|
8th-snype posted:idiot bitch fucker Don't sign your post halfway through it.
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2013 02:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 05:40 |
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:Don't sign your post halfway through it. Look at this guy missing a rule thread snipe for a mediocre burn.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2013 02:41
|
|
|
8th-samurai posted:Look at this guy missing a rule thread snipe for a mediocre burn. I didn't miss the snype, son. Work on your reading comprehension.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2013 02:53
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:I didn't miss the snype, son. Work on your reading comprehension. DO YOU THINK THIS IS A GAME SON !?! 8th-snype fucked around with this message at 03:07 on Aug 2, 2013 |
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2013 03:02
|
|
|
8th-snype posted:DO YOU THINK THIS IS A GAME SON !?! Haha you literally spent money on that. You're welcome, Lowtax.
|
|
#
?
Aug 2, 2013 03:09
|
|
|
In all seriousness, would anyone else be interested in an instant photography thread? There's been an influx of Instax posts lately and with a little more awareness, it might get drum up enough enthusiasm for people to go out and buy one or run a pack of really expensive film through their parents' lovely Polaroid 600 for funsies. I'm probably not the most knowledgeable on the subject, but if no one else wants to make the thread, I can put some research into it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2013 18:24
|
|
|
aliencowboy posted:In all seriousness, would anyone else be interested in an instant photography thread? There's been an influx of Instax posts lately and with a little more awareness, it might get drum up enough enthusiasm for people to go out and buy one or run a pack of really expensive film through their parents' lovely Polaroid 600 for funsies. I'm probably not the most knowledgeable on the subject, but if no one else wants to make the thread, I can put some research into it. I'd find it interesting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2013 19:51
|
|
|
There was an instant thread I used to post in, but I think it fell back into the archives.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2013 23:40
|
|
|
Spedman posted:There was an instant thread I used to post in, but I think it fell back into the archives. Yeah I was going to say we already had one, then I looked and couldn't find it, so this is probably what happened.
|
|
#
?
Aug 3, 2013 23:46
|
|
|
aliencowboy posted:In all seriousness, would anyone else be interested in an instant photography thread? There's been an influx of Instax posts lately and with a little more awareness, it might get drum up enough enthusiasm for people to go out and buy one or run a pack of really expensive film through their parents' lovely Polaroid 600 for funsies. I'm probably not the most knowledgeable on the subject, but if no one else wants to make the thread, I can put some research into it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 4, 2013 00:52
|
|
|
Can we have a JPG only thread? Really loving sick of all these film and raw shooters.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 01:20
|
|
|
Musket posted:Can we have a JPG only thread? Really loving sick of all these film and raw shooters. It's ok, they hate you just as much as you hate them. Probably more.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 01:23
|
|
|
The only true art is straight OOC.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 02:21
|
|
|
rio posted:The only true art is straight OOC. Straight OOC, you say? 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 02:24
|
|
|
Out of 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 02:29
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:Straight OOC, you say?  im a snyper with a helluva scope
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 03:06
|
|
|
aliencowboy posted:
NOSCOPE CORNSHOT BAN THIS SICK FILTH
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 03:15
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:BAN THIS SICK FILTH
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 10:39
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2013 14:56
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:...I... FILTH
|
|
#
?
Sep 10, 2013 07:32
|
|
|
aliencowboy posted:
What the hell is this? No seriously, where are his sideburns.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2013 00:46
|
|
|
Bump for rule 21 update: posting What The Duck comics will get you probated for a week because they are terrible.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2013 03:16
|
|
|
Aw mann fine.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2013 03:48
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:Bump for rule 21 update: posting What The Duck comics will get you probated for a week because they are terrible. I just looked that up because I've never heard of it and holy poo poo is that a bad comic
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2013 04:32
|
|
|
404notfound posted:I just looked that up because I've never heard of it and holy poo poo is that a bad comic It's funny like once every three years but basically some hack venting his feelings of entitlement/inadequacy the rest of the time.
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2013 06:08
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:It's funny like once every three years but basically some hack venting his feelings of entitlement/inadequacy the rest of the time. dorkroom.txt
|
|
#
?
Sep 24, 2013 15:30
|
|
|
I looked at one What the Duck and it was awful. I figured it was luck of the draw, even good comics have the occasional turd (except Bill Watterson). Then I read another. And another. I gave up after eight.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2013 05:54
|
|
|
Bob Socko posted:I looked at one What the Duck and it was awful. I figured it was luck of the draw, even good comics have the occasional turd (except Bill Watterson). Then I read another. And another. I gave up after eight hundred.
|
|
#
?
Sep 26, 2013 09:30
|
|
|
If there were a dorkroom irc, would anyone join the dorkroom irc? Sometimes while editing I feel like I just need to take a break, and while the actual dorkroom is great, some real human interaction (via pc to pc internet chat) would also be pretty great.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2013 06:56
|
|
|
rio posted:If there were a dorkroom irc, would anyone join the dorkroom irc? Sometimes while editing I feel like I just need to take a break, and while the actual dorkroom is great, some real human interaction (via pc to pc internet chat) would also be pretty great. We don't talk about IRC on the forums but you should find information relevant to your question in the OP of this very thread. (see: "The Chill Zone") SoundMonkey fucked around with this message at 07:07 on Sep 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2013 07:04
|
|
|
Poster "Wario In Real Life" is no longer allowed to post in Dorkroom, since he contributes nothing of value, has posted like two photos in his entire life, and has a rapsheet longer than the rules list in the OP. If you see him post after Oct 29, 2013, please use the report button with extreme prejudice.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 05:57
|
|
|
So I did my little effort post thing four pages ago in this thread and maybe 6 months back time wise. The result was the creation of our current LOW EFFORT POSTING thread, paired with Photo a Day. I'm curious whether people think it has been a success, or a failure. FWIW, I've chafed at the rules in Low Effort. I want to be able to chatte more, but you reap with you sow so...
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
There have indeed been a couple times where I was in the low effort thread and said to myself "gently caress the rules, I'm going to comment on that picture because it's just that good." But I hate not having POSTING PRIVILEGES so I closed the tab and tried to forget the situation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2014 18:26
|
|
|
It doesn't seem like it has changed PAD, but it has been long enough that I may have forgotten what it was like before the split. Not having comments in the low effort thread is basically like, let's make a dorkroom tumblr or something. If it is up for discussion it seems like it might as well have the no commenting rule lifted.
|
|
#
?
Jan 3, 2014 18:45
|
|
|
It's basically because SAD was mostly just people who didn't want to give actual GOOD critique but basically just wanted Flickr gold-stars without any constructive discussion. I mean it wasn't ALL that, but that was a big part of it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 01:10
|
|
|
I miss the opportunity to simply tell someone that they really hit/missed the mark without expanding to a real crit. This is part because  but also because I think a lot goes without saying.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
Ric posted:I miss the opportunity to simply tell someone that they really hit/missed the mark without expanding to a real crit. This is part because I see where you're coming from, but also there's no critique rules in the genre threads (landscape, portrait, etc), so it's really just the one thread that they can choose to post in where you can't critique them. So basically no there was no real easy answer but SAD was getting kind of terrible so welp.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 01:59
|
|
|
I basically treat SAD as a place where I get to see the photos posted in the threads that I don't read, which are often excellent. But then again I had nothing against the old SAD, but now I don't have to scroll through posts I don't care about. On the other hand, I too have often wanted to say "hey that's a good shot" to someone in SAD but haven't done so.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 05:01
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:I see where you're coming from, but also there's no critique rules in the genre threads (landscape, portrait, etc), so it's really just the one thread that they can choose to post in where you can't critique them. Yeah but saying "Oh you can go into the genre threads" isn't a great answer either. I'm not sure you can expect someone to check all the threads with all their chat and what not, and I'm also not sure everyone wants to x-post between genre threads and low effort. Dunno. It's definitely not an easy answer. SAD was distracting from PAD. SAD got dumped because Critique Is A Good Thing. So we have this weird muzzled thread now. That either puts people off, or sends them into the genre threads, which forces people to track a larger number of threads. Has this experiment created more traffic/critique in PAD? Or is it just the same, with less chat in low effort?
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 05:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 05:40 |
|
|
God forbid we have to read more threads.
|
|
#
?
Jan 4, 2014 19:14
|
|
