|
Steve Holt! posted:You mean this? I was expecting a Jesus dildo...
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 01:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 11:59 |
|
|
Kakairo posted:I was expecting a Jesus dildo... You mean this?  http://i.imgur.com/yjxGo73.jpg Or this? http://i.imgur.com/EIqC5a1.jpg
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 02:18
|
|
|
Steve Holt! posted:You mean this? My reaction to this was to say Jesus loving Christ. Which happens to be rather accurate.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 02:49
|
|
|
I'm not sure what church you went to, but that is clearly Elmer Fudd wearing a Burka
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 03:59
|
|
|
SplitSoul posted:You mean this? Yes, because this... ...is clearly a Mary butt plug. Know your holy sex toys (and which holes they go into)! 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:15
|
|
|
Kakairo posted:Know your holy sex toys Oh yeah? Pop quiz, hotshot: 
SplitSoul has a new favorite as of 04:32 on Jul 7, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:20
|
|
|
Strudel Man posted:This one is "jumping jesus on a pogo stick." Well, if he has the same luck with those things that I did, he WILL be on a crutch.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:27
|
|
|
SplitSoul posted:Oh yeah? Pop quiz, hotshot: I hope it's called The Bible Thumper.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:57
|
|
|
SplitSoul posted:You mean this? These are actual things you can purchase, if you are so inclined.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:02
|
|
|
I'm really disappointed they didn't call the Jesus ones "Cruci-dicks"
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:08
|
|
|
Snowy posted:I hope it's called The Bible Thumper. Indeed Hydrolith posted:These are actual things you can purchase, if you are so inclined.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:10
|
|
|
Man of Steel nips
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:19
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Man of Steel nips He's just stealing Powdered Toast Man's power. Those are his nipples of the future.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:32
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:He's just stealing Powdered Toast Man's power. Those are his nipples of the future. Wasn't that Really Really Big Man?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 06:22
|
|
|
Jamesman posted:He's just stealing Powdered Toast Man's power. Those are his nipples of the future. Going back and looking at cartoons I watched when I was younger is freaking scary.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 07:06
|
|
|
Blackheart posted:Wasn't that Really Really Big Man? Yeah, that's the right guy.  More content: Jennifer Lawrence playing with herself. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 07:07
|
|
|
Blackheart posted:Wasn't that Really Really Big Man? You... you shut up. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 07:11
|
|
|
Snowy posted:I hope it's called The Bible Thumper. I'm guessing the page is at Revelations 3:11. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 08:35
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:I'm guessing the page is at Revelations 3:11. You're good people.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 12:09
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 13:38
|
|
|
Doesn't it just bother you a little bit how the names are over the wrong actors?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 17:07
|
|
|
I think there was a thread, or at least a derail, about that particular annoying aspect of movie posters.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 17:34
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:I think there was a thread, or at least a derail, about that particular annoying aspect of movie posters. It's a frequent subject in the movie posters thread in CineD.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
"One time, in biology class, we were doing synovial biopsies, and this one girl..."
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 23:48
|
|
|
Rollersnake posted:"One time, in biology class, we were doing synovial biopsies, and this one girl..." There's a fetish for every one of those answers, isn't there? (How to make a dozen goons google "stumpfuckers"!)
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 00:00
|
|
|
This is more suited for the awkward and ugly thread. PEE-U!
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 09:02
|
|
|
Tochiazuma posted:Have you seen my owl? I've looked in every tree I can find around here... I was at the National Zoo a few weeks back and they have a burrow owl exhibit. A lady next to me said "I didn't know owl's lived in the ground" and it was all I could do to not say "Jumpin' Jesus on a Pogo Stick! Everybody knows that a burrow owl lives in a hole in the ground! Why the hell do you think they call it a burrow owl?"
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 15:07
|
|
|
If some large corporations used the same font as your office's secretary when she writes a friendly reminder note about the fridge in the break room being emptied this Friday:
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 15:41
|
|
|
Walt Disney looks alright. MTV even looks really good in a 90s animation kind of way.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 15:46
|
|
|
Oh sweet jesus. Sending that to a graphic designer friend of mine. Expecting a seething reply within minutes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 15:46
|
|
|
Captain Trips posted:Oh sweet jesus. Also send the Photoshop Phriday: Comic Sans Everywhere!  
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 15:51
|
|
|
My Lovely Horse posted:Walt Disney looks alright. MTV even looks really good in a 90s animation kind of way. Yeah, the issue with those photoshops, as talked about by somebody in the photoshop thread that produced the images above, is that Comic Sans actually does have conceivable uses. It's terrible for long-form text and most things attempting to be serious, but it's really good for 'friendly' logos and other short-form stuff. Comic Sans was actually based on the handwriting used in Watchmen. So that should both give you an idea of its intended setting, and what's been ruined by it more than anything else Comic Sans has ever touched.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 16:00
|
|
|
My Lovely Horse posted:Walt Disney looks alright. MTV even looks really good in a 90s animation kind of way. It would have saved millions of kids the confusion of Walp Gisnep
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 16:03
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Yeah, the issue with those photoshops, as talked about by somebody in the photoshop thread that produced the images above, is that Comic Sans actually does have conceivable uses. It's terrible for long-form text and most things attempting to be serious, but it's really good for 'friendly' logos and other short-form stuff. Yeah it's not a readable of legible font it's a font with a specific use (mimicking comicy hand writing). It also doesn't look good blown up. People misuse it and it looks like poo poo, people use a whole page of it and its just difficult to read so it looks like poo poo. Whatever though comic sans is nothing compared to Papyrus.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 16:59
|
|
|
Cleretic posted:Yeah, the issue with those photoshops, as talked about by somebody in the photoshop thread that produced the images above, is that Comic Sans actually does have conceivable uses. It's terrible for long-form text Actually people with certain brain problems can apparently read Comic Sans more easily than other fonts or actual handwriting.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:02
|
|
|
FishBulb posted:Whatever though comic sans is nothing compared to Papyrus.            EDIT: Famous Logos in Jokerman Font Famous Logos in Algerian Font Famous Logos in Helvetica Palpek has a new favorite as of 17:12 on Jul 8, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:08
|
|
|
Jerry Cotton posted:Actually people with certain brain problems can apparently read Comic Sans more easily than other fonts or actual handwriting. I know I was told in teacher training that if a pupil has certain dyslexic-type difficulties then you should use sans serif fonts for power points and stuff. So not specifically comic sans, but thats the one that was given as an example, and so the one everyone used because most people dont really know what "Sans Serif" means and using the default sans font is quicker than looking it up.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:11
|
|
|
It kinda works. Like shops you see in one of those rich people areas where they want everything to look classy and meet a theme.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:11
|
|
|
pageerror404 posted:It kinda works. Like shops you see in one of those rich people areas where they want everything to look classy and meet a theme. No it does not! And you're a terrible person for thinking it does!
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 11:59 |
|
|
Palpek posted:The CNN logo looks like it was drawn in crayon.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 17:23
|
|
