|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXg3XxHTsJc Colt Cabana recommends you visit the dentist
|
# ? Jan 29, 2013 17:41 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 08:31 |
|
a radii hike posted:Oh man, there's a second part: Dude reacting to her filming the toys are loving hysterical. "Yeah, film it, I'm a loving retard. I play with toys."
|
# ? Jan 30, 2013 04:02 |
|
a radii hike posted:Oh man, there's a second part: I'm amazed at how out of his league that girl is. I mean, she's not glamorous or super hot or anything, but that guy is so below average that I'm amazed. I'm amazed that a guy who throws his toy replica belt in rage as an adult has an average seeming girl. Yep.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2013 08:45 |
|
I came across this while doing research. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DIAKnGujUVM Now I want to see him do this in Chikara.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 03:36 |
|
Generic CAW posted:Dude reacting to her filming the toys are loving hysterical. "Yeah, film it, I'm a loving retard. I play with toys."
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 04:23 |
|
Jack Anderson posted:I came across this while doing research. John Cena should get his rear end beaten by the Rock so badly that he vanishes into kayfabe ICU land, and returns as this to take the US title back from Cesaro. Even have an Evangelion-esque video package of a shadowy room full of old men in suits deciding the fate of the world hinting at his return. John Cena would go over like no man before him.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 07:33 |
|
Someone awesome has uploaded some DVD's of every single NWO segment. This is just disc 1 of 44.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2013 21:45 |
|
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50140086n Rock's Got Milk ad
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 04:18 |
|
Bret Hart puts over CM Punk as unique, proclaims Hunter to never have a great match ever (including Mania with Taker, HIAC), only good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSNJX1aBDSw For those who seethe when hearing Bret, he states that he could envision the entire Taker/HHH match in his head before it happened and it was by the numbers to him. Called it a 3/10 or 4/10. However, when CM Punk goes out to the ring he does things unique and fresh.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 08:33 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Bret Hart puts over CM Punk as unique, proclaims Hunter to never have a great match ever (including Mania with Taker, HIAC), only good That assessment of the Taker/HHH match is hilarious to me. I'm sorry but that match wasn't about workrate or moves or anything other than telling a story, and I literally could not care less if the story was predictable, it was an amazing story and spectacle.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 08:54 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Bret Hart puts over CM Punk as unique, proclaims Hunter to never have a great match ever (including Mania with Taker, HIAC), only good I agree with him on the Taker/HHH match, but to say that HHH has never had a great match? That's going way too far and just refusing to let a grudge go.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 09:07 |
|
I'm not sure if that's right or not. Personally, I can't think of a match I really loved with HHH, but I'm no expert on what makes a 'great match'. However, by all accounts, HHH was a massive douche and a total sycophant from his original DX run with Shawn Michaels onwards. Bret Hart spells it out quite nicely in his book and Jericho, in his second book, refers to a number of occasion where HHH behaved pretty appallingly (although Jericho apologises for him very generously). With that in mind, I'm not surprised a number of people do hold grudges against him.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 09:18 |
|
I can understand where he's coming from, but HHH/Cactus Jack at RR2000 proves him wrong in one move.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 10:17 |
|
Bret has some weird opinions. Remember when he said Melina was the best?
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 10:26 |
|
Everyone is overrated. HHH marks surely wouldn't think he's overrated. Neither would Bret marks think that of him. I figure they're both a little overrated.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 12:27 |
|
Saying HHH never had a great match is absurd. Saying HHH never had a great match with someone who wasn't a great worker, would be much less absurd.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 13:40 |
|
VogeGandire posted:I can understand where he's coming from, but HHH/Cactus Jack at RR2000 proves him wrong in one move. Can a match really prove a guy wrong in one move? Also, what was the story being told in HHH vs. Taker HIAC other than people yelling how it's an end of an era? To be honest I haven't watched it yet. Because every clip I see of it is just HHH and Taker doing things that was considered not PG while being really old guys.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 15:16 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Can a match really prove a guy wrong in one move? Oh, I meant his "Triple H has never had a great match" statement. In one move (that match), he's proven wrong.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 15:56 |
|
Bret slagging anybody for wrestling a predictable match is hilarious
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 16:51 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Can a match really prove a guy wrong in one move? HHH broke Taker after their WM27 match. Taker won, but HHH walked out. No one's ever done that. Taker's goal is to prove to HHH that he can't get it done. Shawn's in there because he was forced to accept Taker's better than him (in kayfabe) and in theory could want revenge (and help his best friend in the process), adding drama to the match. HHH threw everything he had at him (and HBK for that matter) and it meant nothing. Taker was still better.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 17:12 |
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:HHH broke Taker after their WM27 match. Taker won, but HHH walked out. No one's ever done that. Taker's goal is to prove to HHH that he can't get it done. Shawn's in there because he was forced to accept Taker's better than him (in kayfabe) and in theory could want revenge (and help his best friend in the process), adding drama to the match. HHH threw everything he had at him (and HBK for that matter) and it meant nothing. Taker was still better. I'll probably watch the match sometime tonight but I can understand why Bret would feel it's still boring to him by that explanation. It would be HHH doing everything he did in the last match and everything he does in every match, but now it's added with HBK with interferences. Am I going to see like five Pedigrees in this match? That said, I don't entirely agree with Bret either. Austin vs. Rock at WM17 was them pretty much doing what they always do but the story involved elevated it. There was meaning to Austin's desperation and Rock's resilience. It wasn't just a chair shot, it was accepting the devil. And so on.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 17:25 |
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:HHH broke Taker after their WM27 match. Taker won, but HHH walked out. No one's ever done that. Taker's goal is to prove to HHH that he can't get it done. Shawn's in there because he was forced to accept Taker's better than him (in kayfabe) and in theory could want revenge (and help his best friend in the process), adding drama to the match. HHH threw everything he had at him (and HBK for that matter) and it meant nothing. Taker was still better. Also you could see Trips getting more and more frustrated as his attempts to put down Taker failed. Finally he hits a point where he stops being angry at Taker and starts being terrified of his folly. It was pretty awesome. HBK spends most of the match confused/conflicted and selling the gravity of the situation too.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 17:25 |
|
Gaylord Plower posted:Also you could see Trips getting more and more frustrated as his attempts to put down Taker failed. Finally he hits a point where he stops being angry at Taker and starts being terrified of his folly. It was pretty awesome. Yeah both of these are very very true.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 17:54 |
|
Its a match without all the history or backstory known loses alot of impact but if you do know it all it was one of the most emotionally invested matches I've ever watched and I did enjoy every second of it and thought everyone played their role as expected to near perfection.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 20:26 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hVZV54a9M8 I don't know if this should go here, but it is a Youtube video. Here's Tom Dotterer, the man who had his liquor store held up and was shot in the eye but when interviewed for local news he complained more about Rock beating Punk at the Rumble, who gets a surprise call from Punk during a radio interview. He sounds like the most humble man on the planet and I'm seriously in awe of how eerily calm he is about everything.
|
# ? Feb 1, 2013 20:27 |
|
New Gentlemen's Club https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ptjl7zW-Nk8
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 03:14 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:New Gentlemen's Club The Ants thing is hilarious.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 03:58 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:New Gentlemen's Club Grizzly Redwood knows how to Be a Star.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 07:24 |
|
The whole lot of them will never be seen in Chikara again once Quack gets wind of these videos.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 14:41 |
|
Jubs posted:Someone awesome has uploaded some DVD's of every single NWO segment. This is just disc 1 of 44. They went through all that trouble uploading those videos and then in the most important part, Bash at the Beach 96, there's no sound for 30 minutes.
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 19:54 |
|
New episode of The Reem https://vimeo.com/58786194
|
# ? Feb 2, 2013 23:39 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vrmp70C7yo New Botchamania with a NL Inc ad
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 00:30 |
|
The Batiri are always awesome.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 01:14 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Vrmp70C7yo That whole Baba segment wasn't even a botch, and Steen F5ing Mack onto Knox was a planned Ref bump. Botchamania is overrated.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 08:23 |
|
KungFu Grip posted:That whole Baba segment wasn't even a botch, and Steen F5ing Mack onto Knox was a planned Ref bump. Botchamania is overrated. On the other hand the Miz figure four with David Flair's music was pretty funny.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 09:10 |
|
Super Ninja Fish posted:They went through all that trouble uploading those videos and then in the most important part, Bash at the Beach 96, there's no sound for 30 minutes.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 11:02 |
|
Chemi posted:True but those first videos really make clear why the nWo was so loving hot back then. Seriously, those were some well worked segments. It feels pretty fresh now and it was the mid-90s then That's exactly what I thought watching the first 15 minutes of it. Two job guys are fighting in the ring (the NWO angle starts the wrestling boom would lead to that never happening again) and Hall comes out and cuts a promo, that's it. Nash doesn't show up until 2 weeks later, and they don't even attack anyone until a week after Nash debuts. Such a slow build, but it was white hot. I remember people in middle school who didn't even watch wrestling talking about Hall and Nash showing up in WCW. I didn't believe them (I didn't watch WCW) and I thought they had no clue what they were talking about. Then they go on to completely dominate the entire WCW roster while insinuating they were from the competing company. Which is exactly the opposite of what the WWF did and it ruined the greatest business and entertainment opportunity wrestling will ever know. That kind of thing will never happen again either
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 14:26 |
|
Indeed, and the realism really came across, especially in the historical context. You had obvious characters like Sting with the facepaint in WCW or Yokozuna in WWF, promos where wrestlers would shout incessantly at the camera, and ostentatious costumes. The early nWo segments really broke that mould. You had Hall and Nash using their real names in street clothes, talking to the camera about the owners of the business. It was such a sharp contrast with how things had been done and it was central to re-capturing the audience that had been kids in the era of Hulk Hogan but had grown up and couldn't suspend disbelief readily.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 14:48 |
|
KungFu Grip posted:Steen F5ing Mack onto Knox was a planned Ref bump. Botchamania is overrated. I'd like to hope that they didn't intend for Mack to land directly on Knox's head. Man that was nasty.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 23:31 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 08:31 |
|
Jesus, how lovely did that match look before Hall showed up on the nWo thing? Good lord.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2013 23:40 |