|
redbackground posted:Well, that was delightful! ASM1 had a great cast and did a fantastic job introducing and establishing the character. Honestly, it was the second best comic movie to come out that year after Avengers. And no, I didn't forget that Dark Knight Rises came out that year.
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 16:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 21:12 |
|
|
DFu4ever posted:ASM1 had a great cast and did a fantastic job introducing and establishing the character. Honestly, it was the second best comic movie to come out that year after Avengers. You forgot Dredd
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 16:56
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:You forgot Dredd Also Ghost Rider 2. You all forgot Ghost Rider 2!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:02
|
|
|
The movie is terrible, but Garfield and Emma Stone (especially Stone) are fantastic.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:09
|
|
|
redbackground posted:One of you is lying I really liked the film, it was my favourite comic book film that year after Dredd but it's very messy and from studio interference doesn't make 100% sense but Garfield and Stone are perfect representations of modern Peter and Gwen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:21
|
|
|
Great cast, lousy script barely salvaged in editing. Every time a plot thread disappears, take a drink.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:23
|
|
|
Omnomnomnivore posted:Great cast, lousy script barely salvaged in editing. Every time a plot thread disappears, take a drink. I wouldn't say editing saved it since it was editing that cut out a ton of scenes including a major characters death so he just disappears at the end of the film for no reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:26
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:I wouldn't say editing saved it since it was editing that cut out a ton of scenes including a major characters death so he just disappears at the end of the film for no reason. Which character is this?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:27
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:I wouldn't say editing saved it since it was editing that cut out a ton of scenes including a major characters death so he just disappears at the end of the film for no reason. I guess I'm assuming they chopped up the movie because the uncut version was worse. Haven't seen any deleted scenes or anything. Your example argues in favor of my drinking game.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:31
|
|
|
Omnomnomnivore posted:I guess I'm assuming they chopped up the movie because the uncut version was worse. Haven't seen any deleted scenes or anything. I finally bought the movie but haven't watched the deleted scenes yet. From what I hear they expanded on what was going on with Peter's parents, and it's also where that scene from the trailer of Osborn talking to whoever went to.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:33
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Which character is this? Irrfan Khan is killed by the Lizard, they even used their confrontation as promo images leading up to the film's release, but then cut it at the last minute so he goes from being the main human villain and mouthpiece to Osborn to just running away from the Lizard and never showing back up. There's also some various different takes on scenes and a couple of jokes like the "doorman joke" which I presume they deleted as it was too similar to a joke in Spider-Man 2.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:40
|
|
|
The VFX were also offensively bad. That's my main concern with the sequel, because looks intensely VFX-based, even compared to ASM1. The great animation in the trailer makes me feel more optimistic, though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 17:49
|
|
|
Blargjpbhiviyfnh, Dredd was awesome so mad it tanked. Hmmm Cersei Lannister was Ma Ma, Jaime Lannister was in the movie Mama, what does it mean??
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 18:39
|
|
|
I really disliked the idea of bringing in Peter's parents because I've never really found them to be that interesting as characters. But if the film is going in the direction that most if not all of Spider-Man's foes are mishandled utilizations of Richard's research then that would be pretty cool and really push the whole "responsibility" thing in a new direction with Parker feeling he is responsible for dealing with these guys rather than just being in opposition to them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 18:58
|
|
|
Timeless Appeal posted:I really disliked the idea of bringing in Peter's parents because I've never really found them to be that interesting as characters. But if the film is going in the direction that most if not all of Spider-Man's foes are mishandled utilizations of Richard's research then that would be pretty cool and really push the whole "responsibility" thing in a new direction with Parker feeling he is responsible for dealing with these guys rather than just being in opposition to them. It also partly explains why they're skipping Norman to make Harry the Goblin first because it fits with the generational battle between Parkers and Osborns.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 19:11
|
|
|
Seeing Toomb's original flight pack there, was the moment where I suddenly could not wait to see this movie.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 19:37
|
|
|
Jesus I can't get over Harry's hair. I don't know if it's terrible or perfect or both at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:33
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:Jesus I can't get over Harry's hair. I don't know if it's terrible or perfect or both at the same time. Dane Dehaan is already pretty sinister looking, that haircut just seals the deal.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:45
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:Jesus I can't get over Harry's hair. I don't know if it's terrible or perfect or both at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:52
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:Dane Dehaan is already pretty sinister looking, that haircut just seals the deal. He also appears to be playing his character from "Chronicle" again: guy with daddy issues who gets powers and goes insane. Nothing wrong with that, really, he did a good job with that character.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 21:53
|
|
|
He's basically evil Peter from Spider-Man 3.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:12
|
|
|
DeHaan is Actual Evil Peter. Tobey in Spider-Man 3 was Naive Nerd's "Cool Guy" Impersonation Peter.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:16
|
|
|
So.... Bryan Singer just tweeted this@BryanSinger posted:
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:53
|
|
|
Dacap posted:So.... Bryan Singer just tweeted this Sheesh. These doomsayers are always pushing the date back. Year 2000, no it's 2012! Now it's 2016!
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:55
|
|
|
Well it's apparently got an actual release date too.quote:Sensing it has a hit on its hands with “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” 20th Century Fox is prepping another installment in the blockbuster superhero franchise titled ”X-Men: Apocalypse” that will hit theaters on May 27, 2016, according to Exhibitor Relations. source With the way every studio is trying to one up each other there's no way this isn't heading to audience burn out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 22:58
|
|
|
2018/19 will have X-Men: Onslaught, Avengers: Heroes Reborn, and Zero Hour and make like, $10.75 at the box office combined.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:03
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:2018/19 will have X-Men: Onslaught, Avengers: Heroes Reborn, and Zero Hour and make like, $10.75 at the box office combined. Then Marvel will win. Cause Then Fox and Sony will stop making Super Hero Movies. Rights revert back to Marvel and we finally get the full crazy Marvel Movie Super Hero Event.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:08
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Then Marvel will win. Cause Then Fox and Sony will stop making Super Hero Movies. Rights revert back to Marvel and we finally get the full crazy Marvel Movie Super Hero Event. Pyrrhic victory. I do think way too many movies are coming out way too fast and there's gonna be a superhero movie burnout pretty soon at this rate.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:20
|
|
|
Yoshifan823 posted:2018/19 will have X-Men: Onslaught, Avengers: Heroes Reborn, and Zero Hour and make like, $10.75 at the box office combined.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:44
|
|
|
Justice League: Final Crisis will be pretty much an indecipherable mess when it comes out on the big screen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:45
|
|
|
TwoPair posted:Pyrrhic victory. I do think way too many movies are coming out way too fast and there's gonna be a superhero movie burnout pretty soon at this rate. I've been hearing that for about 10 years now. It' salsa one of the ways Marvel excels; each movie is it's own thing. Iron Man is more of a buddy cop/sci fi, Thor is Fantasy/Sci Fi, Cap is adventure/spy thriller. It' same big part of why Nolan's movies were so much better than pretty much anything Warner's been able to do, he just made a crime noir where the hard boiled detective happened to dress like a bat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:50
|
|
|
Dexo posted:Then Marvel will win. Cause Then Fox and Sony will stop making Super Hero Movies. Rights revert back to Marvel and we finally get the full crazy Marvel Movie Super Hero Event. Fox will never stop. They made X-Men: Origins Wolverine and Generation X. Those rights are with them until the end of time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:51
|
|
|
I imagine there's a big clock in the Marvel offices, counting down the time until they get FF back. Hoping Fox just forgets to start up on that franchise.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2013 23:58
|
|
|
I can not wait for Avengers the Crossing as directed by Uwe Boll or Tommy Wiseau
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 00:00
|
|
|
Waterhaul posted:Fox will never stop. They made X-Men: Origins Wolverine and Generation X. Those rights are with them until the end of time.  And I had forgotten about Generation X
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 00:08
|
|
|
Dexo posted:
Why would you want to forget a show where some guy hacks into people's dreams to make them fart on time?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 00:16
|
|
|
I've been on a Fringe binge for the last couple of months. I'm about a third of the way through season five. I think if they're ever going to include the Vision in an Avengers movie, they should totally get Michael Cerveris to play him.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 01:09
|
|
|
Gatts posted:This is a good thing. In fact, screw it, just make the next Spider-man movie set years ahead and Jeff Goldblum can play Peter Parker. And Spider-man. No CG. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 01:32
|
|
|
Metal Loaf posted:I've been on a Fringe binge for the last couple of months. I'm about a third of the way through season five. Same here. Watching it for the first time and almost finished with season 3. I can see why some folks here want Olivia to play Captain Marvel.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 01:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 21:12 |
|
|
Soonmot posted:Same here. Watching it for the first time and almost finished with season 3. I can see why some folks here want Olivia to play Captain Marvel. Ms. Marvel?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2013 02:07
|
|