|
Isentropy posted:So the Toronto Police just raided the complex and homes near where the crack video was taken and confiscated all of the cellphones. He's actually going to loving win this one. Well, there's an interesting question. Assuming this raid was a move to gain access to the video, are the police on Ford's side or not? Is the intent to make the phone disappear or perhaps was it done to get access to the phone and 'leak' the video to the public? I don't know Ford's past history with police funding.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 15:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:37 |
|
Canuckistan posted:Well, there's an interesting question. Assuming this raid was a move to gain access to the video, are the police on Ford's side or not? Is the intent to make the phone disappear or perhaps was it done to get access to the phone and 'leak' the video to the public? I don't know Ford's past history with police funding. He had a showdown with Chief Blair re: cutting police budgets in his first year. As far as I can recall Blair refused to cut police budgets 10% and in the end Ford backed down but the Chief really seemed to disappear from the public eye after that. If I had to guess, I'd say there is bad blood.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 15:54 |
|
I'm guessing a raid of this size needed more than a month of prep. I very much doubt this has anything to do with the Ford video, except maybe tangentially.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 16:52 |
|
Ofc. Sex Robot BPD posted:I'm guessing a raid of this size needed more than a month of prep. I very much doubt this has anything to do with the Ford video, except maybe tangentially. Yeah, I agree. The Star is reporting that police picked up information about the crack tape as part of their surveillance though.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 16:56 |
|
This article has to be a troll. I've never heard of this Brian Lee Crowley guy until now but some of the statements in here are ridiculous.Brian Lee Crowley posted:Mass transit is chiefly a poorly designed and very expensive social program for those who don’t have a car. We’d be better off buying them cars and spending the leftover money on well-designed roads, preferably where people were charged for every kilometre they drove and a premium at rush hour to reduce congestion. Kilometre and rush hour charges are good but, correct me if I'm wrong, isn't part of the point of rush hour charges to encourage people to use public transit instead of adding another car to the road? Even if the point is just to time-shift some journeys, it won't solve everything. How is buying everyone a car supposed to improve gridlock? We would still have the same number of people trying to get back to suburbia at the end of the day. I don't even know where to start. Even Rob "End the War on Cars" Ford is in favour of some transit funding (albeit for expensive subways over other options). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/my-homage-to-the-undeservedly-hated-car/article12504347/
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:02 |
|
Sounds like the kind of guy who just throws overpasses and cloverleafs all over his cities in Simcity instead of just adding a few bus stops and commuter trains. They're not that expensive, just put the bus stop on that empty square, you putz!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:05 |
|
Shofixti posted:This article has to be a troll. I've never heard of this Brian Lee Crowley guy until now but some of the statements in here are ridiculous. I wonder if his head explode were he to see all the Bay Street suits using the Yonge Line and GO trains every rush hour. Why are we subsidizing those wretched poor bankers who can't afford cars?!?!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:10 |
|
Shofixti posted:This article has to be a troll. I've never heard of this Brian Lee Crowley guy until now but some of the statements in here are ridiculous. The comments are genuinely more intelligent and reasonable than the lead articlw. How often does that happen?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:16 |
|
Dallan Invictus posted:The comments are genuinely more intelligent and reasonable than the lead articlw. How often does that happen? On Wente Wendesdays.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:30 |
|
Lobok posted:I wonder if his head explode were he to see all the Bay Street suits using the Yonge Line and GO trains every rush hour. Why are we subsidizing those wretched poor bankers who can't afford cars?!?! Seriously. I commute into downtown Toronto every day using the GO train. Those trains are often packed - standing room only. If all of those people started driving and looking for parking downtown it would be a god drat disaster.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:30 |
|
Shofixti posted:Seriously. I commute into downtown Toronto every day using the GO train. Those trains are often packed - standing room only. If all of those people started driving and looking for parking downtown it would be a god drat disaster. Ah a congestion charge with no alternative to driving, what an amazing plan. Poor? gently caress you you aren't getting to work today! Perhaps people too poor to drive should consider working the oil sands?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:33 |
|
Brian Lee Crowley works at the Maconald-Laurier Institute. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute is one of the major right wing think tanks in Canada, along with C. D Howe, Fraser, the Frontier Centre, the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, the Montreal Economic Institute and the Manning Centre (which is actually less of a think tank and more focused on training conservative staffers and activists or facilitating conservative networking). These institutes rake in huge amounts of money from a small handful of wealthy foundations run by guys like Peter Munk, Clay Riddell, the Donor family, etc. Collectively they represent the source of most right wing commentary and analysis that ends up in the National Post or Globe and Mail. Newspaper don't have the resources nor the inclination to do a lot of investigations or analysis, so these think tanks are tasked with providing opinion pieces or analysis of ongoing issues.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:41 |
|
I made the mistake of reading his book "A Fearful Symmetry: The Fall and Rise of Canada's Founding Values" a few years ago and hoooo boy is it ever bad. I can deal with conservative viewpoints if they're grounded in reality but this guy is just out to lunch. I wouldn't take anything he says seriously. It looks like he wrote his own wiki too.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 17:54 |
|
In pure terms of energy used to transport people, public transit always wins. Even if we bought every poor person a car (which he wold also hate, the liar), who's going to pay for the gas? That's his big loving deliberate omission, the actual cost of the energy to move all the subsidized hunks of metal he's decided solve the transit issue. It's a really awful argument. You might as well say we should build blimps instead of air planes since they cost less, without ever calculating the fuel efficiency factors that makes blimps much worse than airplanes.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 18:23 |
|
Helsing posted:Brian Lee Crowley works at the Maconald-Laurier Institute. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute is one of the major right wing think tanks in Canada, along with C. D Howe, Fraser, the Frontier Centre, the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, the Montreal Economic Institute and the Manning Centre (which is actually less of a think tank and more focused on training conservative staffers and activists or facilitating conservative networking). These institutes rake in huge amounts of money from a small handful of wealthy foundations run by guys like Peter Munk, Clay Riddell, the Donor family, etc. Are there any left-wing think tanks in Canada? I remember trying to do a casual search for them and all I could find were self-described liberal institutes that were basically bastions of neoliberal policies. edit: ah found the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 18:30 |
|
Dreylad posted:Are there any left-wing think tanks in Canada? I remember trying to do a casual search for them and all I could find were self-described liberal institutes that were basically bastions of neoliberal policies. Naw they're pretty much constrained to internet forum echo chambers
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 18:31 |
|
priznat posted:Naw they're pretty much constrained to internet forum echo chambers However, there is a lot of money for policy advocacy on globalization and neoliberalism.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 18:49 |
|
This morning Mulcair blows through the Hill security check-point, runs several stop signs while being chased by a police car with it's lights on, pulls up to his parking spot and asks the officer "Don't you know who I am?". http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2013/06/13/tom-mulcair-driving-stop-sign-rcmp-screening_n_3436290.html quote:NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair has apologized after failing to stop for an RCMP screening on Parliament Hill Thursday morning and then reportedly asking an officer: "Don’t you know who I am?"
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 18:57 |
|
^^edit: Jesus Christ, it really bugs me when politicians, business executives or other supposedly important people pull petty poo poo like that. What kind of sense of entitlement do you need to have to think its acceptable to pull a "Do you know who I am?" when you're dealing with some poor working stiff who is just trying to do his goddamned job.Dreylad posted:Are there any left-wing think tanks in Canada? I remember trying to do a casual search for them and all I could find were self-described liberal institutes that were basically bastions of neoliberal policies. United Way Toronto has released some really good reports on poverty, inequality and the need for the government to make better investments into low income neighbourhoods. Their stuff is definitely worth checking out. There's also the recently founded Broadbent Institute, which looks like it wants to fashion itself into a Social Democratic version of the Manning Centre. Universities and unions also fund a modest amount of research on policy ideas, movement building, or governance issues (though in many cases these Universities are pretty right wing, as with the Calgary School of Public Policy). But really there's no equivalent to the right wing think tank eco system in Canada. There's a lot more money to be made writing about why climate change is a hoax and unions kill prosperity than there is to be made advocating for a new national housing strategy. Helsing fucked around with this message at 19:03 on Jun 13, 2013 |
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:00 |
|
oh wow thats loving dumb , I'm just glad there isn't an audio recording for an amazing soundbite. Still reflects poorly on his charachter.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:01 |
|
There's also the Pembina Institute, who in a healthy political climate probably wouldn't be considered as being on the left-right spectrum at all, but since the right has apparently chosen its environmental policy to be "climate change is a hoax, mine as much oil as possible, at any cost", I suppose that makes Pembina on the left.Canuckistan posted:This morning Mulcair blows through the Hill security check-point, runs several stop signs while being chased by a police car with it's lights on, pulls up to his parking spot and asks the officer "Don't you know who I am?". Gods loving damnit Mulcair. You were doing PittTheElder fucked around with this message at 19:04 on Jun 13, 2013 |
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:02 |
|
Oh goddamnit Mulcair. What politician seriously does the "Don't you know who I am" bit? When does that ever work for anyone?
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:02 |
|
Helsing posted:Brian Lee Crowley works at the Maconald-Laurier Institute. The Macdonald-Laurier Institute is one of the major right wing think tanks in Canada, along with C. D Howe, Fraser, the Frontier Centre, the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, the Montreal Economic Institute and the Manning Centre (which is actually less of a think tank and more focused on training conservative staffers and activists or facilitating conservative networking). These institutes rake in huge amounts of money from a small handful of wealthy foundations run by guys like Peter Munk, Clay Riddell, the Donor family, etc. The fact that a person who can write such a offensively terrible article can get a job at a think tank is depressing
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:05 |
|
Dolash posted:Oh goddamnit Mulcair. What politician seriously does the "Don't you know who I am" bit? When does that ever work for anyone? Well I think there's a decent argument to be made that he might not need to show his ID at whatever checkpoint he went though, since it's a good bet just about everyone in Ottawa would recognize him. But that really doesn't excuse blowing stop signs, not stopping for a pursuing RCMP vehicle, or berated the officer afterwards.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:05 |
|
The article says he was driving through a security gate he drives through every day, and gets recognized by his face and waved through. Today he got stopped and asked if the guy knew who he was. Seems like a legit question if he got to drive through painlessly every other day. Then he asks for the guy's badge and suggests he may be in trouble for this... God dammit Mulcair.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:07 |
|
Alctel posted:The fact that a person who can write such a offensively terrible article can get a job at a think tank is depressing He doesn't just have a job, he's the managing director. And his job is pretty much to be offensively terrible so that other opinions which are also terrible start to look reasonable by comparison. PittTheElder posted:Well I think there's a decent argument to be made that he might not need to show his ID at whatever checkpoint he went though, since it's a good bet just about everyone in Ottawa would recognize him. Politicians should be forced to go through the same check points and other bullshit security theatre as everyone else, if only as a constant reminder that they are merely the highest tier of civil servants. Anything that further privileges or insulates politicians on the hill from the daily grind that the rest of us experience is a bad call in my opinion.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:13 |
|
PittTheElder posted:Well I think there's a decent argument to be made that he might not need to show his ID at whatever checkpoint he went though, since it's a good bet just about everyone in Ottawa would recognize him. Not when it's much more decent to just show your loving ID.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:29 |
|
It aint over till the Fat Mayor sings:CTV News posted:EXCLUSIVE: Toronto police probing alleged crack video linked to Ford weeks before story broke I do feel bad for that poor woman who got her door kicked in. I'm not familiar with the details here but so far as I know the cost of cleaning up after a police raid is carried by whoever was unlucky enough to own the property, right? Also: The Toronto Star posted:Councillor Doug Ford says he’ll have lots of time to help brother Rob campaign to be re-elected mayor in 2014.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 19:53 |
|
Lumius posted:oh wow thats loving dumb , I'm just glad there isn't an audio recording for an amazing soundbite. That's what you think. See you in 2015. It is a dick move on Mulcair mostly of the whole berating the officer for doing his job. The whole "don't you know who I am?"can be taken in so many different ways depending on the tone. It's possible that he could have just done rolling stops (which is not a legal stop) but was probably left vague as running stops for the sake of dramatic effect. This is really a non issue since he at least went back to apologize but I wouldn't be surprised if the Conservatives and the Liberals take advantage of this.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 20:05 |
|
That Mulcair thing is pretty embarrassing but I don't think it is gonna get a ton of press since the RCMP has just launched a criminal investigation into Wright's $90K cheque
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 20:06 |
|
Angry Tom strikes again!
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 20:25 |
|
quaint bucket posted:It's possible that he could have just done rolling stops (which is not a legal stop) but was probably left vague as running stops for the sake of dramatic effect.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 21:12 |
|
I didn't like it when Rob Ford pulled that poo poo and I don't like it now. There are few things less appealing than a politician saying some variation of "Don't you know who I am?!?!?" Yeah we do because we put you there, fucker.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 21:24 |
|
Can I throw out the possibility that "Don't you know who I am?" means "Isn't it your job to know what the Leader of the Opposition looks like when you work on Parliament Hill?" I know it's politics but holy crap could we mountain-size that molehill faster
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 21:33 |
|
Tochiazuma posted:I know it's politics but holy crap could we mountain-size that molehill faster Admittedly I'm on the left politically, but seriously what the hell media. Am I correct in understanding these stop signs were inside the parking lot? Because
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 22:33 |
|
Tochiazuma posted:Can I throw out the possibility that "Don't you know who I am?" means "Isn't it your job to know what the Leader of the Opposition looks like when you work on Parliament Hill?" I'm not sure if you've been on the hill and through security much in a vehicle but when Pierre Pollievere did it, it was stupid as gently caress too. It doesn't matter if they know who you are and it wasn't the parking lot. They check your vehicle at the checkpoint not just to make sure who is in it but to make sure it is safe. Then you are flagged through. Even the big green Parliamentary buses do it. It's a security concern, period. I don't think it's much of a story either, for the record. But it was poorly handled. Then Charlie Angus called the person a "meter maid" which was a bit disingenuous too because she was an officer. Anyway whatever it's not that big of a deal anyway.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 22:55 |
|
There's also a lot of foot traffic there, and running stop signs around pedestrians isn't cool no matter who's doing it.
|
# ? Jun 13, 2013 23:11 |
|
brucio posted:There's also a lot of foot traffic there, and running stop signs around pedestrians isn't cool no matter who's doing it. Pretty much, yeah
|
# ? Jun 14, 2013 00:46 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Not when it's much more decent to just show your loving ID. Oh I completely agree. What Tommy pulled there was pretty shameful.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2013 00:54 |
|
|
# ? Jun 2, 2024 04:37 |
|
If Jack Layton had done the same thing, you guys would be clapping like dazed seals and shouting ORANGE CRUSH ORANGE CRUSH as the wheels of his immaculate stretch smartFortwo ground the pedestrians into a milky gruel.
|
# ? Jun 14, 2013 00:59 |