|
thrawn527 posted:First off, Dinklage is incredible and verbally spars opposite amazing (and tall) actors all the time. As far as physically sparring, he has massive sentinels backing him up. Why would he "go up" against anyone himself?
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:32 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 22:37 |
|
Can't wait to see if your dumb opinion comes to fruition.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:33 |
|
Very well, to pose a physical challenge, Dinklage will hop into a Sentinel and drive it like an Iron Man suit or Mecha. Dinkinel vs the X-Men.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:34 |
|
Devour posted:The point I was making is that I would have preferred someone with a commanding screen presence to assume the role. Watch The Station Agent.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:37 |
|
God drat, Devour just suddenly came out of nowhere to make endless awful posts in movie threads this week. Of course Dinklage has a commanding presence, holy crumbs!
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:52 |
|
I find it hard to believe anybody who's actually watched an episode of GoT thinks Dinklage doesn't have a commanding screen presence.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:56 |
|
Plus Gary Oldman has been exclusively terrible lately so that's a bad suggestion.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 21:58 |
|
Devour posted:Bolivar Trask wasn't a midget in the comics was he? He sounds like an interesting character in the same vain as William Stryker. I would've liked to have seen someone like Gary Oldman perhaps play him, not some dwarf. Oldman is great, but Peter Dinklage is far from just "some dwarf" - he's probably one of the most talented actors working right now. I have serious, serious doubts about Days of the Future Past, but he's one of the reasons I may give it a shot.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:08 |
|
scary ghost dog posted:Plus Gary Oldman has been exclusively terrible lately so that's a bad suggestion. His all-time best performance was only two years ago. edit: just clarifying that I do not agree with Devour in any way though.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:18 |
|
Travis343 posted:I find it hard to believe anybody who's actually watched an episode of GoT thinks Dinklage doesn't have a commanding screen presence. Pretty much this - Dinklage steals every scene he is in. The guy is legit and Devour is a loving moron.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:19 |
LtKenFrankenstein posted:His all-time best performance was only two years ago. But Tiptoes was ten years ago not two
|
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:24 |
|
Alhazred posted:But Tiptoes was ten years ago not two
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:29 |
|
Devour posted:The point I was making is that I would have preferred someone with a commanding screen presence to assume the role. Dinklage just doesn't have that, in villainous roles or especially when competing with the likes of Mckellen & Stewart on screen. Given this, the eventual confrontation with Dinklage's character onscreen with said actors will probably fall flat, in terms of tension. We'll see how it turns out, but I'm not getting my hopes up. Roger Ebert posted:The bar contains a fair number of people so witless and cruel that they must point and laugh, as if Finbar has somehow chosen his height in order to invite their moronic behavior. Finally he climbs up on a table and shouts, "Here I am! Take a look!" And that is the moment you realize there is no good reason why Peter Dinklage could not play Braveheart.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:32 |
|
Devour posted:The point I was making is that I would have preferred someone with a commanding screen presence to assume the role. Dinklage just doesn't have that, in villainous roles or especially when competing with the likes of Mckellen & Stewart on screen. Given this, the eventual confrontation with Dinklage's character onscreen with said actors will probably fall flat, in terms of tension. We'll see how it turns out, but I'm not getting my hopes up. This is the most post I have read in CD in a long, long time.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:36 |
|
Jesus Christ. I make an offhand comment about a fictional dwarf and I get probated over in BSS. Here we have a page long conversation about how Peter loving Dinklage can't possibly have any screen presence and it's all hunky dory, no big deal.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:40 |
|
Rhyno posted:Jesus Christ. I make an offhand comment about a fictional dwarf and I get probated over in BSS. Here we have a page long conversation about how Peter loving Dinklage can't possibly have any screen presence and it's all hunky dory, no big deal. If he weren't desperately trolling or begging for a probation, I'd have bought him a Dinklage avatar by now.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:43 |
|
Travis343 posted:I find it hard to believe anybody who's actually watched an episode of GoT thinks Dinklage doesn't have a commanding screen presence. Hell, he rocked it on 30 Rock, and that's just one episode in a network comedy show. (albeit, really, one of the good ones) Even the people who don't like GoT have to admit he's good, right? Though the upside is this thread is now prompting me to watch The Station Agent, because Dinklage is easily the man.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:45 |
|
If you haven't seen The Station Agent and you're a Dinklage fan, thenDan Didio posted:Watch The Station Agent.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 22:58 |
|
If Dinklage is 'some dwarf', Oldman is just some dude. You don't have to be tall or hulking to command a scene. Jesus christ, do you just nod along sternly when people demean his stature in GoT? "Some dwarf." That says it all.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:09 |
|
Devour posted:The point I was making is that I would have preferred someone with a commanding screen presence to assume the role. Dinklage just doesn't have that, in villainous roles or especially when competing with the likes of Mckellen & Stewart on screen. Given this, the eventual confrontation with Dinklage's character onscreen with said actors will probably fall flat, in terms of tension. We'll see how it turns out, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:20 |
|
I don't give a poo poo about how tall Dinklage is or why it's an issue at all when the REAL topic should be the bitching 'stache he's rocking for the movie. I mean, drat. Happy Noodle Boy fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Jul 31, 2013 |
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:23 |
|
He can have cocks for hands it won't matter when the Sentinels gently caress everything up. Hilarious twist to this thread though.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:27 |
|
The Dave posted:He can have cocks for hands Peter Dicklimbs?
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:30 |
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:I don't give a poo poo about how tall Dinklage is or why it's an issue at all when the REAL topic should be the bitching 'stache he's rocking for the movie. He looks like Biggs from StarWars.
|
# ? Jul 31, 2013 23:45 |
|
Sorry guys, it's plain to see that a dude of short stature making 5 story tall humanoid killer robots has no dramatic potential whatsoever. Why couldn't Triple H, Chris Benoit or John Cena play this part?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:10 |
|
Mr. Flunchy posted:Sorry guys, it's plain to see that a dude of short stature making 5 story tall humanoid killer robots has no dramatic potential whatsoever. Chris Benoit would have been a pretty interesting choice.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:19 |
|
Jamesman posted:Chris Benoit would have been a pretty interesting choice. Would love to see how the Sentinels would deal with mutants under his direction.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:21 |
|
Jamesman posted:Chris Benoit would have been a pretty interesting choice. Wouldn't be the first corpse they propped up in a comic book movie. Speaking of, any bets on Stan Lee's cameo in this one?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:21 |
|
Mr. Flunchy posted:Why couldn't Triple H, Chris Benoit or John Cena play this part? Those are the people playing the Sentinels. Also, if there's any guy from wrestling that should be a villain it's Vince McMahon.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:36 |
|
Tuxedo Jack posted:Wouldn't be the first corpse they propped up in a comic book movie. Speaking of, any bets on Stan Lee's cameo in this one? Stan never has a cameo in any of the Fox films.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:48 |
|
jscolon2.0 posted:Stan never has a cameo in any of the Fox films. What? He was in Xmen, Daredevil and X3 off the top of my head...
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:51 |
|
Tuxedo Jack posted:What? He was in Xmen, Daredevil and X3 off the top of my head... Wow, I was totally wrong about this. Somehow my brain just pieced him not being in Wolverine or First Class as a trend. jscolon2.0 fucked around with this message at 01:31 on Aug 1, 2013 |
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:58 |
|
jscolon2.0 posted:Stan never has a cameo in any of the Fox films. Look how absolutely wrong you are. http://www.listal.com/list/stan-lees-marvel-movie-cameos
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 00:58 |
|
I believe Stan only cameos in movies for characters he created (or co-created). Of course, his best 'cameo' is playable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9vVCyF4tTo
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 01:27 |
|
The MSJ posted:I believe Stan only cameos in movies for characters he created (or co-created). Of course, his best 'cameo' is playable. Nope, he's in the Captain America movie. I'm pretty sure it's just his availability and how much effort whoever is making the film is willing to put in. Since he didn't cameo in First Class or either of the Wolverine movies, I doubt he's going to be in the new X-Men, but who knows.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 02:32 |
|
I think the reason he wasn't in the Wolverine movies is he didn't create Wolverine.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 03:00 |
|
FabioClone posted:I think the reason he wasn't in the Wolverine movies is he didn't create Wolverine. And they couldn't have Len Wein do a cameo because then they'd have to admit that he deserves royalties from the movie.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 03:05 |
|
So they made a follow up to The Punisher: #DIRTYLAUNDRY short. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YDYL6oECjU
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 03:05 |
|
Pugnac posted:So they made a follow up to The Punisher: #DIRTYLAUNDRY short. Just watched this, it's actually pretty damned funny.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 04:15 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 22:37 |
|
omg chael crash posted:Just watched this, it's actually pretty damned funny. It doesn't hurt that Ryan Kwanten is loving awesome and has amazing comedic timing.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2013 04:25 |