|
i've known about it i just havent had the time to set it up
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 02:36 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 22:17 |
|
it's seriously a war file man
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 02:37 |
|
thats not the part that takes time to set up.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 03:26 |
|
you point it to your source control and maven handles the rest, it's seriously less than an hour
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 03:50 |
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:you point it to your source control and maven handles the rest, it's seriously less than an hour Yeah ... not if you want it to do your integration tests as well.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 03:56 |
|
what's better coderush or r#? i used to use r# and I'm doing a lot of refactors now so thinking about getting it again in particular does one have good performance compared to the other? my work machine is lovely. i mostly do c# coding
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 03:57 |
|
Hard NOP Life posted:Yeah ... not if you want it to do your integration tests as well. why isn't maven doing your tests?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 04:07 |
|
because only 20% of them pass
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 04:28 |
|
well then.. i hope you don't make medical devices
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 04:32 |
|
Some shamefull shits going on because we have no test team.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 04:37 |
|
why do you need a test team devs write the tests and CI runs em
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 10:49 |
|
Im guessing theyre cowboy coding becuase new features and hurryhurryhurry and it kinda seems to work most of the time. Also no or vague specs No wait, thats our team
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 11:03 |
|
jira owns, jenkins owns, git owns.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 13:41 |
|
TURBO BUTTON posted:why do you need a test team think he means like QA
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 13:41 |
|
everyone go read qa confidential right now
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 13:41 |
|
deploy directly into production like a postagile motherfucker, fred george is my copilot, where were going we wont need unit tests
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 13:51 |
|
TURBO BUTTON posted:deploy directly into production like a postagile motherfucker, fred george is my copilot, where were going we wont need unit tests same except unironically
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 14:00 |
|
Wheany posted:Im guessing theyre cowboy coding becuase new features and hurryhurryhurry and it kinda seems to work most of the time. Also no or vague specs Holy poo poo do you work in Monterrey? Seriously this is startup 101 coding practices. Nothing matters, just bullshitting enough until some dumbo investor buys this and all the management team cashes out. TURBO BUTTON posted:why do you need a test team Most of our testing to make sure the newest build is working is done by hand using whatever mix of SOAPUI, jMeter and hand crafted HTTP Posts that requiring a running server. Janitor Prime fucked around with this message at 19:05 on Nov 4, 2012 |
# ? Nov 4, 2012 18:53 |
|
TURBO BUTTON posted:deploy directly into production like a postagile motherfucker, fred george is my copilot, where were going we wont need unit tests
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:03 |
|
git is more trouble than its worth, just use svn and get over yourself.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:36 |
|
rotor posted:git is more trouble than its worth, just use hg and get over yourself.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:54 |
|
like basically everyone else in the world, ive never used or paid any attention to hg so i have no opinion on it
|
# ? Nov 4, 2012 19:55 |
|
WHOIS John Galt posted:everyone go read qa confidential right now leisuretown owns
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 02:57 |
|
rotor posted:like basically everyone else in the world, ive never used or paid any attention to hg so i have no opinion on it
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 08:10 |
|
Gazpacho posted:Yet u post in a forum that is itself stored in hg honestly id be surprised if there was even a backup.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 09:12 |
|
*right click, send to Compressed Folder, rename to hi_haters.zip*
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 09:19 |
|
rotor posted:git is more trouble than its worth, just use svn and get over yourself. nope git owns, svn is trash, delete all copies of svn everywhere in case any moron is tempted to ever use it again i have extra backup repositories on a usb drive for stuff thats really important. plug it in, mount it, git push usb (since i have 'usb' set up as a remote repo for projects that i back up here) "what do you mean their are multiple remote repositories?" -a literal idiot child
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 13:40 |
|
Hard NOP Life posted:Things have gotten out of hand and the technical debt is through the roof. Old tests are commented out or given null parameters to shut the compiler up and then nothing gets done to fix them later. did you hear about this weird old tip discovered by Romney's mom that can reduce technical debt in your tests by 80%
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 14:09 |
|
step 1 delete all of those "tests" they are less than worthless
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 14:12 |
|
TURBO BUTTON posted:step 1 delete all of those "tests" they are less than worthless
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 14:26 |
|
Lysidas posted:
this dev workflow seems good to me
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 16:34 |
|
Lysidas posted:nope git is great if you only need versioning and not source control.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 16:47 |
|
Shaggar posted:git is great if you only need versioning and not source control. shagger how does this make sense? many if not most of the largest source repositories on earth use git and/or hg
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:06 |
|
ccs: worked on some c this weekend I........i like it. twiddling bits, settin' registers, but you still have some structure and flow control
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:10 |
|
c is pretty great but you need a beard to get the most out of it imo
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:13 |
|
c is great but what are you doing with registers jonny. Unless you mean like vim registers.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:14 |
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:shagger how does this make sense? many if not most of the largest source repositories on earth use git and/or hg yeah but they arent source control, they're just distributed repositories. source control requires a central control point which, as git proponents are very proud of, git does not have.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:15 |
|
rotor posted:this dev workflow seems good to me those backups on the flash drive on my keychain are in addition to the main central repositories that i use, just as extra backups in case my office is hit by a meteor and my laptop drive dies at the same time it's a best-effort thing like 'oh i havent copied stuff to my usb drive in a while, should probably do that today' point is, having multiple remote repositories is really useful
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:15 |
|
Ronald Raiden posted:c is great but what are you doing with registers jonny. Unless you mean like vim registers. well idk the exact term in this context but i was twiddling the clock dividers for PWM on the arduino last night code:
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:17 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 22:17 |
|
Shaggar posted:yeah but they arent source control, they're just distributed repositories. source control requires a central control point which, as git proponents are very proud of, git does not have. at some point your software produces artifacts, what ever repository is used to make those and who ever has access to that one is the control
|
# ? Nov 5, 2012 17:18 |