Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

didn't

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

dragon enthusiast
Jan 1, 2010
already moved on to next page sorry

Lutha Mahtin
Oct 10, 2010

Your brokebrain sin is absolved...go and shitpost no more!

Purple drank is a slang term for a recreational drug popular in the hip hop community in the southern United States, originating in Houston, Texas. Its main ingredient is prescription-strength cough syrup containing codeine and promethazine.[2] Cough syrup is typically mixed with ingredients such as Sprite soft drink or Mountain Dew and pieces of Jolly Rancher candy. The purplish hue of purple drank comes from dyes in the cough syrup.

There are numerous slang terms for purple drank, including sizzurp,[3][4][5][6][7] lean,[2][4][5][8] syrup,[4][6][9] drank,[6][10] barre,[6] purple jelly,[5][6] Texas tea,[10] and Tsikuni.[11]

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



is tsikuni japanese b/c if so lol

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

Carthag posted:

is tsikuni japanese b/c if so lol

http://publicintelligence.net/ules-lulzsec-release-arizona-purple-drank-warning/

quote:

Numerous slang terms for purple drank include: "Sizzurp, Lean, Syrup, Drank, Barre, Purple Tonic, Southern Lean, Texas Tea, Memphis Mud, Mrs. Dranklesworth, Tsikuni, Lean, P-Flav, Slip, Purple Sprite, PG Tips, Purp, and Purple Jelly".

Nelson MandEULA
Feb 27, 2011

"...the biggest shitbag
I have ever met."

Install Gentoo posted:

Ideas

I need regular e-mail address to submit attachments if you are receptive and you'd like to have them (me @ here.net). I am not sure what the legal notice at the end means, nor am I concerned. But you should be if you misinterpret me. My copyright notice takes precedence. Data I have is unique and nobody other than myself would be in position to know. "Conquering moon" with NASA Apollo space program was another goof, by the way.

Your information desk recommended contacting you. You might want to contact them about what I suggested if the haven't contacted you yet. What is going to be available is Moron 101 Survival Guide in Lotus Notes database I am building. Business opportunity exists in that I would compensate with 10% of cash that flows through for handling registration of subscribers to the service and money. Moron 101 is not in category of memoirs. It is a serious work. Basically, Wikipedia would mail out a copy of Survival Guide on CD to anyone who requests it. They can be had free of charge as promotional material. Those who decide to subscribe would state so and pay subscription fee. The fee is what one can comfortably part with but not to extreme either way, so a $50 from a retired person is as good as a thousand or two from another. Excessive stinginess may affect relationship with me in the future (I had it with that attitude).

Wikipedia would establish a business relationship with me by getting involved. Keep in mind that I am a Principal and there can be no third party to a transaction or relationship involving Principal unless with consent. I am most adamant about it and I will enforce. Wikipedia would be my agent within the meaning of the copyright notice (attached). Benefits I see for myself are vast number of contributing editors and translation venues already established by Wikipedia. On the other hand, volume of cash flow might be expected to be more than sufficient to fill financial gaps Wikipedia is experiencing.

Subscribers develop one to one relationship with me once signed up. The role of Wikipedia would end at handling of the subscription fee with appropriate disposition (90%-10% split). There are things people were never told but should know and this is what Moron 101 is about.

Of immediate concern is the infamous OT III incident L. Ron Hubbard looked into in the sixties. You should know that when Hubbard started caving in under pressure of what he found out (death of some magnitude stared in his face) and his OT team on board could no longer hold the space, he called for backup. God, Satan, NATO, Earth (as all life on it) were involved. They knocked some lines into me and Hubbard claimed he created safe space which I would hold for him on basis of name association (ship was named Apollo). Hubbard was effect (and a bad one, too) at the time so he could not create space but force shield was created. Hidden behind it Hubbard claimed immunity from harm and continued his research hanging the death key-in on me. On that basis he guided safely many people through what he called Wall of Fire. All those are false attestations. How could Hubbard who could not confront and contain that incident could guide others through safely does not make sense, does it? LRH's use of my name was illicit and illegal within the meaning of your laws. Unique names are proprietary. Apollo is the trademark of Apollo. The shield they knocked in must and will come down. I contained OT III but as of 2003 I am no longer willing to. Consequences of it are beyond the scope of this note. It is in your interest to know more.

I am still working on Intelligence Report (one of documents in the database). I will copy-paste some material into this note and see if "imbedded file" works as attachment.

A Simple Business Plan

Devised on Saturday, November 24, 2012


Design of Notes database to contain my Survival Guide (Moron 101 course) is almost complete. I will focus on closing the design from now on. Once this is completed, I will use scanner/OCR to add selected pages from the printout of M101 I made before my other laptop that contained the file was stolen. Survival Guide (moron101.nsf file) is meant to be a Promotional. One article in it explains data, information and truth as those relate to seniority and ownership. One can “know about” truth but can only act on it if it’s duly owned.

I will make a CD with “readme.txt” file shown in borders below explaining how to install Lotus Notes interface (Notes Desktop) and the database, making it so easily that anyone can do it. “Readme.txt” will be something like this:

Insert the CD. Click Start->All Programs->Accessories->Windows Explorer. Locate C and CD/DVD drives on the left. Double-click on CD drive to see content. Point to “notes” folder and hold down left mouse button while dragging it until it overlays C drive, then drop it by releasing the mouse. “c:\notes” directory will be created and content will be copied from the CD. Next open c:\notes you just created on your hard drive, locate “notes.exe”, right click on it and create a desktop icon for convenience. Double click “notes.exe” or the icon and Notes will start. You are done with installation.

On Notes desktop you will find only three icons representing databases: Notes Help, Names and Address Book and Survival Guide. In Names and Address book there is only one Person record for you, of someone named Concerned Person that represents you. Concerned Person is a generic name that has Read access to Survival Guide. The password is set to SquareOne but can be changed. If you want to restrict access, click File-Tools-User ID and set the password. DO NOT enable Notes add-ons. You can change password at any time (hit Enter without typing new password to clear the existing one)

Double-click Survival Guide icon. First window that opens is “About This Database”. It shows Copyright notice. “Using This Database” will take you to a document explaining Notes GUI and how to navigate databases. Either document can be opened at any time through Help menu in your Notes desktop (workspace). Default view is “Main”, which deals with technical matters. All views are organized by Category, Subject and Topic. Moron 101 is indexed for text search.

If a particular rendition of MS Windows GUI that user has running prevents proper start-up of Lotus Notes (I can’t see why it should), one would use Microsoft “Install” wizard to install the application from c:\notes. It would then become available in Start-All Programs menu and be included in Windows registry, inviting hackers to crowd up traffic the I/O port. Release 4.1 is valuable, read “How I made it big at IBM” for more. Lotus Notes has its own registry, “notes.ini” file, which can be found in c:\notes directory. It can be viewed through Notepad and saved as ASCII file but should not be edited. If it is, the course will have to be re-loaded from CD/DVD again to replace it with a clean copy. Don’t fall for off-site backup of Notes.

EVEN A GRANDMA SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO IT.

Your god's role as male version of contemporary Helen of Troy bidding for rescue is exposed. As of year 2003 his demise is assured. I delivered to administrators running his American estate the key player (some call it a trophy) who was holding your god in check but god did not act. The name of the key player was Roman Hofa.

In Luboń (postal Luboń 3) central square, a church appeared once game's players moved to introduce Christianity into the environment in mid-late fifties. That was predictable. Also in late fifties attack from a spaceship hovering above that church came my way while I was standing on a nearby soccer field of Stella Żabikowo sports club. High energy weapons were used, which I was able to block/outflow only partially due to use of handles with which I was being held back. The handles had been laid into me during U-turn procedure and on other occasions.

U-turn is delivered to persons who are trying to check out of the game and show up at "Office of God" to report so. I remember standing in front of him, slightly leaning on the spear I was holding in my right hand. He was seated on podium slightly above, flanked by two guards one on each side. In a few millennia which preceded the scene I made sure to develop appropriate dislike of me but they knew that they could not challenge me for a fight and win. That they could not defeat me was very obvious, as I stood there conversing for a while. It did not matter that god didn't know that I was not his enemy. He should not have known for his very own good, because he was in a bind while I was not. I had a "leave it to Beaver" attitude and I allowed myself a moment of dispersal (inattention), during which they grabbed me and threw me back in. Ride down the chute into the physical realm installs handles on the rider and so weakens him or her. U-turn procedure cuts in deep and is dangerous. Nobody that I knew of had recovered from it. I was chivalrous enough to expose myself, to go through with it on behalf of others, also the ones running the game. My solution to all problems was perfect in that it covered everyone, including your idiot (as it turned out) god.

Strategically, the situation was so tight that most of my time prior to that scene I spend developing cover (alibi of sort) for all in danger of being punished for neglect in failure to stop me. Not that they really could. Those most exposed were given a chance to make a move hostile to me and wherever I saw a hole in cover for a participant developing, I would arrange for situation in which such participant played “by the book”, anticipating that time would come when I would be disabled and unable to defend anyone effectively. I passed through, to at length land in a human body on the inside while leaving behind problems I arranged for but not without clues as to my purpose. I mean reasons I did so. If the man who wrote down Homeric Hymns could be identified, he would be shredded to pieces for the information divulged because it was known that the information came from source who knew its usefulness, just as the Bible is the source of information for those who know how to relate to what they read. Such writings come useful as weapon against forgetters. I am appalled that Homeric Hymns are not de facto in public domain and cannot be had in pure form without interpretations, comments, commercial promotions and references to sources unrelated to Homeric Hymns. They were available from UC Berkeley only a little more than a decade ago. These days they are part of books sold for money. I do not insist that this situation be reverted but I warn anyone tempted to violate copyright notice of Moron 101. On a lighter note, comments one may find on Internet saying that a certain Homer was the author of Homeric Hymns are the signs of incurable mental condition I call Zeusism. The man was a scribe to me, same way as Geoffrey Filbert was on many occasions on condition that Excalibur Revisited can be found in public domain. Geoffrey kept his side of agreement and there is no more to say.

I was landed into about 1 year old body near house at Wojska Polskiego No. 56 in Luboń sometime in 1951/52, I think, around the time LRH was delivering his Washington, DC OT Series lectures. It cannot be ruled out that what he was teaching was extracted from me during U-turn procedure, because as A5 Hubbard had insufficient awareness level to know what he divulged. This supersedes all evaluations, comments and jokes I make about him elsewhere in this course. Same concerns his mentors at galaxy central, should it indeed be true that he studied there for 1,000 years. OT III incident alone is more than sufficient to irreversibly block awareness of any dweller in MEST universe separating him or her from the time of being implanted before then. And that's overwhelm, a flip and loss of viewpoint. I do not know who grew the body I was given but he remained attached to it. Massive forgetter on the landing that I received prevailed because it used handles installed by U-turn procedure, which are beyond the level of awareness of those who go through it. I knew those would be laid in (I know everything) but took risks.

Risks I took should be appreciated by those who have some recollections or witnessed what was being done to others. Energy of the thetan was used to enslave him, LRH says. I am not a thetan because I didn't flip. I have never been defeated but I did risk my life. Situation computed only to about 95% chance of my survival after landing. What I saw as my future, should I be defeated, shocked me even though "I've seen stuff" in my time.

I "worked off" with comfortable margin the 5% certainty of survival missing by engaging a number of galactic emperors hostile to me and you in the fifties, sweating off the pressures and pain of those engagements as I went along. One to whom the reader should be able to relate was the former tsar of Russia Nikolai of the Romanoff dynasty. That a foreign galactic emperor could come here for guest performance of the sort he had, running armies around and wasting a nation should tell the reader the strategic position your own emperor is in having gone into hiding 212,000 years ago (Excalibur).

LRH's manner of speech recorded on DC lectures indicates that he was not talking out of his own memory. "Well, I'd", "yah, why", "you know", "then, why, you see" and other speech breakers that often occasion such mannerism do not correspond to clarity of expression found in Scientology 8008 book. If it turns out that he was not giving his own data, which is of the kind that Moron 101 copyright notice protects, those lectures would mark a major error within the meaning of Point 4 ("Error made in unknown or misunderstood context is irrecoverable"). Accordingly, independent research to confirm the materials of DC lectures in Scientology auditing sessions would guarantee a buildup of GPM and Bypassed Charge phenomena. Trying to browse through what I knew in order to verify the data for a self-help solution to the way out was not a wise move. See document "Scientology works?" titled "Sample MEST game log" for more.

Many people value knowledge. Rift-raft that flocked into Hubbard's vicinity in early years of his research was there to either subvert the research or to steal information. If data Hubbard was looking into were originally his, his copyright would stick without legalities. I cannot say with certainty whether it was or not. More to the point, this article is offered not as Promo only (value No in the field, subject to copyright notice restrictions) so that people understand this. If you acquire knowledge illicitly, there may be a situation in the future when you are in trouble, but you know you have the right to appeal and you voice it. You can not only have the right of appeal denied on basis of your knowledge about it being gained illicitly, but also punished and given strong forgetter on that knowledge so as to cut your link to sanity for good. I see no reason why there should not be a 666 Beast type reign on Earth before it is destroyed when Andromeda "comes in" and stars start falling from the sky as the Word says. But those games will not be played in my time and my space. I will take the time I need to rest in central Europe unbothered about what's going on. False start will be called to level the playing field. Present day players will have to give up gains they think they've made and get back to the starting line. This is how MEST game computes minimum damage to least number of dynamics and maximum benefit for most dynamics, not the way crooks do it in a game that is last in rank.

Major advantage of being my daughter is that one can have Moron 101 for free (just a bit of humor)

While at it, I just walked around the room to stretch my legs and while I walk in front of the TV Diane Feinstein is shown, I haven't the faintest idea why. If she pays for subscription and is admitted into business relationship with me as subscriber, then and ONLY THEN can she own Moron 101 data and understand. All she really needs to do is grasp the significance of the short paragraph on Washington DC lectures above, which basically says she doesn't have a viewpoint from which to as-is (nullify, LRH). She has evaluation point because she flipped like everybody else. Auditing (clearing mental mass) does work if it is done from one's own viewpoint and of course someone who has own viewpoint does not need auditing. He just edits out of his mind unwanted existences. Think about it. After Feinstein understands that, she is likely to know better than to remind me of the time she attacked me as "US Senator" on highway 101 going north into San Francisco. Perhaps she can also appreciate what accumulated on Scientologists and do something about it. Break for humor?

"We are a democratic society and you have citizen rights. Those rights include religious freedoms, freedom of speech and pursuit of happiness. But on this laptop here which I brought with me there is Moron 101 Survival Guide that you should know. You must read it. If you show symptoms of not knowing it after you read it, qualified auditor will be brought in to word-clear it for you on e-meter. If you word-clear and still wish to remain with Scientology, inside or outside the church, I will check you off and nobody will bother you again. If you decide not to be part of Scientology after you do Moron 101 course, we will go to the nearest church where I will retrieve all money you paid them at gunpoint. You can then become a subscriber (if qualified), pay for my expenses (it's 3,457.50 in our county) and keep the rest. If you refuse to take that money or refuse to study so I can check you off I will shoot you in the head. We do not want to leave any loose ends hanging, you know?" Who said it?

A policeman said it. And he would have said it many times already IF policies here were reasonable, which they are not on least two counts (see documents titled "How I made it big at IBM" and "Removed ones" in Essays view). What Hubbard learned is how to rig. He has nothing left to loose.


Those who made a bid for sex to avoid punishment in early sixties should take notice. To begin with, if punishment was due it was not from me. Theta is death residues remaining in (existing in, fused with) MEST, as thetans follow energy flows in the process of dying, thus identifying with various parts of MEST. In that case it was intimate parts of MEST body that will die and rot. It is your own potential that you are wasting, which is why de-WOG is recommended. Satan is smarter than most. He only tried one time to get to me as person in late fifties but failed (see document True Identity). I waited until he deposited enough energy to be contained and traceable before I switched to NOT BE state. The body was damaged and shitted pants in pain (pardon my French) but Satan will not get away, on account of indignities I suffered in those days.

Some of information Hubbard conveyed pertains to "aliens" and spaceships. Apparently (I am not able to confirm), people were set up and betrayed so often in the past that they develop sensitivity spot on the subject, a button just ready to go off. From what I can recall, if this gets restimulated people seek out leaders of any and all religions and when they find them they kill them. Filbert explains what religion is: it is any cause one is willing to diminish another for. Most organizations on Earth are classifiable as religion this way. Related to this is "group bank" data (OT III, society as 3rd Dynamic of existence) which unless taken with appropriate perspective (grain of salt, reservation on basis of reason) may get one in trouble. I cannot assess whether Inquisition is near or far or whether it formed at all. It only evaluates to that it should. If Inquisition does intervene, it would be from outside and it would avoid unnecessary killing. Strategic objective is to force de-WOG. To them and to the reader, points below could be of value:

1. data Hubbard discovered analyzing PC folders, which he summed up when he said "There is nothing the PC (preclear) can tell you in session that you haven't done yourself". This refers to situations which on simplest of example is expressible by "This is the brother you love so dearly (or hate as the case may be). One of you must die, now fight!". 2. my assertion that nobody who is not in good standing with me has a chance to survive and that residence in the Territories (of Ursa Minor) will be by invitation only. 3. game's default will not be reverted until living arrangements satisfactory to me are made and signaled as accomplished. Only then will MEST game start again to compute on basis of minimum damage to least number of dynamics and maximum benefit for the greatest number of dynamics, as it is explained in Introduction to Ethics book (LRH). Game's computations are above what your clumsy systems compute. They are unbiased and correct, which cannot be said about Zion’s sub(system), American Dream sub(system) or any other. Universality is considered. Those computations are not applicable to me, of course. I can compute for myself once spies on lines are off. Lands in central Europe are my residence and my property, as is the rest of the universe. I can have them cleared of squatters any way I wish, including carpet bombing of Warsaw. It is so because I own the place. I should not be interpreted as indecision or weakness when I offer choice instead of issuing an order and maintaining it as consideration. It certainly wasn't the case with Russia. My creed and mode of operation is to offer choices. I am not sure yet what Russia's choice was when they declined a chance to break Polish state (entity) militarily last Christmas season, but it well may turn out to have been a choice (that they have already made) between Warsaw and Moscow falling. Now both will. 4. people are advised to stop insulting me with comments of the kind "now god knows" or "god is helping" that I hear through media as via now and then. He moved against me for a kill in the fifties. He failed to kill me but cannot survive the attempt. This should be obvious.

After I was landed in Poland Zysiu (formal Zygmunt) was to play role of my father. He was standing there and shortly thereafter "male-bonded", knocking my head against a tree for forgetter. I had a bruise but it takes more than what he had available (local devils only) to lay in forgetter on me so I did not forget. The usual noise from controllers followed as I was being taken home to meet mother Kazia (formal Kazimiera) and two older siblings, Alicja (born 1947) and Andrzej (born 1948). They knew who I was, but playing stupid started there (idiocy level 2, see my idiocy test). Controllers were working on developing impression on me of being some kind of James Bond in hiding or under cover, an agent without purpose or a fugitive, while passing thoughts that could be summed up with "do not allow yourself to be recognized or else you are in trouble". Well, trouble me some more now. I think the idea was that if I develop enough cover in this direction I myself get fooled by it.

My sister Hania (formal Hanna, nickname Guła but only for me) was brought into the household in 1952. Russian Putin acknowledged her recently on WebTV as Diana, which I take to mean Artemis. Birth of a human named Krysia (formal Krystyna) in 1955 completed the family. A Polish Jew by the name Sobol (formal Sobolewski, Zbigniew) who lived on same street as I and who was earlier known as Hermes and Mercury made some idiotic associations of word “miesiaczka” used by commoners for menstrual period (word derives from Polish “miesiac” meaning month which in folk cultures of the past also meant moon). Sobol claimed that since Artemis was a goddess of moon (I wonder how, see Homeric Hymns), she was barren as moon and also responsible for pains associated with “miesiaczka” (menstrual period). They were able to press enough force on it to put my sister through great pain for “being cause of women’s menstrual cramps” by offloading other women’s pain on my sister. She was subsequently raped, punished by your god for sinning against me (it was recognized that I was pure whenever that was convenient. So was she) and thrown for further degradation to Roman Hofa. Hermes willingly identified with planet Mercury and MEST will have him. He will Deep Fry. I will personally see to it unless Artemis does first. She was a virgin known for chastity and purity in ancient times (Homeric Hymns).

Of interest to Americans who may have spent lifetimes elsewhere as "guests" but do not remember may be a few comments I have about my grandmother on Zysiu's side, Stasia (formal Stanisława). She was running the household with means far below cut-off line of lowest poverty standards used in America, doing chores 12 hours a day or more; cleaning, weeding the garden, cooking and doing laundry without any modern conveniences, and she still considered being better off there than she would be in America. My take was that in America one must incur debt which later has to be paid off, as in "you owe us for the SUV and the house in subdivision and good job we allowed you to have". Stasia "female-bonded" but should be held harmless because it was on controller's demand. She existed in a state of agitation and fear at times and she died in horrible physical condition and paranoid state of mind, accusing people she could not even recognize anymore of trying to steal her pillow and other artifacts. Controllers were ready to pull the plug on her at any time and she knew it. In the fifties she went into a psychotic spin on the sight of police uniforms showing up at the door. The cops only wanted some answers as formality to close (and dismiss) false accusations our neighbor made of grandma stealing some clothes from her. The cops said that statements the accusing woman made to the police were nutty and didn't check out. Neighbor’s name was Witkowska (Mrs.) who was abandoned by her husband (Roman, I think) who "escaped communism and went to Canada". Of his four children only Danuta was worth anything as being of different race than the rest. Roman Witkowski was a plant. He imported into Canada his daughter Halina and later his eldest son Kryspin, setting him up as traffic controller in Toronto, I think, where an airplane crashed into control tower while he was at work to kill him. He went too far with me and I couldn't let him live. Needless to say, Polish wife that Roman Witkowski left behind was his victim.

Stasia liked me, gave me a few pennies from time to time for a sweet roll or a cake and that's good enough for me. I heard on TVN Business channel from Warsaw more recently "We ARE the state” and "We never liked you", and that's good enough for me, too. Beware.

As a rule of thumb if reader does not remember spending lifetimes being wasted while enduring bad living conditions in different times and countries AND does not know that this has been going on, he or she is not an insider in the racket known as American Dream. Documents pertinent to this subject are The Pyramids, Imminent Domain and last line in Table of Games. If Filbert's data is correct (it had better be) there was only about half a million of insiders on Earth as of early eighties and they must get out of way. The half million figure roughly corresponds to LRH's "there's about 1% of them, they are a sorry lot, they got governments on their knees", etc. (about Suppressive Persons, RJ 67 tape)

Readers please notice that this report is rendered graciously and without pointing fingers. I understood that "bad guys" running operations themselves were the victims of flipping, many times over (flip occurs at points of overwhelm, see definitions) and that nobody involved with affairs of this physical universe can be considered to be in his right mind. L. Ron Hubbard knew that. Introduction to Area/Plex technology is offered to explain what a "model citizen" is. The technology is very advanced (difficulty level 103) but is included at introductory level 101 to bring to light its importance. Arrangements necessary to make its implementation possible, to advance sciences to the current level, had been made in more distant past and I had something to do with those arrangements. This is also what L. Ron Hubbard is talking about on his RJ 67 tape. I gave Ron's Journal 67 to Natalia for safekeeping while she visited with me in Hudson NH. Why is it missing?

As of 2003, Area/Plex will not be developed. "By grace alone you shall be saved" and grace is withdrawn.

Weight which the spaceship loaded on me on that Stella Żabikowo soccer field was such that I fell to my knees under pressure. That is where Roman Hofa laid hands on my sister Hania, who was earlier raped and "sinned" against me by American Howie. In years subsequent to attack from that spaceship, vast regions of outer space (deep space objects such as planets, galaxies and galactic clusters) were "integrated" through me into WOG-wide-web your god was building. He was aiming at a position of absolute ruler over the universe, claiming to have created it himself well before this fallacy could be assured to stick. Last I knew he already shafted (duped and short-changed, gave shorter end of the stick) his partner Satan (Point 4 at work). Treachery of your god is beyond description but Satan himself is not a dummy. Satan is very clever.

When it became clear to me that my mission bore no fruits I decided to shorten it to avoid escalations. It was mid-late fifties when I made it plain to Zysiu that I would not recognize his parental authority. It did not take long before his blood started boiling in anger. In a scene in our bedroom (family of 5 had only one bedroom about 4x4 meters in size and a kitchen cut out of secondary building of which part remained a sty) Zysiu went for a showdown. After he caught me he beat me, demanded that I kiss his hand and apologize, then beat me again when I said No or ignored him, over and over. He finally pinned me face down on the bed and pressed pillow over my head to choke me to death. Satan was present. Just about when I decided to leave the body (unconscious) Satan ordered Zysiu to stop. Why?

Before Zysiu caught me, a chase after me around the room took place. I was too fast to be caught. The effort was beginning to tire Zysiu and hightened his fury. One can imagine the fan I had, running around the room jumping on and off the bed, all under pressure from above while effectively holding my shield against Satan who was trying his damnest to assist Zysiu by hitting me. I was not afraid of physical death. As I said, Satan was clever and he questioned my decision not to run for the door to get out and into the open in the commotions. He did not know my reasons and assumed (correctly) that I was up to something that he didn't want. He was being "prudent". The word is in quotes because it would be far better for him not to be "prudent". Worst he could expect at the time was maybe a slap. I would have told him my purpose for visiting these parts, that they blew my project and wasted time I invested, and then ask him if he really wants to stand in my way and fight me. I doubt if he would. I have no equals.

When I listen to music looking at that incident today, I hear "I can see you there, Saturn" on Jack FM radio when I direct my attention above. Has anybody noticed that Saturn planetary system produces the effect of compacting space?

Shortly after I was landed in Poland test was conducted on me to see how fast and how accurately I can compute on patterns, to then copy what's learned for implementation. Test was by Americans, god participated. It was known that I had information up my sleeve which was not compromised. The reason that it wasn't is that Magician's mind is incompatible with yours. What I placed to be known in "regular mind" that I set up was meant for you as information. That the test had military applications instead of a more appropriate "please help us" color tells me that my intentions were misread and existence of theta trap encapsulating that test was unsuspected. I could not have told anyone directly without the recipient being instantly obliterated as result. Fact that I remain alive should suffice as proof that I have the trap "figured" (one word for short). Music lovers who can relate to Pink Floyd's Temporary Lapse of Reason ("One slip and down the hole you go") should appreciate the intelligence required and what the risks are. It should therefore not be considered that I would treat anyone involved in lesser games as enemy. It is your rejection and lack of respect for me alone that will finish you.

At another time on same soccer field I tied up Saturn with Jupiter. They were most eager to fight when the planets were in alignment. I tied them by containing the energy of their simultaneous attack, and than throwing lines back but in reverse order; what Jupiter dumped I attached to Saturn and what Saturn discharged at me I attached to Jupiter. I did it two or three times (on "be my guest, mess up some more" basis) until they figured what it meant and stopped. Instead of taking care of me they have been "competing" ever since. I remembered them from House of Representatives (representing invasion parties in Greek Pantheon), where to the best I can tell I was the only member representing my own interest. Zeus was a member of another, higher house if my memory serves me right. It was a closed house, and as I also say elsewhere, discretion ruled in that if matters of importance were discussed one would not come down to Earth to tell local merchants all about it. I can only vouch for my own discretion, of course, but this was the etiquette of the place.

In closing, it might be good to remind readers that theocracy became the actual system of administration in United States. The country was surrendered to NATO by Al Haig at the time Reagan was shot. Document with topic "Polish connection" titled "I rest my case" has more details of Roman Hofa.

Can Wikipedia put information in on distances to galaxies "orbiting" Milky Way and make sure they are named right? Word orbiting is in quotes because we are dealing with relative motion and nobody (except me) can anchor properly to make this place the center of anything. Nodes are “wet"; they are slipping are depleting, down to whatever stage of your fiasco you cared to take things in your insistence. I hold in contempt your crucification schemes.

They are all kinds of pyramids to keep us focused on schemes. Here are a few of them (picture didn't copy):


As Commander in Chief, Ronald Reagan was more independent than William Buckley, Al Haig, Brzezinski/Kissinger, Knights of Malta and others within the NATO/Vatican cooperative. He had more confidence, too. Today (11/30/2012) I found out why. I spot incidents where he impinged on me deeply in the sixties involving also Urszula, who is a Principal and who later became my wife. Thus his fate is sealed. Games overlap, but to the degree those mentioned fall into American Dream promotion scheme they may wake up in Inquisition area instead of Promised Lands after they drop the body. That’s on assumption that Inquisition does not move soon, which would be a sign of serious misinterpretation of me. See my idiocy test for clues as to why current course continues.

Rome as such, the modern state, is not a game within the meaning of Moron 101 Survival Guide materials. There are just people in it who are part of Zion, Zoo and all kinds of other games. Keep in mind that the state must abide by rules but usually doesn’t on its own initiative. If you don’t call them on rules, expect to be taken advantage of. They don’t announce rules because that would end polarization of society and “opportunities” for them. Filbert refers to that group as “Players” who know rules (which rules?) and estimates their count on Earth to be about 500,000. US did recognize my “exempt” status (Principal, person in his own right), I have to say, but they did permit all kinds of rift-raft to move against me, also from within their own government circles. Anyway, the “insiders” are the Players. Do not expect to be treated fairly unless you can call them on rules. Do you know them?

Filbert was telling me about a man who killed a few spicks (Mexicans) by running them off the road with his car. The judge in murder trial let him go but warned (for good PR, no doubt) not to do it again. “You provided valuable service to us in the past so I’ll let you off on this but you should understand we can’t have such things going on” or something like that was the judge’s line. One can tell both were Players understanding each other above the crowd’s heads.

We are on a stage on which resolution of all games is taking place. A state official can also be a Mason, Islamic leader, a Scientologist, a businessman or someone uncommitted to any other cause, but he is a state official foremost. State officials were given seniority over games in certain areas and were entrusted with information others don’t have. In a way they are “exempted” from certain controls as ruling groups. They are assured to have sufficient force to maintain law and order by a built-in mechanism of taxation of its populations to keep them in check if necessary. This arrangement was deemed desirable by Players earlier on. One was expected to take responsibility for others when applying for state jobs, to forgo alternate motives when charged with management of state affairs. The opposite became norm, however. This constitutes breach of trust.

Ike Eisenhower was the first and last man elected to power I know of to have had the guts to warn about what he called military-industrial complex arising. Ike of course meant corruption, vested interests. As I also say elsewhere, there is not a single legitimate government on Earth today but their illegitimacy does not lie in refusal to fall on knees before me. I couldn’t care less. It lies in abuses involved in process of crawling up on negative selection mechanisms in order to take over and continue a game that’s already in default, which now MUST run out its course because I no longer care to pick it up and redefine it. My refusal to partake in games societies play is not same as abdication from Authority I have. Russia was not in position to refuse my order to move into “Republic of Poland” militarily to break that entity about a year ago. I thought the idea of Christmas presents being dropped from bombers over Warsaw on Christmas Eve was amusing but they didn’t provide the mood breaker I needed by doing it. What used to be known as Poland is my private residence and the longer it takes to make proper arrangements for it the higher the price paid for delays will be. The situation (but not only in “Republic of Poland”) is directly related to SuperFlip. This is why statements such as one accompanying Survival Guide copyright notice in which I say that its materials are descriptive, not causative in nature should be kept in mind. I refuse to redefine your game or allow anyone into my own except where I see it fit.

Everybody who still believes I was bluffing when I said we were in End Times just carry on. Others consider de-WOGging and after you do, see what options you have left.

Where is that prophecy about Iron Generation, by the way? I can’t find it on Internet.

Unique: VCHA-92KAUM

same

Pardot
Jul 25, 2001




http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AirQuotes.jpg

duTrieux.
Oct 9, 2003


what if it's quickly done with one hand, held up but facing away from the other person, and with only one come hither

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp
i've now invented the 'air bird'

i just gave it to you when i said 'air bird'

there, i did it again

Sweevo
Nov 8, 2007

i sometimes throw cables away

i mean straight into the bin without spending 10+ years in the box of might-come-in-handy-someday first

im a fucking monster

Neosexual is a neologism used to describe a subset of the heterosexual male population. A neosexual relates to a departure from metrosexual, back towards more traditional masculine characteristics. A neosexual is described as "James Bond with a sense of humor".[1]

The traits of a neosexual include:

Masculinity
Debonair bearing
Fit and healthy body
"Handy" around the house, able to fix things, etc.
Sense of humor
Loves to Cook

A neosexual is described as sensitive to his partner's needs without losing his masculinity.[2][3]

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp

Sweevo posted:

Neosexual is a neologism used to describe a subset of the heterosexual male population. A neosexual relates to a departure from metrosexual, back towards more traditional masculine characteristics. A neosexual is described as "James Bond with a sense of humor".[1]

The traits of a neosexual include:

Masculinity
Debonair bearing
Fit and healthy body
"Handy" around the house, able to fix things, etc.
Sense of humor
Loves to Cook

A neosexual is described as sensitive to his partner's needs without losing his masculinity.[2][3]


oh look the standard pattern of male behavior has shifted yet again from "ridiculously masculine" up to "cartoonishly masculine"

certainly, gender barriers are being demolished as we speak and we live in a brave new world of homofriendly genderfuckitude

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



im debonair and i can fix ur computer & carry printers if u want

marry me

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp

Carthag posted:

im debonair and i can fix ur computer & carry printers if u want

marry me

Got Fedora?

Carthag Tuek
Oct 15, 2005

Tider skal komme,
tider skal henrulle,
slægt skal følge slægters gang



yeah i inherited one from my great great grandpa but its all beat up

H.P. Hovercraft
Jan 12, 2004

one thing a computer can do that most humans can't is be sealed up in a cardboard box and sit in a warehouse
Slippery Tilde

Sweevo posted:

Neosexual is a neologism used to describe a subset of the heterosexual male population. A neosexual relates to a departure from metrosexual, back towards more traditional masculine characteristics. A neosexual is described as "James Bond with a sense of humor".[1]

The traits of a neosexual include:

Masculinity
Debonair bearing
Fit and healthy body
"Handy" around the house, able to fix things, etc.
Sense of humor
Loves to Cook

A neosexual is described as sensitive to his partner's needs without losing his masculinity.[2][3]

what does masculinity mean in this context

because i'm thinking the intention is "masturbates to guy/girl and girl/girl porn and is definitely not gay"

Guido van Possum
Apr 7, 2012

by T. Finninho
is human will gently caress

Panty Saluter
Jan 17, 2004

Making learning fun!

Sweevo posted:

Neosexual is a neologism used to describe a subset of the heterosexual male population. A neosexual relates to a departure from metrosexual, back towards more traditional masculine characteristics. A neosexual is described as "James Bond with a sense of humor".[1]

The traits of a neosexual include:

Masculinity
Debonair bearing
Fit and healthy body
"Handy" around the house, able to fix things, etc.
Sense of humor
Loves to Cook

A neosexual is described as sensitive to his partner's needs without losing his masculinity.[2][3]

where's the part about people you would actually want to be around not giving half a runny poo poo about any of this

Deacon of Delicious
Aug 20, 2007

I bet the twist ending is Dracula's dick-babies

Sweevo posted:

A neosexual is described as sensitive to his partner's needs without losing his masculinity.[2][3]

what if my partner needs me to be less masculine

Guido van Possum
Apr 7, 2012

by T. Finninho

Deacon of Delicious posted:

what if my partner needs me to be less masculine

find a new partner

Deacon of Delicious
Aug 20, 2007

I bet the twist ending is Dracula's dick-babies

Guido van Possum posted:

find a new partner

no i like mrs deacon :3:

Cold on a Cob
Feb 6, 2006

i've seen so much, i'm going blind
and i'm brain dead virtually

College Slice

Detroit Q. Spider posted:

where's the part about people you would actually want to be around not giving half a runny poo poo about any of this

that awful man
Feb 18, 2007

YOSPOS, bitch

Carthag posted:

is tsikuni japanese b/c if so lol

it's some sort of yogurt-based sauce from greece

theflyingexecutive
Apr 22, 2007

Why the hell is it called neosexual if it's a return to conservative gender constructs?

axolotl farmer
May 17, 2007

Now I'm going to sing the Perry Mason theme

neosexuals took the blue pill

ymgve
Jan 2, 2004


:dukedog:
Offensive Clock
this thing will be more than worthless tomorrow

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Maya_date

Radio Paranoia
Jun 27, 2010

It is now safe to turn off your computer.

axolotl farmer posted:

neosexuals took the blue pill

whoa

Malloc Voidstar
May 7, 2007

Fuck the cowboys. Unf. Fuck em hard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_shot_first#References_in_Star_Wars_culture

JawnV6
Jul 4, 2004

So hot ...

Install Gentoo posted:

uh how is that great. you get no calls for free.

not like "long distance" rates have been expensive on landlines in america since the 70s either

when i tried to get a landline here, "local" was defined by a list of exchanges. my workplace, an impressive 5 miles away from my residence and the only place I'd regularly call, is a non-local exchange

prefect
Sep 11, 2001

No one, Woodhouse.
No one.




Dead Man’s Band

It's the author's use of paragraphs that I find most compelling.

buttcoin smuggler
Jun 25, 2011

theflyingexecutive posted:

Why the hell is it called neosexual if it's a return to conservative gender constructs?

on this topic, i am in an airport, a man just explained to his ~2 year old boy that he can't wear the extra pink hat his mom has because it is "girly"

he wasn't being ironic

buttcoin smuggler
Jun 25, 2011
i am unreasonably disturbed by that

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp
that dude that spent a month wearing skirts b/c his boy liked to wear skirts is the polar opposite of that dude and also one of the better dads

Yodzilla
Apr 29, 2005

Now who looks even dumber?

Beef Witch
gently caress any dude who won't wear pink

Stay Safe
Sep 1, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Teemu_Ruskeep%C3%A4%C3%A4

quote:

The Official Fantasy of the School Threats In Finland
In September 2009 in Rovaniemi, Finland, I was detained for 68 hours, sued for a year and after that I was fined for showing an airsoft in a classroom in a happy manner to my friend. The charge was that "placed the toy which looked like a gun to his personal desk and pointed it towards him".

Happy manner means that I was being careful not to make my message seem serious to my friend. Therefore I placed it on an adjacent table with me, not pointing to him and not close to him on his table. I walked to my friend, placed the toy on another table, stood there for 10 seconds and then I went to sit behind him quietly for less than a minute and then I put the toy away. I was gesturing to my friend that "hey, would you like to see my cool toy, which I'm taking to the forest trip after class?". It was a nice thing to do. I went to the forest trip for four hours and when I stepped off the bus back in the campus, to my surprise, I was escorted to the jail. My friend had assumed that it was real and that I was a school terrorist, even against his best friend's opinion, who was in the classroom.
That man knew it to be an airsoft. He said in the classroom that "so I know what it is but I don't think you should be showing it in here", by which he was referring to a toy gun in a public place and the possible misconceptions of such an act, and not to any "threatening way" in my displaying of the toy. I wanted to defy the oppressive local attitudes by a free and morally sound act of friendship especially when just two of my friends saw the defiance and because I wanted to be myself despite of the local bullies. In the court he also said that "I don't think Teemu did it". My friend said nothing under any occasion. I got no warning and couldn't have known what he felt like.

My friend got worried of what he mistook as a gun in his face, and he was made to believe the fantasy which the interrogator and the prosecutor invented as the explanation. The rationale of the authorities was to stop people from dying at the hands of adolescent gun-waving crazy kids, which made them feel like I needed to be fixed with a story that would get me convicted. Of course I wasn't like that and their feelings where never backed up by evidence during the case. I could have discussed about it like a normal person and apologize to my friend if needed. But the friend and the authorities never let me. They looked at me through the context of violence and assumed that I couldn't be normal. They rushed to stop me from making an assumed terrorist attack. Even when I talked nicely, it was taken with extreme prejudice. They wouldn't revise their attitude even after the investigation of a year before the court. In the background is the bullies in the local law school, who had called for "metal detectors" to the campus on my account, as a slander, because I had told them "I am going to stop your bullying" such as mocking, gossip talk and isolation in the university of Lapland. They even wrote that "he has got to go". I was going to do it by writing to the forum of the student union. My friend was too impressionable and under the influence of the gossips of the law students and the fantasies of the crime professionals. During 2010 I had also heard from the prosecutor that my friend had claimed that the toy was on his table and that it was pointing him. I can't think of any other reason for this lie, except that the prosecutor tried to secure victory in the court. The authorities should have calmed him down and not use some criminal law against me as a revenge.

The argument of the police and the judge was the affirming the consequent logical fallacy. All cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. Ginger must be a cat. An airsoft is like a gun. School terrorists use guns. I must be a school terrorist. That's why I was repeatedly reminded by other students of the school shootings and how "I should have known better" and "you must admit, it was a stupid thing to do". I don't think so, because that's not what I was talking about.
But it is not proven that Ginger can't be another type of animal. It was not proven that I did not use the airsoft in any other than a threatening manner. In other words, the gun looked real. Real guns are shown as to threaten. Even fake guns may point to a potential real attack in the future. I was assumably threatening, and I was actually detained and put to an isolated cell for this assumption. But it was not proven that I didn't show a seemingly real gun in any other purpose than to threaten. I was assumed to have a motive to threaten without any investigations even thought the prosecutor was assumed to be right about what I had done. Also the law students were assumed to be legitimate, even though I had mentioned the forum posts to the interrogator. The prosecutor/police/judge complex should have dropped the case once they saw that it wasn't a terrorist affair. Instead they pretended that it needed serious legal process so that they wouldn't be seen to overreact like they did in that afternoon. It just doesn't apply what I've heard some high ranking police officer tell in the national radio: "It doesn't matter who has committed the crime, if a crime has been committed, the investigations begin in every case". It depends on who gets to decide if a crime has been committed (beyond reasonable doubt).

Another issue was how the police interrogators apparently used my co-operation on purpose by twisting it as bad as possible. They lied to me about who is the leader of the investigation, whom I met only after they were told to release me, they gave dubious answers in the intercom, they refused to tell when I could get out, they didn't give me food in a day or a shower except once and they made me hysterical by telling me how this could yet continue in the Oulu prison. They didn't care that I was trying to be constructive and co-operative, but they just picked the wrong things from my speech under my distress and confusion that they told to the press and to build the case in the court. They even sent me to the Lappi Central Hospital for a check after I had sung in the cell, but the doctor supported me.
In the court, I used my very limited time as to explain that even if it was on his table and even if it pointed to him in the beginning, once he had straightened up his back and as I had observed by their gestures, the pipe didn't point to him anymore, I didn't turn the pipe towards him again as to threaten him. It went to say that I had no motive to threaten my friend with a gun. I wasn't "allowed" to read a text from the paper and the judge kept telling me "no, you are not to talk about that now". There was no proof other than the prosecutor's word, who behaved as if it was axiomatic. My friend didn't talk even in the court. My friend should have talked to his friends or me before rattling me to the cops.

It is so that the original form of the charge came as the police chief's cause for the detention, and that was taken by the prosecutor as the case, and the prosecutor pushed my friend away from trust and communication with me into the total neglect and the cynical suing process. The verdict was as serious as the police chief's speculative cause for my attention and they didn't need to let it go. They just made up the specific form of it without investigations as to get it into the court. The allegations were all proven by authority alone and not by evidence at all throughout the police investigation and the court session. The mistakes were all circled around the user of power which was the students and authorities specifically in the field of law. The police should have observed the situation from afar like in any normal situation and then decide about intervening as needed and not to cause public distress and personal damage. Instead the police recoded my action with an assumed malicious motive and they invented the way that I had allegedly threatened afterwards, which was not what I had done. The police determined what the situation should be handled like and the prosecutor probably told my friend just how bad it seemed to the police. I gave my friend a misunderstanding and that is not a threat. The police made the rest of the country scared by making a systematic lie.

Even the Lapin kansa newspaper wrote just what the officials had told them during that I was kept isolated in the cell, so I neatly couldn't talk for myself. The reporter wrote that I "threatened as a test", but I had told the interrogator about Erving Goffman's deviation experiment as an example of deviance, that is how to break habitual norms intentionally as to cause a reaction which proves that the people except always the same compliance to norms and the people become aggressive when that habituality is broken. I wasn't talking about threatening somebody intentionally, but I was trying to make the interrogator understand that deviance can be harmless and still cause an irrational reaction. I wasn't testing my friend, I was defying the risk of a misunderstanding and I counted on that my friend would see my well-meaning purpose and rationally overlook my deviance.

After the toy presentation, I spent the whole 90 minute lecture with my friend in the classroom and I participated actively in the class. My friend never expressed any problem at any point. I also commented 10 minutes later and before the lecture to my friends that "what if I run with that through the front doors of the university and screamed?". That was sarcasm about the law students' comments about metal detectors and the fake discourses that I knew they would try to create, so that they would have to admit that they made the whole thing up, because the toy wasn't real. I believed that nobody could be charged for a threat if there was no weapon and if the behavior of myself was normal. I thought I had made that obvious to my friends. By joking about running in to the university with a toy gun, I wanted to express my unhappiness about the bullying of the law students and I hoped that my friend would have showed compassion as a friend. I wasn't about to do that and that's why I chose my words to my friend "what if...". Unfortunately the authorities applied the same kind of false deduction even to the occasion where I talked about making that kind of a joke. I got an answer to my sarcastic question, which showed absolutely clear the misleading effort of the law regime. There were multiple symbolic meanings in people's behavior during those couple of minutes, that the official investigation wouldn't detect, and none of them was a threat.
In analogy, the interrogator first blamed me for "threatening to run through the classroom door and see what my friend will do". She didn't even get the door right, not to mention the hypothetical tone. I denied that and I never heard about it again. Why where there so many contradicting versions by the interrogator? That proves the charge didn't come from my friend in the first place. The interrogator was trying to make up the way I had threatened without having any evidence. The interrogator also talked about how dangerous an airsoft can be if it hit someone in the eye. I said, yes, it could be, which was an honest reply, but she used that as a pretext to show that I could have made a threat with an airsoft. The interrogator created a fear factor for the object and then claimed that I could have used it. But it was not proven that there was no positive factor like friendliness. I should have replied: "what does that have to do with anything I talked with my friend?". Airsofts are not dangerous, unless somebody intends to shoot into the eye and unless there is firing in the first place without safety glasses, but that's not what had happened. It was pure and utter nonsense by the interrogator and intentional misleading of the situation. However, in the court the judge asked the other friend who came to testify that "are you friends with Teemu?". He tried to help me but unfortunately he said that "we know each other but we are not close". The correct answer could have changed everything. There was also a third person in the classroom, a middle aged woman, who commented to the Lapin Kansa that "it looked like a real gun to me". The charge didn't include her either, and I was surprised to hear about 10 months later from the court secretary when she sent me the summons that it was my friend who had sued me. I thought it was the stranger woman. The interrogator told me once in the jail that "they have made a case out this", while not naming which one from the classroom. Why didn't she tell me that? Because she thought that it was obvious. That proves how the interrogator had decided before the trial that I was guilty and that the law regime was going to put me through a show trial. All these things could easily be misunderstood, but they weren't even mentioned in the court. So the prosecutor and the police were trying to find the right story in order to make a case that was based on my friend's complaint but it was not based on what my friend had told them. The police didn't know for sure what had happened even in the court. The method of crime could have been anything the authorities could invent. To get me sued, they picked the version which was the hardest one to disprove, being that I allegedly "placed the toy which looked like a gun to his personal desk and pointed it towards him". Then there are the morons as students who hate for what they think I did. In 2012 in Joensuu, one student refused to shake hands with me and another one thought that I am "a really lovely guy".

In essense, the authorities heard my attenuating account, they were in a free and conscious position to decide and they decided to punish me for something that they could see I had not done. My co-operation with the interrogators, the court, the board of the university and my friend by mail prior to court session was all but ignored. It is typical that when a fake charge is made as to get somebody implicated under the ulterior motive of the accuser, then the process goes through despite argumentation. Nobody wanted to listen. They all wanted to get me for "terrorism", and I had no power to stop them. This is also how Iraq was invaded after the 9/11 attacks.

The judge became part of the scam by the time time prosecutor told to the judge in the court that "I think all the basics are here". He was manipulating the judge to overlook my arguments and not to go into them. That was the only time I spoke without being addressed in the court and I said forcefully and looked in the eye of the prosecutor: "The basics are not clear!". Everybody were quiet and I looked away. The prosecutor was clearly the bigger evil. He probably belonged to that Finnish hard-liner parliament group, which try to use rightist force and fight fear with fear instead of supportive social policy. They have created the situation I read about this week in the tabloids: "Teachers are suffering from fears". The judge ignored my letters to her and my argument about not pointing the toy intentionally and she declared me guilty of a threat. In addition to having suffered as an innocent man and having been suspended from the university for six months, she gave me a 450 euros (3 jail days reducted) fine. I think the judge should have ended the case due to the lack of evidence, but they didn't need to acknowledge my arguments. The degree-holders of the justice system and the entire government wouldn't have to admit that they can't assess people's lives accurately by the law and they are just imposing their own contexts to things which are not related. Instead the judge, the prosecutor and the police created a criminal stigma, which would destroy somebody else but their authority in Rovaniemi. That's how the fake justice system supports whatever discourse is wanted against an innocent victim on the pretense of the law.

It seems that the circumstances made it too likely that the situation in the classroom would be misunderstood and then the authorities "tried" to get me for much more than just a misunderstanding. My friend was foolish but also the victim of the circumstances that the police and the students of law of the University of Lapland had created. As a result, the campus cleaning women walked around me with a hysterical disposition. The university board was foolish too. There was nothing I could tell them that would stop them from seeing me as if I was a school terrorist. It was quite unprofessional of academics and that's why I quit. I became a victim of the circumstances of the day but also the terrorist witch-hunt in this country.

Teemu Ruskeepää 188.67.83.90 (talk) 18:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Jonny 290 posted:

that dude that spent a month wearing skirts b/c his boy liked to wear skirts is the polar opposite of that dude and also one of the better dads

link please

also yeah, that's really good for his self esteem and all, but i would hope that the dad does explain social norms to him sometime because no matter how open the family is, a man wearing a skirt is not treated normally in north america

(kilts minor exception)

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp

Sagebrush posted:

link please

also yeah, that's really good for his self esteem and all, but i would hope that the dad does explain social norms to him sometime because no matter how open the family is, a man wearing a skirt is not treated normally in north america

(kilts minor exception)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/04/meet-the-dad-who-wears-skirts.html

germany

Sniep
Mar 28, 2004

All I needed was that fatty blunt...



King of Breakfast
pink used to be the masculine color

Socracheese
Oct 20, 2008

its almost as if the idea of 'correct' clothing is culturally imposed and arbitrary

funky not a junkie
Aug 5, 2011
computers

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Trig Discipline
Jun 3, 2008

Please leave the room if you think this might offend you.
Grimey Drawer

this forum is for funny computer, not just regular computer

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply