|
Would be an amazing idea if DC didn't take themselves so seriously all the time.
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 19:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:09 |
|
|
Gatts posted:Well if I'm fancasting JLI with those people... I say skip ahead to super buddies Switch Segal to Elongated Man Rock to captain atom Wahlberg to Booster McConaughey to Maxwell Lord And add Alison Brie as Mary Marvel Rashida Jones as Sue Dibney Olivia Wilde as Fire Would also accept Sean William Scott as Booster and Will Arnett as Maxwell Lord
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 19:44
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:Wrong Olivia. Either Olivia would be great actually.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 21:15
|
|
|
Yannick_B posted:Because it's not purely a Superman movie anymore. It's not about Superman and the Superman characters. It's going to be about Superman and Batman and Wonder Woman. That poster doesn't have Henry Cavill's face on it anymore, he's sharing it with Ben Affleck. I see a lot of people saying this, and I get why you'd think that way, but why can't Bruce/Diana be written in to continue Clark's narrative arc and still have it be a Superman movie? I personally love the idea of having bigger DC characters play significant roles in each others character development; if anything, it makes the world feel more expansive. quote:It might, but they're announcing her 2 years in advance. The plans for Superman/Batman are thrown together because their comic-con announcement was a logo and like, the 9th castmember of Man Of Steel coming in to read a paragraph from DKR. That is the farthest you go from "we're a studio launching this big thing that was planned all along". If something big like the Affleck casting had been done, it would've been announced there. Haha, ok. Were you the one who got all upset about them not including Superman's trunks in Man of Steel? I forget.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 22:16
|
|
|
teagone posted:I see a lot of people saying this, and I get why you'd think that way, but why can't Bruce/Diana be written in to continue Clark's narrative arc and still have it be a Superman movie? I personally love the idea of having bigger DC characters play significant roles in each others character development; if anything, it makes the world feel more expansive. I would love it too but...And Bruce and Diana certainly CAN written in to continue Clark's narrative arc, but they'll be in this movie to be showcased and springboarded into other movies. They're not going to be there to be supporting characters in a Superman movie, they're there to be co-leads (Batman for sure). Having other characters can feel more expansive but Man Of Steel barely has a world to expand to begin with! I feel like the movie ends halfway into the origin and the character needs more on his own before meeting other superheroes. It could still be good! I want it to be good! I want to enjoy Superman and the DCU on the movie screen! teagone posted:Haha, ok. Were you the one who got all upset about them not including Superman's trunks in Man of Steel? I forget. I'm not upset about not including the trunks at all. But I think Zack Snyder and David Goyer sincerely thinking the costume looks "more real" or less silly because of their absence is real dumb.
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2013 23:15
|
|
|
Sion posted:Morena Baccarin would be good. I'm not normally into fan casting and such, but I really dig this idea.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 00:08
|
|
Ignite Memories posted:the new batman movies kinda sucked there i said it Look how wrong this opinion (and grammar) is.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 00:18
|
|
|
Batman and Robin was the best Batman movie around and there will never be another good Batman movie again. Anyway, seeing as there isn't even a script yet or anything we know next to nothing about the next Batman movie so people worried about cramming in too many characters or whatnot are acting...premature? If anything MoS is a great leaping on point for other heroes to come out of the woodwork anyway. We just had to overpowered gods destroy a freaking city. Now it's time to see how the world reacts. If that means a certain Bruce Wayne teams up with Luthor to try develop some defense weapons against Superman awesome. If that means a magical island of women have to try figure out now if Superman is a threat to them seeing that he is an extremely powerful being, well great. There are quite a few ways the next movie can fit organically to MoS and until a trailer comes out, or a little more is known about the movie besides casting, writing it off this early on is pretty stupid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 00:49
|
|
|
Get tae gently caress, '66 pisses all over Batman & Robin. Batman & Robin is practically Attack of the Clones levels of loving Awful and all who attempt to defend it should be sent straight to
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 02:13
|
|
|
I'd honestly skip Batman and have Marky Mark as Max Lord because the casting just fits. EDIT: Sentinel Red posted:Get tae gently caress, '66 pisses all over Batman & Robin. Batman & Robin is practically Attack of the Clones levels of loving Awful and all who attempt to defend it should be sent straight to Yeah, everyone who likes the movie about gay men and self actualized women fighting against the constant pervasive corrupting power of the patriarchy should be shoved into re-education camps. Hopefully such deviance can get rooted out post-haste. Mr. Maltose fucked around with this message at 03:02 on Dec 20, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 02:50
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:I'd honestly skip Batman and have Marky Mark as Max Lord because the casting just fits. It's wonderful that Death of the Author lets you construct elaborate fantasies about what you wish a movie represents, but this is the biggest load of horseshit. Batman and Robin isn't even entertaining on a "so bad it's good" level outside of Arnold. Keep that SMG level crap in CD where I already have it on ignore.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 03:43
|
|
|
Batman and Robin is dripping with things like issues of masculinity and femininity, how men control women and vis versa in modern society, and how those things influence us as we grow into adulthood. I don't need to quote Zizek to point out that Bruce and Dick suiting up in their skintight benippled suits probably wasn't teehee a butt joke or just something for the ladies. That doesn't mean that Batman and Robin is a good movie, either. Surprisingly enough sometimes movies have messages and themes but are still bad.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 03:55
|
|
|
Soonmot posted:It's wonderful that Death of the Author lets you construct elaborate fantasies about what you wish a movie represents, but this is the biggest load of horseshit. Batman and Robin isn't even entertaining on a "so bad it's good" level outside of Arnold. E: goddammit Maltose! 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 03:56
|
|
|
Sentinel Red posted:Get tae gently caress, '66 pisses all over Batman & Robin. Batman & Robin is practically Attack of the Clones levels of loving Awful and all who attempt to defend it should be sent straight to http://comicsalliance.com/batman-and-robin-movie-review/ http://comicsalliance.com/batman-robin-movie-review/ They make some great points here. And the set design from B&R was amazing and not matched in any other batman movie. edit: But it was not a good movie either way.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 05:49
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:That doesn't mean that Batman and Robin is a good movie, either. Surprisingly enough sometimes movies have messages and themes but are still bad. Well the dude you responded to merely called it awful and you seemed to insinuate that must be due to minority suppression or something, but here you basically agree. Interesting choices and style aside, B&R was pretty awful from an entertainment\plot and writing aspect. I didn't much care for Returns or Forever in recent viewings either. '66 still got me laughing plenty, always fun.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 06:41
|
|
|
sleepingbuddha posted:Look how wrong this opinion (and grammar) is. Batman is so great when he growls like a six year old doing an impression of someone who clearly isn't batman because batman doesn't loving growl like an idiot! Christian bale is such a good actor! I love it when people in the movie literally tell me what the themes and morals of the movie are! Subtlety is for idiots! There is no reason a movie should be better than a children's cartoon made 15 years ago! Guys isn't heath ledger so great because he died? I prefer for my villains to sound like sean connery in a port-a-potty! I will suck christopher nolan's dick for managing to make a batman movie without rubber nipples in it, because my expectations have been lowered just that much! Ignite Memories fucked around with this message at 06:54 on Dec 20, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 06:49
|
|
|
Mr. Maltose posted:Batman and Robin is dripping with things like issues of masculinity and femininity, how men control women and vis versa in modern society, and how those things influence us as we grow into adulthood. I don't need to quote Zizek to point out that Bruce and Dick suiting up in their skintight benippled suits probably wasn't teehee a butt joke or just something for the ladies. I came off as pretty hostile, which I apologize for, but I still think you are reaching. This isn't Elm Street 2. That said, I don't think I've watched in well over a decade and have no plans to just because it has themes that I may find appealing if I squint hard enough, because it's a horrible, boring mess of a movie. But hey, what do I know? I watch Suckerpunch as a critique of the male movie going audience and their support of faux- Strong Female Character movies that really only exist for T&A and the illusion of being progressive. So I guess we can both BS our ways through movies 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 06:56
|
|
|
Electromax posted:Well the dude you responded to merely called it awful and you seemed to insinuate that must be due to minority suppression or something, but here you basically agree. Interesting choices and style aside, B&R was pretty awful from an entertainment\plot and writing aspect. I didn't much care for Returns or Forever in recent viewings either. He was the dude making the reeducation camp joke, I was just pointing out that it wasn't the best joke to make because, well. I still think B&R is probably the best Bat film except '66 and maybe the first Burton film.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 07:16
|
|
|
So now it's actually official straight from Marvel. http://marvel.com/news/movies/2013/12/19/21669/paul_rudd_set_to_star_in_marvels_ant-man Also Edgar Wright's confirmation tweet is great https://twitter.com/edgarwright/status/413865161179402240
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 07:32
|
|
|
Awesome. I love Paul Rudd. He seems more like a Scott Lang guy than Hank Pym, so I'm curious which one they'll be going with.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 07:58
|
|
|
i like tacos posted:So now it's actually official straight from Marvel. He has important work to do. Ultron, kick up the 4d3d3d3. Add sequence Scott Lang.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 07:58
|
|
|
Codependent Poster posted:Awesome. I love Paul Rudd. He seems more like a Scott Lang guy than Hank Pym, so I'm curious which one they'll be going with. Eric O'Grady. It's going to be a National Lampoon picture. Yeah, Ant-man's European vacation. Ths shrinking to get into the women's shower at euro-avengers tower is going to be epic, bro. epic. edit: Hold on I did this joke for ASM already. Please disregard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 08:05
|
|
|
i like tacos posted:So now it's actually official straight from Marvel. Ughhh I'm so loving hyped for this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 08:58
|
|
|
It's going to be 'Hank Pym'.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 12:04
|
|
|
i like tacos posted:Also Edgar Wright's confirmation tweet is great I just noticed that this is apparently set inside Cerebro.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 12:11
|
|
|
Dan Didio posted:It's going to be 'Hank Pym'. Yeah there's no way it's not Hank Pym. Marvel will just never mention the wife beating thing and that'll be it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 12:17
|
|
|
TwoPair posted:He has important work to do. Ultron, kick up the 4d3d3d3. Add sequence Scott Lang. Can I get a nude Lang?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 13:34
|
|
|
Gatts posted:Well if I'm fancasting JLI with those people... My dream JLI cast is still: Beetle: Adam Scott Booster: Joel McHale Guy Gardner: Adam Baldwin Fire: Sofia Vergara Ice: Malin Akerman Captain Marvel: Patrick Warburton Power Girl: Christina Applegate Flash (Wally!): Neil Patrick Harris Elongated Man: Bill Hader Sue Dibny: Lizzy Caplan Max Lord: Sam Neill Martian Manhunter: Harry Lennix
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 13:55
|
|
|
Dude, you are really good at that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 14:04
|
|
|
Sorry, but Channing Tatum pretty much won the role of Guy in 21 Jump Street, aka Green Lantern and Blue Beetle's High School Caper.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 14:42
|
|
|
Gatts posted:Well if I'm fancasting JLI with those people... In that group Batman needs to be the gruff strait-man. This is a version of Batman that almost never jokes, but when he does it's creepy and freaks everyone out. Karl Urban would be great for that. Big Bad Voodoo Lou posted:Flash (Wally!): Neil Patrick Harris Aaron Paul or Bradley Cooper look more like The Flash to me and both would be pretty good for a JLI comedy. Harry Lennix would be great, but if it's part of an integrated movie universe he's already the general from Man of Steel. VV I could deffinately buy Urban one shoting Adam Baldwin or Channing Tatum. VV Dr. MonkeyThunder fucked around with this message at 20:35 on Dec 20, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:21
|
|
|
Dr. MonkeyThunder posted:I think in that group Batman needs to be the gruff strait-man. This is a version of Batman that almost never jokes, but when he does it's creepy and freaks everyone out. Karl Urban would be great for that. He also can throw a sweet punch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:31
|
|
|
drat Sam Neil as Max Lord would be perfect
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 21:38
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:drat Sam Neil as Max Lord would be perfect
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 22:16
|
|
|
redbackground posted:Literally no other choice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 23:39
|
|
|
IGN reports (from a Latino Review source) that Avengers 2 might have another villain that could explain the origins of Wanda and Pietro. Possible spoilers: http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/12/20/another-avengers-age-of-ultron-villain-revealed The rumored villain is Baron Von Strucker, HYDRA leader and father of superpowered twins Andreas and Andrea in the comics.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 00:40
|
|
|
Makes sense, and that'd be easy to lead into from Cap 2. Redford could even be Strucker, if they modified the backstory on Secret Warriors a bit
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 00:57
|
|
|
Rogue has been cut from Days of Future Past http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/12/20/x-men-days-future-past-rogue-anna-paquin/
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 01:33
|
|
|
Dacap posted:Rogue has been cut from Days of Future Past Good. I hope they re-cast her.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 01:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 17:09 |
|
|
Dacap posted:Rogue has been cut from Days of Future Past That headline sounds worse than it is. They cut one scene she was in, drastically reducing her screentime, which leads me to believe she was only in the movie for like 5 minutes to begin with. A shame, but maybe it'll be on the blu-ray.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2013 01:36
|
|
