|
MononcQc posted:if you think of text as individual characters you can manipulate you're most likely gonna be in a world of pain. or words as space delimited 
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 04:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 23:56 |
|
|
by default gpg requires real names to be 4 characters in length minimum this would cause issues for japanese people if they didn't implement it using strlen so it actually winds up counting bytes (though i wonder if there are any japanese first/last names that are one kanji)
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 04:21
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:by default gpg requires real names to be 4 characters in length minimum there are, but if they're not using the romanized spelling of their name they deserve what they get
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 05:53
|
|
|
how many of his 99 problems are unicode related? at least two, obviously, but what's the exact total? 1. bom in utf8 2. surrogate pairs in utf8 3. surrogate pairs 4. composite characters 5. decomposed characters 6. han unification 7. non-han separation 8. variation selectors, language tags, interlinear annotations, bidi controls and other stupid poo poo 9. locale-dependent case folding
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 06:08
|
|
|
why is this thread blacked out? some kind of CISPA protest?
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 09:02
|
|
|
poo poo he found us you guys can come out now
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 10:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 17:41
|
|
|
im going to assume thats from hn and you should feel bad hth
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 17:44
|
|
|
polpotpi posted:im going to assume thats from hn and you should feel bad 
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 17:56
|
|
|
slightly surprised snap and yesod aren't higher but eh
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 18:09
|
|
|
iirc there are like 5-10 other charts for different kinds of benchmarks on different back-ends. The results are not uniform in all cases.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 18:13
|
|
|
i h8 that visual studio doesn't do transitive dependencies.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:19
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:i h8 that visual studio doesn't do transitive dependencies. It doesn't actually traverse the dependency tree, but instead only looks at the first level? Wow.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:30
|
|
|
what is it called when visual studio asks you to resolve ambiguity despite the exact type being defined on that line. because that sucks
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:37
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:what is it called when visual studio asks you to resolve ambiguity despite the exact type being defined on that line. because that sucks Java
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:44
|
|
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:It doesn't actually traverse the dependency tree, but instead only looks at the first level? Wow. it doesn't have a dependency tree, i guess? idk. heres my current solution layout Solution -ProjectA (contains model + interfaces) --Has Dependency on System.IdentityModel -ProjectB (contains an implementation of interfaces in A) --Has Dependency on ProjectA -ProjectC (service that uses B to implement A.) --Has Dependencies on ProjectA and ProjectB When i start to implement something in ProjectB the System.IdentityModel reference is not available until i add it manually, even though it is required in the already referenced ProjectA. Im sure theres a reason for this but its dumb. Werthog 95 posted:what is it called when visual studio asks you to resolve ambiguity despite the exact type being defined on that line. because that sucks that's b/c visual studio litterrally does not compile or error check code in realtime like eclipse does. if you hit rebuild it should go away. this is my #2 grievance w/ visual studio.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:46
|
|
|
oh ok neato
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2013 21:50
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:that's b/c visual studio litterrally does not compile or error check code in realtime like eclipse does. if you hit rebuild it should go away. this is my #2 grievance w/ visual studio.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 04:03
|
|
|
idk who that is. is she qt?
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 05:08
|
|
|
current scala status: pattern matching is fuckin wacky
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:00
|
|
|
pattern matching owns
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:08
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:pattern matching owns also regular expressions 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:09
|
|
|
A lovely guide to matching things: regular expressions  pattern matching unification 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:12
|
|
|
so far for my job i just can't get into tdd. i don't necessarily mind tests but i just don't like the idea of writing tests first. addendum: in particular, i don't like digging through a hundred spec files to find the most appropriate place to add specific tests.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:14
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:current scala status: pattern matching is fuckin wacky current type erasure status: still a bitchhhhh
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:23
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:so far for my job i just can't get into tdd. i don't necessarily mind tests but i just don't like the idea of writing tests first. best argument I have for this is that tests are going even more boring and lovely to write after the code. Writing them first couples them to the design phase you likely have mentally -- designing becomes a bit more boring, but writing tests is no longer a huge pain in the rear end that you end up hamfisting until they aren't helpful at all, just to get done with it. Also forces you to think as someone who uses the code first, instead of only as the person who writes it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:31
|
|
|
The counter corollary to that is that you never get full requirements during the design phase so you're still gonna be making iirrelevant/impotent tests after the construction phase.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:36
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:current scala status: pattern matching is fuckin wacky are you doing the coursera thing too does it bother you that the description of the problems have typos and weird grammar
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:39
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:are you doing the coursera thing too nah I'm used to that from taking college classes from profs that don't speak english. honestly I think it's pretty dope to learn a language from the guy who loving invented it
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:41
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:nah I'm used to that from taking college classes from profs that don't speak english. honestly I think it's pretty dope to learn a language from the guy who loving invented it that part is nice, definitely, but most of my struggle with the course has been related to parsing the English of the problem set i've been out of college for too long
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:45
|
|
|
just replace the ???s until the tests pass
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 16:49
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:The counter corollary to that is that you never get full requirements during the design phase so you're still gonna be making iirrelevant/impotent tests after the construction phase. Isn't the counter to that counter that if you need to change tests, you'll also need to change code, so why would you drop the tests but not the code? IMO when the requirements are not known, I prefer to be able to take a step to prototype poo poo, show it, let people make their minds, and then develop the serious thing from there. With the assumption the prototype is a throwaway without tests, and that it will be rewritten more seriously, that is. It's a bit longer as a process and doesn't necessarily protect you against future change, but it drops a lot of uncertainty, and the tests tend to help having loosely coupled components that are easy to throw away and replace when they're not good anymore, with more confidence than "let's just inject the behavior change in the old messy code". Either that, or you ship without tests, up to the point where you just do the "think very hard and pray it doesn't break" routine on every modification. Which works, but is a loving pain.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:01
|
|
|
The reason is because we are governed by business. Assuming a 6 month project, 2 months design. If they want to add something in month 5, you just hope your butt that the design accommodates the change gracefully. Or you can reject and get put on the support team for the thing until the feature is added.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:12
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:are you doing the coursera thing too Do you only speak English? I think being bilingual has shielded me from bad grammar and spelling, all that matters is comprehension which can be inferred most of the time. I haven't finished the scala lectures for this week so I don't know what the problems are like.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:36
|
|
|
i'm still cranking out the huffman poo poo myself. every goddamn time i take a coursera course i get distracted four weeks into it and forget about it, trying not to do that again
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:42
|
|
|
Oh hey there Mr Hardware layout guy. If you are going to put a USB port on the device, put it on correctly. VCC D- D+ ID GND it's not VCC D+ D- ID GND Also please don't use lovely 5v regulators that crap out along with lovely Ceramic Oscillators for things that need precision. TYIA fucker.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:47
|
|
|
what does any of that have to do with programming languages, Mr Rat Bert Guy
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:50
|
|
|
for as long as connections exist, people will find a way to swap tx/rx, d+/d-, mosi/miso. it is simply the way of the universe
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:58
|
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:what does any of that have to do with programming languages, Mr Rat Bert Guy if only there were a Language that could Describe some Hardware - perhaps the Very high speed type
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 23:56 |
|
|
Werthog 95 posted:what does any of that have to do with programming languages, Mr Rat Bert Guy Perhaps, perhaps if there was a way to program hardware. In a way that we could all use it in a simple to use way, such as plugging it in to a computer. Also perhaps there are pre-compiled libraries that should work correctly with minimal changes. And if it doesn't work with some very small changes, it could cost a weeks worth of time. Otto Skorzeny posted:for as long as connections exist, people will find a way to swap tx/rx, d+/d-, mosi/miso. it is simply the way of the universe This is a truth that has bit me on the rear end more than once. And everytime like a broken record I forget to check the pinout for at least a day or so. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 18:01
|
|