|
Wardende posted:That's fine because it means that a hacker would have to physically be at the machine which hosts the database to hack it. or exploits a remote-access vulnerability in some other application on the same server which gives it local access, and then it can just connect to the database without needing a password.
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2013 07:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:29 |
|
|
beuges posted:or exploits a remote-access vulnerability in some other application on the same server which gives it local access, and then it can just connect to the database without needing a password. Or downloads the database onto their local machine 
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2013 15:25
|
|
|
Wardende posted:Or downloads the database onto their local machine Nah don't worry guys, it's cool, we'll just put up some signs around the office saying "DO NOT STEAL OUR DATABASE" and we'll be covered
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2013 20:34
|
|
|
QuarkJets posted:Nah don't worry guys, it's cool, we'll just put up some signs around the office saying "DO NOT STEAL OUR DATABASE" and we'll be covered What if someone uses whiteout on the "NOT" and then claims that you asked them to steal it? Check and mate 
|
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2013 23:42
|
|
|
Not really bad code per se, but who the gently caress indents like this????code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 05:25
|
|
|
Biowarfare posted:Not really bad code per se, but who the gently caress indents like this???? That is really strange...generally I would do it like this, as I imagine most would: code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 05:41
|
|
|
Biowarfare posted:Not really bad code per se, but who the gently caress indents like this???? Looks like a variant of Eastern Polish Christmas Tree notation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 07:09
|
|
|
senrath posted:Looks like a variant of Eastern Polish Christmas Tree notation. Yeah that's exactly what I thought. But there's no periods or assignment or anything so they did this. I'd take a guess their coding in other languages would probably look like Eastern Polish Christmas Tree at times, hopefully not all the time, but I can't tell if they've only done it on like-elements or not 
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 08:31
|
|
|
Biowarfare posted:Not really bad code per se, but who the gently caress indents like this???? The Bootstrap examples are formatted like that for some reason. That has probably lead to that style getting popular because people are copy-pasting the examples as base templates 
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 09:59
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 10:39
|
|
|
qntm posted:
 I suppose there are worse habits.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 11:18
|
|
|
Dicky B posted:I know it's pointless and annoying to maintain for anybody who doesn't have some kind of editor plugin How?
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 16:52
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 17:30
|
|
|
aaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 18:19
|
|
|
hey guys, my indentation style can beat up your indentation style
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 19:02
|
|
|
Dicky B posted:
Stuff like this is where editors that have multi-cursor support come in handy (eg Sublime Text 2)
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2013 21:49
|
|
|
Dicky B posted:
Visual block mode will handle fixing that in a pinch 
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2013 02:20
|
|
|
So I learned last year how to access private member fields with Java's reflection library. Funny little trick, but I'm never going to use it right? Well, this application dispatches events to an asynchronous scheduler with private access. I need to write unit tests to check that these events actually complete. And thus I end up with code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2013 17:44
|
|
|
Amarkov posted:So I learned last year how to access private member fields with Java's reflection library. Funny little trick, but I'm never going to use it right? If you have access to the source, try making the private inner class package private, and/or write a subclass to expose that variable for testing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
I think this counts (use 80 columns): s=$(echo H4sIAG9C7lEAA61XbZLrKAz8v6cx5sPiOIDx/Y+w3ZKJIZN5eVu1UU1mnJh2q9USjNvcHb766rZv4UOU ozGiuK2V3+5LqbbsavO1Nl7HLnvsPsz3RClAeOJoxP+MVxujHynxHh9KOzfZSyIL47ViWYxv5+iHryn1 I7t+GJ7shlcaEFvsZPYTi1G2TwxTItbAo46GpwyxbEUrSXx2gt+8Iu83hWt2DKJZzlDxxqOKRJ3xpPSN If5zxtkZP8ZAddvI1/CMi6L52s58unOXW0HqMefMqhrKg0oNBx7fLc+y0SXi+an42Okafg8P9Rlv5qbZ VvUGletaE0Uyx1EvXpNxSYc+8T3fGc2yPRpU329+vNpmpeho+5So9pR3PMv5rnAwtxJV37Eu9njlrYJ2 vPgOtwv9vT5pzndkbeqJ57OR4yUZNQi11ojKHb7V0LfzoqeYh7mQHfC470EjS6yK53VeFZ1K3POiO3Ad swSPZ5WeapBSI/O2qvtwtOG+p8LGL3ZFA2a8qKJkIoJfy7t2TyG7sOeXL9c+NkRjJ7nAp+SDDCOukiHi GvZA4lhJbujQI2+mX5RPHZeSKQbHZsWj5oVeETDBt0W1kJTOK0V3pJNcnwlA3deJN7S4+UVMsMh+E68z B/VAN0bkHVhnqLnFa63pmHXDVTfeDr0S7zeWRNYcYg1WmxFUmE8aFeVfc9Z39RMdwXrc64B9K11WPMyE YpN4dOkaD8Na51X1pTeq8ob3eGPl9qYhakqWN95L5RTXfKnYcNq6+/jiC100zbkXSymcssMJmnMiGrOd +7424wgHb2eyyT4Y6my7uBbrPCfy82S6hx5kV8ANS7cqWuIMWzPWrqxpY69wxlApXEfjyXdMLp1ZI2Pj 5wPmrxjLmV/hPnKy+4nXAhHpoVrxE9iP1m2yI3edxfYkTjn+xnxHJzh5TYwINOBxt2AXEpETS7WDhpJt 2tu+/dTCWMHDQFNGlXNN/7JomnHWyd7JSzvRczKaRp9OFdwr8E3jenc49L3umk3xddZUvmK89NNos/+3 4O6IZznyMSzpCEkBaFl33J27EE8LfIb70Qk/EMuMJ3ixKNDTWRXHnFPGf4HHk899rwCR/WGnoYNsdc4Z Nw0++c/csDaOCgDxcPaSURPFgPtMg6/ZhsHuWb9ca5VSEH35X898xo4/4Leu/xHgxxNC49nrm3ZU6xue Mv6CZLkihf3uroeNuJf6I3f3B8ct7BRPEc3PztxDzAf3u0cG3n3iSTxTWEb32bmNSvwtlsXgxy4gHt1j +6Tuf/8JyxRUN08nEGi6P/j/R/C/jE/7/vf4519mHHRY0QwAAA==|sed 's/ //g'|base64 -$(if [ `uname` == "Darwin" ];then echo D;else echo d;fi)|gunzip);tput rev;for i in $(seq 0 2 $((${#s}-1)));do tput setaf $(printf '%d' 0x${s:i:2});echo -n ' ';done;echo;tput sgr0 emoji fucked around with this message at 09:54 on Jul 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2013 08:03
|
|
|
kraftwerk singles posted:I think this counts (use 80 columns): Someone run this and post screenshot. I'm guessing it's goatse.
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2013 08:31
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:Someone run this and post screenshot. You guessed well (kinda). Version 1  Version 2 Edit: colours are slightly off cause my terminal is transparent ephphatha fucked around with this message at 10:40 on Jul 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2013 10:36
|
|
|
Thanks for running my bullshit code. This elegant piece will display any image from a file or url in the terminal without the terminal size restriction, but it requires ImageMagick. More info here. Someone else has already put a wrapper around it that continuously gets a flickr stream given some tags, which is cool if you're really into stupid crap like me. The code may make you cry. convert image.png -resize 40 txt:-|sed -E 's/://;s/\( ? ?//;s/, ? ?/,/g;s/\)//;s/([0-9]+,[0-9]+,[0-9]+),[0-9]+/\1/g;s/255/254/g;/mage/d'|awk '{print $1,$2}'|sed -E 's/^0,[0-9]+ /print "echo;tput setaf "\;/;s/^[0-9]+,[0-9]+ /print "tput setaf ";/;s/(.+),(.+),(.+)/\1\/42.5*36+\2\/42.5*6+\3\/42.5+16/'|bc|sed 's/$/;echo -n " ";/'|tr '\n' ' '|sed 's/^/tput rev;/;s/; /;/g;s/$/tput sgr0;echo/'|bash
|
|
#
?
Jul 23, 2013 10:53
|
|
|
Just ran into something that's always pretty sad (it's coldfusion, but the comments make it worse):code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 08:58
|
|
|
geonetix posted:Every single line of code in this file has a comment. It wasn't there some revisions ago. Somebody actually spent time adding it. I'm sure someone was just doing a thorough refactoring, and forgot to remove the comments after cleaning up the code. And now I'm glad I'm not saying that out loud or you'd hear me cracking up halfway through.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 09:44
|
|
|
Foiltha posted:This is magnificent. https://github.com/Mikkeren/FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition/commit/8a53efdf66a294ca715e7ea105c6c99c6e4afbde quote:<= is a lot of responsibility on one line, better separate it into < and ==.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 14:01
|
|
|
geonetix posted:Just ran into something that's always pretty sad (it's coldfusion, but the comments make it worse): pokeyman posted:I'm sure someone was just doing a thorough refactoring, and forgot to remove the comments after cleaning up the code. Of course those comments are completely useless. Yes, I can see that you're checking whether the thread is still running. That is obvious. The question the comments should be answering is "Why", not "What" e: preemptive "The thread might still be running, so we have to check" "Trace a message so that people debugging know what is going on"  Wheany fucked around with this message at 14:13 on Jul 24, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 14:10
|
|
|
geonetix posted:Just ran into something that's always pretty sad (it's coldfusion, but the comments make it worse): This is okay as long as they put in a meta-comment block at the top of each file explaining why they commented the lines they commented and now I have to go rinse the vomit out of my mouth.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
C# code:
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 18:08
|
|
|
Bunny Cuddlin posted:
At least they're not throwing ex.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 18:22
|
|
|
Ithaqua posted:At least they're not throwing ex. throw new Exception(ex);
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 18:23
|
|
|
Bunny Cuddlin posted:
I dunno, maybe it lets them set a breakpoint on the throw line to look at the exceptions in the debugger before they hit something else.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 19:51
|
|
|
If only debuggers had a feature that let you break when the exception was thrown. If only...
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 19:53
|
|
|
Zhentar posted:If only debuggers had a feature that let you break when the exception was thrown. If only... If only this feature always worked
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 20:00
|
|
|
I usually have to keep it turned off because of .NET framework things that like to throw exceptions
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 20:25
|
|
|
Zhentar posted:I usually have to keep it turned off because of .NET framework things that like to throw exceptions You can selectively enable/disable exceptions to trap. Just don't ever trap SqlClientException and expect to be able to step over EF calls because they sure as poo poo like to use exceptions as control flow  So, perfectly okay poo poo will have tons of exceptions raised that you'll just have to continually "continue" past.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 21:23
|
|
|
geonetix posted:Just ran into something that's always pretty sad (it's coldfusion, but the comments make it worse): Here's a  coding convention from my current project.Java code:
IMlemon fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Jul 24, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 22:34
|
|
|
Later, SomeClass will be refactored to implement SomeOtherInterface instead. The comment won't be updated, of course.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 22:58
|
|
|
I'm not going to post code because it would just be a nested series of statements, but I've inherited a farrago of snakes on a .NET project. This guy is basically bubbling ALL errors in web.config and doing a custom handler for them. Which is good right? Not when the error catch is to redirect everything to Error.aspx. No matter what it is. Broken image? Error.aspx. Http versus Https mixup? Error.aspx. CSS or javascript file not load for whatever reason? Error.aspx. Oh what if there's an error on Error.aspx? Error.aspx. Forever.
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 23:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:29 |
|
|
Scaramouche posted:a farrago Am I the only one who had to look this up?
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2013 23:23
|
|
