|
Mudoubleha posted:I have a UIScrollview which covers the screen on the app, and has an UIView animation of 3 buttons which scroll from left-to-right. The buttons don't sit in any view, so I'm moving them UIView animations. If the buttons are visible, they're in a view. Which view are they in? Can you post a small example project that illustrates the problem?
|
# ? Jul 20, 2013 18:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:02 |
|
kitten smoothie posted:So what horror has befallen the Apple Dev Center site? It's been down for something like two days now with a cryptic "maintenance" message. Provisioning, forums, downloads, you name it, it is dead. Marco Arment seems to think it's security related. Like, they got hacked and now have to audit everything. Or maybe they're moving away from WebObjects and it isn't going as well as they'd hoped. edit: or maybe the old PowerMac G3 they seemingly ran the developer forums on has unexpectedly given up the ghost Doc Block fucked around with this message at 01:24 on Jul 21, 2013 |
# ? Jul 21, 2013 01:21 |
|
I want the Dev Center to be down for a week straight, then suddenly pop back online, without a single issued statement or leaked explanation. It will be hilarious. Alternative: Ender.uNF's iCloud Core Data thread caused the forums to evaporate in a puff of logic, bringing the Dev Center down with it.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 01:31 |
|
Turns out that the dev cneter was backed by core data with replication done via icloud and their servers got out of sync.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 01:41 |
|
pokeyman posted:If the buttons are visible, they're in a view. Which view are they in? The buttons are in the UIScrollView too, and they are being animated from right-to-left. Their only superview is the UIScrollView. This is the piece of code that has a scheduler that moves the UIButtons every 6 seconds. code:
code:
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 08:44 |
|
By my reading the buttons should be moving to the left; you're subtracting each button's width from its origin's x-coordinate. Aside from that, I don't see anything obviously wrong with the code you posted. Perhaps the problem comes from elsewhere?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 08:58 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:Turns out that the dev cneter was backed by core data with replication done via icloud and their servers got out of sync.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 12:30 |
|
Time for another post where PT6A is frustrated and probably overlooking something obvious (either that or I discover a lot of bugs)! I have a View in a Storyboard. This view contains, among other things, a subview at the bottom and a TableView that should make up the rest of the main view. I want the subview at the bottom to maintain its size, and the TableView to expand to fill any empty space. To this end, I've pinned the subview's bottom space to the superview (at 0), and likewise for the TableView. For whatever reason, nothing is changing when I use the 3.5-inch screen instead of the 4-inch screen. Is there some obvious thing within the Auto Layout system that I'm failing to understand? I feel like this is a pretty simple case of view rearrangement, so I'd prefer not having to do it in code if I can avoid it. I'm using iOS 7 beta 2, if it helps. I didn't notice beta 3 was out until the developer portal hosed up. EDIT: If anyone else has this problem, it can be fixed by selecting "Resolve Auto Layout Issues" -> "Add Missing Constraints". PT6A fucked around with this message at 23:04 on Jul 21, 2013 |
# ? Jul 21, 2013 22:53 |
|
They realized that links from as long ago as 2010 were still somehow resolving to their intended location, instead of redirecting to the developer portal. They're working to resolve the issue
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 22:55 |
|
PT6A posted:I'm using iOS 7 beta 2, if it helps. I didn't notice beta 3 was out until the developer portal hosed up.
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 23:52 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:OTA update should still work since it's just the website that's offline. Yeah, as it turns out the notification just popped up on my device as I was posting that. Still, it would be nice to have an upgrade of the xCode beta and the simulator as well. Is there a workaround for those?
|
# ? Jul 21, 2013 23:59 |
|
Oh hey, I guess this explains all those weird AppleID password reset emails I got on the 10th.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:12 |
|
PT6A posted:Yeah, as it turns out the notification just popped up on my device as I was posting that. Still, it would be nice to have an upgrade of the xCode beta and the simulator as well. Is there a workaround for those?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:17 |
|
quote:Last Thursday, an intruder attempted to secure personal information of our registered developers from our developer website. Sensitive personal information was encrypted and cannot be accessed, however, we have not been able to rule out the possibility that some developers’ names, mailing addresses, and/or email addresses may have been accessed. In the spirit of transparency, we want to inform you of the issue. We took the site down immediately on Thursday and have been working around the clock since then. Whoooops.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:18 |
|
Why do I get the feeling the breach was worse than they're letting on? You don't "completely [overhaul your] developer systems, [update your] server software, and [rebuild your] entire database" because some russian botnet was spamming the reset password link. Edit: Oh jesus, what if someone knocked over the PowerMac G3????
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:31 |
|
carry on then posted:Why do I get the feeling the breach was worse than they're letting on? You don't "completely [overhaul your] developer systems, [update your] server software, and [rebuild your] entire database" because some russian botnet was spamming the reset password link. "Overhauling our systems, updating our server software, and rebuilding our database" sounds like the sort of technobabble you would tell the general public to get them to briefly put down their torches and pitchforks while you scrambled to figure out what the hell actually went wrong. Which of course is a little funny when this is what you tell people who actually have a technical background. Tuesday afternoon is the AAPL quarterly investor call. It might get interesting if this stuff is still up in the air by then. kitten smoothie fucked around with this message at 00:45 on Jul 22, 2013 |
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:42 |
|
It sounds like they had some gaping security hole that let someone grab the entire DB, but some of the data in the DB is encrypted and the attacker may not have gotten the key.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 00:42 |
|
kitten smoothie posted:
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 01:19 |
|
chumpchous posted:I really doubt investors care about something like this "You only made 582 gazillion dollars last quarter? Some analysis That's what investors care about!
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 04:14 |
|
Working on better preview area docking: It works by putting a tall, thin UIView with a UIPanGestureRecognizer on the rightmost edge. Dragging in from outside the screen animates it down to size, then pans with the touch. Works great! Except... 1. On iOS 7, only the right edge (when holding the device upright) drags well from outside the screen. When rotated, the other three don't catch it - you have to land a touch exactly on the UIView strip. On iOS 6 all four screen edges pull in just fine. 2. Playing the preview grid area (a subview of the drawer view), it starts to stutter when multiple touches start going wild. If I add the preview grid view directly to the main view controller's view, there is no stuttering. I have a feeling it's recognizing a gesture on the view, which stops the input from getting to the right touch methods, but I don't know how to check for this.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 13:43 |
|
lord funk posted:1. On iOS 7, only the right edge (when holding the device upright) drags well from outside the screen. When rotated, the other three don't catch it - you have to land a touch exactly on the UIView strip. On iOS 6 all four screen edges pull in just fine. I haven't actually played around with it (code-wise), but I suspected behaviour like this would break lots of apps. The other 3 bezels now have "OS-level" gesture recognizers - top brings in Notification Centre, bottom brings in Control Centre and left is the back gesture in a navigation view. What happens if you build an IPA against an earlier SDK and install this on the iOS 7 device? (As this disables other iOS 7 specific behaviours, e.g. status bar layout and translucent keyboard). On that note (general question, not a lord funk reply), is there currently an alternative way to deploy directly to an iOS 7 device while building against an earlier SDK? I have to build an IPA in Xcode 4.6 and install this to the phone, I haven't found a way of using earlier SDKs in Xcode 5.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 14:07 |
|
Froist posted:I haven't actually played around with it (code-wise), but I suspected behaviour like this would break lots of apps. The other 3 bezels now have "OS-level" gesture recognizers - top brings in Notification Centre, bottom brings in Control Centre and left is the back gesture in a navigation view. This is what I expected. I'll try building against iOS 6 and see what happens. What doesn't make sense is why it's the physical screen edge, instead of the currently rotated edge. Edit: here's a quick test project in case you want to try it out: EdgeDrawer.zip It seems like the bottom edge works too. It's just the top and left that don't. lord funk fucked around with this message at 15:26 on Jul 22, 2013 |
# ? Jul 22, 2013 14:27 |
|
I just had an email telling me that I need to click the following link to reset my password. I didn't ask to change my password, is everyone getting these? Or does it mean someone has tried to access my developer account on iTunes COnnect?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 16:59 |
|
Funso Banjo posted:I just had an email telling me that I need to click the following link to reset my password. The Developer Center got its database dumped, so it's mostly being attributed to that. Someone's trying to phish your password from you.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 17:14 |
|
Lots of people are getting those. It is probably related to the security breach.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 17:15 |
|
I've been trying out Crittercism for crash reporting and some other neat stuff. I just got my favorite crash log ever:code:
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 17:22 |
|
ManicJason posted:I've been trying out Crittercism for crash reporting and some other neat stuff. I just got my favorite crash log ever: I like that they use both Favonius and Zephyr. Also Zephyr is the Spring wind..for Springboard?
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 18:25 |
|
I guess this was the wrong week to realize one of my distribution certs expired.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 20:56 |
|
Dev site is back up now.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 21:01 |
|
Doc Block posted:Dev site is back up now. Oh you tease.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 21:10 |
|
Doc Block posted:Dev site is back up now. Hughlander posted:I guess this was the wrong week to realize one of my distribution certs expired.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 21:10 |
|
Hughlander posted:I guess this was the wrong week to realize one of my distribution certs expired. drat, it's only up if you go to developer.apple.com. If you actually go to any of the actual developer sections, though, it's down. Doc Block fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Jul 22, 2013 |
# ? Jul 22, 2013 21:14 |
|
All this stuff didn't keep them from pushing out Mavericks DP4 in the app store at least. Don't know about iOS 7 B4 yet.
|
# ? Jul 22, 2013 22:43 |
|
I swear the next potential client of mine that acts with surprise and alarm upon discovering that a "simple app!!!" (read: not a very simple app) starts at around $6000-$10000 is just going to be told to gently caress off and come back when they're serious, instead of receiving a detailed, calm explanation of why things take time to do. Oh, your boss only wants to spend $2000? That's his (and your) problem, not mine. That might get you a preliminary database design and some interface sketches, depending on the project. I have to wonder if this lack of connection with reality extends to other bits of their lives. Do they get upset when the supermarket insists they pay $10 for a steak, when they only want to pay $2?
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 17:21 |
|
PT6A posted:I swear the next potential client of mine that acts with surprise and alarm upon discovering that a "simple app!!!" (read: not a very simple app) starts at around $6000-$10000 is just going to be told to gently caress off and come back when they're serious, instead of receiving a detailed, calm explanation of why things take time to do. Oh, your boss only wants to spend $2000? That's his (and your) problem, not mine. That might get you a preliminary database design and some interface sketches, depending on the project. From what I hear the answer to that is yes. A plumber charges what? Electricians cost how much?
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 18:35 |
|
But I thought you liked doing this stuff! Besides, think of all the exposure you'll get by doing our app! And maybe we could work out some kind of profit sharing in exchange for a smaller upfront payment!
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 20:07 |
|
Doc Block posted:But I thought you liked doing this stuff! Besides, think of all the exposure you'll get by doing our app! And maybe we could work out some kind of profit sharing in exchange for a smaller upfront payment! The exact line was, "well, if they like this app, we have two or three more to do later, so you have to factor that in!" gently caress. Off. I don't need to do poo poo. You need to pay me for my time, and that's where the discussion begins and ends. I've given discounts to people I've worked successfully with before (based largely on the fact that they pay me promptly and don't drive me loving nuts), but certainly not for a new client, and certainly nothing in the range of a 50% discount.
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 21:26 |
|
I have a property: @property (nonatomic) Class myClass; This allows me to do: thing = [[self.myClass alloc] initBlah]; That's great and all, but why can't I do: thing = (self.myClass*)thisIsCastable; What am I doing wrong? It says I'm missing an expression. It's been a long day
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 22:32 |
|
Doh004 posted:I have a property: I'm not sure how that's done, but in the meantime could you do: code:
|
# ? Jul 23, 2013 22:50 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:02 |
|
Doh004 posted:What am I doing wrong? It says I'm missing an expression. It's been a long day I don't think you can cast to the result of an expression (ie casting is compile-time afaik, so the compiler won't know what self.myClass returns) E: also, just cast it to id and send whatever selector you want. Or cast to id<Protocol> if you want to be a little more safe Carthag Tuek fucked around with this message at 22:54 on Jul 23, 2013 |
# ? Jul 23, 2013 22:51 |