|
The Japanese trailer of The Wolverine is more or less the one we have seen before but with added Japanese voice over and text. Anybody hear understand Japanese? The title is apparently Wolverine: Samurai in Japan.
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 00:38 |
|
|
Thor 2 trailer was good but not great. I think I was spoiled by the Superman trailer. The "enemy as old as time itself" stuff is a little tired but if the villains themselves are capable and complex, I'll give it a pass. As for the whole "Why don't the Avengers assemble for this?" I think Thor and the Asgardians probably see this as their problem and are too proud to ask for help anyway. There might be a throwaway line as to why the Avengers don't help in this, but that's all I expect.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:28
|
|
|
I know it doesn't make sense from a studio and contractual/licensing side of things, but I'm going to keep hoping for a quick Spiderman cameo in Avengers 2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 17:59
|
|
|
mfaley posted:I know it doesn't make sense from a studio and contractual/licensing side of things, but I'm going to keep hoping for a quick Spiderman cameo in Avengers 2. RDJ essentially plays the same snark role that Spiderman played during his stint with the Avengers. Also Spiderman imo works way better on a street level rather than the large stage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 18:05
|
|
|
mfaley posted:I know it doesn't make sense from a studio and contractual/licensing side of things, but I'm going to keep hoping for a quick Spiderman cameo in Avengers 2. There's so much money to be made in cross-promotion that it's ridiculous to think about it, haha. If Fox/Sony managed to put Andrew Garfield and Hugh Jackman into The Avengers 2 as Spider-Man and Wolverine, that would be loving bonkers.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
FooF posted:Thor 2 trailer was good but not great. I think I was spoiled by the Superman trailer. The "enemy as old as time itself" stuff is a little tired but if the villains themselves are capable and complex, I'll give it a pass. As for the whole "Why don't the Avengers assemble for this?" I think Thor and the Asgardians probably see this as their problem and are too proud to ask for help anyway. There might be a throwaway line as to why the Avengers don't help in this, but that's all I expect. That and the Avengers are Earth's Mightiest Heroes. Not Asgard's. They have a vested interest in the protection of Earth, but the scope really doesn't carry much outside that. (Thor, obviously, feels this same connection as he feels responsible for introducing interstellar war to Earth).
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 19:37
|
|
|
Pretty excited to see Thor team up with Tommy Wiseau in the new movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 21:29
|
|
|
More like a skinny version of Peter Steele.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 22:50
|
|
|
Dexo posted:RDJ essentially plays the same snark role that Spiderman played during his stint with the Avengers. I agree somewhat. Though I am admittedly unfamiliar with any story line in the last fifteen years, I would still say that Tony Stark is acting very much as the focal point of the Avengers (in respect to the first one, I mean), so there is still some space for a wise-rear end. I could just SO see a Spiderman cameo like Wolverine's in First Class. Just maybe a quick web sling to save someones life, he cracks a joke, and swings off. Enough to get the audience to go wild. Like teagone said, it would be such a revenue driver. On the other hand, I know studio's are notoriously inflexible, so the likeliness of it happening is zero.
|
|
#
?
Apr 23, 2013 22:57
|
|
|
mfaley posted:I agree somewhat. Though I am admittedly unfamiliar with any story line in the last fifteen years, I would still say that Tony Stark is acting very much as the focal point of the Avengers (in respect to the first one, I mean), so there is still some space for a wise-rear end. I could just SO see a Spiderman cameo like Wolverine's in First Class. Just maybe a quick web sling to save someones life, he cracks a joke, and swings off. Enough to get the audience to go wild. It would also be a completely useless scene for no reason other than fan service. I doubt Avengers 2 is going to be shorter than Avengers and that movie was already too long, so there is no real benefit. The Wolverine cameo in First Class is part of a montage of recruiting mutants and it's likely that not everyone they approach will sign on, so it makes sense from that perspective, it also ties the film into the other X-Men movies, which is important if you want to maintain a sense of continuity, since the entire cast is different. Also it, and I have no idea if they were planning on making a Days of Future Past movie when they made First Class, makes it easier to do a sequel with two different actors playing Xavier and Magneto in different time lines.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 00:19
|
|
|
mfaley posted:I agree somewhat. Though I am admittedly unfamiliar with any story line in the last fifteen years, I would still say that Tony Stark is acting very much as the focal point of the Avengers (in respect to the first one, I mean), so there is still some space for a wise-rear end. I could just SO see a Spiderman cameo like Wolverine's in First Class. Just maybe a quick web sling to save someones life, he cracks a joke, and swings off. Enough to get the audience to go wild. That sounds like a groaner.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 00:20
|
|
|
All I care about for Thor 2 is that Loki dies in it. Because then we can get Thor 3: Journey Into Darkness with Kid Loki.
feedmyleg fucked around with this message at 01:01 on Apr 24, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 00:38
|
|
|
Terrible Horse posted:That sounds like a groaner. Yeah, what does he do? Make a big grand entrance in the final fight and then realize he left the oven on so swings home after his cameo?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 00:41
|
|
|
The best way for other superheros to have cameos that don't suck is for them to be in the news somehow in a totally unrelated way - a headline or an anchorman in the background talking about events in some other city.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 01:55
|
|
|
Mr. Flunchy posted:Man there's a lot of blockbusters taking place in London lately. Well it has the Doctor in it, of course it'll be in London. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 02:04
|
|
|
mfaley posted:I know it doesn't make sense from a studio and contractual/licensing side of things, but I'm going to keep hoping for a quick Spiderman cameo in Avengers 2. This is precisely why Sony is clinging to the rights. Nobody in that building wants to be the guy who let Spider-Man get away and watch Marvel make 20 trillion dollars off "Spider-Man Meets The Avengers".
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 02:13
|
|
|
Hollywood can work different. I remember reading about Microsoft coming into Hollywood and throwing their weight around trying to pit the studios against each other demanding huge concessions and percentages until all studios bowed out but 2 and those two had the execs meet over lunch and agree that one would get international distribution and the other domestic (or something like that) and completely took away Microsoft's leverage also killing the Halo movie. If Disney and Sony agree to something like one has domestic and one has international who knows. It just takes some forward thinking individuals to go "We all could make oodles of money so let's work it out." But, as you say, odds are no one wants some gently caress up to happen and be responsible for losing out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 02:16
|
|
|
Benne posted:This is precisely why Sony is clinging to the rights. Nobody in that building wants to be the guy who let Spider-Man get away and watch Marvel make 20 trillion dollars off "Spider-Man Meets The Avengers". Why does no one want to be the guy that signs a deal with Marvel to split the profits off a "spiderman meets the avengers"?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 02:31
|
|
|
Away all Goats posted:Why does no one want to be the guy that signs a deal with Marvel to split the profits off a "spiderman meets the avengers"? I feel like that would be a never ending lawsuit. With how terrible studios are at paying their own people, I wonder how much of a clusterfuck it would be for them to sort out going even-steven on a movie like that. Maybe establish a third production company.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 02:38
|
|
|
Why would anyone even want to see the cluster gently caress that is the X-Men movie universe or the tonally incompatible Spider-man universe co-exist with each other/Marvel's venture?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 03:07
|
|
|
Studios won't co-operate because they basically hate each other. Look at the Adam West Batman TV series, still not available on DVD. That show would ABSOLUTELY rake in the cash, but because WB & Fox can't agree on the rights, it languishes in limbo. Studios want all or nothing, 50/50 arrangements means their opponents get a cut and they can't stand that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 03:22
|
|
|
Marvel got back Daredevil, so maybe we'll get a new one!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:11
|
|
|
Could Carnahan legally shop his same pitch to Marvel?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:14
|
|
|
This has no relevance to any of the current conversations, but I was digging through some old comics tonight and now I'm seriously praying for them to make a movie from The Tick. I think now is the time. spoon
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:18
|
|
|
schwenz posted:This has no relevance to any of the current conversations, but I was digging through some old comics tonight and now I'm seriously praying for them to make a movie from The Tick. I think now is the time. Only if Warburton reprises the role OR!!! if they give it to The Rock.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:22
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I feel like that would be a never ending lawsuit. With how terrible studios are at paying their own people, I wonder how much of a clusterfuck it would be for them to sort out going even-steven on a movie like that. Maybe establish a third production company. Aren't there still lawsuits going over Who Framed Roger Rabbit?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:27
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:Only if Warburton reprises the role OR!!! if they give it to The Rock. Seeing those pics from Pain and Gain, the Rock may actually be anatomically equal to how The Tick is drawn. They wouldn't even need to beef up his suit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 04:33
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:All I care about for Thor 2 is that Loki dies in it. Because then we can get Thor 3: Journey Into Darkness with Kid Loki. Hiddleston apparently loved Kid Loki. I don't think there would be any child actor that could pull it off. Just give Kid Loki's personality to Hiddleston and I bet he can pull it off.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 05:50
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Hiddleston apparently loved Kid Loki. I don't think there would be any child actor that could pull it off. Just give Kid Loki's personality to Hiddleston and I bet he can pull it off. I think Asa Butterfield would be pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 06:05
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Hiddleston apparently loved Kid Loki. I don't think there would be any child actor that could pull it off. Just give Kid Loki's personality to Hiddleston and I bet he can pull it off. I think eventually they are going to tackle a redemption arc for Loki and using the Kid Loki plot, but maintaining Tom Hiddleston (the main reason I watch the Marvel films) would be a really good idea for it - it's suitably cosmic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 06:11
|
|
|
Does anyone have a link to any news stories or could explain a little bit more in depth about the different properties marvel license out. From what i understand Spider Man has 6 movies isn't that correct? I mean eventually the rights will come back to Marvel right?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 06:22
|
|
|
Hollis posted:I mean eventually the rights will come back to Marvel right? Some day far in the future maybe. I think they have the franchise as long as they keep making movies. There was a new deal done a few years ago that I think is set up like the Fox X-Men deal. X-O fucked around with this message at 06:29 on Apr 24, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 06:27
|
|
|
Deadpool posted:Some day far in the future maybe. I think they have the franchise as long as they keep making movies. There was a new deal done a few years ago that I think is set up like the Fox X-Men deal. Which is what, exactly?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 09:15
|
|
|
Doflamingo posted:Which is what, exactly? Marvel made these deals way back when they were either in or near-bankruptcy. Basically, as long as the studios make movies within a certain time frame, they retain the rights to keep making movies. Edit: As far as the Fox deal, I thought Disney just got back animation rights.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 09:41
|
|
|
Gatts posted:Hollywood can work different. I remember reading about Microsoft coming into Hollywood and throwing their weight around trying to pit the studios against each other demanding huge concessions and percentages until all studios bowed out but 2 and those two had the execs meet over lunch and agree that one would get international distribution and the other domestic (or something like that) and completely took away Microsoft's leverage also killing the Halo movie. Bugs Bunny and Mickey Mouse shared screentime for the first time ever.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 10:06
|
|
|
LividLiquid posted:Who Framed Roger Rabbit happened. It's not going to happen because Avengers 2 will make an enormous ton of money with or without Spider-Man in it. From a financial point of view you're forking over a wodge of the profits of your biggest film of the year to one of your business competitors for no reason.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 11:31
|
|
|
Lobok posted:I feel like that would be a never ending lawsuit. With how terrible studios are at paying their own people, I wonder how much of a clusterfuck it would be for them to sort out going even-steven on a movie like that. Maybe establish a third production company. Roger Rabbit is the one reason why I think its remotely possible that a crossover could happen by Avenges 3.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 11:45
|
|
|
Fish Of Doom posted:Pretty excited to see Thor team up with Tommy Wiseau in the new movie. Am I the only one who saw this screenshot and thought "Skrillex?" feedmyleg posted:All I care about for Thor 2 is that Loki dies in it. Because then we can get Thor 3: Journey Into Darkness with Kid Loki. I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of fangirls on Tumblr suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 11:59
|
|
|
Has it been mentioned that Fox are apparently looking to do a shared universe in some capacity with the Fantastic Four reboot and future X-Men movies?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 14:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 00:38 |
|
|
*shudder*, that reeks of an executive looking at the Avengers' profits and saying "gently caress what can we do that's like that?" I don't know how it'd be any good, as the FF and X-Men don't work that well together, and there's very little reason for them to intersect beyond "WORLD IN PERIL WORLD IN PERIL" crap.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2013 14:51
|
|
