|
Nomnom Cookie posted:ssh to the remote machine and run it locally in ur remote shell. i'm doing that, you're meant to use a special artisanal command to run the program and it's not there. like there aren't man pages for it or anything
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 00:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
look at the source code it should 'document itself'
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 00:35
|
|
|
just read the last 4 pages and PISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS reverse version of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmM_xDzy2nU how do you guys feel about SA being written in PHP?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 01:08
|
|
|
i often wish someone would exploit a php vulnerability and delete SA so im ok with it
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2013 01:36
|
|
|
dur posted:i wrote a qa tool for this telecom conversion project. the code is probably very bad (because it is python) but it works and it even creates point feature error flags and a log file and everything just like our grown-up qa tools do. i finished this thing finally. http://pastebin.com/8e8twexu i think it turned out ok but there are probably better ways i could have done things. Elder Postsman fucked around with this message at 21:11 on Oct 31, 2013 |
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
i spent all day giving nodejs a try. it sucked. i wanted to make something that would let me submit urls, it'd snapshot it using phantomjs and add it to a big pdf i could download. mainly so i could add all the 100s of links to individual chapters of the feynman lectures on physics into one big rear end pdf. and things like documentation for projects that don't provide a pdf so i can read it offline. instead i spent 3 hours writing grunt tasks so my express app would copy files to the right places and a million other workflow things instead of actually writing code. npm is a wasteland of poo poo too!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2013 01:08
|
|
|
Facebook was created for people to communicate easier and that's all it was meant to be. Zuckerberg created a space for people to share & communicated, what the users of Facebook do on it was not influenced by him. He gave them a canvas and they filled it up with THEIR content. There is absolutely no reason to hate him. That's like hating your God because he created the Earth for humans, or hating a carpenter because he built a house for someone.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2013 01:48
|
|
|
source your quotes
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 02:36
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:Facebook was created for people to communicate easier and that's all it was meant to be. Zuckerberg created a space for people to share & communicated, what the users of Facebook do on it was not influenced by him. He gave them a canvas and they filled it up with THEIR content. this isn't a particualrly wrong opinion in the context of "everyone on facebook and by extension this lovely lame-rear end earth is wack as heck" lol @ the whole startup culture but that code video is legit. code is legos with google as the instruciton manual (copy other people's good code (lego models) and steal it and make your own lovely version that will fall apart the second u touch it)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 02:51
|
|
|
rsjr posted:i spent all day giving nodejs a try. it sucked. use java, seriously. libraries libraries libraries
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 02:53
|
|
|
use a plang for your dumb glue code scraping proejcts or whatever its good for that sorta stuff. python + beatufiul soup if ur gonna web scrape
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:01
|
|
|
is java any good for like dumb toy projects or whatever it seems like it'd be painful i'd suggest c# but its a bit annoying with scraping and things i guess java might have good libs
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:08
|
|
|
if its truly a toy project, use something like ruby or python
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:09
|
|
|
nothing compares to the productivity of using other peoples' code for the heavy lifting. u try to do a toy project in a p-lang and three weeks later you have a diy pdf generator. use java and you were done three weeks ago
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:13
|
|
|
there are definitely pdf generators for plangs
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:14
|
|
|
lovely ones that started as diy poo poo for a toy project and woe unto those with differing use cases from the author
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:16
|
|
|
if you need a gui use c# otherwise java is good cause everything has already been done for you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:25
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:nothing compares to the productivity of using other peoples' code for the heavy lifting. u try to do a toy project in a p-lang and three weeks later you have a diy pdf generator. use java and you were done three weeks ago
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
Mr SuperAwesome posted:is java any good for like dumb toy projects or whatever it seems like it'd be painful if java is too much effort, pick up scala or groovy all the java library access, all of the great java tools, none of the verbosity
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:if java is too much effort, pick up scala or groovy theyre basically jplangs
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 04:16
|
|
|
ruby is fine for toy stuff if you stick to the libs out there which are universally agreed upon to be good (there aren't all that many)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 04:19
|
|
|
Bloody posted:theyre basically jplangs fianlyl, a language family named after my initials
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 04:42
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:if java is too much effort, pick up scala or groovy can you use jython for python + java libs? I know jython is a thing but I have no idea how good or poo poo it is compared to real python (or how good the interop with other jvm stuff is)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 04:42
|
|
|
i thought ruby was the jplang?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 05:24
|
|
|
don't use python or ruby in any form
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 05:25
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:don't use python or ruby in any form
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 05:33
|
|
|
Plastic Snake posted:source your quotes lol, gently caress off!
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 06:29
|
|
|
nrook posted:can you use jython for python + java libs? jython and jruby are both much faster than their originals (particularly jruby), but they make lots of compromises to be compatible with upstream. They are really "fast python" and "fast ruby" and java compat is kinda bolted on Scala and groovy were designed for java interop and ease of use from day one, so java interop is so smooth as to be seamless.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 06:34
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:ruby is fine for toy stuff if you stick to the libs out there which are universally agreed upon to be good Sulk you gotta learn a j-lang and get to grips with maven/Jenkins/nexus before you spout off like this It's not that p-langs or their libraries are intrinsically bad, it's all the supporting infrastructure that sucks. Failure to distinguish source from artifacts. Lack of quality build/test/deployment tools. Second rate debuggers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 06:38
|
|
|
yeah like you need a high quality debugger when you can REPL
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 06:47
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:Sulk you gotta learn a j-lang and get to grips with maven/Jenkins/nexus before you spout off like this i probably should have said 'gems' instead of libs but ruby's main problem is that its community is loaded full of the same poo poo rewritten over and over and not that many singular great solution libs. a good example is with the testing frameworks, which are almost all poo poo. holy gently caress rspec is bad. to be fair, that may sort of go right into the infrastructure point you brought up. oh and also 99% of the gem names are loving dumb. i'd do a jlang if i cared enough but i have poo poo going on and don't have a pressing need to. i don't really have any reason to write for ios or anything even though i'm familiar enough with objc. maybe if i had an ipad again i would care, but honestly i know i wouldn't. w/e programming sucks
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 07:00
|
|
|
fulk
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 07:03
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:Sulk you gotta learn a j-lang and get to grips with maven/Jenkins/nexus before you spout off like this id kwhat the difference between source and artifact is ones like a mtg card or something i guess?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 07:04
|
|
|
Stringent posted:fulk yeah idk. im phone typing and tired and need to go to sleep
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 07:05
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:yeah like you need a high quality debugger when you can REPL i demand both ideally i should be able to switch from a debug prompt to a repl but that's asking for a lot
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 20:41
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i demand both RubyMotion can do this (too bad it's terrible)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 20:55
|
|
|
i wrote a rails app today from scratch with a bunch of d3 and slickgrid and my plangs suited my needs quite well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 22:08
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:lol, gently caress off! i honestly thought it was a quote , didnt mean to offend, sorry, god bless
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 22:42
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:i probably should have said 'gems' instead of libs but ruby's main problem is that its community is loaded full of the same poo poo rewritten over and over and not that many singular great solution libs. a good example is with the testing frameworks, which are almost all poo poo. holy gently caress rspec is bad. to be fair, that may sort of go right into the infrastructure point you brought up. oh and also 99% of the gem names are loving dumb. ruby has bad frameworks and bad libraries and bad infrastructure and a bad community and its a bad language. don't use it objc is kind of dead cause ios is post-peak-apps
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 23:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:52 |
|
|
would it be a bad idea to learn erlang for fucks
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 23:57
|
|
