|
Ez posted:Yeah, there's too much going on, it should just be a drop of blood and a bunch of neckties on a folded paper background. I was just about to photoshop this joke, you jerk 
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 17:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Tarantino is more about paying homage to the 70s instead of making movies based in the 70s. I mean it's refreshing to see that general aesthetic and soundtrack without Tarantino, regardless of when it's set.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 17:55
|
|
|
Yeah that movie looks alright. I just want Clive Owen to get more work, dude hasn't been in that much stuff lately, at least not in any bigger productions and it felt like he was a bit underused in The Shadow Dancer despite being a pretty good movie.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 17:56
|
|
|
Tewratomeh posted:I mean it's refreshing to see that general aesthetic and soundtrack without Tarantino, regardless of when it's set. gently caress yeah, Lee Moses. Hope the actual soundtrack is awesome too.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 18:10
|
|
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Crudup looks like a grown up Russel Hammond Well he kind of is. I like to imagine a world where a grown-up Stillwater is running scams and doing contract killings. Totally down for this movie as well though. That trailer.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 19:10
|
|
|
Any idea why the movie would already have this crappy score of 4.7/10 on IMDB? It says 58 reviews, but the film hasn't even been publicly released anywhere yet, has it?
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 19:30
|
|
|
colonel_korn posted:Any idea why the movie would already have this crappy score of 4.7/10 on IMDB? It says 58 reviews, but the film hasn't even been publicly released anywhere yet, has it? 
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 19:34
|
|
|
It looks like that score is from user votes- maybe it's drawing in internet hatred for some reason.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 19:39
|
|
|
That poster is boring as hell but like others have said authentic. Looks like it would fit right in anywhere from 1975 to 1982. Speaking of authentic 1970s movie posters... 
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 20:48
|
|
|
Red_Museum posted:Set during the 70s, if you can belive that SRM posted:If it wasn't brought to my attention that Clive Owen was in this, I would've thought this was actually a movie from the 70s. That's a pretty authentic poster.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 20:50
|
|
|
Nikaer Drekin posted:It looks like that score is from user votes- maybe it's drawing in internet hatred for some reason. iMDb users are pretty much universally awful, so I imagine it's just a bunch of bored teenaged nerds thinking the trailer and poster look "old and boring, like something out of the 80's". Once people have actually seen the movie the score will probably go up to the median iMDb score of 7.8.
|
|
#
?
May 21, 2013 23:44
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:I was just about to photoshop this joke, you jerk You can still do it. I'd like to see it.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 00:22
|
|
|
Nikaer Drekin posted:It looks like that score is from user votes- maybe it's drawing in internet hatred for some reason. It was just shown at Cannes out of competition and is getting mixed reviews.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 00:56
|
|
|
Saul Bass imitation: Not just for film posters anymore.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 02:42
|
|
|
Those are some rad optometry text books.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 05:23
|
|
|
Check out this clusterfuck of marketing: that is some Baby's First Photoshop poo poo right there. TRAIN SURFIN' HORSE, Y'ALL.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 06:02
|
|
|
SuitcoatAvenger posted:Check out this clusterfuck of marketing: that is some Baby's First Photoshop poo poo right there. Don't blame the designer on that. The execution really isn't the issue. That's something that was clearly designed by committee and put unrealistic pressures on the designer due to a whole lot of people not understanding their job and the push-and-pull when it comes to theses things. And that resulted in a whole lot of compromise.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 06:05
|
|
|
My favorite part is the train in the foreground being on seemingly the same track as the crashing train on the collapsing tracks in the background.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 06:31
|
|
|
User-Friendly posted:My favorite part is the train in the foreground being on seemingly the same track as the crashing train on the collapsing tracks in the background. Even better is the galloping horse on top of the foreground train.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 06:36
|
|
|
SuitcoatAvenger posted:Check out this clusterfuck of marketing: that is some Baby's First Photoshop poo poo right there. Dat text 
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 07:15
|
|
|
So the movie features Johnny Depp in old makeup and a big beard, while Armie Hammer is in drag? Who are these two guys in the middle?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 07:21
|
|
|
I like how the sun is right behind them but they're clearly being heavily lit from the side.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 07:28
|
|
|
Hewlett posted:So the movie features Johnny Depp in old makeup and a big beard, while Armie Hammer is in drag? Could we seriously stop with the name placement bullshit. That poo poo was funny/clever/interesting/topical NEVER.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 07:29
|
|
|
Noxville posted:I like how the sun is right behind them but they're clearly being heavily lit from the side. Except the guy foreground left, he's clearly already in the moonlight which is somehow 6 feet in front of the other people.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 07:35
|
|
|
SuitcoatAvenger posted:Check out this clusterfuck of marketing: that is some Baby's First Photoshop poo poo right there. So they are in a panic mode with this film too? Now they have resorted to "let's just throw everything against the wall, SOMETHING must stick!". I've seen about 3 different trailers for this and I still couldn't tell what the story is. Of course sometimes it is good not to tell everything, but I'd like if there was more to it than "Bill Fichtner tries to ____, Indian-Depp and Hammer try to stop him, action follows". But then again, it's Verbinski burning away Disney's money in a somewhat nice fashion so I can't be too mad about it.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:27
|
|
|
I do like though that a literal train wreck is present in the marketing material for this movie.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:33
|
|
|
It's the sequel to Wild Wild West that all of us never wanted!
Mierenneuker fucked around with this message at 08:54 on May 22, 2013 |
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:34
|
|
|
Kush posted:Of course sometimes it is good not to tell everything, but I'd like if there was more to it than "Bill Fichtner tries to ____, Indian-Depp and Hammer try to stop him, action follows". This, big time. From what I can tell Lone Ranger is shot by Fitchner, resurrected by Tonto(?), and they team up to seek revenge. Oh, and Helena Bonham Carter is in it and has a leg cannon. Oh, and apparently there's a train sequence because every trailer has been built around showcasing it. It's like they're so banking on "Johnny Depp in makeup" that they don't feel the need to actually show anything of substance about the movie itself.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:37
|
|
|
Ez posted:You can still do it. I'd like to see it. It's done. The moment is ruined also my attempt would have sucked anyway SuitcoatAvenger posted:Check out this clusterfuck of marketing: that is some Baby's First Photoshop poo poo right there. What the hell is even going on here
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:44
|
|
|
Okay, I know I posted the poster originally and everything, but I just noticed the two dwarf's on the far-right. Wow.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:45
|
|
|
It's like a goddamn Asylum poster. You'd think with a budget as big as that movie has ($250 million  ), they'd allocate enough for some loving decent posters, but I guess not!
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:45
|
|
|
SuitcoatAvenger posted:Okay, I know I posted the poster originally and everything, but I just noticed the two dwarf's on the far-right. Wow. Is that a SKELETON?!
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:49
|
|
|
 Here's a huge version we can scrutinize.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 08:49
|
|
|
spanky the dolphin posted:
oh they aren't dwarfs they are tiny doll prostitutes? Why are there chickens next to Carter, how did that get into the committee? This poster is the gift that keeps on giving, so many tiny inexplicable details.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:05
|
|
|
There's a full brass band playing on top of the train in between the surfing horse and a full blown gun fight.
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:13
|
|
|
Do Tonto and the Lone Ranger spend all their time hand cuffed together? Is this actually a remake of the Laurence Fishburne/Stephen Baldwin vehicle 'Fled'?
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:18
|
|
|
spanky the dolphin posted:
Oh lord. It looks like everything has suddenly appeared from their own dimensions to a new one with no relation to each other. Rageaholic Monkey posted:It's like a goddamn Asylum poster. You'd think with a budget as big as that movie has ($250 million I think it also comes down to a clear vision they should have had (and probably did) even before the film has started shooting. I mean, if you look at the Man of Steel trailers and posters, everything looks so carefully planned. Everyone of those lens flares and color schemes look like they have a point and they belong. Even Wolverine has those Japanese style posters and themes, even if the trailer makes the film look a little flat and pointless, they still try. With this, they have once again fallen into the pit of "Westerns are so hard to sell". Surely they should have known this from the beginning. Westerns are always their own thing, they all look the same; dusty, dry, washed out colors. Some people find those things boring and somehow "lifeless". Now they had the advantage of Verbinski and Depp team and surely that's how they started out. Then they probably had some analysts going "people aren't responding to zany Indian-Depp as well as we hoped". There you have your first and biggest problem. They then start throwing in everything they have. Now it's over the top action film with huge setpieces and crazy western action. Like Wild Wild West? SHIIIIEEET. Now there's some mystique and weird spiritual things, maybe otherworldly things and characters! Like Jonah Hex? SHHHHHHHIIIIIII- IT'S EVERYTHING, LOOK! GO SEE IT!
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:19
|
|
|
Lobok posted:
Late, but this bugged me too. It's almost certainly a (really bad) homage to this Walking Dead cover: 
|
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:37
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:Could we seriously stop with the name placement bullshit. That poo poo was funny/clever/interesting/topical NEVER. Also, that's the least of the problems with that poster. By a loving country mile. Rageaholic Monkey posted:It's like a goddamn Asylum poster. You'd think with a budget as big as that movie has ($250 million Holy poo poo. There's no way this pile is going to break even, let alone be a hit. TheJoker138 posted:There's a full brass band playing on top of the train in between the surfing horse and a full blown gun fight. And then after all that poo poo, the graphic designer yelled "gently caress it, might as well throw a poo poo load of birds in there too!" in exhaustion and defeat. CPL593H fucked around with this message at 10:00 on May 22, 2013 |
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 09:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 21, 2024 05:02 |
|
|
CPL593H posted:Holy poo poo. There's no way this pile is going to break even, let alone be a hit. The train wreck will be better than the movie. e: The metaphorical train wreck. Not the train wreck in the actual movie. That will be part of the movie and thus be part of the aforementioned metaphorical train wreck. Dissapointed Owl fucked around with this message at 10:13 on May 22, 2013 |
|
#
?
May 22, 2013 10:09
|
|