|
pagancow posted:be happy not knowing what "right" is
|
#
?
Nov 10, 2013 22:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 09:42 |
|
|
i just watched Olympus Has Fallen Oh god they shipped a movie with
lol pagancow fucked around with this message at 05:03 on Nov 11, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
i shouldn't be so hard i've had to ship poo poo too, if you worked on the movie grab a beer with me and I will listen to all the woes you had in post on that film im sorry
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
you only posted twice pagancow. i expected more from you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 05:14
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:you only posted twice pagancow. i expected more from you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 05:20
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:you only posted twice pagancow. i expected more from you.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 05:35
|
|
|
ACanofPepsi posted:wonder if the radius group ever has conferences to discuss releasing a new standard didn't radius (actually supermac) sell cinepak to adobe or someone in the early 90s
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 08:04
|
|
|
hmm it's not explicitly stated but maybequote:SuperMac, was working on a NuBus-based video digitizer called VideoSpigot and their own codec, which they called Cinepak. The board came with a program called ScreenPlay that was used to capture video and play it back. SuperMac wanted to give their customers a program to do some simple editing, in addition to capturing and playing back video. Randy Ubellios, who worked for SuperMac at that time, wrote a program called ReelTime for use with files created by ScreenPlay and VideoSpigot. ReelTime did not control the digitizer but it could take files created by ScreenPlay and could do cuts and transitions and put them together, display the result, and write it to disk. ReelTime was meant to be bundled with the VideoSpigot, but SuperMac was a hardware company. They needed their customers to have a program like this, but they didn't need to be the ones to sell and maintain it. There were lots of potential buyers for ReelTime, but it ended up selling to Adobe and becoming their first video software product. It was renamed Adobe Premiere, and was bundled with the VideoSpigot and available alone starting at the end of 1991.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 08:11
|
|
|
maybe they only sold the editing software and not the codec partquote:The SuperMac acquisition [in 1994] netted Radius the Cinepak video compression CODEC, which was still supported by most encoders and almost all media players by the early 2000s.
|
|
#
?
Nov 11, 2013 08:14
|
|
|
it suddenly dawned on me that xvid is divx spelled backwards
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 05:12
|
|
|
holey shitttt [img-40-fps-in-Davinci-Render.png] PISSSSS  poo poo is crazy  its so hot in here
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 05:21
|
|
|
idgyu
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 08:11
|
|
|
do you even encode?
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 16:26
|
|
|
fans feeling so swole after that hour long 99% cpu operation
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 16:27
|
|
|
pagancow posted:fans feeling so swole after that hour long 99% cpu operation 99‰? my Mac regularly hits 800%
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 17:26
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:99‰? my Mac regularly hits 800% i want to make a kickstarter for a little propeller/fan that balances on trashcan macs but the fan spins using the rising heat from the center of the can. the slowly spinning blade charges an iphone5s gold. call it the "green fan for ur black can"
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 17:53
|
|
|
here is what pagancow has to do for a living: https://vimeo.com/73746421 Skip to 4:42 as told by a very svelt and better looking man than pagancow
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 17:57
|
|
|
pagancow posted:here is what pagancow has to do for a living: ur job is professional adobe kuler operator?
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 17:58
|
|
|
no explaining cameras to people who know nothing then doing it all myself.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:00
|
|
|
pagancow posted:no explaining cameras to people who know nothing then doing it all myself. that job sounds like it kinda owns tbh
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:00
|
|
|
he gets very yvcpos and starts talking about 10-bits (the non shameful version, the ones captured in log space from real cameras)
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:00
|
|
|
i imagine pagancow explaining cameras and stuff to normals the same way he describes it to people in this thread short excited bursts of information punctuated by infographs, pictures of curves, "HOLY poo poo", 'do you even encode??" and then just shaking his head and walking away
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:19
|
|
|
pagancow posted:he gets very yvcpos and starts talking about 10-bits (the non shameful version, the ones captured in log space from real cameras) lol you have to explain technical things for non-technical people gondolences
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:20
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:i imagine pagancow explaining cameras and stuff to normals the same way he describes it to people in this thread i dont post infographs i post colorspaces mapped to XYZ cordinates.
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:26
|
|
|
pagancow posted:i dont post infographs i post colorspaces mapped to XYZ cordinates. same thing to the plebs (me(
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:27
|
|
|
also when have i ever walked away from YVCPOS? 3 pages down and i'll post in it born a codec warrior, gonna die a codec warrior
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:27
|
|
|
also the guys explanation of "this doesn't fit within rec.709" is kind of a misnomer because if the customer at home has the 10,000,000:1 contrast ratio TV and it's actually jacked up, then all kinds sphincter ripping, retinal tearing, colors be coming out of "rec.709"
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:29
|
|
|
uuugh gently caress you jib guy
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:53
|
|
|
i think this guy is literally just a crane operator with a camera, not a cameraman
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 18:53
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:i think this guy is literally just a crane operator with a camera, not a cameraman what, the camera isn't supposed to be overexposed and just jerk to a stop?
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:01
|
|
|
this show has one guy who underexposed everything, one guy who overexposed, the jib operator who was doing idk what, a slow cam that looks okay, and lots of go pro stuff probably shot by the producer (or maybe the jib guy idk). the middle ground is not pretty
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:05
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:i imagine pagancow explaining cameras and stuff to normals the same way he describes it to people in this thread
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:06
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:this show has one guy who underexposed everything, one guy who overexposed, the jib operator who was doing idk what, a slow cam that looks okay, and lots of go pro stuff probably shot by the producer (or maybe the jib guy idk). fun time at work is camera/producer people sticking a gopro at the end of a shaky boom pole, walking down a street with it and then asking me to track the jello-garbage I get back. Yeah, I can replace that rhombus-shaped rectangle with constantly-shifting distortion. Oh, the XD camera you brought on the shoot was set to 1/8 shutter speed to look 'like a movie'? of course that is usable, i never could have replicated that terrible poo poo in after effects, good thing its baked into the source
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:20
|
|
|
ACanofPepsi posted:fun time at work is camera/producer people sticking a gopro at the end of a shaky boom pole, walking down a street with it and then asking me to track the jello-garbage I get back. Yeah, I can replace that rhombus-shaped rectangle with constantly-shifting distortion. Oh, the XD camera you brought on the shoot was set to 1/8 shutter speed to look 'like a movie'? of course that is usable, i never could have replicated that terrible poo poo in after effects, good thing its baked into the source i think you work at my company
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:21
|
|
|
i really dont understand how you can attach a gopro to a dirtbikers helmet and have him to flips in the air and the result is pretty cool but when you hand it to a producer or cameraman it suddenly gets way worse probably just because i can compare it to better footage but still
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:24
|
|
|
Gopro made a silver plastic case for a SI-2k mini and just shoots all their promo poo poo with that. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 19:29
|
|
|
cool new thing for producers to attach to the end of a boom (from kickstarter thread): http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/panono-panoramic-ball-camera
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
USSMICHELLEBACHMAN posted:this show has one guy who underexposed everything, one guy who overexposed, the jib operator who was doing idk what, a slow cam that looks okay, and lots of go pro stuff probably shot by the producer (or maybe the jib guy idk). Yeah when I try to train other people to run cameras nobody can get exposure right even when you show them how the histogram works and they tell it back to you like "hey this is what you just said" so I know they understand it people just see really bad too i guess
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
also gently caress that i don't need to histogram i know my equipment light everything within 3-5 stops anyway
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 09:42 |
|
|
ACanofPepsi posted:fun time at work is ... a shaky boom pole
|
|
#
?
Nov 12, 2013 21:52
|
|
