|
Smythe posted:I fuckin hate jigsaw pUZZLES me too, smythe
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 05:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 04:15 |
|
|
guys, go see gravity immediately on the biggest screen you can find i have three complaints about the movie: 1. there's some dodgy orbital mechanics going on, but meh whatever it's just to expedite the story and it isn't insulting to one's intelligence like 99% of movies with space travel, and you won't even notice it unless you play a lot of kerbal space program 2. it gets a little too melodramatic in parts imo, but then again maybe i'm just a sperg who would rather look at spaceships than listen to why sandra bullock is sad 3. 24 fps makes some of it look like smeared-out blurry poo poo from an rear end; why are we still filming movies at such a low framerate is it 1904 but otherwise it is amazing so seriously go watch it it's a little known fact that sandra bullock's last name is actually short for bad-at-airlock
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 06:19
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:
change is scary and framerates that don't look like blurry rear end whenever the camera moves too fast look unnatural
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 06:25
|
|
|
people complaining about the 'soap opera effect' are like 90% people with lovely motion interpolation on their tvs that makes certain scenes look spooky unreal and others completely unchanged. proper high framerate is fine after like 30 seconds
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 06:34
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:it's Vin Unleaded 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 06:37
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:change is scary and framerates that don't look like blurry rear end whenever the camera moves too fast look unnatural no they look like an absolute garbage dump because its like watching THE NEWS~
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 06:37
|
|
|
"hey kids its raining lets do a puzzle" -fuckers only the fkiner sperg kids would be like YAY i'd pretend 2 nails were space ships and fly em aorund gently caress puzzles
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 07:40
|
|
|
how come half the things on my 'top 10 for you' list on netflix say "best guess for you: 1-2 stars"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 07:43
|
|
|
nigga crab pollock posted:people complaining about the 'soap opera effect' are like 90% people with lovely motion interpolation on their tvs that makes certain scenes look spooky unreal and others completely unchanged. proper high framerate is fine after like 30 seconds ugh I despise when people have this on their tvs they say they can't tell or it's good for sports but it sucks for sports you see a guy running and just stuttering and poo poo everywhere
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 07:54
|
|
|
ol qwerty bastard posted:guys, go see gravity immediately on the biggest screen you can find just saw it. point by point: 1. don't care much 2. absolutely agree, and this is my biggest complaint (albeit still fairly minor) about the movie 3. don't care much all in all it was pretty drat good, very suspenseful and intense. also lol at the intro basically saying "space has no air. you can't hear anything because there isn't air. also you can't breathe in space because there isn't air. we're only telling you this because we know many of you are borderline retarded"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 09:36
|
|
|
so sound is fully in-helmet?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 09:38
|
|
|
Carthag posted:so sound is fully in-helmet? p much yeah
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 09:46
|
|
|
Trig Discipline posted:p much yeah alright now im kinda intrigued
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 09:52
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:change is scary and framerates that don't look like blurry rear end whenever the camera moves too fast look unnatural gently caress hollywood forever sony has been touting this for years and honestly i think its so they can get away with not putting the work needed to push things above 30fps going to see gravity tonight with my fiance p excited
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 14:19
|
|
|
Sandra "Bullocks!" Cocks it up again in her latest movie, Miss Congeastronaut - or rather Gravity , as the title puts it !
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 18:38
|
|
|
A wooden performance from a nutty woman and her oak of a man make this weightless thriller a 'must miss' for October. Ham fisted trajectories and a predictable orbits make this reviewer think --- "George Clooless?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 18:42
|
|
|
INstead, save your momentum and see a real attractor - the family. A tight nit nucleus is what the funny one needs
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 18:47
|
|
|
Kirk posted:A wooden performance from a nutty woman and her oak of a man make this weightless thriller a 'must miss' for October. Ham fisted trajectories and a predictable orbits make this reviewer think --- "George Clooless?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 19:57
|
|
|
i kinda wanna see gravity but the trailer makes it look dopey as poo poo like, does the woman who's been training for yers to spend a few days in orbit seriously start screaming and crying like an idiot? when whatever accident happens and she starts spinning away is there any explanation for why she doesn't click on her attitude control and then jet back to safety?
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 19:58
|
|
|
angry_keebler posted:i kinda wanna see gravity but the trailer makes it look dopey as poo poo im pretty sure they dont train you on what to do when the space shuttle blows up because the only time that happens the astronauts had exactly enough time to go "welp" before the disintegrated/hit the surface at 300 m/s. i bet part of the "astronauts are totally calm and stoic at all times" thing is because nobody survives when the poo poo really hits the fan like when Soyuz 11 depressurized or when Soyuz 1's parachute failed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 20:05
|
|
|
haven't seen the movie yet but the dv of a real-life astronaut jetpack is minuscule and probably wouldn't have helped much e: the total dv of the emergency recovery jetpacks used on the iss is THREE. the total dv of the mmu used in that famous image is ~24
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 20:07
|
|
|
do the regular suits even have thrusters? I thought they needed that chair thing for that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 20:08
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:do the regular suits even have thrusters? I thought they needed that chair thing for that. not really, they have a SAFER unit that is supposed to be useful if you let go of the hull or something but it only packs like 3 m/s of dV which is equivalent to less a third of a second of freefall on the surface. e: like for comparison if you were moving at 7 miles per hour in space, 3 m/s dV wouldn't even be enough to stop you, let alone start pushing you back. and thats still a best case scenario were you happen to be pointing in the exact right direction with no rotational velocity and no need to correct course. Constant Hamprince fucked around with this message at 20:16 on Oct 5, 2013 |
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 20:13
|
|
|
haveblue posted:haven't seen the movie yet but the dv of a real-life astronaut jetpack is minuscule and probably wouldn't have helped much well the trailer seems to show sandy spinning away and tumbling at way less than a combined 3m/s like step one, spread eagle to reduce spin and tumble step two click on attitude control(the safer pack automatically maintains attitude anyway?), step 3 assess the situation not step one panick and start screaming what do i do
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 20:37
|
|
|
i dont think you know how fast a meter per second is
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:18
|
|
|
Gus Hobbleton posted:i dont think you know how fast a meter per second is 1 m/s is a slow walking pace
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:21
|
|
|
Science Nerds State Unequivocally What They Would Do In Crisis
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:22
|
|
|
Gus Hobbleton posted:i dont think you know how fast a meter per second is in my expert analysis of roughly 2 seconds of a trailer that i didn't pay much attention to i accurately determined her combined roll and tumble looks like slightly less than 1 rotation a second so ~1.7 m/s or so that's 1.3 m/s Δv budget left to spare to scoot back to safety
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:37
|
|
|
will one of you kerbal players please explain what this is http://spacefellowship.com/news/art...e-universe.html i mean i know what the CMB is but i dont know how to read this picture
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:40
|
|
|
Don't cross the streams.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:41
|
|
|
that is a picture of beams of light traveling from the CMB towards us. as they travel they are being distorted by massive objects near their path. the article is about analyzing the distortion to make deductions about the objects and that they have just discovered something about the very early universe from it
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:will one of you kerbal players please explain what this is it's a model of how the trajectory of cosmic background radiation is bent by the gravity of celestial bodies as they pass through space, which is what they mean by 'gravitational lensing'. it's similar to the phenomenon scientists use to find large extrasolar planets: they point a telescope at a star and look for irregularities in the light coming from it, then do calculations to see if they're caused by the mass of a gas giant bending light from its parent star.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:44
|
|
|
Can-O-Raid posted:it's a model of how the trajectory of cosmic background radiation is bent by the gravity of celestial bodies as they pass through space, which is what they mean by 'gravitational lensing'. it's similar to the phenomenon scientists use to find large extrasolar planets: they point a telescope at a star and look for irregularities in the light coming from it, then do calculations to see if they're caused by the mass of a gas giant bending light from its parent star.
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:51
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:-Marissa Explains It All- 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:52
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:will one of you kerbal players please explain what this is the squiggley lines are being wiggled by gravity so we can kinda infer that there must be some pretty heavy stuff in space e: what those guys said said also another possible application is to refine estimates of dark matter and its distribution in the early universe which could provide evidence to explain whether dark matter is mostly uniform or disparate wimps or if it's more machos
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:57
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:will one of you kerbal players please explain what this is that is a Game Cube from the show Reboot, actually
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 21:59
|
|
|
Smythe posted:that is a Game Cube from the show Reboot, actually Nice!
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 22:08
|
|
|
Smythe posted:that is a Game Cube from the show Reboot, actually I heard they were rebooting Reboot for its 20th anniversary 
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 22:14
|
|
|
yea i heard that too and im gonna jerk off to Dot again and also that babe enzo meets online and its gonna feel just like old times
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 22:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 04:15 |
|
|
angry_keebler posted:like, does the woman who's been training for yers to spend a few days in orbit seriously start screaming and crying like an idiot? she actually didn't have that much training, she was a mission specialist. angry_keebler posted:when whatever accident happens and she starts spinning away is there any explanation for why she doesn't click on her attitude control and then jet back to safety? well she probably didn't have the thrust for it if she had any at all, but also she is in a blind panic at that point for obvious reasons. i've never been adrift in space and spinning wildly, but i have been in some pretty hairy situations underwater and it's not at all uncommon to do incredibly stupid things, particularly in the first minute or so. you hope your training kicks in immediately and you just do the right thing as a first response, but sometimes it doesn't
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2013 22:29
|
|