the worst goddamn programmers are the ones who poo poo all over other developer's worth because that developer once made a bug that was probably leftover code from an old change or something. people make bugs all the time and u probably make the worst.
|
|
# ? May 20, 2013 13:54 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:53 |
you mean, changes to code can make code ugly and sometimes introduce new bugs?? can we get a mod in here??????
|
|
# ? May 20, 2013 13:58 |
|
AWWNAW posted:can any of yout errible programmers tell me why needful never gets done because types are stupid, and this language's == operator is broken
|
# ? May 20, 2013 14:09 |
Tiny Bug Child posted:because types are stupid, and this language's == operator is broken Tiny Bug Child posted:Avoid Symmetry, Allow
|
|
# ? May 20, 2013 14:11 |
|
the worst programmers are the programmers that make mistakes and then don't try to understand why the mistake happened. they don't understand what they hell they are typing and when confronted with a problem encrust it with more things they think they understand until the beatings stop.
|
# ? May 20, 2013 14:18 |
|
that is every programmer
|
# ? May 20, 2013 14:46 |
|
The worst programmers are the ones who can't/won't read compiler error messages, and instead immediately jump on [whatever programmer forum/site] and ask people how to fix it. Especially when they just paraphrase the error message instead of posting it and the offending code. Especially especially when they're using clang.
|
# ? May 20, 2013 16:07 |
|
Doc Block posted:The worst programmers are the ones who can't/won't read compiler error messages, and instead immediately jump on [whatever programmer forum/site] and ask people how to fix it. Especially when they just paraphrase the error message instead of posting it and the offending code. Especially especially when they're using clang. sometimes you just really need to discover yet a new reason for "segmentation fault" or whatever that really cryptic mingw error was that i used to get that really just meant 'something somewhere is wrong' i guess what i'm saying is gently caress c
|
# ? May 20, 2013 16:39 |
|
Bloody posted:gently caress c
|
# ? May 20, 2013 16:41 |
|
"introduce terror" or like "introduce t'error" like 'the error' all accented or cadenced or w/e
|
# ? May 20, 2013 20:07 |
|
That's really an easy mistake to make. If you showed it to him he'd probably see the error immediately. I mean if he really doesn't understand why it's wrong, then he's a bad program. Looks like he's just human tho Woops I thought I was replying to a post that was just made. It's back a page. Can you guess which one?
|
# ? May 20, 2013 20:35 |
JawnV6 posted:"introduce terror" or like "introduce t'error" like 'the error' all accented or cadenced or w/e 'the' error is php
|
|
# ? May 20, 2013 21:03 |
|
Bloody posted:gently caress c
|
# ? May 20, 2013 21:20 |
|
OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:the worst goddamn programmers are the ones who poo poo all over other developer's worth because that developer once made a bug that was probably leftover code from an old change or something. people make bugs all the time and u probably make the worst. terrible programmer apologist spotted
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:38 |
all languages are terrible, much like real life ones
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:39 |
|
poo poo i guess i might add the guy spent a week "testing" that "code" but i guess my standards are too high
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:41 |
test on production
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:42 |
|
gucci void main posted:test on production irl this is just shortened to "production"
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:44 |
|
AWWNAW posted:how about a true life terrible programmer story you are talking about this right. Anyway idk what language or whatnot that is but my guess as to why DoNeedful wasn't executed would be that datagridrow[hardcodednumber].value does not == datagridrow[anotherhardcodednumber].value that seems pretty straightforward. I'm not sure if im missing some typo or secret or something.
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:47 |
|
I thought it was because the if statement was comparing two objects for equality which doesn't make any sense.
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:55 |
|
Ronald Raiden posted:you are talking about this right. Anyway idk what language or whatnot that is but my guess as to why DoNeedful wasn't executed would be that datagridrow[hardcodednumber].value does not == datagridrow[anotherhardcodednumber].value lol
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:55 |
|
Papes posted:I thought it was because the if statement was comparing two objects for equality which doesn't make any sense. i believe that u can do this in javascript
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:56 |
|
CamH posted:i believe that u can do this in javascript hell yeah >var test = { test : "test" } undefined >var otherTest = test undefined >test == otherTest true
|
# ? May 21, 2013 06:58 |
|
object a = 1; object b = 1; a == b //false
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:02 |
|
this is how it works in steve baller's java or some call it C-Sharp
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:03 |
|
Ronald Raiden posted:you are talking about this right. Anyway idk what language or whatnot that is but my guess as to why DoNeedful wasn't executed would be that datagridrow[hardcodednumber].value does not == datagridrow[anotherhardcodednumber].value finally some terrible programmers in this thread
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:10 |
y'all just got trolled
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:23 |
|
Papes posted:I thought it was because the if statement was comparing two objects for equality which doesn't make any sense. It depends on the language. Most modern high level languages have sane object equality comparison, which would allow 2 different objects with thesame value tobe equal. Generally, in languages that allow that, the notion of identity comparison, which is what you are referring to, is different. (for instance, 'is' in python)
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:47 |
|
Java has that too only it does it backwards. The less common usecase, identity comparison, is the operator '==', while the more useful one is the object method object.equals. Also java generics suck.
|
# ? May 21, 2013 07:54 |
gucci void main posted:all languages are terrible, much like real life ones idk if you got lucky with this statement or what but it kinda implies that ur not a terrible programmer anymore
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 08:09 |
|
There's no terrible languages. Only terrible people like everyone in this thread.
|
# ? May 21, 2013 08:22 |
|
CamH posted:hell yeah yes but you're comparing two references to the same object there. since test and otherTest are equal in the sense that they refer to the same object, the equality holds. JavaScript code:
|
# ? May 21, 2013 10:46 |
MeruFM posted:There's no terrible languages. Only terrible people like everyone in this thread. no, they're all loving terrible and much of the communities are especially terrible. it varies greatly but the only redeeming thing about the profession is the money as long as you can tolerate insufferable nerds with autism I'm not familiar with the java/.net communities, but I'm going to assume that the normalcy of a community is inversely proportional to how far it's trying to get away from corporate culture
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:01 |
|
gucci void main posted:no, they're all loving terrible and much of the communities are especially terrible. it varies greatly but the only redeeming thing about the profession is the money as long as you can tolerate insufferable nerds with autism in my (limited) experience, the perl community is pretty sensible
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:02 |
prefect posted:in my (limited) experience, the perl community is pretty sensible probably because its a bunch of old dudes from the 80s who just truly loved the profession. they're just nerds and not toy language startup zealots
|
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:05 |
|
prefect posted:in my (limited) experience, the perl community is pretty sensible if you love regular expressions, have i got a language for you
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:16 |
|
chumpchous posted:if you love regular expressions, have i got a language for you i do like regular expressions, and get a bit depressed when people reflexively act like they're wizard magic
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:19 |
|
wizard magic, yes, that's my problem with regular expressions (tbqh i don't really know a better way to parse lots of text, i guess my solution to regular expressions is to get a job that doesn't involve parsing a lot of text).
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:22 |
|
regex suck because they are completely unreadable and unless you have decades of autism are also completely unwriteable
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:24 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 16:53 |
|
the reason regex are so popular in perl is because regex syntax is actually much better than perl syntax
|
# ? May 21, 2013 15:30 |