Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Eulogistics
Aug 30, 2012

Walter posted:

I don't want to be a huge douche here, and I'm not trying to pick on you specifically, but can we please not turn into Reddit with this reflexive "citations please" posting garbage?

With literally the keywords "Hitler loosened gun restrictions" on Google you get pages of references. It's not hard to look through a few to find one that can be trusted (including the link that was posted in response to this request, which was four links down from the top of the first page's results).

Seriously, I suspect we're all college-educated people or college students in here. Research is a skill we are *all* supposed to have developed to some extent. Exercise that skill. Please.

The side in a discussion that makes a claim should always be the side that backs up the claim with citations/sources; in any responsible discussion, the other side should not have to run around and figure out if what you said is true. Similarly, just because people use "citations please" as a snarky response on Reddit(that's what I'm assuming happens because it riled you, I never have occasion to visit Reddit) does not mean that all people who do it are being similarly snark; I would rather be in a discussion where everyone demands sources than a discussion where no one does.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sarion
Dec 24, 2003

Plus this thread is supposed to be about sharing ideas and data about why these emails/facebook messages are wrong or at the least misleading. I could go out and google a claim made by someone in this thread, and maybe I'll find the source they're using, or maybe I won't. But the only way to know for sure that I'm looking at the same information they're using is to ask them. Regardless of whether it's a "I like your argument and want to use it, too" or a "I don't believe you" response, I think asking for sources is a good thing.

TerminalSaint
Apr 21, 2007


Where must we go...

we who wander this Wasteland in search of our better selves?
Capitalism BAD! :ironicat:

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

SalTheBard posted:

One of the people I posted this link too accused it of having a liberal bias and then proceeded to counter with the "War of Words" video that was posted earlier in this thread.

Anytime I hear the words liberal bias or any other bias meme that the republicans have thought of, my brain shuts off and I can't continue on with the conversation anymore.

SalTheBard
Jan 26, 2005

I forgot to post my food for USPOL Thanksgiving but that's okay too!

Fallen Rib

ratbert90 posted:

Anytime I hear the words liberal bias or any other bias meme that the republicans have thought of, my brain shuts off and I can't continue on with the conversation anymore.

I feel the same way. This same person also linked this website http://memoryholeblog.com/2012/12/20/analyzing-the-newtown-narrative-sandy-hooks-disappearing-shooter-suspects/ and told me to get educated.

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun

ratbert90 posted:

Anytime I hear the words liberal bias or any other bias meme that the republicans have thought of, my brain shuts off and I can't continue on with the conversation anymore.
I'm always reminded of this research when someone accuses me of bias.

Token Cracker
Dec 22, 2004

Ghost of Reagan Past posted:

I'm always reminded of this research when someone accuses me of bias.

Very interesting. Thanks for this.

Orange Devil
Oct 1, 2010

Wullie's reign cannae smother the flames o' equality!

peak debt posted:

When the Allies disarmed the Germans again in 1945 there were tons of weapons in private ownership.

Didn't help those Germans against either the Soviet or American armies, unlike those brave American patriots who would use them to beat both, simultaneously.

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

Ghost of Reagan Past posted:

I'm always reminded of this research when someone accuses me of bias.

Oh I agree completely with the article. I try to be as non-bias as possible; but if you are going to talk or debate with me, and I am the only one citing studies not from blogs of random schizophrenics, my brain tends to shut down because I don't want to loose other valuable information that I have previously stored.

Such as how not to have a aneurysm.

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal

KillerJunglist posted:

My one facebook "friend" is on a roll:





I've determined that the issue with guns is that people in America are willing to die over them ("Pry them from my cold, dead hands"). People love their guns more than they love their children. And that's where it gets weird and crazy.

downout
Jul 6, 2009

This quote keeps being attibuted to George Washington on my FB feed.

[quote="George Washington"]
When any nation mistrusts it's citizens with guns it is sending a clear message. It no longer trusts it's citizens because such a government has evil plans.
[quote]

The problem is I can't find a single source that has him saying this. I'm starting to think it's completely made up.

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun

downout posted:

I'm starting to think it's completely made up.
Whenever I see quotes attributed like that I'm immediately suspicious. Like Abraham Lincoln said, "many people will attribute things to me that I did not say, but you should not believe them."

dalstrs
Mar 11, 2004

At least this way my kill will have some use
Dinosaur Gum

seiferguy posted:

I've determined that the issue with guns is that people in America are willing to die over them ("Pry them from my cold, dead hands"). People love their guns more than they love their children. And that's where it gets weird and crazy.


Has anyone seen a study that shows a comparison between the number accidental child gun deaths and the number of crimes stopped by citizens using their guns? I have a feeling it the first number is much larger than the second.

prom candy
Dec 16, 2005

Only I may dance

downout posted:

This quote keeps being attibuted to George Washington on my FB feed.

[quote="George Washington"]
When any nation mistrusts it's citizens with guns it is sending a clear message. It no longer trusts it's citizens because such a government has evil plans.
[quote]

The problem is I can't find a single source that has him saying this. I'm starting to think it's completely made up.

It's a misattribution, Morgan Freeman actually said that.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin
There was a big study back in the 90s done by the CDC that showed that guns end up increasing your risk rather than reducing it.

The NRA didn't like it, the next year the CDC had their budget cut by exactly the cost of that study and we're forbidden from doing research that could support gun control.

http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/grants/additional_req.shtm

"Restrictions on lobbying activities described above also specifically apply to lobbying related to any proposed, pending, or future Federal, state, or local tax increase, or any proposed, pending, or future requirement or restriction on any legal consumer product, including its sale or marketing, including but not limited to the advocacy or promotion of gun control."

Edit:
I don't want to start a gun debate. If you have a gun to protect your family, I totally understand the values and feelings that go into that decision. I just hope you do a thorough risk assessment and take appropriate steps to protect yourself and family from the real dangers that an available firearm can present.

Dr. Arbitrary fucked around with this message at 19:23 on Jan 10, 2013

seiferguy
Jun 9, 2005

FLAWED
INTUITION



Toilet Rascal

dalstrs posted:

Has anyone seen a study that shows a comparison between the number accidental child gun deaths and the number of crimes stopped by citizens using their guns? I have a feeling it the first number is much larger than the second.

According to this site: http://www.policymic.com/mobile/articles/21002/gun-control-debate-6-chilling-facts-about-guns-in-the-u-s

There were 851 accidental deaths from guns (everyone, not just children). Preventing crimes with a gun is incredibly hard to predict.

Additionally the site says half of suicides are by gunshots too. Something to think about.

Aika
Mar 12, 2008

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SEAL THE EXITS!!!
Not an email, but I need to post this somewhere so I don't froth with rage on facebook and get my whole family angry with me.

This was posted by my ex-army cousin who is now a stay-at-home milwife popping out kids like it's out of style:



And she's 100% serious. I want to bang my head against a wall.

KillerJunglist
May 22, 2007

Lion of Judah protect you, Jah be praised.

Aika posted:

Not an email, but I need to post this somewhere so I don't froth with rage on facebook and get my whole family angry with me.

This was posted by my ex-army cousin who is now a stay-at-home milwife popping out kids like it's out of style:



And she's 100% serious. I want to bang my head against a wall.

I hate these ecards anyway, but when they get all political they become a special kind of annoying. I am confused about the "take our healthcare" thing tho. I know the rest are just conservative talking points, but I thought the right was super worried that liberals wanted to give everyone health care.

Great picture too. Gun control? No way! Here, have a picture of a guy taken hostage at gun point.

Aika
Mar 12, 2008

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, SEAL THE EXITS!!!

KillerJunglist posted:

Great picture too. Gun control? No way! Here, have a picture of a guy taken hostage at gun point.

Bonus points for her mom being a Chicago cop! I never heard the taking children one, though. I just can't believe I'm related to these people.

ultimateforce
Apr 25, 2008

SKINNY JEANS CANT HOLD BACK THIS ARC
I, too, randomly Capitalize words too.

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

KillerJunglist posted:

I know the rest are just conservative talking points, but I thought the right was super worried that liberals wanted to give everyone health care.

No, you've got it absolutely wrong. All the honest doctors are changing professions because they don't like socialism or something. Also death panels.

Guilty Spork
Feb 26, 2011

Thunder rolled. It rolled a six.

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

There was a big study back in the 90s done by the CDC that showed that guns end up increasing your risk rather than reducing it.

The NRA didn't like it, the next year the CDC had their budget cut by exactly the cost of that study and we're forbidden from doing research that could support gun control.

http://www.cdc.gov/od/pgo/funding/grants/additional_req.shtm

"Restrictions on lobbying activities described above also specifically apply to lobbying related to any proposed, pending, or future Federal, state, or local tax increase, or any proposed, pending, or future requirement or restriction on any legal consumer product, including its sale or marketing, including but not limited to the advocacy or promotion of gun control."

Edit:
I don't want to start a gun debate. If you have a gun to protect your family, I totally understand the values and feelings that go into that decision. I just hope you do a thorough risk assessment and take appropriate steps to protect yourself and family from the real dangers that an available firearm can present.
As I understand it, the thing with the CDC is part of an overall pattern of the NRA using its lobbying power to prevent any part of the government from doing any proper research into gun violence. As far as I'm concerned, the NRA is effectively admitting their positions can't stand up to legitimate science. I have no doubt that there's a reasonable approach that still allows for gun ownership, but the NRA has apparently chosen to make itself an obstacle to that, on account of actually being an organization that represents gun manufacturers rather than owners.

myron cope
Apr 21, 2009

The part I don't understand about the "hitler took all the guns, look what happened!!" stuff (even if it were true), is there are other countries that have effectively banned guns and aren't under some crazy dictatorship, right? They say it like it will DEFINITELY happen. Doesn't England have super tough gun control laws? Or have they not gone all the way and outright banned/collected guns so it's ok?

Or is it just a matter of time before English people are put into the ovens?

Doctor Butts
May 21, 2002



This meme seems to be popping up on Facebook a lot and it is really bothering me.

It's not like the colonists were stockpiling weapons for a Duty Free Indian Hunting Day in the Appalachians.

Soviet Commubot
Oct 22, 2008


myron cope posted:

The part I don't understand about the "hitler took all the guns, look what happened!!" stuff (even if it were true), is there are other countries that have effectively banned guns and aren't under some crazy dictatorship, right? They say it like it will DEFINITELY happen. Doesn't England have super tough gun control laws? Or have they not gone all the way and outright banned/collected guns so it's ok?

Or is it just a matter of time before English people are put into the ovens?

You'd be surprised what some people think Europe is like. I was back in the States last summer on vacation and while tubing I ran into a guy who seriously thought that western Europe is Soviet-style breadlines and 1984 police states. He didn't believe me when I told him otherwise and he was even skeptical of my claim that most Europeans even have TVs and watch American shows.

Amused to Death
Aug 10, 2009

google "The Night Witches", and prepare for :stare:

Doctor Butts posted:



This meme seems to be popping up on Facebook a lot and it is really bothering me.

It's not like the colonists were stockpiling weapons for a Duty Free Indian Hunting Day in the Appalachians.

The colonists were stock piling weapons because revolution was already being fermented with things that had nothing to do with guns. The attempt to seize the Concord stockpiles was just the catalyst that set it off.

Also the minutemen on Lexington Green got mowed down and ran off the green because as always, a small group of random people with guns do terrible when up against professional troops.

bobkatt013
Oct 8, 2006

You’re telling me Peter Parker is ...... Spider-man!?

Amused to Death posted:

The colonists were stock piling weapons because revolution was already being fermented with things that had nothing to do with guns. The attempt to seize the Concord stockpiles was just the catalyst that set it off.

Also the minutemen on Lexington Green got mowed down and ran off the green because as always, a small group of random people with guns do terrible when up against professional troops.

I do not think that the Federal Government has literly shut a major port/city down and forced unfair laws on them. The people of Boston had good reason to stockpile guns.

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR

Why did they have to photoshop M4s into the picture?

Amarkov
Jun 21, 2010

Job Truniht posted:

Why did they have to photoshop M4s into the picture?

The Second Amendment was written in a context where the most powerful firearms available were horribly slow and inaccurate. It is very, very important that you not see evidence of this, or you might start thinking about how it might have been dependent on that context.

Job Truniht
Nov 7, 2012

MY POSTS ARE REAL RETARDED, SIR
Why doesn't that guy have trigger discipline? Why do the redcoats have standard muskets? This picture is mind numbingly stupid.

Countblanc
Apr 20, 2005

Help a hero out!

Job Truniht posted:

Why doesn't that guy have trigger discipline? Why do the redcoats have standard muskets? This picture is mind numbingly stupid.

Trigger discipline doesn't look badass enough.

Boxman
Sep 27, 2004

Big fan of :frog:



I once met a holocaust survivor who hated my (and everyone else's) German Shepherd. I couldn't blame her, really. :smith:


The best part of this one is that it inadvertently rebuts talking point "progressives just hate the rich!"

KillerJunglist
May 22, 2007

Lion of Judah protect you, Jah be praised.
Geez a lot of these have been turning up lately. I think some people I actually know and talk to are starting to develop opinions based on facebook crap.



Follow up that I posted for her: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/09/mom-shot-intruder/1821905/

by her own admission the guy pleaded for her to stop shooting. This is that "Break into my house to see how I feel about gun control!" fantasy but with a scarred woman being guided by her husband to empty a clip into the intruder.

poopinmymouth
Mar 2, 2005

PROUD 2 B AMERICAN (these colors don't run)
This posted yet?

some republicans girlfriend posted:


Ronald Reagan agreed to $3 in spending cuts for every dollar taxes increased (taxes went up, spending cuts never came to fruition). Also, George H. W. Bush agreed to $2 in spending cuts for every dollar taxes increased (again, the taxes came - and we still pay them today - but the spending cuts never happened).

Now, for every $43 in tax increases, there will only be $1 in spending cuts. Not only is the ratio not even anywhere close, it's going in the opposite direction. Spending will continue and continue, and raised taxes will not even come close to covering it. Obama's "the rich pay a little more" plan would only run our government for eight days per year. Meanwhile, hypothetically, if we were able to somehow liquidize the money spent on entitlements like food stamps and Obamaphones, it would come out to approximately $67,000 per household, per year (which would mean that 100% of Americans would fall well above the poverty level).

Instead, our worthless government continues to throw money into entitlements. Anti-poverty programs have surged by 49% in just the past decade, even after adjusting for inflation. Spending for food stamps alone has more than tripled since 2002. Over $2 billion was spent on entitlements in fiscal year 2012. It is expected that it will be at least that next year as well, and none of these figures reflect the $1.7 trillion that Obamacare is going to cost us.

Meanwhile, our worthless president issued an executive order for people like Congress members and Joe Biden to receive a pay raise to make up for the tax increase so they don't have to adjust their lavish lifestyles. He also returned to his 20-day, $4 million vacation (complete with the guy who "handles" the family dog - and gets paid $102,000 of taxpayer dollars annually to do so) in Hawaii on the day that I, along with all my coworkers, will begin to pay a minimum of $100 per month in additional taxes.

Obama supporters who work for a living (I know that's a small group): how do you defend your president refusing to cut entitlement spending while raising taxes? Are you HAPPY to hand over this extra money every month?

Countblanc
Apr 20, 2005

Help a hero out!

poopinmymouth posted:

This posted yet?

It's pretty ballsy to say "anti-poverty programs" as a pejorative instead of some buzzword like "entitlements."

myron cope
Apr 21, 2009

poopinmymouth posted:

This posted yet?

"(taxes went up, spending cuts never came to fruition)"

"(again, the taxes came - and we still pay them today - but the spending cuts never happened)"


Our guys agreed to spending cuts and didn't cut spending, why can't your guy cut spending?!?

my bony fealty
Oct 1, 2008

Eulogistics posted:

The side in a discussion that makes a claim should always be the side that backs up the claim with citations/sources; in any responsible discussion, the other side should not have to run around and figure out if what you said is true. Similarly, just because people use "citations please" as a snarky response on Reddit(that's what I'm assuming happens because it riled you, I never have occasion to visit Reddit) does not mean that all people who do it are being similarly snark; I would rather be in a discussion where everyone demands sources than a discussion where no one does.

This, I have looked at reddit maybe like 3 times in my life so I don't know what that refers to. Googling "hitler loosened gun control" does in fact return a plethora of good sources, although the first link is an article by William L. Pierce and I'm not keen to respond to right-wingers with something an actual Neo-Nazi wrote. Citing sources is important, even on an informal internet forum!

Here's an email I got from one of my dad's crazy ex-military friends. It's from the day after the election so a bit old but on topic!

quote:

The Will of the People Has Spoken and America Died
Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh Wednesday, November 7, 2012


Our Constitutional Republic died a peaceful death on November 6, 2012. Having reached the point of no return in a comatose state after years of progressive and illegal immigration assaults, the fabric of conservative society is now completely unraveled and Uncle Sam's America is no more.

The United States of America is now relegated to the dust bin of history as a "has been" empire. The Shining City on the Hill, the hope of so many millions since July 4, 1776, no longer exists. What rises from the ashes is a country that few of us will recognize, like, or learn to accept submissively.

After 236 years of existence, a new country emerges today, run by secular progressives who rejected our Constitution, what we stand for, and who we are as a nation. The Supreme Court will be forever altered after its last conservative members will be replaced by the liberal academics who call themselves "progressives." The rule of law will be implemented by Executive Orders, making Congress irrelevant.

The communist motto "Forward" that resonated with so many ignorant Americans will plunge us into many years of darkness from which we will never be able to recover. We have proven our Founding Fathers right, they did give us a Constitutional Republic and we were unable to maintain it.

The forces of the failed communist fundamental transformation that were driven underground in many places around the world, resurfaced with a vengeance in the United States and have now taken over.

How long we will still have freedom of speech, movement, assembly, and control of our private property remains to be seen. Faith and churches will be driven underground; allowing secularism to prosper and take deep roots among the progressives whose God is Mother Earth.

The welfare dependent Americans, unions, and illegal aliens have chosen for the rest of us the dark path of serfdom to big government and to socialist utopia.

Who would have guessed that the very people who were complaining that the government is not extricating them from disaster or giving them the help they needed in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, would vote for the very politicians who turned their backs on needy Americans after the lights went dark when the political photo opportunities ended?

Who would have guessed that Americans were as ignorant and irresponsible as to choose fiscal destruction over fiscal sanity for their children and grandchildren, secularism and communism over faith, dependence over personal responsibility and self-reliance?

Americans have been protesting for the last four years the dismal state of the economy and the direction of our country, the corruption of our politicians, and the loss of personal and economic freedom.

Rallies in support of conservatism overwhelmed venues for Mitt Romney while rallies for our bumbling President became scarcer and scarcer. Yet, miraculously, at the ballot box, our President won all over the country.

We lost seats in the Senate. Americans chose liars and cheats to be their Senators and Representatives, rejecting those who protected the Constitution. The candidate from Massachusetts who claimed direct American Indian lineage to Pocahontas is now a Senator, having defeated Scott Brown. Representative Allen West lost his seat by a narrow margin to the infamous Wasserman Schultz from Florida.

Americans chose high unemployment, reduction of our military, communist indoctrination of their children, and loss of personal freedoms unlike we have never seen before in this country.

I am saddened by the loss of millions and millions of American soldiers who have died to preserve freedom yet we lost it on November 6, 2012. Those buried in cemeteries around the world and at Arlington must be rolling in their graves today. We shamelessly allowed their sacrifice of blood and treasure to go in vain. We have no honor because we let down all the soldiers who fought in recent times and returned home limbless with lives shattered from physical and mental wounds of war.

I mourn today the loss of my adopted country. I have fought hard over the last four years to prevent its overt and accelerated destruction but the darker forces stronger than many of us have overcome concerted efforts by millions of Americans to maintain the Republic. Mediocrity, sloth, godlessness, dependence, cowardice, using the law selectively or ignoring it, and hopeless corruption will define the new country. Only God can save us now with his mercy and grace.

"When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance becomes Duty." ~Thomas Jefferson

It is a shining example of empty rhetoric combined with factual inaccuracies (Allen West lost to Wasserman Schultz? Really?) that define modern conservatism in America.

Mo_Steel
Mar 7, 2008

Let's Clock Into The Sunset Together

Fun Shoe

quote:

Now, for every $43 in tax increases, there will only be $1 in spending cuts. Not only is the ratio not even anywhere close, it's going in the opposite direction.

That's because Congress couldn't reach an agreement on the spending portion of sequestration so they kicked it down the road two months and resolved what they could reach an agreement on. Maybe the author of this would've preferred no agreement was reached and all the tax increases that were scheduled to go into place would have, but I doubt it.

quote:

Spending will continue and continue, and raised taxes will not even come close to covering it. Obama's "the rich pay a little more" plan would only run our government for eight days per year.

However many "days" funding would run the government is a lovely metric because it makes any idea seem inconsequential: "During meetings of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction — a failed attempt to avert the looming sequestration — Republicans proposed raising an estimated $50 billion per year by eliminating deductions and closing tax loopholes. That covers only 4.8 days of government spending. Republican members of the committee also proposed trimming Medicare and Medicaid spending by about $28 billion per year. That would reduce government spending by only 2.7 days if you use the McConnell-McCarthy metric." Guess we shouldn't cut entitlements or close tax loopholes, it only covers half or a quarter of the days these tax increases do. :jerkbag:

A better metric is to look at how laws change the budget deficit, and see what percentage of that gap between revenues and expenses is covered by the changes: "Under current policies, the projected 2013 deficit is about $1 trillion. So the tax hike would eliminate 6.5 to 8.5 percent of that shortfall — and would obviously have an even greater impact in later years. Over a decade, the rate hikes and other provisions affecting the wealthy would raise $968 billion, which is essentially one year of the current deficit."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...06cc9_blog.html

quote:

Meanwhile, hypothetically, if we were able to somehow liquidize the money spent on entitlements like food stamps and Obamaphones, it would come out to approximately $67,000 per household, per year (which would mean that 100% of Americans would fall well above the poverty level).


Did you know that Obama started giving out free phones in 1985? You're talking about the Lifeline Program for Low-Income Consumers, and it's paid for through the Universal Service Fee put in place in 1996. It cost about $1.3 billion in 2010. (Table 1.11) Total SNAP benefits were $64.7 billion in that same year. We can do the math, because there were 114.8 million householdsp, the sum of those two programs is $574.91 per household. In reality, $67k per household would be $7,691,600,000,000, so just shy of 8 trillion dollars.

quote:

Instead, our worthless government continues to throw money into entitlements. Anti-poverty programs have surged by 49% in just the past decade, even after adjusting for inflation. Spending for food stamps alone has more than tripled since 2002. Over $2 billion was spent on entitlements in fiscal year 2012. It is expected that it will be at least that next year as well, and none of these figures reflect the $1.7 trillion that Obamacare is going to cost us.

Yeah, gently caress poor people spending all "my money" on food.

quote:

Meanwhile, our worthless president issued an executive order for people like Congress members and Joe Biden to receive a pay raise to make up for the tax increase so they don't have to adjust their lavish lifestyles. He also returned to his 20-day, $4 million vacation (complete with the guy who "handles" the family dog - and gets paid $102,000 of taxpayer dollars annually to do so) in Hawaii on the day that I, along with all my coworkers, will begin to pay a minimum of $100 per month in additional taxes.

Also gently caress rich people spending all their money on vacations. Is there anyone you don't misguidedly hate, because you seem to be throwing poo poo everywhere and hoping it sticks in this tantrum.

quote:

Obama supporters who work for a living (I know that's a small group): how do you defend your president refusing to cut entitlement spending while raising taxes? Are you HAPPY to hand over this extra money every month?

Yes.

MariusLecter
Sep 5, 2009

NI MUERTE NI MIEDO

KillerJunglist posted:

Geez a lot of these have been turning up lately. I think some people I actually know and talk to are starting to develop opinions based on facebook crap.



Follow up that I posted for her: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/09/mom-shot-intruder/1821905/

by her own admission the guy pleaded for her to stop shooting. This is that "Break into my house to see how I feel about gun control!" fantasy but with a scarred woman being guided by her husband to empty a clip into the intruder.

Wow, she could have stopped him by answering the door or at any time actually confronting the guy, gun or no gun.
+150 points for hiding in the closet and ambushing the guy though.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FlapYoJacks
Feb 12, 2009

MariusLecter posted:

Wow, she could have stopped him by answering the door or at any time actually confronting the guy, gun or no gun.
+150 points for hiding in the closet and ambushing the guy though.

And shooting SIX TIMES and not killing him. Wild bullets out the door into residential areas are such a great thing!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply