|
fuc art edit: removed bad art atomicthumbs fucked around with this message at 02:48 on Dec 17, 2013 |
#
?
Dec 16, 2013 21:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:06 |
|
|
8th-snype posted:Wanna go to a cheese castle. And after, you can go not poop (cause you're constipated, that's what I'm getting at) at "Oasis Inn!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 16, 2013 22:32
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:post the wisconsinest pics u got Owns.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 01:07
|
|
|
I can't stop (won't stop). St. Rita Substation by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr  Sturtevant Substation by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 03:50
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:post the wisconsinest pics u got      
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 04:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 06:06
|
|
|
 december in california by francography, on Flickr  december in california by francography, on Flickr  moon over the marina by francography, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 10:38
|
|
|
somnambulist posted:
What were your exposure settings for this one?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 15:35
|
|
|
 NW Vista, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr  NW Burnside, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr  Vista Bridge, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 16:14
|
|
|
Musket posted:
This is awesome.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 16:57
|
|
|
ZippySLC posted:What were your exposure settings for this one? Pretty sure they set the mode dial to "loving awesome." That shot of GNP a couple posts up is pretty awesome too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 17:52
|
|
|
ZippySLC posted:What were your exposure settings for this one? 0.25 sec (1/4) , f8, iso 1600 shot at 166mm.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2013 20:43
|
|
|
 IMG_5315 by s-bothun, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 02:14
|
|
|
ZippySLC posted:What were your exposure settings for this one? (Not trolling, genuinely curious because maybe I missed something)
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 11:15
|
|
|
Mathturbator posted:I'm curious, why does it matter? It's a nice picture, but it doesn't appear to involve very sophisticated exposure. Mostly because I find that I have difficulties getting that kind of sharp focus in my night photography, so I was wondering what aperture he was using. I had predicted something like f/22 and the shutter being open far longer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 16:46
|
|
|
ZippySLC posted:Mostly because I find that I have difficulties getting that kind of sharp focus in my night photography, so I was wondering what aperture he was using. Scale-focus  Is how you get good sharp pictures at night, not f/22.
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 16:54
|
|
|
Musket posted:Scale-focus And an amazing piece of technology known as a "tripod." 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 17:28
|
|
|
shoot slide in direct sun and give no fucks Southwest by voodoorootbeer, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2013 20:16
|
|
|
Any of you guys using telephotos for your landscapes regularly? I've always shot really wide 10-16mm range but just picked up a 70-200mm 2.8 for some portrait stuff and thought it might be nice to use it to change up the landscape perspective a bit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 01:42
|
|
|
I've found using a 35mm equivalent lens has become my sweet spot, not too wide, not too long.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 01:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 02:18
|
|
|
Had some crazy fog in North Texas a few nights ago. Fog by jayRaz, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 04:36
|
|
|
 TREES, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 05:35
|
|
|
Went out and hiked through snow to take some pictures. Didn't realize my camera was in low res jpg mode (aka: cat mode) until I got back.  PC190011.jpg by MrDespair, on Flickr  PC190007.jpg by MrDespair, on Flickr T
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 23:15
|
|
|
Mr. Despair posted:Went out and hiked through snow to take some pictures. Didn't realize my camera was in low res jpg mode (aka: cat mode) until I got back. thats why you should shoot film all the time; not only will you never have this problem, but you will have the best cat pictures ever
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 12:17
|
|
|
I first read that and I thought cat mode was some advanced camera method... then I realized that I was stupid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 16:18
|
|
|
Shnakepup posted:Had some crazy fog in North Texas a few nights ago. I'm loving the atmosphere in this, the unearthly creeping shapes of the branches. I'm just going to go ahead of repost a sunset pic I took from the PAD thread...  the sky over manhattan caught fire today by thetzar, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 16:40
|
|
|
Some amazing shots in here lately!whaam posted:Any of you guys using telephotos for your landscapes regularly? I've always shot really wide 10-16mm range but just picked up a 70-200mm 2.8 for some portrait stuff and thought it might be nice to use it to change up the landscape perspective a bit. I use 50mm & 70-200mm for landscape all the time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:08
|
|
|
Marshmallow Blue posted:I first read that and I thought cat mode was some advanced camera method... then I realized that I was stupid. Pentax got a cat mode on the dial I believe.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:31
|
|
|
 Ducks & Beavers, Portland by Ashade76, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
erephus posted:Pentax got a cat mode on the dial I believe. My D7K has a preprogrammed cat mode also.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 21:38
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 05:19
|
|
|
 idafors-8 by dabrovnijk, on Flickr  idafors-6 by dabrovnijk, on Flickr Where I live, this is as "street" as it gets.  idafors-10 by dabrovnijk, on Flickr erephus fucked around with this message at 22:18 on Dec 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 15:59
|
|
|
xzzy posted:And an amazing piece of technology known as a "tripod." Yes, thank you. I use one when I'm out at night.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 22:16
|
|
|
edit: nvm, found a post of yours earlier in the thread single-mode fiber posted:A little bit of both. In Lightroom, I usually bump clarity up by around 10-15 (depending on the photo), and then vibrance maybe 10 above clarity's value. I also tend to chop down luminance of blue by 10-15, and maybe 0-5 on green. On the actual lens itself, I use a circular polarizer that I adjust to basically max effect, in addition to trying to locate myself such that the 'plane' of my field of view is as close to orthogonal to the 'plane' of the sun as I can get. Of course, there's a lot of pictures where I, the sun, or both, are at bad angles, and then I just don't process/post those I like basically everything except your skies, as the skies are kind of harsh to my eye. It almost looks like they were pasted in. That's cool if that's your thing, but I just wanted to mention it. luchadornado fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Dec 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 23:21
|
|
|
 2 by Isaac Sachs, on Flickr
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 23:54
|
|
|
 Goodsprings Business District by atomicthumbs, on Flickr  Stamped Metal Walls by atomicthumbs, on Flickr edit:  Goodsprings by atomicthumbs, on Flickr atomicthumbs fucked around with this message at 06:30 on Dec 22, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2013 01:12
|
|
|
Holy poo poo, I did not know this a real place... Find some sunset sarsaparilla to go with it too?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2013 14:32
|
|
|
That is a great hike, and is why I finally got a 10-22 because 18 wasn't wide enough. There was people diving off that boulder on the left when I was there, they be crazy. I could only wade around for a minute or so before I had to get out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 02:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 14:06 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 23, 2013 04:08
|
|
