|
Henchman of Santa posted:Bill Barnwell dropped a totally unnecessary Q and Not U reference in a column last week and I don't know if it was great or just stupid. Which is how I feel about Simmonsian writing in general. I saw that and I specifically remembered reading it, which I guess is the point, but I still don't know how I feel about Soft Pyramids as they relate to football.
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 15:16 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 14:56 |
|
because like football they evaporate at daylight probably
|
# ? Oct 20, 2013 15:21 |
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:And a certain number of Seminole Indians get scholarships to FSU every year. You can rag on FSU for a lot of stuff but certainly not the Seminole stuff Indians? I wasn't aware that there were any Seminole living in India. Nice to know they get a piece of FSU jersey sales in Mumbai. Henchman of Santa posted:Haven't official Seminole leaders actually come out in support of FSU using their name though? Like that's why Chief Osceola is still a thing in the first place. Yes. It's not perfect, but at least Florida State asked permission and their name isn't a racial slur. I wouldn't have a problem with names that weren't literally racial slurs. anime sarah palin fucked around with this message at 10:19 on Oct 21, 2013 |
# ? Oct 21, 2013 10:14 |
|
anime sarah palin posted:Indians? Indian is an acceptable term. "Native American," is just as inaccurate if you want to be that way.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 10:44 |
|
Mad Mafioso posted:Indian is an acceptable term. "Native American," is just as inaccurate if you want to be that way. No. It's not. Indians live in India. Unless you are referring to people who live in India, it's not an acceptable term. It is at best inaccurate, and at worst offensive. Some dumbass from Italy got lost and thought we were Indians. That doesn't mean we actually are. The best term is just to refer to us as the nation or people we belong to. Failing that, Native American works. If you really want to be autistic about it, go ahead and say indigenous.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 10:49 |
|
anime sarah palin posted:No. It's not. Indians live in India. Unless you are referring to people who live in India, it's not an acceptable term. So, you're a Redskins fan?
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 12:09 |
|
anime sarah palin posted:No. It's not. Indians live in India. Unless you are referring to people who live in India, it's not an acceptable term. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>shut up
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 14:35 |
|
Well that's an interesting tangent to go on. I apologize, I was unaware I was offending you. I appreciate the direct "passive aggressive child" approach at correcting me though.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 16:41 |
|
Let's all be sure to tell the American Indian Movement they've got things all wrong.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 17:54 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Let's all be sure to tell the American Indian Movement they've got things all wrong. NAACP has "colored" in it, but I still don't call black men colored.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 18:06 |
|
Chichevache posted:NAACP has "colored" in it, but I still don't call black men colored. The difference is that the AIM fights to be called Indians on the basis that they think it's less offensive then being referred to as "Native American" because they feel being referred to as a title with the word "American" in it is pretty offensive considering Americans tried to commit genocide and took their land. Nobody in the NAACP is making that argument, or anything resembling it.
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 18:10 |
|
The Onion ends the debate once and for all http://www.theonion.com/articles/re...eview:1:Default
|
# ? Oct 21, 2013 22:14 |
|
E: nevermind
FUCKFACE MORON fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Oct 21, 2013 |
# ? Oct 21, 2013 22:29 |
|
Rap posted:The Onion ends the debate once and for all http://www.theonion.com/articles/re...eview:1:Default well then.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:14 |
|
Rap posted:The Onion ends the debate once and for all http://www.theonion.com/articles/re...eview:1:Default Yeah, I'm in the camp, too. Goddamn what a headline.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:38 |
|
I think Rick Reilly may literally a goblin. I would say he is very unfortunate looking, but I think it's just his personality making him look like a kobold.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:42 |
|
Seminoles aren't even strictly Native Americans anyhow. It's not a nation. It's some Creek and some others and some runaway slaves and I'm pretty sure some Spanish Floridians that really didn't like England owning Florida.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 00:53 |
|
How long until The Onion deletes that
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:02 |
|
Chris Gaines posted:How long until The Onion deletes that The Onion has only ever deleted one thing ever and it was way worse than that
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:10 |
|
The premise of the joke is that it's offensive ethnic slurs so barring mass outrage or something they won't. Only thing they've deleted in recent memory is that tweet about the child actress being a oval office or something, which was at best barely a joke.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:12 |
|
pangstrom posted:The premise of the joke is that it's offensive ethnic slurs so barring mass outrage or something they won't.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:15 |
|
Chris Gaines posted:I'm aware of the premise of the joke, but man the slur they use is almost on par with the n-word. You know what else is a slur on par with the n-word?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:16 |
|
Owned
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:17 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:The Onion has only ever deleted one thing ever and it was way worse than that What was that? Also, the Onion publishes stuff like that and way worse than that routinely.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:26 |
|
swickles posted:What was that? They called a child actress a oval office in what was clearly a misfired joke that went too far on the edgy side and everyone flipped their poo poo about it, because it's still hosed up to call an 11 year old girl a oval office even if you're joking
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:29 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:They called a child actress a oval office in what was clearly a misfired joke that went too far on the edgy side and everyone flipped their poo poo about it, because it's still hosed up to call an 11 year old girl a oval office even if you're joking They also changed the "Bill Belichick finds new and interesting ways to cut people" with a picture of the lake Marquise Hill drowned in." That said, why would they change this one?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:32 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:They called a child actress a oval office in what was clearly a misfired joke that went too far on the edgy side and everyone flipped their poo poo about it, because it's still hosed up to call an 11 year old girl a oval office even if you're joking Wasn't that their Twitter, not a story?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:39 |
|
DangerKat posted:Wasn't that their Twitter, not a story? It was but that's the only thing The Onion's ever backed down on to my knowledge.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 01:44 |
|
Chris Gaines posted:I'm aware of the premise of the joke, but man the slur they use is almost on par with the n-word. And it's a joke that illustrates the point that "forbidden" words shouldn't exist. It's a perfect use of the slur and anyone who protests it is literally protesting the concept of letters being put together in a combination they don't like. You have to 100% ignore the context to be offended.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:25 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:And it's a joke that illustrates the point that "forbidden" words shouldn't exist. I have never seen someone miss the point so profoundly
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:37 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I have never seen someone miss the point so profoundly Go on.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:40 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:And it's a joke that illustrates the point that "forbidden" words shouldn't exist. It's a perfect use of the slur and anyone who protests it is literally protesting the concept of letters being put together in a combination they don't like. You have to 100% ignore the context to be offended. Whoaaaaaa mind blown
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:41 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I have never seen someone miss the point so profoundly
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:42 |
|
It's making the joke that "kike" which is shocking and offensive to see printed anywhere is as heinous a slur as "redskins" is. If you took it to mean that no one should be offended by either word there is no hope for you
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:45 |
|
Pron on VHS posted:Whoaaaaaa mind blown Oh for gently caress sake, I wasn't trying to say anything profound. I was referring to prominent people saying that some words shouldn't be used because they are so offensive. The point is that the word isn't offensive, it's the context, yet we still have seemingly intelligent people actually proposing that there isn't any context for them. "Redskins" is offensive if it's used in the context of a loving professional football team. On the other hand, if Mel Brooks uses it (and friend of the family for that matter) in Blazing Saddles, it's making a point, not degrading the subject of the slur.
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:45 |
|
I wouldn't want Mel Brooks to say kike though
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:47 |
|
Props Department posted:It's making the joke that "kike" which is shocking and offensive to see printed anywhere is as heinous a slur as "redskins" is. If you took it to mean that no one should be offended by either word there is no hope for you See above. And holy poo poo, I'm the one that missed the point?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:47 |
|
Peter King is a brownnosing access-seeking piece of poo poo
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:48 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Oh for gently caress sake, I wasn't trying to say anything profound. I was referring to prominent people saying that some words shouldn't be used because they are so offensive. The point is that the word isn't offensive, it's the context, yet we still have seemingly intelligent people actually proposing that there isn't any context for them. No that is profound, don't sell yourself short
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:48 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 14:56 |
|
Guys. Sticks and stones. Y'know what I mean?
|
# ? Oct 22, 2013 02:50 |