|
swickles posted:Yeah, I think the Best Teams of All Time stuff are really funny. Like yeah, the 07 Pats would dominate a lot of teams playing in today's game. But if the 2007 Pats had to play the 1978 Steelers in 1978, they would get obliterated. I don't know, I think there is something to be said for the development of schemes on both sides of the ball that might make up for the rule changes between then and now. Assuming you have '07 coaches against '78 coaches there's a lot of innovation involved there.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:01 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:59 |
|
Sash: Yeah, that's a problem with recruits in general. It isn't just the US- there's been some stories in China about the rising obesity problem limiting the pool of potential soldiers. Also: Size difference alone would make a huge factor (Re Steelers/Pats). The Steelers offensive line was just north of 250 pounds per player, that is not going to hold up.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:22 |
|
superaielman posted:Sash: Yeah, that's a problem with recruits in general. It isn't just the US- there's been some stories in China about the rising obesity problem limiting the pool of potential soldiers. Yeah true, so the run game would be better. But in an era where going across the middle was a death sentence, do you really think some of the high powered offenses of today would hold up in those playing conditions?
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:25 |
|
swickles posted:Yeah true, so the run game would be better. But in an era where going across the middle was a death sentence, do you really think some of the high powered offenses of today would hold up in those playing conditions? If you're entertaining size difference between then and now it's more important that the run game would stop, like completely for Pittsburgh. Being able to legally decapitate a guy on D running a crossing route probably wouldn't make up for that.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:38 |
|
^^ Hah, speak of the devil.swickles posted:Yeah true, so the run game would be better. But in an era where going across the middle was a death sentence, do you really think some of the high powered offenses of today would hold up in those playing conditions? Probably just switch to a power running game and annihilate them in the trenches. The 1978 Steelers' oline averaged 250 lbs and defensive line was smaller then the Patriots' linebackers.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:40 |
|
Yeah, if the 07 Pats were allowed to play '78 rules they would dominate almost on size alone, on top having a knowledge advantage.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:49 |
|
My point wasn't really about size. Even the worst teams of today would dominate, thats jsut a given the way the game has evolved. My point is that a pass heavy offense that relies on crossing routes wouldn't fare well in the 70's. Just like how the run heavy teams of then wouldn't fare well in today's game. My point is that given all these various simulations and comparisons made, there is just too much to take into account. Like if you are going to say that Pats today would change to a power running game, then why couldn't the Steelers similarly bulk there players up and have the training and facilities of today? If you are going to allow for any changes, its only fair to allow for the past teams to also have some adaptations and advantages of the modern era, otherwise whats the point. The 0-16 Lions would dominate any SB champ from before 1980-something.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:54 |
|
Kalli posted:The 1978 Steelers' oline averaged 250 lbs and defensive line was smaller then the Patriots' linebackers. I just looked it up, Mike Webster was 6'4", 255 at center for those Steeler teams. Their current center, Maurkice Pouncey is also 6'4". And is listed as 305 lbs. Webster was considered undersized for a center, but still, 50 loving pounds, incredible. Oh, and remember, the NFL has its PED problem under control. Better training techniques and dietary practices account for a league made up of players who are half a human heavier and still faster than players of only 20-30 years ago.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 04:58 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:I just looked it up, Mike Webster was 6'4", 255 at center for those Steeler teams. I also have several second hand accounts that Mike Webster was a very nice guy, whereas Maurkice Pouncey is awful.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 05:04 |
|
swickles posted:My point is that a pass heavy offense that relies on crossing routes wouldn't fare well in the 70's. Just like how the run heavy teams of then wouldn't fare well in today's game. My point is that given all these various simulations and comparisons made, there is just too much to take into account. Like if you are going to say that Pats today would change to a power running game, then why couldn't the Steelers similarly bulk there players up and have the training and facilities of today? If you are going to allow for any changes, its only fair to allow for the past teams to also have some adaptations and advantages of the modern era, otherwise whats the point. The 0-16 Lions would dominate any SB champ from before 1980-something. This kind of goes back to my original point about the innovations on both sides of the ball as far as scheming goes, those Steelers would never have seen a 46 defense, teams were completely clueless on how to block a guy like LT when he first came into the game and going through that happened to improve protection in general, the idea of spreading the field horizontally might have existed but wasn't well explored, and so on. I don't know, I guess I agree that a modern offense would change quite a bit if you plopped it down in the 70s. It would be interesting to see though. Actually I'm probably most excited about the thought of Brady begging for flags.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 05:15 |
|
Grittybeard posted:Actually I'm probably most excited about the thought of Brady begging for flags. "poo poo, I think Jack Lambert just bit Brady."
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 05:43 |
|
That entire Steelers team would be serving a Goodell 4 game suspension for violating the PED policy.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 13:06 |
|
Sash! posted:I also have several second hand accounts that Mike Webster was a very nice guy, whereas Maurkice Pouncey is awful. I don't know what that has to do with how big and strong he is, really. Every offensive play for modern teams would start in the secondary.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 15:27 |
|
Rap posted:Gladwell is an idiot and boxing fell apart in large part because of obviously rigged fights imo I've made the argument here before, and I maintain it, that more than anything else the fall of boxing is due to the rise of football and basketball. No matter how hard you are it's always more fun as a kid to play a game, run and chase each other, throw a ball, etc. than it is to punch each other in the face. Once running around and catching each other started to earn good money, and then eventually giving you opportunities to earn more than all but the top boxers, you're going to stick with that. Not to mention the school/pee-wee system integration getting kids started earlier and invested in a sport before they're old enough to really begin boxing (Some people have their kids boxing at 7 and 8, those people are called psychopaths). Fixed fights, head trauma, lack of good American heavyweights, and later the rise of MMA all contributed as well of course, but I think the biggest factor is that kids want to have FUN. And when there's 5 or 6 kids playing together it's a lot easier to play a game of 3 on 3 basketball, or toss the ball around at each other, than it is to lace up and set up a round-robin sparring session.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 16:10 |
|
Keith Olbermann politely tells Pete Prisco to go gently caress himself: http://deadspin.com/keith-olbermann-annihilates-prisco-column-1231842169
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 16:55 |
|
Pete Prisco probably should sue his high school for concussions because clearly his brain is hosed if he thought that column was worth handing in. edit holy gently caress that Olbermann video is a work of art. Amazing Ribsauce fucked around with this message at 17:01 on Aug 31, 2013 |
# ? Aug 31, 2013 16:58 |
|
Prisco's response on Twitter is what I'd expect from a high school journalist. No introspection, no hint of, "Maybe I should look at what these people are saying," just, "Whatever." I'm not even saying he has to change his idiotic opinion, but his unwillingness to even consider the possibility that he was wrong is sad.
|
# ? Aug 31, 2013 17:10 |
|
Prisco acting surprised that his column got him attacked is the icing on the poo poo cake. Scott Fujita even attacked him on twitter for it, which is surprising since he's a member of the sports media now. Olbermann and Prisco deserve each other.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2013 02:43 |
|
Pete Prisco is a loving clown and an embarrassment to the sportswriter community, even by sportswriter standards. Why CBS is still writing him checks is a mystery to me.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2013 03:07 |
|
Benne posted:Pete Prisco is a loving clown and an embarrassment to the sportswriter community, even by sportswriter standards. Why CBS is still writing him checks is a mystery to me. I think they're still writing him checks because columnist jobs are (inexplicably) for life, barring extreme embarrassment for the given media outlet.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2013 04:46 |
|
superaielman posted:Olbermann and Prisco deserve each other.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2013 06:20 |
|
Maybe they just find Pete Prisco's name aesthetically pleasing due to the alliteration.
|
# ? Sep 2, 2013 16:18 |
|
Pete Prisco is doing exactly what he needs to be doing. The thought of this man in the role of a contributing member of society such as a a cab driver, nurse, or bathroom attendant is frankly frightening. Thank god for CBS putting him in a position where Pete will only influence the already irreparably damaged, cbssports.com
|
# ? Sep 3, 2013 03:19 |
|
If you were wondering whether Bleacher Report getting picked up by CNN would eventually lead to an increased quality of writing because of an increased budget, http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...-bin&hpt=hp_bn8 "The preseason is absolute garbage—that's the adage, and it's mostly true. How the NFL gets away with charging real cash money for a bunch of hopeless cases—who, after the preseason is over, will be driving ice cream trucks—is one of the great travesties of capitalism. 'Merica." you'd be wrong. And shame on you for thinking that in the first place.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 01:24 |
|
sweet thursday posted:If you were wondering whether Bleacher Report getting picked up by CNN would eventually lead to an increased quality of writing because of an increased budget, Like CNN has high-quality journalism to begin with e: Florio thinks the Lions are going to the NFC Title Game http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/09/04/pfts-2013-season-predictions/ Vertical Lime fucked around with this message at 01:37 on Sep 5, 2013 |
# ? Sep 5, 2013 01:34 |
|
There's no shame in predicting a Lions loss in the NFC Championship Game.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 02:27 |
|
Cruel and Unusual posted:There's no shame in predicting a Lions loss in the NFC Championship Game. True enough, if you put the 2012 Chiefs in the AFC Championship Game they would have lost the hell out of that.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 02:29 |
|
sweet thursday posted:If you were wondering whether Bleacher Report getting picked up by CNN would eventually lead to an increased quality of writing because of an increased budget, The worst part is that Mike Freeman is a pretty famous columnist, dude's written for a bunch of newspapers and CBS.com. He has no excuse for that garbage.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 02:32 |
|
I hate when people blame capitalism for things that have nothing to do with the economic system we live in.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 02:34 |
|
Vertical Lime posted:Like CNN has high-quality journalism to begin with He predicts exactly 11 of 12 playoff teams from last year will make the playoffs again. That's pretty lazy. At least try to throw in some curveballs to reflect the historical trend of playoff team turnover.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 02:36 |
|
Sash! posted:I hate when people blame capitalism for things that have nothing to do with the economic system we live in. No see socialists would never charge full ticket price for a preseason NFL game. This is an incredibly specific and very conditional claim but it's probably true so, Click here to see our Top 20 Most Epic Fail Preseason GIFs with Grumpy Cat Photoshopped In.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 07:18 |
|
Showtime's NFL show had Pete Prisco on to talk about his column. He was quite proud of himself for stirring up a controversy. I had to turn it off when within ten words coming out of his mouth I realized that despite all the people telling him what was wrong with his column, he still doesn't know or understand the fundamental issue.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 07:57 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Showtime's NFL show had Pete Prisco on to talk about his column. He was quite proud of himself for stirring up a controversy. I had to turn it off when within ten words coming out of his mouth I realized that despite all the people telling him what was wrong with his column, he still doesn't know or understand the fundamental issue. "Look at all the attention I'm getting! I must've done something good!"
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 13:04 |
|
Sounds like he's Embracing Debate.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 13:07 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:Sounds like he's Embracing Debate. Only if he can find ways to bring Tim Tebow into every possible coversation.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 17:23 |
|
I definitely should not have just spent that much time on Twitter ranting at Pete loving Prisco. I could have been doing anything else.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 18:10 |
|
Toaster Beef posted:I definitely should not have just spent that much time on Twitter ranting at Pete loving Prisco. I could have been doing anything else. Like posting your name so we can see
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 20:36 |
|
Sorry, Twitter handle, because old loving people use Twitter
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 20:36 |
|
My bad, I'm @comicsansisokay
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 20:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 07:59 |
|
Toaster Beef posted:My bad, I'm @comicsansisokay You were really dishing into him too. I kept refreshing twitter every 5 minutes to see a new rage tweet
|
# ? Sep 5, 2013 20:39 |