve your problems together, and then all contribute to paying for the solution. Government and taxes are for suckers! The other thing that strikes me, is that in Mr. Libertarian's view, no one would have bothered to do anything before hand. They would have just waited until after the storm, and then some plucky young John Galt would fix everything!
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 21:15 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:52 |
|
Not so much a forward as a screed, this comes from a guy I was friends with in college who went insane when Obama won 4 years ago. I've blocked his posts from appearing in my feed because the constant Breitbart.com posts and quotes from Mark Levin got to be a bit much, but I still visit his page once or twice a week to get a good idea on how deep down the rabbit hole this guy goes. There's no point in arguing with him, but when I read this I felt it belonged here. Enjoy!Guy I know on Facebook posted:There are so many reasons to vote for Obama. It's pretty amazing. Notice he calls the Birth certificate phony (he's a Pam Geller fan) and thinks that Romney is "Endlessly Charitable". In the past, he's written "It's not Romney vs. Obama. It's Liberty vs. Tyranny". The day before the Obamacare decision was handed down, he was crowing about how the "O-bots" would be calling for the impeachment of the Supreme Court. After is was upheld, he posted nothing for three days, and then said the country he grew up in was dead. He was really funny in college though!
|
# ? Nov 2, 2012 21:16 |