|
still no 2k video support.
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 19:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
Instant Grat posted:hey echinopsis, weren't you doing some datamoshing (lol) or something like that at one point hh thanks yeah i was loving around with the idea and failing
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 20:38
|
|
|
looks like premiere is winning the NLE war here at work. I wanted avid but I'm starting to feel a lot better about premier espescially thanks to pagancow going on about it. even if it's really bad i'll at least feel better
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 20:46
|
|
|
pagancow posted:iPad Air: the fastest runner at the special olympics
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 22:10
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:looks like premiere is winning the NLE war here at work. I wanted avid but I'm starting to feel a lot better about premier espescially thanks to pagancow going on about it. even if it's really bad i'll at least feel better premiere lets you go home at 5, thats why i like it if you want to be cool get a mac with final cut pro so people stuck in last decade can think you're rockin with the best.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:23
|
|
|
final cut poor
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:23
|
|
|
finaru cuto fooooooooooo
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:23
|
|
|
apple final cut the pro software development
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:24
|
|
|
guys i just made the final cut...on final cut. now someone gets to use a real editor to online that poo poo and get it out the door
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:24
|
|
|
^^^ this is why creative editors dont make over 100K anymore
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:24
|
|
|
if you have to ask the question "Is final cut X ready for prime time?" then it isn't nobody asks if Premiere Pro or Media Composer are ready for prime time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:26
|
|
|
pagancow posted:if you have to ask the question "Is final cut X ready for prime time?" then it isn't no one was asking this
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:52
|
|
|
loooooooooool http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/performance/  what does this even mean???????
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:59
|
|
|
its 4x faster than the baseline. Who cares how many fps that was!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 22, 2013 23:59
|
|
|
http://www.apple.com/mac-pro/video/#assembly your video editor is a piece of poo poo lol audio is desynched from video
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 00:03
|
|
|
git clone trooper posted:no one was asking this we're revisiting final cut pro x for the second time just to 'keep an open mind'
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 00:09
|
|
|
pagancow posted:loooooooooool all cuda enabled programs run like poo poo compared to final cut x* *on a mac pro using an ati video card
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 00:10
|
|
|
i guess if you've been using the same software for over a decade (and it's treated you pretty well) i can understand why you'd be terrified of changing. like i've only been using fcp7 since it was already lovely and old so i dont really get why anyone at all likes it it's especially hard if you're an old and moving from linear edit bays to NLEs was like, insanely hard and a huge investment and you think moving to another NLE will be similarly difficult
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 00:16
|
|
|
pagancow posted:plug up 6 speakers and tell it to blast out in 5.1, you'll get more RMS power this way usually. lol if u dont have active speakers with discrete amps tuned for each driver
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 01:03
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:lol if u dont have active speakers with discrete amps tuned for each driver
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 01:03
|
|
|
pagancow posted:my speakers weigh 70lb a piece, I don't think anybody is accidently knocking those over. wat speakers you got
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 01:04
|
|
|
mine are over 60 kilos each, not sure what that is in yuor ancient lovely measurements but it's a lot
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 05:51
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:mine are over 60 kilos each, not sure what that is in yuor ancient lovely measurements but it's a lot your speakers are almost as heavy as me
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 15:32
|
|
|
Instant Grat posted:your speakers are almost as heavy as me yeah it's loving ridiculous really i'm moving soon and i'm dreading having to move the bastards luckily the apt i'm moving to has a lift they sound real nice though
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 15:37
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:yeah it's loving ridiculous really i'm moving soon and i'm dreading having to move the bastards how many kilograms worth of speakers do you have
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 15:48
|
|
|
Instant Grat posted:how many kilograms worth of speakers do you have in total id say 165ish
|
|
#
?
Oct 23, 2013 15:59
|
|
|
last month there apparently was some leak of a triple-layer 100GB blu-ray disk that is going to get used for 4k material. so far all the blu-ray rips i've made have been under 25 gigs for the movie itself, so if there is 4x the capacity on the disk and if hevc really is two times as efficient as h.264, they might be able to pull off putting 4k movies in good quality on shiny plastic discs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2013 21:23
|
|
|
triple layer and quad layer blu rays have been part of the spec since the original blu ray release
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2013 22:32
|
|
|
Install Windows posted:triple layer and quad layer blu rays have been part of the spec since the original blu ray release yes, but apparently there was some "leak" that happened last month about some new sort of blu-ray that has 33 gigs per layer, so a triple-layer disc would have 100GB
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2013 22:57
|
|
|
Wheany posted:yes, but apparently there was some "leak" that happened last month about some new sort of blu-ray that has 33 gigs per layer, so a triple-layer disc would have 100GB heres an article about triple layer 100 gb media being sold from 2010 http://www.geek.com/chips/sharp-to-ship-triple-layer-100gb-blu-ray-disc-1270872/ its called bd-xl and was approved in april 2010
|
|
#
?
Oct 24, 2013 23:06
|
|
|
cisco is putting out an open source version of h264 for all the other browsers so we dont have to give a gently caress anymore maybe everyone can finally uninstall flash after that's put out Share Bear fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Oct 30, 2013 |
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:02
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:cisco is putting out an open source version of h264 for all the other browsers so we dont have to give a gently caress anymore ahahaha and it's under the bsd license suck it fsf
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:ahahaha and it's under the bsd license suck it fsf it's under the bsd license because it's just a shim over binary modules, so that cisco can assume all the patent liability
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:ahahaha and it's under the bsd license suck it fsf it's still not free enough since everyone is assuming that the mpeg-la will just wait for long enough to sue everyone
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:07
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:it's under the bsd license because it's just a shim over binary modules, so that cisco can assume all the patent liability p sweet
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:22
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:it's still not free enough since everyone is assuming that the mpeg-la will just wait for long enough to sue everyone it gives browser distributors an "out" on the lawsuit thing content creators are still up poo poo's creek
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:28
|
|
|
idk we kind of need an unencumbered codec for web
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
oh hi daala
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 18:33
|
|
|
Share Bear posted:it's still not free enough since everyone is assuming that the mpeg-la will just wait for long enough to sue everyone
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 19:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
the meere act of putting audio and video inside a single file is patented so good luck doing anything with video in the US
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 19:45
|
|