|
Oh hey, I was an extra on this last year.
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 12:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:Woody Harrelson as...Heisenberg.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 13:55
|
|
|
BonoMan posted:I will never, ever, get tired of that clip. I show it to anyone who even vaguely knows who Michael Caine is just to have an excuse to watch it again. Their Sean Connerey bit is amazing too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:34
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:I show it to anyone who even vaguely knows who Michael Caine is just to have an excuse to watch it again. Their Sean Connerey bit is amazing too. We're reaching Inception levels of Michael Caine... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX0F3kY3uxU
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:42
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:We're reaching Inception levels of Michael Caine... I love Michael Caine, I wish he would do an official SatNav.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:48
|
|
|
I've got a real one this time:
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:30
|
|
|
I miss the silly phazers and tricorders. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:45
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:I miss the silly phazers and tricorders. I agree, this looks like it's a generic action thriller instead of a Star Trek film. You can't even see Spock's ears clearly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:49
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:I miss the silly phazers and tricorders. Me too  They're actually holding handguns...
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:58
|
|
|
What the hell? Why are they wielding handguns?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:59
|
|
|
"People don't want a Star Trek film that's like the show, no one likes Star Trek. Let's make a film for people who hate Star Trek." I swear, if this is another 'the villain wanted to be caught!' film, I'm going to... well... express disappointment.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:05
|
|
|
Where's the spaceship. Star Trek is supposed to have spaceships.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:38
|
|
|
Surprised they didn't put the word Star Trek in tiny print above "In the Darkness".
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:41
|
|
|
Cicadalek posted:Where's the spaceship. Star Trek is supposed to have spaceships. Some of the best Trek adventures didn't involve the ships in any measurable way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:45
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:Some of the best Trek adventures didn't involve the ships in any measurable way. It seems like they're not trying to reproduce the last film. That was all spaceship-action. In this one they're going to be on a planet, in civilian clothes, using regular weapons and not special cadet-issue laser zappers. Sure, I'll buy into that. Anyway, if you want the same old thing there's always half a dozen Trek films that are virtually indistinguishable in their sameness.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:12
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:I swear, if this is another 'the villain wanted to be caught!' film, I'm going to... well... express disappointment. What does this even mean? Anyways, that's a poster. Created at the whim of execs to appeal to the broadest audience possible. Which makes for generic looking crap. I'm sure you guys will get your phazers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:29
|
|
|
Edit: Beaten like a motherfucker. TheBigBudgetSequel fucked around with this message at 17:54 on Mar 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:33
|
|
|
Look like ten posts above yours.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:46
|
|
|
Red Pyramid posted:What does this even mean? He means the trope of the villain getting caught, and it turns out getting captured was a vital part of his plan (whereupon he hacks the gibson/makes a masterful escape). Bonus trope points if the good guy's leader pitches a hissy fit saying "he did this RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES", or if the good guys were dumb enough to put some vital macguffin in the same building as the supervillian.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:03
|
|
|
Crackbone posted:He means the trope of the villain getting caught, and it turns out getting captured was a vital part of his plan (whereupon he hacks the gibson/makes a masterful escape). Bonus trope points if the good guy's leader pitches a hissy fit saying "he did this RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES", or if the good guys were dumb enough to put some vital macguffin in the same building as the supervillian.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:09
|
|
|
Red Pyramid posted:What does this even mean? That's an international poster to show off the actors in the film; not defending it, but isn't that fairly normal with international marketing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:11
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:That's an international poster to show off the actors in the film; not defending it, but isn't that fairly normal with international marketing? Also, Star Trek has always been much less popular overseas than in the US, so I'm not surprised to see an international poster downplay the "Trekkiness" of it (ie, no Enterprise).
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:14
|
|
|
Canned Panda posted:I've got a real one this time: Looks like we are finally getting that Federation Cop Drama we always wanted!  Anyway, this poster is  
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:25
|
|
|
fenix down posted:Like Avengers, Dark Knight Rises, and Skyfall? And The Dark Knight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 04:07
|
|
|
Barometer posted:Anyway, this poster is Looking at it on my wall right now 
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 08:05
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:Some of the best Trek adventures didn't involve the ships in any measurable way. I just watched the '79 movie last night and it had a lot of screentime devoted to showing ships.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 09:22
|
|
|
effectual posted:I just watched the '79 movie last night and it had a lot of screentime devoted to showing ships. 50% of that movie was interior shots of the ship; the next 25% was exterior shots of the ship traveling through the universe's longest hallway, and the other 25% was exposition.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 09:23
|
|
|
effectual posted:I just watched the '79 movie last night and it had a lot of screentime devoted to showing ships. He probably meant on the show, even though I'd still argue that the ship was always prominently involved. Regardless, everything I've seen of this new film looks really off in tone. While the 1st one had plenty of problems, it was at least bright and enough of a space adventure to pass for Trek in a favourable light. A different tonal treatment would be fine if the story knocked it out of the park, but Hollywood hasn't given me much cause for optimism lately. Prove me wrong Star Trek Into Darkness, prove me wrong.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 09:29
|
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:I swear, if this is another 'the villain wanted to be caught!' film, I'm going to... well... express disappointment. I kind of assume the twist is that the villain is a good guy who turned bad in order to prepare the Federation for an even bigger, upcoming threat. Cue: third movie. I'd call it the Darth Revan trope.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 10:34
|
|
|
Ninjas! Ninjas! Ninjas!   If you can rip through reality with them then it's time to cut your nails     The True Professionals..........of...........awkward....pauses  Master of the deadly "Hmmm, not bad." technique  In which the villain is Anthony Kiedis' Dad (no, really)  Ho Ding Pow and Lo Dow Mien sound pretty delicious to me  
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 03:53
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:I miss John Cassavetes This is a great movie. I really have no idea what you'd make the poster be, though. Just to give y'all an idea of how things can waver, here's what the DVD cover looks like:  The DVD cover is certainly more accurate in terms of representing the movie's _look_, I'll say that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 04:46
|
|
|
ShufflerZero posted:Ninjas! Ninjas! Ninjas! "Whoa dudes, there's a lot of ninja movies to pick from but let's get this one! Look at how many white guys are in it! You know it's gonna be good!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 04:57
|
|
|
Lobok posted:"Whoa dudes, there's a lot of ninja movies to pick from but let's get this one! Look at how many white guys are in it! You know it's gonna be good!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 05:14
|
|
|
How many of those movies have Richard Harrison in them and was he paid for any of them?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 05:18
|
|
|
So I just caught up with this thread and I have to say it's been awesome just to read straight through. So much cool insight into design stuff in general, especially from kiimo- really neat to get insight from somebody working in the industry. Anyway, I think there were a whole slew of kaiju posters a few pages back, so I'd like to add this:  In season 2 of the Star Wars: The Clone Wars series there was a two-episode kaiju style story arc about a giant creature called the Zillo Beast. This was included in the booklet in the Blu-Ray set.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 05:40
|
|
|
ShufflerZero posted:Ninjas! Ninjas! Ninjas! In keeping with the ninja theme:  Featuring a Garfield phone, evil toy robots and this guy.  I'm not even kidding. You can find the whole thing on Youtube in all it's  glory!
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 06:01
|
|
|
I have seen that. The blond guy is a reverse Super Saiyan; he removes his wig revealing black hair underneath, and then loses a fight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 06:02
|
|
|
Did someone say Richard Harrison? Did someone say Ninjas? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqql30HE0To
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 06:30
|
|
|
ShufflerZero posted:Ninjas! Ninjas! Ninjas! Aaron Eckhart was in ninja movies?
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 08:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 17, 2024 17:37 |
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:Those Moonbeam films were really ahead of their time. Is there a version of this with just RDJ and Gyneth Paltrow, without all the other people in the background? Because I think that could be a decent poster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 24, 2013 09:05
|
|
