|
javascript snipe
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 05:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:12 |
|
|
A pile of utter tosh for your delectation: http://www.paristechreview.com/2013/03/15/big-data-cartesian-thinking/
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 12:14
|
|
|
i inductively deduce from one example that the author is paid by the word and a pretentious jackass
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 12:43
|
|
|
also, you know how algorithmic trading erased billions of dollars from the economy and no one knows why? well, now we should abandon all hope of understanding those systems so we make those kinds of mistakes faster
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 12:48
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:A pile of utter tosh for your delectation: http://www.paristechreview.com/2013/03/15/big-data-cartesian-thinking/ thanks for sharing
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 12:49
|
|
|
Wtf. Numbers don't speak for themselves. What is this objectivist bullcrap
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:05
|
|
|
I mean sure in the most simple way, numbers speak in that they say there are four balls on the edge of the cliff But to make any sense of it you gotta interpret them
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:07
|
|
|
in scons news, it took the build for one component from 40 minutes to just over an hour, but its a much nicer system to work with today we'll try building an entire application, which currently takes ~4.5 hours. will it finish before i go home  also Zombywuf posted:A pile of utter tosh for your delectation: http://www.paristechreview.com/2013/03/15/big-data-cartesian-thinking/ 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:08
|
|
|
How on earth does that come within any definition of acceptable
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:10
|
|
|
4.5 hours is not the longest i've spent compiling c++, this system is quite compact
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:12
|
|
|
I guess. At my old job we could compile our entire stack in like 15 mins. We did have a monthly sales report that took just short of a workday if we ran it against production. Against staging it took like 19 hrs, it was bad. Especially the week when it kept crashing on a bad line item when almost done, and making GBS threads out a worthless stack trace
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 13:54
|
|
|
Jerry SanDisky posted:in scons news, it took the build for one component from 40 minutes to just over an hour, but its a much nicer system to work with seriously; if you can afford electric cloud (i think they were mentioned along with scons earlier), do it; they will make poo poo super-fast and insanely well-documented
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 14:09
|
|
|
assembly is a high level language 
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 16:35
|
|
|
uh, no poo poo better than machine code, it's even ordering the bytes for you
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 16:58
|
|
|
Unless you're laying down transistors, I'd say that you have a thing or two to learn about low level.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:11
|
|
|
lol yospos lecturing chip verification engineers about what constitutes low level
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:14
|
|
|
Unless you're moving individual electrons by hand it's high level.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:28
|
|
|
it doesnt matter because the javascript processor is coming soon and it will be able to run node.js natively
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:36
|
|
|
MononcQc posted:it doesnt matter because the javascript processor is coming soon and it will be able to run node.js natively and i thought those java processors were a bad idea
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:40
|
|
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:lol yospos lecturing chip verification engineers about what constitutes low level mostly write c# nowadays MononcQc posted:it doesnt matter because the javascript processor is coming soon and it will be able to run node.js natively http://opencores.org/project,jop was bad enough
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:41
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:ugh, link? I'm yosposting, fortunately.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 19:43
|
|
|
please don't get my hopes up like that, javascript is already faster than native imagine what hardware accelerated js would perform like??
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2013 20:04
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:Unless you're moving individual electrons by hand it's high level. no, language abstraction level is a spectrum, basically exaclty like autism
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 08:18
|
|
|
functional programming = functional autism??? :whoa:
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 09:32
|
|
|
yeah but neither is very functional
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 09:36
|
|
|
chumpchous posted:yeah but neither is very functional 
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
ultramiraculous posted:and i thought those java processors were a bad idea the various sun "java processors" through the years were just embedded systems that ran a jvm early in the boot process. usually 32 bit SPARCs azul systems made a "java processor" that didn't execute jvm bytecode or anything... it just had write barriers for memory and a few other cute tricks to make jvms faster. that poo poo was loving bananas, but i guess it wasn't cost effective because they are getting rid of it they made some bad assed google tech talks though https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uljtqyBLxI
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 17:34
|
|
|
spongeh posted:please don't get my hopes up like that, javascript is already faster than native imagine what hardware accelerated js would perform like?? nerds reinvent lisp machine but with algol syntax. a few lisp weenies die inside. i like this future.
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 17:57
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:the various sun "java processors" through the years were just embedded systems that ran a jvm early in the boot process. usually 32 bit SPARCs ARM had its jazelle thing too, which could apparently execute bytecode directly on Sun VMs
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 18:38
|
|
|
tef posted:nerds reinvent lisp machine but with algol syntax. a few lisp weenies die inside. i like this future. Hey tef now you can write the web in the queens language!
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2013 22:20
|
|
|
tef posted:nerds reinvent lisp machine but with algol syntax. a few lisp weenies die inside. i like this future. The homoiconicity, it burns!
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2013 00:24
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:basically maven and autotools are acceptable build systems. everything else is horrible trash what about cmake?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2013 06:43
|
|
|
http://dailyjs.com/2012/04/05/node-unix-interfaces/ jabascript ... in the terminal!
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2013 09:56
|
|
|
i don't know anything about node and i definitely don't care enough to read about it but its basically a slow tangled mess and shaggar's exhibit a for a lovely p-lang thing right
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 00:16
|
|
|
javascript: unreal engine 3 java: minecraft checkmate, nerds, javascript owns
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 00:37
|
|
|
if you want to get paid to write functional (the programming paradigm, not usefulness) code, javascript is your only option
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 00:39
|
|
|
spongeh posted:java script: simcity lol
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 00:50
|
|
|
polpotpi posted:if you want to get paid to write functional (the programming paradigm, not usefulness) code, javascript is your only option how dare you leave out excel
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 01:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:12 |
|
|
while simcity was a good game, the simulation engine wasn't written or running in javascript, whereas the entire unreal engine is running under js
|
|
#
?
Jun 10, 2013 01:01
|
|