|
And the Cornell site gives you the full text.
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 06:01 |
|
|
Yes we are supposed to read your mind, transform into librarians, and provide you with exactly what you want because you can't be assed to do any of your own research. You say you're at school. Do you have librarians? That's kinda their job. Ask them for things like Heinonline, Westlaw, LexisNexis, Statutes at Large, and poo poo like that. Voila. I've already put in about 18 times as much effort as you have into doing your research.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:24
|
|
|
WaveLength posted:And the Cornell site gives you the full text. Right. The full text that has been amended a whole lot of times since 1936. Figuring out which of the articles are from the period after the original drafting is seemingly impossible. I am writing a paper on the original legislation and the period immediately following said legislation and need only the bill that was passed in 1936. I should have clarified but there is really no need for the others to get all goony about it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:27
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:Yes we are supposed to read your mind, transform into librarians, and provide you with exactly what you want because you can't be assed to do any of your own research. I have actually spoken to them, and they haven't been helpful. I've searched all of my school's (Loyola University of Chicago) databases and come up with nothing. I figured maybe one of you all had stumbled upon this document at some point in your studies (assuming any of you are looking to go into compliance) and figured I would ask. There isn't really any good reason to be e-aggressive.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:29
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:I should have clarified but there is really no need for the others to get all goony about it. The irony.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:32
|
|
|
Walamor posted:The irony.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:33
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:Right. The full text that has been amended a whole lot of times since 1936. Figuring out which of the articles are from the period after the original drafting is seemingly impossible. I am writing a paper on the original legislation and the period immediately following said legislation and need only the bill that was passed in 1936. I should have clarified but there is really no need for the others to get all goony about it. Except that when people say "The Act of 1841" or whatever, they typically mean the current version, operating after amendments. While it's not the most precise language, it is how most people (particularly people in legal fields...i.e. people in this thread) use those terms. Also, get off your high horse. We got e-self-righteous only after you started on the e-rear end in a top hat train.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:34
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:You go to ASU dude I don't even care if I get banned for saying good luck finding a job you dumb sack of poo poo You're claiming you go to the "Loyola University of Chicago" and you're making fun of people about their school?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:36
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:You're claiming you go to the "Loyola University of Chicago" and you're making fun of people about their school? Augh you caught it. Anyway, I am to assume no one here can direct me to the original bill. Thanks!
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:37
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:Augh you caught it. Anyway, I am to assume no one here can direct me to the original bill. Thanks! You assume wrong. I already did. Alternatively, ILL that poo poo. If you have a law school within about 50 miles, go there. Ask them for help. I can think of at least three books off the top of my head that'd have the original bill in it. And no, I'm not going to tell you what they are, because I'm a jerk. A huge raging rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:40
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:[help me] Take it easy, law thread, he's majoring in the economics of PUA. He's just throwing you some negs to make you really want to research for for him. (On the bright side, rest assured he must believe you all to be SB (smart body) 8s and 9s since he's negging on you this hard) fuzzy fluffystuff posted:There isn't really any good reason to be e-aggressive. Walamor posted:The irony.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:41
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:Augh you caught it. Anyway, I am to assume no one here can direct me to the original bill. Thanks! Amazing. I hope you understand how dumb it is that if you were correct that I was going to ASU, I would probably be going to their law school, as this is the law school/law thread. ASU law is the 26th best law school in the country and is a desirable school to go to. In reality, I went to ASU, graduated and have had continuous and good employment for the past 5 years, and am now in law school. Get your condescending rear end out of this thread and grow up.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:41
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:You assume wrong. I already did. Alternatively, ILL that poo poo. If you have a law school within about 50 miles, go there. Ask them for help. I can think of at least three books off the top of my head that'd have the original bill in it. And no, I'm not going to tell you what they are, because I'm a jerk. A huge raging rear end in a top hat. There are several comprehensive books on futures regulation. I have them all. None have the full bill, none even quote large sections of it. Again, thanks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:51
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:There are several comprehensive books on futures regulation. I have them all. None have the full bill, none even quote large sections of it. Again, thanks. You're welcome!
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 04:58
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:There are several comprehensive books on futures regulation. I have them all. None have the full bill, none even quote large sections of it. Again, thanks. Bwahahahahaha. I don't know poo poo about futures regulation, nor any of the topic-specific books. And you don't know poo poo about legal research. However, I do know where to find your law. So try talking to someone who does, but you might want to leave your ego at the door. Or they'll tell you to gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:01
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:You're claiming you go to the "Loyola University of Chicago" and you're making fun of people about their school? As another Loyola alum, you shouldn't talk trash to anyone else's school, even if they went to Cooley. Seriously. edit-to be clear I wanted to mock the LUC guy mastershakeman fucked around with this message at 05:07 on Nov 26, 2012 |
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:02
|
|
|
fuzzy fluffystuff posted:I have actually spoken to them, and they haven't been helpful. I've searched all of my school's (Loyola University of Chicago) databases and come up with nothing. I figured maybe one of you all had stumbled upon this document at some point in your studies (assuming any of you are looking to go into compliance) and figured I would ask. There isn't really any good reason to be e-aggressive.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:05
|
|
|
mastershakeman posted:As another Loyola alum, you shouldn't talk trash to anyone else's school, even if they went to Cooley. Seriously. Oh, I'm well aware of pots, kettles, and the color black. But at least you call it "Loyola," not "Loyola University of Chicago," which is far less pretentious, and less likely to get you mocked in an e-peen waving fight.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:05
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:Oh, I'm well aware of pots, kettles, and the color black. But at least you call it "Loyola," not "Loyola University of Chicago," which is far less pretentious, and less likely to get you mocked in an e-peen waving fight. Yeah I meant to mock him (for making fun of another person's school while going to a crummy one) not you so whatever 
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:11
|
|
|
Arcturas posted:Oh, I'm well aware of pots, kettles, and the color black. But at least you call it "Loyola," not "Loyola University of Chicago," which is far less pretentious, and less likely to get you mocked in an e-peen waving fight. Isn't the latter description technically more accurate since there's four Loyola Universities in the US?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:12
|
|
|
Yup, surely the original version of the CEA isn't located anywhere. It's not a very important thing and nobody pays attention to it. Anyone with Lexis or Westlaw access should be able to pull it up in 30 seconds. God, I hope you're an undergrad.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:50
|
|
|
Hey lawyers stop getting mad. Geez, why you gotta be so argumentative?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 05:53
|
|
|
UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE 74TH CONGRESS - 2ND SESSION Convening January 3, 1936 An Act To amend the Grain Futures Act to prevent and remove obstructions and burdens upon interstate commerce in grains and other commodities by regulating transactions therein on commodity futures exchanges, to limit or abolish short selling, to curb manipulation, and for other purposes. June 15, 1936
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:11
|
|
|
I have a powerpoint to give tomorrow, could you guys find me a link to the original text of the criminal law in the 1980s? Seriously replies from ivy grads only, please.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:14
|
|
|
Guys, guys, guys, please stop arguing, I have a serious question. I'm writing a brief involving a complex legal issue. Can someone link me to the case with the answers and also shepardise that poo poo or I'm not interested. Thanks. Also no TTT responses please.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:19
|
|
|
Agesilaus posted:Guys, guys, guys, please stop arguing, I have a serious question. I'm writing a brief involving a complex legal issue. Can someone link me to the case with the answers and also shepardise that poo poo or I'm not interested. Thanks. Would you like an undergrad transcript as well?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:23
|
|
|
Zarkov Cortez posted:Would you like an undergrad transcript as well? Better safe than sorry.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:25
|
|
|
Agesilaus posted:Better safe than sorry. You forgot LSAT requirement. I don't talk to people who got under 178.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:26
|
|
|
I find that google satisfies 100% of my legal research needs. In that if it's not on google, I either make it up or punt. This will clearly never steer me wrong...
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 06:36
|
|
|
Agesilaus posted:
You need some higher standards here, YLS, SLS, or maybe top 5% of Harvard.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 07:27
|
|
|
woozle wuzzle posted:I find that google satisfies 100% of my legal research needs. In that if it's not on google, I either make it up or punt. This will clearly never steer me wrong...
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 07:47
|
|
|
gvibes posted:No joke I use google scholar for like 80% of my legal research. Oh god I thought I was the only one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 08:04
|
|
|
nm posted:You need some higher standards here, YLS, SLS, or maybe top 5% of Harvard. Harvard is pretty much the new standard for TTT.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 08:21
|
|
|
Glowing Red Sign posted:Harvard is pretty much the new standard for TTT. Well it is third.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 09:08
|
|
|
Holy poo poo, I really do miss all the good stuff.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 11:14
|
|
|
IrritationX posted:Holy poo poo, I really do miss all the good stuff. OH YEAH? <looks around and gives you a sharp shove in the chest> We've had enough of your snark!
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 13:26
|
|
|
We are a broken and ruined people.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 14:48
|
|
|
gvibes posted:No joke I use google scholar for like 80% of my legal research.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 15:40
|
|
|
Looking for some legal research, no fat chicks
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 16:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 06:01 |
|
|
Was that kid an undergrad? It's so much funnier if he is.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2012 16:15
|
|
