|
If it's a 40mpixel sensor with various rows/columns masked off (ignored?) for their new video AF system, wouldn't one expect that to cause moire in still frames? Dropping rows/columns (as opposed to downsampling each frame from the full sensor) is the cause of the moire you get in most DSLR video systems.
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 21:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:53 |
|
|
I guess every pixel simply set up such that one diode sees half the light from the microlens and the other diode sees the other half. Stolen from dpreview: quote:
I doubt that the kind of moire you describe will be a problem - they'll be combining the information from each diode, not throwing one away.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 22:05
|
|
|
Oh my god, I love NMA stuff but I've never seen them do a camera review before. That was even better than watching DigitalRev  And that Asian guy blogging with the DigitalRev sign over his computer...was that supposed to be Kai? He was a few hundred pounds and Kai's a stick!
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 22:56
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Oh my god, I love NMA stuff but I've never seen them do a camera review before. That was even better than watching DigitalRev Is Kai the one who has named his wireless network Cuntflaps? The is pretty much the only thing I remember with there 5D M3 preview a while back. NMA got the tone right for DigRev I guess.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 23:00
|
|
|
Call me when half the photodiodes have ND filters on them resulting in insane 20 stop dynamic range.
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 23:05
|
|
|
doctor 7 posted:Is Kai the one who has named his wireless network Cuntflaps?
|
|
#
?
Jul 2, 2013 23:11
|
|
|
Amazon dropped the TS-E 24mm II to $1999 with an additional 2% back. http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Ultra-Tilt-Shift-Digital-Cameras/dp/B001TDL2O0/ I'm very close to pulling the trigger at that price.  edit: Adorama's got the same price. Did new rebates kick in? Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 02:09 on Jul 3, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 02:04
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Amazon dropped the TS-E 24mm II to $1999 with an additional 2% back. Are you the Dorkroom's resident dentist? Man the gear you pick up gives me gear lust so bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 02:35
|
|
|
CarrotFlowers posted:Are you the Dorkroom's resident dentist? Man the gear you pick up gives me gear lust so bad. No, that's me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 02:50
|
|
|
CarrotFlowers posted:Are you the Dorkroom's resident dentist? Man the gear you pick up gives me gear lust so bad.  I think my hobby really just boils down to being more interested in the technical side of the photography rather than the artistic side. That's not to say I don't appreciate photography as an art; I love going to exhibits and seeing all of the creative stuff people come up with online. I'm just not very good at it and don't have the time to fully invest myself in the hobby. I suppose that would classify me more as a camera enthusiast. If I had any less sense, I'd probably be one of those guys over at POTN listing all of the gear I own pretending anyone else even gives a drat. I'd love for my current job's exposure to embedded systems to someday allow me to do something like ARM firmware development for Canon's camera bodies, but I believe all of that engineering is done in Japan. I know they have some engineering presence in New York, but I don't know in what capacity. Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 03:07 on Jul 3, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 02:57
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:And that Asian guy blogging with the DigitalRev sign over his computer...was that supposed to be Kai? He was a few hundred pounds and Kai's a stick! That was NMA's version of a typical neckbeard/DigitalRevTV YouTube commenter literally frothing at the mouth to post in a highly visible avenue for public discussion. ^^ Living the dream
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:04
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:I'd love for my current job's exposure to embedded systems to someday allow me to do something like ARM firmware development for Canon's camera bodies, but I believe all of that engineering is done in Japan. I know they have some engineering presence in New York, but I don't know in what capacity. It may not actually be as hard/impossible as you think -- I did some CV stuff and had a presentation for Casio's camera division last year.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:08
|
|
|
tarepanda posted:It may not actually be as hard/impossible as you think -- I did some CV stuff and had a presentation for Casio's camera division last year. I did recently learn, however, that RED is located down the street from me so there's still hope that I could someday get a job doing work for a camera designer! Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Jul 3, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:12
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:The "but I believe all of that engineering is done in Japan" is my polite way of saying that I don't want to go to Japan. That's awesome you're able to do that, even if you aren't super into the actual picture taking aspect of photography. Keep me in mind when you decide to upgrade 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:20
|
|
|
How much to just paint the red rings on the L lenses? pm me tia
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:24
|
|
|
doctor 7 posted:Is Kai the one who has named his wireless network Cuntflaps? The is pretty much the only thing I remember with there 5D M3 preview a while back. NMA got the tone right for DigRev I guess. http://youtu.be/y3nS6IAuAMc?t=14m22s  Amazing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:26
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:No I'm just overpaid, not married yet You are living the dream
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:29
|
|
|
Dren posted:You are living the dream
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:32
|
|
|
feigning interest posted:How much to just paint the red rings on the L lenses? pm me tia Just get a red rubber band, then you can swap it onto a new lens instead of wasting valuable money on all that paint.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:55
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:At this point I have to spend more on the ring than all of my combined L-glass' value, right? That only seems right to me. A diamond that big could probably double as a lens!
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 03:57
|
|
|
Fluorite crystal ring.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 04:07
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:At this point I have to spend more on the ring than all of my combined L-glass' value, right? That only seems right to me. DON'T DO IT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suAhGfVr_4U
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:At this point I have to spend more on the ring than all of my combined L-glass' value, right? That only seems right to me. I've been trying to work a joke along the lines that you should give her an engagement ring with a ruby on it, as a fiance with a red ring is the best fiance available. However hard I try, though, it just sounds like I am advocating premarital anal sex.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 08:48
|
|
|
spog posted:I've been trying to work a joke along the lines that you should give her an engagement ring with a ruby on it, as a fiance with a red ring is the best fiance available. However hard I try, though, it just sounds like I am advocating premarital anal sex. Why can't you do both?
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
drat, $300 for the EOS-M and 22mm lens. http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/buy/CANONEOSM/Ntt/EOS-M+Mirrorless+Digital+Camera/N/0 Hard to pass up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 18:49
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:At this point I have to spend more on the ring than all of my combined L-glass' value, right? That only seems right to me. Can't comment on that (given I have no idea how much you have invested in glass), but that sounds just about as reasonable as DeBeers suggesting 2 months salary as a guideline for a ring. gently caress off DeBeers, my wife was smart not to expect a five figure ring purchase, I would have given her a five finger wave were that the expectation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 18:52
|
|
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:drat, $300 for the EOS-M and 22mm lens. Until you remember that it's an eos-m at least.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 18:55
|
|
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:drat, $300 for the EOS-M and 22mm lens. It's $300 on Amazon too... I'm thinking about it, although I have no real need for one. Apparently a new firmware was just released that addressed problems with focusing. Edit: stupid question, the crop factor is 1.6, but is there anything additional when using the EF adapter? Would the 40mm pancake be 64mm or something even 'longer'? Gambl0r fucked around with this message at 19:18 on Jul 3, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:14
|
|
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:drat, $300 for the EOS-M and 22mm lens. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:16
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Hopefully clearing them out in advance of a refresh that has the new hotness AF system from the 70D. Yeah, it sure seems like that's what is coming. Canon could really shakeup the mirrorless arena with a great body and the new AF system. Edit: And I ordered one. The new firmware has improved the AF, but even if it didn't it's still a great price. An APS-C sensor and a nice lens for $300? Even with slow AF that's a great deal. I could just use that camera as a dedicated studio camera where I don't have to worry about focusing. TheAngryDrunk fucked around with this message at 19:24 on Jul 3, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:19
|
|
|
TheAngryDrunk posted:Yeah, it sure seems like that's what is coming. Canon could really shakeup the mirrorless arena with a great body and the new AF system.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:21
|
|
|
The EOS-M looks awkward as gently caress for someone with big hands to shoot with.
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:37
|
|
|
Gambl0r posted:It's $300 on Amazon too... I'm thinking about it, although I have no real need for one. Apparently a new firmware was just released that addressed problems with focusing. The crop factor wouldn't change. If it did then using a 40mm on a canon aps-c dslr would wind up with a crop factor other than 1.6!
|
|
#
?
Jul 3, 2013 19:57
|
|
|
Gambl0r posted:Edit: stupid question, the crop factor is 1.6, but is there anything additional when using the EF adapter? Would the 40mm pancake be 64mm or something even 'longer'?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2013 13:04
|
|
|
Reading what you guys wrote about the TS-E 24mm has weakened my will. You guys are evil.quote:Order #4389 (Pending)
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2013 18:43
|
|
|
The one part of my transition to full frame I forgot to account for was a wide angle lens. Does anyone have any opinions on the 16-35 vs the 17-40? I don't really need the 2.8 aperture as this is mostly going to be for landscape work. Or there is also the 24-105 which is pretty similar to the focal range on the 15-85mm EFS it's meant to replace. Thanks in advance.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2013 19:06
|
|
|
24 is pretty wide on full frame - more than 80 degrees angle of view. In any case you should have a 24-105 just because.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2013 19:45
|
|
|
Seamonster posted:24 is pretty wide on full frame - more than 80 degrees angle of view. In any case you should have a 24-105 just because. This. It's a very versatile lens, wide enough, sharp enough, good enough IS.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2013 22:35
|
|
|
mclifford82 posted:The one part of my transition to full frame I forgot to account for was a wide angle lens. Does anyone have any opinions on the 16-35 vs the 17-40? I don't really need the 2.8 aperture as this is mostly going to be for landscape work. Or there is also the 24-105 which is pretty similar to the focal range on the 15-85mm EFS it's meant to replace. The 24mm TS-E, duh. Speaking of, I need to get rid of my 17-40....to the SA mart!!! *flies away*
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2013 00:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 21:53 |
|
|
mclifford82 posted:The one part of my transition to full frame I forgot to account for was a wide angle lens. Does anyone have any opinions on the 16-35 vs the 17-40? I don't really need the 2.8 aperture as this is mostly going to be for landscape work. Or there is also the 24-105 which is pretty similar to the focal range on the 15-85mm EFS it's meant to replace. Going along with this, my 17-40 met a horrible death last night... I need to replace it with a wide angle zoom. I love primes for my personal work but I need a zoom with autofocus for work. Is the Sigma 17-50 ok? I like that it's a 2.8 vs. a 4 since I do a lot of low light shooting but I hear the quality control on that lens isn't so good. somnambulist posted:The 24mm TS-E, duh. I might need to jump on this.
|
|
#
?
Jul 6, 2013 04:26
|
|