|
Kush posted:Here's 'Upside Nmoo', with JJ Abrams providing some cool scifi lens flares. Upside Nmoo... wow. This is so silly, they could have at least picked a better font to make it more obviously "upside down".
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 00:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 18:54 |
|
|
This just makes me uncomfortable. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 01:59
|
|
|
Jim Carrey? I'm sold. edit: wait, is that Buscemi on the poster?! His face is so... smooth.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:14
|
|
|
Cinnamon Bastard posted:Jim Carrey? I'm sold. I was trying to identify the other two actors in the poster as I didn't see their names in the credits. Then I realised that I did see their names. That is either amazing makeup or a lovely photoshop job.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:21
|
|
|
How in the world did they turn Steve Buscemi into David Bowie? Impressive stuff!
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:27
|
|
|
WITNESS THE POWER! posted:This just makes me uncomfortable. Everything about this is awesome. Seems to suit the movie pretty well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:29
|
|
|
Madkal posted:I was trying to identify the other two actors in the poster as I didn't see their names in the credits. Then I realised that I did see their names. That is either amazing makeup or a lovely photoshop job. I remember seeing something about this movie, and the tiny bit I remember is that the main guys are done up in facial prosthesis to look like they're held together by plastic surgery. I have a feeling this is this decades Zoolander, and we just don't see it yet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:36
|
|
|
e: ^^^ beaten, kinda. I think the ridiculous airbrushing works and I suspect it's intentional. Aren't they supposed to be vain magicians?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:37
|
|
|
Absolutely love the poster, even though I don't think I'd ever buy it. It definetely shows off what I assume the movie is trying to show off; ridiculous older magicians trying to flaunt themselves off as young and hip.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:48
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Why does Bradley Cooper look like Ralph Fiennes there?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:51
|
|
|
With this and Kick-rear end 2, this could be Jim Carrey's year.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 02:54
|
|
|
VoidBurger posted:How in the world did they turn Steve Buscemi into David Bowie? Impressive stuff! Magic, duh.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 03:02
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:With this and Kick-rear end 2, this could be Jim Carrey's year.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 04:36
|
|
|
Cinnamon Bastard posted:edit: wait, is that Buscemi on the poster?! His face is so... smooth. Smoothscemi.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 04:37
|
|
|
ZackHoagie posted:Smoothscemi. More like Buschimmer. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 04:50
|
|
|
tliil posted:Finally Jim Carrey's chance to shine as an outrageous character dressed in a wacky costume! When I was a kid, and The Mask came out, there was a magazine article that referred to Jim Carrey as "the rubber-faced actor who...". I had to correct my step-cousin, repeatedly, that that the green-face was makeup, and that the phrase meant that Carrey was very expressive and that that ability to create extreme facial expressions was part of what he was known for, rather than her belief that he had actually had his face permanently and surgically replaced with an artificial soft silicone rubber for the purpose of furthering his career. My step family is a few chromosomes short of a salamander, if you follow my meaning.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 05:14
|
|
|
WITNESS THE POWER! posted:This just makes me uncomfortable. So, is the trick that they turned Jim Carey into James Franco's father?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 05:35
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:Upside Nmoo... wow. I think you meant to say "Upside Nmoo...  "
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 07:24
|
|
|
Kush posted:Here's 'Upside Nmoo', with JJ Abrams providing some cool scifi lens flares. Oh this thing, I thought they'd dump it in February with the rest of the dreck; I haven't enjoyed shredding a screener that much since Tree of Life.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 07:41
|
|
|
Hasters posted:Oh this thing, I thought they'd dump it in February with the rest of the dreck; I haven't enjoyed shredding a screener that much since Tree of Life. Nah, as I understand it from Half in the Bag the trend in movies is 'gently caress You, It's January'. 'gently caress You, It's Now February' is less common but still a thing.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 07:49
|
|
|
Hasters posted:I haven't enjoyed shredding a screener that much since Tree of Life. Wait, I don't understand: is it a bad movie or not? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 08:29
|
|
|
Max22 posted:Wait, I don't understand: is it a bad movie or not? It's a bad movie and Hasters has poor taste.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 09:03
|
|
|
Max22 posted:Wait, I don't understand: is it a bad movie or not? It's pretty bad. It thinks it's clever using up and down planets to stand in for social classes, but it comes off as a really shallow gimmick; hell the Total Recall remake used that trope more effectively. Oh and the "rules of matter" on the planets exist solely to fill plot holes that the writer wasn't smart enough to close, instead of emerging organically from the world. For example matter from one world spontaneously combusts after being in contact with the other worlds gravitational field for too long. Why? Who knows? What does gravity have to do with spontaneous combustion? It's never explained; and are we seriously supposed to believe that no one in the history of these two worlds ever had sex with someone from the opposite planet! Bugblatter posted:It's a bad movie and Hasters has poor taste. If it means I never have to see ToL again, then I embrace my classlessness. Gynocentric Regime fucked around with this message at 09:21 on Jan 30, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 09:06
|
|
|
Why are you spoilering things which are fundamental to the premise of the movie?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 09:13
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:Why are you spoilering things which are fundamental to the premise of the movie? Just in case someone wants to actually see it and stay ignorant going in, I have friends who won't even watch commercials and trailers so I've taken to being extra cautious, sorry about that. Gynocentric Regime fucked around with this message at 09:21 on Jan 30, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 09:16
|
|
|
When it's poster/trailer level stuff I don't consider it spoiler worthy and that is coming from someone who basically doesn't watch trailers any more because of them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 09:26
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 11:53
|
|
|
DNS posted:The pine trees above the title are a little cutesy, but they're also in the trailer and I thought that was a nice touch there. I know that's what they are, but all I see is some arrows pointing at Ryan Gosling.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 12:09
|
|
|
This looks terrible in a small size, but it'll be awesome when I see it in person as a full poster.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 13:25
|
|
|
WITNESS THE POWER! posted:This just makes me uncomfortable. Steve Buscemi and Willem Dafoe had a magician.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 15:14
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:Steve Buscemi and Willem Dafoe had a magician.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 15:37
|
|
|
WITNESS THE POWER! posted:This just makes me uncomfortable.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
BOAT SHOWBOAT posted:This looks terrible in a small size, but it'll be awesome when I see it in person as a full poster. Haha. I think the design of the teaser spoiled all of us. It's definitely eye-catching, but I don't think glitch art is going to get people into theaters. Actually, I think it's more like eye-averting because my eyes feel pain when I look at it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 17:46
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:I actually really liked the original poster. Dog and all. In fact judging by the poster http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2241374208/tt1931533 - they ADDED a gun to Colin Ferrell. Terrible. Awful. Am I dumb?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:21
|
|
|
GazChap posted:I've seen this film twice, and I don't actually remember Colin Farrell's character holding a gun at any point during the film, even. Maybe during Billy's dream sequence?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
GazChap posted:I've seen this film twice, and I don't actually remember Colin Farrell's character holding a gun at any point during the film, even. That hardly matters to poster designers: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:39
|
|
|
WITNESS THE POWER! posted:This just makes me uncomfortable. I'm on my phone, but I'm seeing Bruce Willis where Buscemi should be.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:48
|
|
|
User-Friendly posted:That hardly matters to poster designers: Never knew Clive Owen did a claymation movie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:48
|
|
|
What the hell happened to Clive Owen, anyways? He was hot poo poo for a period of about two years then completely disappeared off the face of the earth aside from tiny C-list movies after Shoot 'Em Up.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 18:54 |
|
|
WickedIcon posted:What the hell happened to Clive Owen, anyways? He was hot poo poo for a period of about two years then completely disappeared off the face of the earth aside from tiny C-list movies after Shoot 'Em Up. I actually first saw him in those BMW short films, and I loved him in Sin City and the like. He even got a loving Oscar nomination for Closer. I think, honestly, not getting or seeking the Bond job is what did him in, though I knew he didn't want to do it for fear of typecasting. Maybe he's doing a lot of theatre?
|
|
#
?
Jan 30, 2013 18:55
|
|