|
Kavak posted:I'm sorry, what?!
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:45 |
|
|
Kavak posted:I'm sorry, what?! According to the "official" /v/ FAQ it's basically Rape The Game. It sure is something: http://pastebin.com/iJJWsprT
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:12
|
|
|
oscarthewilde posted:According to the "official" /v/ FAQ it's basically Rape The Game. It sure is something: Cycloneman posted:Sengoku Rance is a porn game. Of course not! It's actually an adult themed video game that handles rape and other atrocities in a humorous way!
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:13
|
|
|
What?? How do you even make a very abstracted grand strategy game like Sengoku or any other Paradox game into a hentai game? Games with 3-d models I can imagine, like all those perverted mods for Skyrim and such, but this is just silly!
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:47
|
|
|
DrSunshine posted:What?? How do you even make a very abstracted grand strategy game like Sengoku or any other Paradox game into a hentai game? Games with 3-d models I can imagine, like all those perverted mods for Skyrim and such, but this is just silly! Sengoku Rance is basically a combination between a SPRG and a visual novel. It's far from being a 'Rape Simulator', stop sounding like Fox News  It's full of porn because that's how japanese doujin games work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:50
|
|
|
Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:53
|
|
|
KoldPT posted:Sengoku Rance is basically a combination between a SPRG and a visual novel. It's far from being a 'Rape Simulator', stop sounding like Fox News Oh. I mistakenly thought it was a mod for Sengoku.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 19:56
|
|
|
DrSunshine posted:Oh. I mistakenly thought it was a mod for Sengoku. Nah, the Sengoku mod is just a standard paradox game mod, kind of in the line of Wiz's stuff. It just adds the option of replacing sengoku's 'amazing' portrait system with animé as hell pictures like 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 20:00
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Austria. Always Austria. Can't ever resist being a Habsburg.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 20:51
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Beat back the scourge of Christendom as the glorious 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:01
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Glorious Serjba. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:17
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Byzantium.....  Though maybe someone in Italy if that is to hard.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:20
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? I shall wait until there are at least 5 mods out which rectify Paradox's inevitable inability to do justice to the glory of the Eastern Roman Empire and then choose between them. (Seriously England, because nationalism/I know how to play them). And I'm amazed Paradox are continuing with the Horde mechanics. I've never heard anyone say they're anything but awful, are the Paradox forums telling them it's good or something?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:22
|
|
|
Velius posted:What do people think is the best scenario to get into the meat of Darkest Hour to learn the vagaries of the tech tree, and nuances of combat without spending hours building infrastructure/factories? Or important things like concentration/infrastructure bonuses to IC production, a la Arsenal? I don't want to run Germany '36 again. I guess steam has the manual, so I'll start there, but I'm sure tons of it has changed since that got put out. The best thing is that KSR uses Darkest Hour-Full's tech tree and units and balance and whatnot, so once you're comfortable with the UI and the mechanics, you can take your learnings right into the OTL game. The only thing that KSR actually changes as far as game mechanics is putting the manpower system back to HOI2 standards, but as far as I'm concerned that's a good thing (DH-Full's manpower system isn't bad, just a little too dense and realism-over-gameplay for me).
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:25
|
|
|
Anyone have a few tips for eu3 multiplayer? About to get into my first multiplayer game tomorrow and I want to at least try not to be the first one knocked out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:29
|
|
|
Trujillo posted:Anyone have a few tips for eu3 multiplayer? About to get into my first multiplayer game tomorrow and I want to at least try not to be the first one knocked out. You're dealing with people, so like in every multiplayer game, communication is key. The few games I have been in with friends, we hashed out what areas of expansion we "claimed" and only started loving with each other as we hit those borders. Also, making peace deals/alliances is a hell of a lot more fun when both sides are people and know how to bargain!
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:31
|
|
|
I really hope they do more with colonization for EUIV, it's one of the areas of the game that really needs some more fleshing out/unique mechanics, more interaction with natives.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:35
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Either A) Teutonic Order, and through the Russian Crusades, bring Catholicism to Russia. Then Convert to Russian Culture. Then found the Russian Order. Option B is restore the Golden Horde as a successor khanate. If I can't make Golden America, EU IV will be a failure .
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:36
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? As far away from Austria as I can possibly get in Europe. Like Norway or something.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:38
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? England, probably. Nice easy mode to learn the ropes/what's changed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:39
|
|
|
Let's do Portugal, ally myself with Spain/England, stay out of Europe and go for colonization. Move my capital to America, become the New World great power. Alternatively, pick Venice, try out the new trade mechanics.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:41
|
|
|
Cantorsdust posted:Alternatively, pick Venice, try out the new trade mechanics. This is what I'm going to do, but with Holland.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? If it's not-so-positive, I'll be going with Sweden since I can be almost sure that at least that one got properly tested and QA'd
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:44
|
|
|
It strikes me that Saxony has the potential to be an interesting country in EU4. It starts out leading a PU with Thuringia and it owns Meissen, the OPM to its northeast. If it inherits Thuringia, it's well on its way to becoming a major player in the HRE.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:45
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:If it's not-so-positive, I'll be going with Sweden since I can be almost sure that at least that one got properly tested and QA'd QA lead is Dutch, so uPen has the better idea! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:50
|
|
|
I'm going to be China, so I can live out the alternate history scenario of "What if the Ming had been expansionist and progressive instead of isolationist and conservative?"! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 21:54
|
|
|
DrSunshine posted:I'm going to be China, so I can live out the alternate history scenario of "What if the Ming had been expansionist and progressive instead of isolationist and conservative?"! Same here, gonna see just what sort of clusterfuck Asia is and figure out what edits it needs for the megacampaign. Speaking of which, I'm working on a thesis that the above didn't happen because of policies that prevented the rise of a bourgeoisie middle class stemming from a lack of maritime trade. What do you think?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:04
|
|
|
I think that every time in China the coastal regions got rich the government eventually had to crack down because it created unrest in all other (poor) areas of the country.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:07
|
|
|
 I think I broke Kieserreich. Its not even 1937 and WW2 has started. I was playing as Austria and went to war with Italy when the event came up, and pressed them pretty hard. Just before I marched into Ancona, Southern Italy declared war on Northern italy, probably because I just destroyed the norths army. Straight after, the event to puppet Italy came up, which immediately ended north Italy's war the south. It didnt stop the event chain happening though, and France ignored German warnings to pull out and went to war with Germany in 1936. Should be interesting to see how this game goes. Weirdly I haven't been drawn into the war though. EDIT: Union of Britain joined France a few days after this picture was taken, and the Royalists attacked Britain after that. Nothingtoseehere fucked around with this message at 22:18 on Jan 26, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:09
|
|
|
Raenir Salazar posted:Same here, gonna see just what sort of clusterfuck Asia is and figure out what edits it needs for the megacampaign.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:22
|
|
|
Trujillo posted:Anyone have a few tips for eu3 multiplayer? About to get into my first multiplayer game tomorrow and I want to at least try not to be the first one knocked out. Show no mercy and never do anything you won't gain either money or provinces from. People will be dicks to you, push you around, they will invade your land because you're probably terrible at waging pvp wars (everyone is before they get the practice) and you will feel betrayed by at least one allie before the session is over. Enjoy!(It's actually a lot of fun)
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:30
|
|
|
Raenir Salazar posted:Same here, gonna see just what sort of clusterfuck Asia is and figure out what edits it needs for the megacampaign. I don't know! My historical knowledge of pre-modern China is pretty spotty, but I still think it's very interesting. I really ought to check out more books. v  v
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:33
|
|
|
telcontar posted:That your thesis is completely wrong because the Ming Dynasty had tons of maritime trade and a (by early modern world standards) huge and wealthy middle class. Not according to Paul Kennedy's work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:41
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:It strikes me that Saxony has the potential to be an interesting country in EU4. It starts out leading a PU with Thuringia and it owns Meissen, the OPM to its northeast. If it inherits Thuringia, it's well on its way to becoming a major player in the HRE. Does anyone know of any more interesting differences between the starting year of EU4 vs EU3 besides the obvious like the emergence of Kazan and Crimea from the Golden Horde, and the improved position of Venice and Burgundy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:42
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all? Denmark, just so that i can reunite the Scandinavian union (Kalmarunionen) 
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:53
|
|
|
DrSunshine posted:I'm going to be China, so I can live out the alternate history scenario of "What if the Ming had been expansionist and progressive instead of isolationist and conservative?"! Same here, hopefully that godawful faction system is gone.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:54
|
|
|
Raenir Salazar posted:Not according to Paul Kennedy's work.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 22:55
|
|
|
Cycloneman posted:Who do you plan to play as first when you get EU4? I'm going to play as the Inca and die horribly to the brutality of racist Swedes making it impossible for me to win. What about y'all?
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 23:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 00:45 |
|
|
Nightblade posted:Does anyone know of any more interesting differences between the starting year of EU4 vs EU3 besides the obvious like the emergence of Kazan and Crimea from the Golden Horde, and the improved position of Venice and Burgundy? Aragon owns Sicily and Sardinia and leads a PU with Naples, that's a pretty big one. Portugal already owns Ceuta, Madiera, and Azores, while Castille already owns Canaries, speeding up colonization. Teutonic Order owns a province in Brandenburg, bringing it much closer to the rest of the HRE.
|
|
#
?
Jan 26, 2013 23:04
|
|