|
Origami Dali posted:Since 40% of Lifeforce consists of Mathilda May's bare breasts, that's all I really remember aside from the scene where Steve Railsback is hamming it up, hilariously trying to resist making out with Patrick Stewart on an operating table (who is possessed by Mathida May, who is a space vampire? It's been a while). It's a really good movie, the director just died this week. Also, fixed: Mister Chief posted:Memories of Murder always made good use of photography for their promotional material. It's secretly the best
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 03:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 00:07 |
|
|
New Star Trek Into Darkness poster
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 03:53
|
|
|
Mondo poster for Kim Ki-Duk's latest, Pieta.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:17
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:New Star Trek Into Darkness poster Yes, Mr. Cumberbatch. You do look quite fantastic against that backdrop of a ruined city. Now could we please get a different shot? No? Okay then.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:21
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:New Star Trek Into Darkness poster Snore! It's Star Trek and I'm not excited to see it, way to go marketing department. In a time when something like The Avengers is a smash hit are they really so desperate to distance this series from anything 'geek sci-fi'? As long as it's still called Star Trek it will never escape that label anyway, may as well embrace it a little.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:37
|
|
|
Darthemed posted:
Does Mr Mandroid have no legs but threads instead? This sounds like the basis of a 1980s cartoon or a pretty good composition for a sci-fi RPG party.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:46
|
|
|
I'm not excited for it either  The first one (reboot from a few years ago) was pretty good, but none of the trailers for this one have sold me on it. I'll probably go see it anyway, but I'm not pumped for it like I was the last one before it came out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:50
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Does Mr Mandroid have no legs but threads instead? See for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKpSKzTzn-8
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:53
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:New Star Trek Into Darkness poster This has to be fake. Look at the clone stamping in the smoke clouds, or the terrible layer blending at the edges of EVERY OBJECT. I'm having a loving heart attack looking at these fauxtoshop pas!
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 04:57
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Does Mr Mandroid have no legs but threads instead? In one of the threads in the Traditional Games sub-forum, it's pretty much been called Rifts: the Movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:This has to be fake. Look at the clone stamping in the smoke clouds, or the terrible layer blending at the edges of EVERY OBJECT. I'm having a loving heart attack looking at these fauxtoshop pas! I was just thinking the same thing. Those smoke clouds are atrocious. edit: Not fake, done by BLT. That isn't too surprising. They've churned out some good stuff in the past but also a lot of crap. kiimo fucked around with this message at 06:33 on Apr 9, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 06:26
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:This has to be fake. Look at the clone stamping in the smoke clouds, or the terrible layer blending at the edges of EVERY OBJECT. I'm having a loving heart attack looking at these fauxtoshop pas! I don't know what to tell you. http://www.startrek.com/article/new-international-star-trek-into-darkness-posters
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 06:32
|
|
|
Darthemed posted:
Charles Band is the unsung king of lovely movies. Everyone always goes with Troma or Corman but no, Charles Band is like the 100% guaranteed seal of poo poo. The relationship Full Moon has with their followers and fans is an emotionally abusive one.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 06:50
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:New Star Trek Into Darkness poster Five bucks says their original tagline had the word "rise" in it somewhere.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 06:56
|
|
|
Cpt. Spring Types posted:Five bucks says their original tagline had the word "rise" in it somewhere. I doubt that since this is the dark middle chapter of the trilogy and words like rise are saved for the third film.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 06:59
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:New Star Trek Into Darkness poster
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 10:51
|
|
|
Stare-Out posted:Yeah, that sure looks like a poster for a Star Trek movie. If you removed all the text (except the tagline for added confusion) what movie would that be? Sherlock 2154? Mass Effect 3 after the Reapers are gone? Well the boys in market research have put in some intense testing and found that the key demos think that Stark Trek is "dumb as hell." e: given that's future-london, it would be Sherlock 2154.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 11:18
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:Well the boys in market research have put in some intense testing and found that the key demos think that Stark Trek is "dumb as hell." I dunno, Mass Effect 3 is in London too. Maybe a crossover! Sherlock has to solve the mystery of why all the buildings are on fire! Spoiler: it was the Reapers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 11:23
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:Stark Trek Centrepoint of Marvel Phase 3 confirmed. Also, I say this not being a major fan, but the idea of a Star Trek film with a heavy Earth focus isn't that bad of an idea to me. It just needs to be done well, and sparingly.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 13:00
|
|
|
Baron von Eevl posted:Charles Band is the unsung king of lovely movies. Everyone always goes with Troma or Corman but no, Charles Band is like the 100% guaranteed seal of poo poo. The relationship Full Moon has with their followers and fans is an emotionally abusive one. Hey Re-Animator was genius. It all depends if it's from Empire where Band actually had a studio backing him or Full Moon where it's just him pumping out Puppet Master sequels,pirating his own movies and making horror bras. Or maybe Stuart Gordon's just that drat good that he could make awesome films even under Band.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 13:58
|
|
|
Stare-Out posted:Yeah, that sure looks like a poster for a Star Trek movie. If you removed all the text (except the tagline for added confusion) what movie would that be? Sherlock 2154? Mass Effect 3 after the Reapers are gone? Heck, is there really anything that makes it clear it's the far future? There are weird looking buildings, but we have some pretty weird looking buildings now. For all you can tell the movie could take place in 2015 or something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 14:44
|
|
|
Pigbuster posted:Heck, is there really anything that makes it clear it's the far future? There are weird looking buildings, but we have some pretty weird looking buildings now. For all you can tell the movie could take place in 2015 or something. I thought the buildings looked like something out of modern Dubai. I guess that would make it Spec Ops: The Line: The Movie QuoProQuid fucked around with this message at 15:19 on Apr 9, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 15:03
|
|
|
At least a couple of those buildings (the Gherkin, most notably) are actual buildings in London.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 16:16
|
|
|
I've been disappointed in the lack of space combat so far in the trailers. I mean they did it perfectly in the opening scene of the last one, but after that we don't see much more of it, which is really too bad considering I like their updated designs of Federation ships.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 17:28
|
|
|
Darthemed posted:
I remember being a kid seeing that poster for the first time 27 years ago in our local mom-and-pop VHS place and thinking "holly poo poo I need to rent this like now!!!" I'm not ashamed to say that I wasn't disappointed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 17:53
|
|
|
Is this new Trek movie mostly going to take place on Earth?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 17:53
|
|
|
Looks like a sizable chunk will, although the 15-minute footage with the Hobbit was entirely on some alien planet of whatevers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 17:55
|
|
|
Zzulu posted:Is this new Trek movie mostly going to take place on Earth?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 17:55
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:Looks like a sizable chunk will, although the 15-minute footage with the Hobbit was entirely on some alien planet of whatevers. Somehow I read this to mean that Martin Freeman was playing a Hobbit on an alien planet in the new Star Trek movie, and I wondered what dimension I had fallen into. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
A wonderful dimension. That's what. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:25
|
|
|
kiimo posted:edit: Not fake, done by BLT. That isn't too surprising. They've churned out some good stuff in the past but also a lot of crap. What the hell a pro studio puts out a poster with the most obviously cloned smoke the world I need to move into the industry if lovely rush jobs like that are acceptable.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
Stare-Out posted:Sherlock 2154? It's been done before. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyGAc-OLAiQ Sherlock Hoooolmes in the twenty-second centur-ray-aay! edit:VVV Wow, how did I never notice the reference of that show's theme song? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhNM2K8cmU8 Internet Alias fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Apr 9, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:46
|
|
|
I unironically want to see a crossover between Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century and Cleopatra 2525. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAbHqcPE9pM
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:51
|
|
|
Internet Alias posted:It's been done before. "So what's your show called?" "Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century." "Oh yeah, what's it about?" "Well..."
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 18:56
|
|
|
That Cleopatra doesn't look very Greco-Egyptian but theme song more than makes up for that vile inaccuracy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 19:44
|
|
|
FreudianSlippers posted:That Cleopatra doesn't look very Greco-Egyptian but theme song more than makes up for that vile inaccuracy. I see it as official cannon now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 22:01
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:I unironically want to see a crossover between Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century and Cleopatra 2525. Only if Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century get an appearance. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60-etRy0dg8
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 22:10
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:I unironically want to see a crossover between Sherlock Holmes in the 22nd Century and Cleopatra 2525. I loved this show. The running joke is that Cleo would use cliches that had fallen out of use, and everyone thought she came up with them on the spot. "All for one, and one for all." "That's beautiful, Cleo."
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 00:42
|
|
|
Young Freud posted:And to continue a tradition, you forgot one... I love movies about sports:  the night dad fucked around with this message at 01:04 on Apr 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 01:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 00:07 |
|
|
penismightier posted:I loved this show. The running joke is that Cleo would use cliches that had fallen out of use, and everyone thought she came up with them on the spot. "All for one, and one for all." "That's beautiful, Cleo." It sounds like someone tried to make a real version of the pilot Mia Wallace was in.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 01:36
|
|
