Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Paul Pot
Mar 4, 2010

by Y Kant Ozma Post

Guilty posted:

It's hard to deal with for you because you probably think a hook starts way out past the shoulder and an overhead starts high and outside. A fatigued fighter will not do a downward angled punch. He's going to drop his guard and throw and then drop on the bring back. It's like lobbing a ball when you're tired. the ball is still going up.

fatigued fighters often wade forward with the hands tucked under their chin and when those guys start reaching with their punches, they're flying at a slightly downward facing angle. you even see this poo poo during endurance drills on the bag..what's so puzzling to you? it happens a lot more often than precise downward punches (outside of tall vs short guy matchups). maybe even more often than you compulsively mentioning hooks and overhands in a discussion about straight punches.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ligur
Sep 6, 2000

by Lowtax

IMO Those are very tight slightly overhand and angled crosses against a shorter opponent. One of the might be even a right hook that starts like a straight (which Guilty mentioned earlier). Klitschko doesn't need to worry about an immediate counter over his hand so no millisecond return through the pipe are required.

edit: I'm actually pretty stoked about hearing why they are anything but. I admit talking about striking on the internet with people who are rarely on the same page and might take some liberties on interpreting each other isn't easy, at least compared to just hanging around at the gym and showing what you mean, but it can be fruitful. After all, what I want to do is learn more.

Paul Pot posted:

fatigued fighters often wade forward with the hands tucked under their chin and when those guys start reaching with their punches, they're flying at a slightly downward facing angle. you even see this poo poo during endurance drills on the bag

Exactly my experience and what I was talking about, tired guys can still keep their hands up at their jaw but reach and drop when they throw.

vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv

Ligur fucked around with this message at 22:16 on Dec 20, 2012

Paul Pot
Mar 4, 2010

by Y Kant Ozma Post
wlad almost exclusively throws overhands with his right, those aren't straight punches

KidDynamite
Feb 11, 2005

Xguard86 posted:

more strikechat:

http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/68212-human-hands-designed-to-throw-punches


my counterpoint is: Why is it so easy to break your hand hitting someone in the head? If the human hand has a significant role in striking, you'd think there would be fewer tiny bones and more robust structures.

I don't know anything about this but I thank my lucky stars my dumb fists have never broken in a streetfight.

Obdicut
May 15, 2012

"What election?"

Paul Pot posted:

fatigued fighters often wade forward with the hands tucked under their chin and when those guys start reaching with their punches, they're flying at a slightly downward facing angle. you even see this poo poo during endurance drills on the bag..what's so puzzling to you? it happens a lot more often than precise downward punches (outside of tall vs short guy matchups). maybe even more often than you compulsively mentioning hooks and overhands in a discussion about straight punches.

Oh, I kinda get what you mean now. Yeah, I guess those are downward angled-- the whole 'train linkage' thing was a distraction since those that's a different problem, that might co-occur.

Remember, what you said was:

quote:

straight punches with a downward trajectory are lovely arm punches resulting from fatigue and wave punch sounds like check hook's retarded cousin

Which was just way too broad-brushed.

Paul Pot
Mar 4, 2010

by Y Kant Ozma Post
not a lot of effort went into that post, even by my standards

kimbo305
Jun 9, 2007

actually, yeah, I am a little mad

Paul Pot posted:

doing that vs a mirrored fighter is suicidal.

Doing what, looking to slip outside their cross? Or doing so and following with an uppercut?

Lt. Shiny-sides
Dec 24, 2008

Xguard86 posted:

more strikechat:

http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/68212-human-hands-designed-to-throw-punches


my counterpoint is: Why is it so easy to break your hand hitting someone in the head? If the human hand has a significant role in striking, you'd think there would be fewer tiny bones and more robust structures.

I read an interesting paper that hypothesized that humans are bipedal because it allows for better punching. They pointed to primates that spend a lot of time as quadrupeds and then stand on their back legs to fight. Also in the research they found that taller people punching down had more punching force than short people punching up, which they claim in part leads to the attraction women have towards taller men. Not sure I buy it all, but it is interesting science.

Here is the hand article in full:
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/2/i.1.full.pdf+html

Edit: Sorry that's not it. This is it:
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/2/236.full.pdf+html

Lt. Shiny-sides fucked around with this message at 04:30 on Dec 21, 2012

BlindSite
Feb 8, 2009

kimbo305 posted:

Doing what, looking to slip outside their cross? Or doing so and following with an uppercut?

Maybe I'm confused or he is or you are with the use of the word mirrored, but if I'm orthodox and they're southpaw, if I slip outside off their cross. I've got my lead hand covering while I throw the rear uppercut. I want to be angled so I'm outside their line and properly angled. They're wide open and I'm defended.

If we're both orthodox and I slip outside throwing a rear uppercut leaves my right side undefended and open to a lead hook. Either if I get tied up, miss my mark or they reset properly and throw I'm eating a hook.

Either way in situation one I'd rather throw the cross counter.

DekeThornton
Sep 2, 2011

Be friends!
I posted this in the B-leauge thread as well, but I think it fits here as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxYGiPxdylg

It sure is something.

gimpsuitjones
Mar 27, 2007

What are you lookin at...
I did some sparring today, first time training in like 2 months (thanks, work)


1: I'm fat
2: Always always always wear a cup
3: Don't spar 1 week after spraining your knee
4: I've completely lost the feel for it. Does anyone else find it to be really perishable?
5: Seriously, always wear a cup



Really not ready for Thailand, going to have to put in some serious cardio work/diet before then. Sprained knee doesn't help (nothing major, just hyperextended it tripping over a rock when hiking). Also keep popping my left shoulder a little bit, really need to do some stuff to pull that back in. Dammit. Mad at myself for getting so out of shape/practice. 12hr days in the Australian outback should be no excuse.

T.S. Smelliot
Apr 23, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
Being a southpaw fuckin owns suck it righties :smug:


e: if you guys think orthodox vs. southpaw is awkward jesus christ I sparred against another southpaw recently...now I understand where all the hate comes from.

Ligur
Sep 6, 2000

by Lowtax

BlindSite posted:

If we're both orthodox and I slip outside throwing a rear uppercut leaves my right side undefended and open to a lead hook. Either if I get tied up, miss my mark or they reset properly and throw I'm eating a hook.

How about throwing a lead uppercut instead, that owns.

kimbo305
Jun 9, 2007

actually, yeah, I am a little mad

BlindSite posted:

Maybe I'm confused or he is or you are with the use of the word mirrored, but if I'm orthodox and they're southpaw, if I slip outside off their cross.

I'm not sure why you ended your sentence there, but then (after you slip outside the mirrored cross) you're already outside their decent angle of attack. If they're very dexterous, they might have faked the cross, had you buy into that, and then thrown a quick rear roundhouse.

quote:

I've got my lead hand covering while I throw the rear uppercut. I want to be angled so I'm outside their line and properly angled. They're wide open and I'm defended.
They're pretty much open once you get to the outside of their cross. Maybe the confusion is how you move your feet? I consider a slip just the initial movement, and not a rule on where you put your feet afterwards. Like you don't have to stand in place once you've leaned your head out of the way, but can step into the direction of the slip.

Paul Pot
Mar 4, 2010

by Y Kant Ozma Post

kimbo305 posted:

Doing what, looking to slip outside their cross? Or doing so and following with an uppercut?

slipping to the outside is already dangerous vs mirrored fighters, i just don't understand why anyone would follow up on that with another risky move (rear uppercut) instead of going for the body...especially against floyd mayweather

Xguard86
Nov 22, 2004

"You don't understand his pain. Everywhere he goes he sees women working, wearing pants, speaking in gatherings, voting. Surely they will burn in the white hot flames of Hell"
I still remember my boxing trainer:

"for you, right now, there is no right hand uppercut. It does not exist"

man I miss striking. I had a good time boxing but I felt like splitting my already kind of limited time was no good and bjj had to take priority.

Julio Cesar Fatass
Jul 24, 2007

"...."

Israfel posted:

e: if you guys think orthodox vs. southpaw is awkward jesus christ I sparred against another southpaw recently...now I understand where all the hate comes from.

In Hell the only boxing on TV is two journeymen southpaws circling each other, giving up on finding a good angle, flicking halfspeed jabs then backing up half a step. All to the orgasmic giggling of Steve Farhood.

kimbo305
Jun 9, 2007

actually, yeah, I am a little mad

Paul Pot posted:

slipping to the outside is already dangerous vs mirrored fighters, i just don't understand why anyone would follow up on that with another risky move (rear uppercut) instead of going for the body...especially against floyd mayweather

Ok, I'm southpaw facing orthodox. He throws a telegraphed and committed cross. I slip to my left, successfully getting to the outside of his right hand. What is the next hazard for me?

Outside of boxing, I see clinch and knee or a fast rear kick being a problem if I step in deep after the slip. In boxing, I'm not seeing the immediate danger. I've just put myself in the most awkward place for him to attack.

The main problem I see is that it's hard to time and succeed in that slip.

Guilty
May 3, 2003
Ask me about how people having a bad reaction to MSG makes them racist, because I've never heard of gluten sensitivity

DekeThornton posted:

I posted this in the B-leauge thread as well, but I think it fits here as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxYGiPxdylg

It sure is something.

seems like a giant waste of time and money

mewse
May 2, 2006

So it's like a tag team but the second round is a 2-on-1?

I was kinda cringing when the outnumbered guy was caught in a rear naked and getting punched in the face by the second guy. If they weren't being sportsmanlike someone could get really hurt..

DekeThornton
Sep 2, 2011

Be friends!

mewse posted:

So it's like a tag team but the second round is a 2-on-1?



I really don't know. I think once one guy taps out or is knocked out his partner is left to fend for himself. It's all very strange and Russian.

TollTheHounds
Mar 23, 2006

He died for your sins...

gimpsuitjones posted:

I did some sparring today, first time training in like 2 months (thanks, work)


1: I'm fat
2: Always always always wear a cup
3: Don't spar 1 week after spraining your knee
4: I've completely lost the feel for it. Does anyone else find it to be really perishable?
5: Seriously, always wear a cup



Really not ready for Thailand, going to have to put in some serious cardio work/diet before then. Sprained knee doesn't help (nothing major, just hyperextended it tripping over a rock when hiking). Also keep popping my left shoulder a little bit, really need to do some stuff to pull that back in. Dammit. Mad at myself for getting so out of shape/practice. 12hr days in the Australian outback should be no excuse.

1) I sometimes worry that MT is giving me a body image disorder, I'm not fat at all ( but obviously have SOME body fat ) but I've never felt as conscious of any non-muscle weight as I have since starting beginning of last year.

2) 100%, even if just doing boxing drills. Love my nutty buddy!

3) Also don't spar with a bruised rib. It sucks feeling like a giant useless pussy but it sucks even more when you have to tell the other guy "hey I'm kind of tender in my side so don't hit to hard OK?? :smith:", then when he barely taps you folding over. Then having to decline all sparring requests because "my rib".

4) I agree, even when it's not injury related. I came back to training/sparring after a 1 month break and it was like starting over from scratch. I was flinching, closing my eyes, turtling after a simple 1-2-3 and just generally felt extremely overwhelmed and scared of getting hit.

The thing is that before doing any MT or sparring, I was admittedly afraid of getting hit - I didn't know what it would FEEL like and assumed it would hurt. Now, mentally I don't really care about getting hit at all - from a logical standpoint I know it won't hurt, I haven't experienced pain from getting hit with all my gear on ( except my rib of course ). Obviously though my body doesn't feel the same way after a break like that. It's like the fear response is so deeply ingrained into my body that it doesn't matter how much I conceptually understand it won't hurt - my muscles still react very defensively.

A few more sessions later and I feel like I'm better than ever, but it's very much like a sub-conscious mental muscle to me - if I don't use it, I lose it. You long-term MT/MMA/Striking guys find it the same? Or is the "recovery" time from a break lessened the more time you've spent sparring? I assume the longer you've done it, the easier it is to get back into step. Either way, just keep it up and it'll come back!

5) ALWAYS, since wearing mine I've noticed a lot of accidental cock punches and grazing. Glad I got my buddy to back me up.

TollTheHounds fucked around with this message at 19:40 on Dec 21, 2012

Guilty
May 3, 2003
Ask me about how people having a bad reaction to MSG makes them racist, because I've never heard of gluten sensitivity
I noticed that if I am caught up in life or whatever, and I'm away from MT for like a month or so, I do better coming back since I miss getting run over by a truck :sigh:

gimpsuitjones
Mar 27, 2007

What are you lookin at...

TollTheHounds posted:

1) I sometimes worry that MT is giving me a body image disorder, I'm not fat at all ( but obviously have SOME body fat ) but I've never felt as conscious of any non-muscle weight as I have since starting beginning of last year.

Haha maybe

Paul Pot
Mar 4, 2010

by Y Kant Ozma Post

kimbo305 posted:

Ok, I'm southpaw facing orthodox. He throws a telegraphed and committed cross. I slip to my left, successfully getting to the outside of his right hand. What is the next hazard for me?

Outside of boxing, I see clinch and knee or a fast rear kick being a problem if I step in deep after the slip. In boxing, I'm not seeing the immediate danger. I've just put myself in the most awkward place for him to attack.

The main problem I see is that it's hard to time and succeed in that slip.

well there's no immediate hazard, but you're pretty likely to hit arm/glove/elbow instead of chin and get countered off that. just seems like a risky move compared to a punch to the liver or temple. i guess there's a bigger chance of success with mma gloves like kiddynamite said, but i doubt big country spends a lot of time contemplating this.

mewse
May 2, 2006

kimbo305 posted:

Ok, I'm southpaw facing orthodox. He throws a telegraphed and committed cross. I slip to my left, successfully getting to the outside of his right hand. What is the next hazard for me?

Outside of boxing, I see clinch and knee or a fast rear kick being a problem if I step in deep after the slip. In boxing, I'm not seeing the immediate danger. I've just put myself in the most awkward place for him to attack.

The main problem I see is that it's hard to time and succeed in that slip.

Wasn't the context of this discussion that if you end up in this spot and throw a right uppercut you are wide open for their left hook?

I'm confused

Ashenai
Oct 5, 2005

You taught me language;
and my profit on't
Is, I know how to curse.

Lt. Shiny-sides posted:

I read an interesting paper that hypothesized that humans are bipedal because it allows for better punching. They pointed to primates that spend a lot of time as quadrupeds and then stand on their back legs to fight. Also in the research they found that taller people punching down had more punching force than short people punching up, which they claim in part leads to the attraction women have towards taller men. Not sure I buy it all, but it is interesting science.

Here is the hand article in full:
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/2/i.1.full.pdf+html

Edit: Sorry that's not it. This is it:
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/216/2/236.full.pdf+html

The first pdf is the sort of moronic garbage that science journalists, being too stupid to understand either science or journalism, regularly poo poo out. The second one seems solid, but doesn't say anything except that all other things being equal, natural selection would probably favor hands that can punch over hands that cannot. Which is pretty self-evident.

The fact that a human will easily lose an unarmed fight to any animal of equal body weight should be a pretty strong clue that we did not evolve for unarmed combat.

BlindSite
Feb 8, 2009

kimbo305 posted:

I'm not sure why you ended your sentence there, but then (after you slip outside the mirrored cross) you're already outside their decent angle of attack. If they're very dexterous, they might have faked the cross, had you buy into that, and then thrown a quick rear roundhouse.

They're pretty much open once you get to the outside of their cross. Maybe the confusion is how you move your feet? I consider a slip just the initial movement, and not a rule on where you put your feet afterwards. Like you don't have to stand in place once you've leaned your head out of the way, but can step into the direction of the slip.

I angle and shuffle a poo poo load because I've got short legs and arms and I train with taller, longer guys. So when I slip I have to close quickly. I drill it a lot on my own as well when doing bag work. Some times in order to open up properly the angles I have don't allow for certain punching angles I guess.

Ligur
Sep 6, 2000

by Lowtax
Today we trained stepping outside a right cross (everyone orthodox) and throwing a left overhand as a counter.

kimbo305
Jun 9, 2007

actually, yeah, I am a little mad

mewse posted:

Wasn't the context of this discussion that if you end up in this spot and throw a right uppercut you are wide open for their left hook?

I'm confused

I think the risk is higher if you step less and counter with the lead upper instead of stepping deep and using the rear upper.

My friend linked me this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZQCoS4FSfk&t=55s
At 1:02, 1:19, and 1:25, McCallum leans slightly to the outside of the cross and then shoots the rear upper. It's not directly relevant to this discussion, imo, because he's outclassing that guy with a barrage of techniques (and dominating the cross exchange) and just occasionally using that one, but there's a time and place for it.

Meeks Sisu
Mar 30, 2011

Is this performance art!?
Newbie striking question: is there a reason that we don't see MMA fighters bob-and-weave like boxers tend to do? The only MMA fighter I can recall doing that was KJ Noons, and it seemed to work fairly well for him. I assume it's because of the threat of knees and kicks but I'm not sure.

canoshiz
Nov 6, 2005

THANK GOD FOR THE SMOKE MACHINE!

Meeks Sisu posted:

Newbie striking question: is there a reason that we don't see MMA fighters bob-and-weave like boxers tend to do? The only MMA fighter I can recall doing that was KJ Noons, and it seemed to work fairly well for him. I assume it's because of the threat of knees and kicks but I'm not sure.

I remember seeing a video of Marlon Sandro doing some fancy bobbing and weaving and ended up eating a ridiculous head kick and dying because of it. I assume that's why.


edit:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkWR0tGC8P8

canoshiz fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Dec 22, 2012

Obdicut
May 15, 2012

"What election?"

Meeks Sisu posted:

Newbie striking question: is there a reason that we don't see MMA fighters bob-and-weave like boxers tend to do? The only MMA fighter I can recall doing that was KJ Noons, and it seemed to work fairly well for him. I assume it's because of the threat of knees and kicks but I'm not sure.

Bringing your head closer to someone's feet and knees isn't a good idea. You do see bobbing and weaving but they're combined with other actions, like stepping in close and other things that'll take away the ability to kick/knee. It's the same reason you don't see them doing the sway back that often, since that leaves your legs undefended. If someone is doing a very big move, you could still sway back but it's risky.

Obdicut fucked around with this message at 23:13 on Dec 22, 2012

Ligur
Sep 6, 2000

by Lowtax

Meeks Sisu posted:

Newbie striking question: is there a reason that we don't see MMA fighters bob-and-weave like boxers tend to do? The only MMA fighter I can recall doing that was KJ Noons, and it seemed to work fairly well for him. I assume it's because of the threat of knees and kicks but I'm not sure.

Anderson Silva is the only person who can do it in MMA and get away with it without eating a massive kick or knee to the face.

Xguard86
Nov 22, 2004

"You don't understand his pain. Everywhere he goes he sees women working, wearing pants, speaking in gatherings, voting. Surely they will burn in the white hot flames of Hell"
its also much easier to take a guy down when hes bent over like that. Its too bad too because watching guys pretend its the matrix is the coolest part of boxing.

TheStampede
Feb 20, 2008

"I'm like a hunter of peace. One who chases the elusive mayfly of love... or something like that."

canoshiz posted:

I remember seeing a video of Marlon Sandro doing some fancy bobbing and weaving and ended up eating a ridiculous head kick and dying because of it. I assume that's why.


edit:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkWR0tGC8P8

As a note, I'm pretty sure no one died here. At least, not according to Wikipedia.

Decades
Apr 12, 2007

College Slice

TheStampede posted:

As a note, I'm pretty sure no one died here. At least, not according to Wikipedia.

I'm pretty sure you can make out the soul leaving his body if you squint, but yeah, don't worry. It came back.

Cozy Hemp Mines
May 16, 2009

by Fistgrrl

Xguard86 posted:

more strikechat:

http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/68212-human-hands-designed-to-throw-punches


my counterpoint is: Why is it so easy to break your hand hitting someone in the head? If the human hand has a significant role in striking, you'd think there would be fewer tiny bones and more robust structures.

It has a hell of a lot more to do with head structure than fist structure.



The human head has incredibly weak areas, and dense bone plating, right next to one another. You might throw a perfect right overhand to his orbital, but if he ducks and you punch the top of his head; well, you prolly gonna have to see a doctor.

Cozy Hemp Mines fucked around with this message at 21:06 on Dec 25, 2012

Degenerate Star
Oct 27, 2005
unlikely

Space human being posted:

It's TKD History Time Y'all


TKD actually comes from Shotokan. It originates in post-occupation Korean schools (kwans) teaching what they learned from Japan. The Korean government wanted to have a national martial art that was "uniquely Korean" so they tried to organize the kwan heads to create one style. A larger emphasis was placed on kicking to make it similar to Taekkyeon, an ancient Korean martial art focused on kicking that more or less completely died out before/because of the Japanese occupation and has absolutely zero relation to TKD in any way. The name "Tae Kwon Do" was chosen because "Taekwon" sounds like "Taekkyeon" so they could pretend that TKD is 2000 years old.

Over time an even larger emphasis was placed on kicking because it still looked "too Japanese" and that's how we end up with what's in the Olympics. There's a lot more politics involved but that's it in a nutshell: the Korean government wanted a Korean and definitely not Japanese martial art to be super popular worldwide. WTF sparring fine as a sport but completely inadequate as a training tool for the underlying martial art. Dojangs that spar under non-stupid rules exist but are incredibly rare, which is why I'm doing Muay Thai and Judo on the side.

It's ironic that TKD started out as Korean Karate when nowadays it is frequently (and unfavorably) compared to Kyokushin, a Karate style founded by a Korean.

There was a lot of nationalist pride in the foundation of Taekwondo.

I can't stand watching Olympic TKD, and I'm at 4th geup. If that was all that TKD was -- 6 minutes of warily shuffling around each other, followed by 10 seconds of vicious kicking -- I would have quit a long time ago. The WTF has used the Olympics thing to boost the popularity of TKD, which has worked, but also resulted in an over-abundance of crappy schools. The WTF sparring points system encourages kicks and devalues hand strikes, which leads to some teachers and students doing the same.

Basically, TKD is a perfectly solid striking art which got really popular several years ago and hasn't done itself any favors since.

From that, you get things like the BJJ guy who told me in all seriousness that TKD doesn't allow any hands at all, like soccer, so it isn't a real martial art.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cozy Hemp Mines
May 16, 2009

by Fistgrrl

Degenerate Star posted:


Basically, TKD is a perfectly solid striking art which got really popular several years ago and hasn't done itself any favors since.


Solid striking arts have a good plan for what happens when the opponent gets too close to strike and the rules says "no throws." What exactly is TKD's plan? I mean, aside from stealing clinch techniques from MT, Boxing & Sanshou. :smugdog:

P.S. 99% of TKD hand strikes are "watch my hands, please" set-ups/rangefinders for kicks or counter-punches to kicks. That is why nobody takes TKD punches seriously, because TKD doesn't take them seriously as a primary striking tool.

  • Locked thread