|
JewKiller 3000 posted:maybe not but the only real distinction is laziness, which is not a fundamental concept imho this might be true of haskell proper but if you include all the fun extensions ghc has then i think haskell gets radically different
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 08:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 04:15 |
|
|
Carthag posted:i dont either, i just was taught standard back in 03/04 this was circa 2006 or so
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 08:40
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:all i remember of sml was causing the interpreter to segfault with some code I had made for an assignment. yep segfault. our first project was writing a 3d projection thing in sml, and i was the only guy wanted to code in my group. i had no idea what i was doing so i did a whole fake OO thing, like namespaces and complex structures everywhere. it was a mess, and it kept loving up. when viewed from certain directions, "random" points of the projection would just go madly in some direction never managed to figure out why at the time, so we just put in a section in the report about how it wasnt supposed to do that
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 09:00
|
|
|
the first time I dealt with SML in some book exercises I wasn't caring much about the type system or whatever and just tried to do everything as if it was python and it was really bad studying sml now with a more formal approach I guess now I "get it" but maybe not, I should try doing those exercises again
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 11:22
|
|
|
in other PL news, ruby's oop is neat I think I like it 
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 11:23
|
|
|
places I've seen people speak positively about OCAML: 1. a lovely options market maker called Jane Street 2. /r/programming 3.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 16:15
|
|
|
ocaml owns people hate it for various reasons, but not any good ones
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 16:45
|
|
|
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/shitmunching.php:12) in /var/www/fucklord.php on line 34 <;tinybugchild>;same, but for php.<;/tinybugchild>; EDIT: the joke was about PHP's lovely escaping band-aids and lo and behold vB doesn't seem to escape my joke correctly lol owned
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 16:50
|
|
|
ocaml does sort of own, being a good take on a pragmatic sml. it is not entirely successful though, and unsurprisingly F# is stealing a lot of their thunder by offering roughly the same thing on a much more complete platform
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 16:52
|
|
|
OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:ocaml owns
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 17:09
|
|
|
Internaut! posted:places I've seen people speak positively about OCAML: I almost got hired by a finance firm based only on the fact that I had some superficial knowledge of ocaml.
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 20:13
|
|
|
a bunch of dudes at hacker school are actually gonna do an ocaml tutorial session thing that jane street is running i guess if the only way you make money is powered by one weird obscure language you're going to do everything you can to get as many people interested in it as possible
|
|
#
?
Mar 9, 2013 21:04
|
|
|
Carthag posted:whats a good book on like idiomatic C or whatever. i feel like when i write C sometimes i just mash keywords in a row and delete poo poo until it compiles this is a few pages back but im guessing nobody gave you the right answer, which is: read K&R then read kernighan and pike "the practice of programming" the only two C books anyone ever needs, period
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2013 00:43
|
|
|
abraham linksys posted:clojurescript day 3 or 4 or whatever: function there_was_an_event(event, state_of_world) -> new_world_order;
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2013 03:08
|
|
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:maybe not but the only real distinction is laziness, which is not a fundamental concept imho wrong http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/history-of-haskell/history.pdf laziness is really fundamental to how haskell functions
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
Sang- posted:wrong you're wasting your time, he's already outed himself as a bob harper mouthpiece
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2013 18:41
|
|
|
i learned to shoot a gun today, you guys better watch yourselves
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 03:16
|
|
|
tef posted:i learned to shoot a gun today, you guys better watch yourselves paging the TSA
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 03:47
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:paging the TSA why, are they using allman style?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 04:32
|
|
|
tef posted:why, are they using allman style? this is the best post in like 20 pages
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 04:36
|
|
|
im gonna make a language statements are indented with tabs. continuation lines are indented with spaces. semicolons still required
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 04:54
|
|
|
tef posted:why, are they using allman style? holy poo poo tef made a funny post!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 05:04
|
|
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:holy poo poo tef made a funny post!!!!! yospos is not about being funny
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 05:42
|
|
|
rotor posted:yospos is not about being funny for some i suppose
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 05:53
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:for some i suppose alt.computerjanitor.recovery
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 06:04
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:for some i suppose this is the best you people can do with a softball straight line like that?? you sicken me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 06:05
|
|
|
Sang- posted:wrong well that says "Laziness was undoubtedly the single theme that united the various groups that contributed to Haskell’s design. Technically, Haskell is a language with a non-strict semantics; lazy evaluation is sim- ply one implementation technique for a non-strict language. Nev- ertheless the term “laziness” is more pungent and evocative than “non-strict,” so we follow popular usage by describing Haskell as lazy." another case of Haskell programmers being non-strict, or as they like to call it, lazy
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 06:52
|
|
|
Win8 Hetro Experie posted:"Laziness was undoubtedly the single theme that united the various groups that contributed to Haskell’s design. Technically, Haskell is a language with a non-strict semantics; lazy evaluation is sim- ply one implementation technique for a non-strict language. Nev- ertheless the term “laziness” is more pungent and evocative than “non-strict,” so we follow popular usage by describing Haskell as lazy." i like that; makes me feel like it-is being read by a ro-bot voice
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 11:32
|
|
|
edit: uh, this made no sense, haven't had my coffee
Cybernetic Vermin fucked around with this message at 12:53 on Mar 11, 2013 |
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 12:45
|
|
|
rotor posted:I almost got hired by a finance firm based only on the fact that I had some superficial knowledge of ocaml. was it jane street if not, run if so, run
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 14:27
|
|
|
rotor posted:yospos is not about being funny sorry I know that I just got excited cuz I got to see a once-in-a-lifetime event like Haley's comet
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 15:10
|
|
|
just in case any of you were wondering, cobol has no intrinsic absolute value function
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 15:25
|
|
|
Phone posted:just in case any of you were wondering, cobol has no intrinsic absolute value function i wasn't wondering fyi hth
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 16:58
|
|
|
Phone posted:just in case any of you were wondering, cobol has no … value
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 16:59
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:i wasn't wondering fyi hth i was wondering
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:10
|
|
|
Phone posted:just in case any of you were wondering, cobol has no intrinsic absolute value function how many people are out there that think cobol is the best language
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:24
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:how many people are out there that think cobol is the best language i don't know but they all smell bad
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:26
|
|
|
WELCOME.. TO THE COBOL GOLDMINE http://www.ils-international.com/
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:31
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:how many people are out there that think cobol is the best language all of the people who make decisions at companies who currently hold your 401k or ira
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 04:15 |
|
|
I used ocaml once and I thought the syntax sucked and the names of building were confusing. Also that you had to declare that a thing was going through be recursive. What's up wrong the that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2013 17:59
|
|
